Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Ezio, from the game Assassin's Creed: Revelations

VS

Batman, from the film The Dark Knight Rises


Both combatants are from their most recent appearances, the above game and film, to be specific, and they are fighting in the Colosseum. The fight starts at midday. They start ten feet apart. To win one must kill or incapacitate the other. They know nothing of each other prior to the fight. Ezio is armed with his wrist-mounted hook-blades, several throwing knives, a sword and his standard armor and clothing. Batman is armed with several Batarangs, smoke bombs and his very capable Batsuit.

Batman dies.

Ezio dies:


Lo0utcf_y-Y

See that's where you're wrong. That's not Nolanverse Batman. Who is easily the least impressive in terms of physical capability.

You mean the Batman who came back and beat Bane? He should honestly beat an aging Ezio.

The Batman who got his back broken in the first place, and only beat Bane by what, damaging his mask and letting Catwoman finish him off?

Even in his old age(Revelations), Ezio was killing men half his age with ease. Highly trained men mind you.

And if you've ever seen Assassin's Creed Embers, he's even older by 10-20 years and he still kills half a dozen Chinese guys chasing an Assassin with no issues.

Batman's slow compared to even old man Ezio. And unlike Bane, Ezio has many pointy weapons.

You'd be better off putting Batman against Altair. He fights just as well as Batman but kills, while being younger at his peak.

Connor may also do better than Ezio, but I haven't finished AC3 yet.

Connor would massacre Batman. He's in his early to mid twenties at the latest, has a lifetime of hunting and killing under his belt, and walks through highly skilled mercs like nothing. Plus he hits pretty hard with just his fists, but more than likely will use his hidden blades or tomahawk, which Batman has no defense against.