Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Then why is NASA telling everyone hands off on their landing sites? AHA!


Why is NASA getting hot and bothered about the private space-race? So much so that they are calling some places off-limits (where their left over landing junk is)?


http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/may/HQ_12-168_Lunar_Protection_Guidelines.html


HMMMM!?!?!?!


HMMM!?!?!



NOW WHAT????? Where's your theories, now?


Mwahahaha





Anyway, I never bought into the idea that we did not land on the moon. But now, I think the theory has been completely destroyed.


However, the "manned moon landings" theorists (the ones that say we had no actual manned missions, just remote landings) could still be right...until they find evidence of "humans" on the moon stuff.

The theory was destroyed long ago when the USSR--the country that would have the most to gain from showing the American landing as a fraud--never once contested the landing's veracity.

So either the USSR was so heavily convinced that they wouldn't even express offhand skepticism about the landing or they somehow couldn't--with all their espionage, scientists, and resources--scrap together more counter-evidence than American conspiracy theorists working with "simulations" and "models" in their basements.

Moon? What Moon?

they prob have a nazi moon base in the dark side of the moon?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Then why is NASA telling everyone hands off on their landing sites? AHA!


Why is NASA getting hot and bothered about the private space-race? So much so that they are calling some places off-limits (where their left over landing junk is)?


http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/may/HQ_12-168_Lunar_Protection_Guidelines.html


HMMMM!?!?!?!


HMMM!?!?!



NOW WHAT????? Where's your theories, now?


Mwahahaha





Anyway, I never bought into the idea that we did not land on the moon. But now, I think the theory has been completely destroyed.


However, the "manned moon landings" theorists (the ones that say we had no actual manned missions, just remote landings) could still be right...until they find evidence of "humans" on the moon stuff.

What better way to convince gullible sheep like you?

AHA!

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why is NASA getting hot and bothered about the private space-race? So much so that they are calling some places off-limits
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20051220024513/uncyclopedia/images/c/cf/Moon_monolith.jpg

There's an alien dome on the moon, they warned us to never return or else.

Originally posted by rudester
they prob have a nazi moon base in the dark side of the moon? Dark side?

No upstanding Nazi would sully themselves with anything dark.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
The theory was destroyed long ago when the USSR--the country that would have the most to gain from showing the American landing as a fraud--never once contested the landing's veracity.

So either the USSR was so heavily convinced that they wouldn't even express offhand skepticism about the landing or they somehow couldn't--with all their espionage, scientists, and resources--scrap together more counter-evidence than American conspiracy theorists working with "simulations" and "models" in their basements.

The common rebuttal to that though is that the USSR and the US were covering each others backs in that regard and that the Cold War was really just invented to allow military funding and build-up to happen under that pretence.

You know, sneering at 'basement conspiracy theorists' isn't likely to generate much debate, you might want to take a look at some other defensive cop-out statements to use in the future so...

http://www.gatecreepers.com/entries/exclusive-debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theorie/

Enjoy!

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
the Cold War was really just invented...

/facepalm

conspiracy theorist rewrites of history are always so mundane and simplistic. they seem tailor made for people with incredibly limited breadths of knowledge or experience and who can't be bothered with nuance. one answer, one narrative; some of the most complex geopolitical situations in human history reduced to a single statement that encapsulates a massively limited worldview.



yayaya, eat a dick

Originally posted by Lord Shadow Z
The common rebuttal to that though is that the USSR and the US were covering each others backs in that regard and that the Cold War was really just invented to allow military funding and build-up to happen under that pretence.

You know, sneering at 'basement conspiracy theorists' isn't likely to generate much debate, you might want to take a look at some other defensive cop-out statements to use in the future so...

http://www.gatecreepers.com/entries/exclusive-debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theorie/

Enjoy!
Rofel Copter.

I thought you left this forum because people were "trolling" by making you look like an idiot by pointing out where the words were coming from: your ass.

In your narrative, what is the real reason for desiring greater defense spending if not to keep up with the rival power?

How is there a better explanation for the cold war than "the USSR and USA were ideologically opposed and both saw conflict as inevitable and neither wanted to come out on the wrong end of said conflict"?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Then why is NASA telling everyone hands off on their landing sites? AHA!


Why is NASA getting hot and bothered about the private space-race? So much so that they are calling some places off-limits (where their left over landing junk is)?


http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/may/HQ_12-168_Lunar_Protection_Guidelines.html


HMMMM!?!?!?!


HMMM!?!?!



NOW WHAT????? Where's your theories, now?


Mwahahaha





Anyway, I never bought into the idea that we did not land on the moon. But now, I think the theory has been completely destroyed.


However, the "manned moon landings" theorists (the ones that say we had no actual manned missions, just remote landings) could still be right...until they find evidence of "humans" on the moon stuff.

Maybe they're scared we'll find out that the stuff ISN'T THERE....HAAA!

Originally posted by dadudemon
Then why is NASA telling everyone hands off on their landing sites? AHA!


Why is NASA getting hot and bothered about the private space-race? So much so that they are calling some places off-limits (where their left over landing junk is)?


http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/may/HQ_12-168_Lunar_Protection_Guidelines.html


HMMMM!?!?!?!


HMMM!?!?!



NOW WHAT????? Where's your theories, now?


Mwahahaha





Anyway, I never bought into the idea that we did not land on the moon. But now, I think the theory has been completely destroyed.


However, the "manned moon landings" theorists (the ones that say we had no actual manned missions, just remote landings) could still be right...until they find evidence of "humans" on the moon stuff.
You expect me to believe this shit?

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
You expect me to believe this shit?

You don't believe that Nasa doesn't want people messing with their stuff?

Proof!

Is this moronic conspiracy theory still going?

So ur wid yo moon and ur makin out wen the phone ringz. U ansr it n da voice sayz "wut r u doin wit ma landing sites?"
u tel ur girl n she say "NASA didn't go to the moon."

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?

It was me. I was phone.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Is this moronic conspiracy theory still going?

Isn't moronic conspiracy theory a bit redundant?