Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/409667_10151345023151178_888909894_n.jpg

http://www.welshbikers.co.uk/forum/Smileys/default/smiley_two_thumbs_up.gif

Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses. http://www.millenniumfalcon.com/phpbb/images/smiles/mf_emoticon_cigar.gif

Agreed.

Therefore any laws that criminals won't obey should thereby go unregulated. From traffic laws on up. Freedom!

That picture didn't miss the point of gun regulation laws at all.

Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed.

Therefore any laws that criminals won't obey should thereby go unregulated. From traffic laws on up. Freedom!

When we legislate against murder, we don't put potential victims at risk by that legislation. And they still have the right to protect themselves.

On a side note, there should be no laws against victimless crimes.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
That picture didn't miss the point of gun regulation laws at all.

When you look at the world through rose colored glasses, no.

On another side note, liberals put the right of self-defense of the common man (iow, those not benefiting from the legal double standard protecting the elite), well below state control of said common man. Even Hitler, the liberal bugaboo (who of course, was a fascist brand of socialist), confiscated weapons as his first step to power. So, was Hitler wrong? Before you answer, consider Chicago and it's totally anti-gun laws.

Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed.

Therefore any laws that criminals won't obey should thereby go unregulated. From traffic laws on up. Freedom!

When we legislate against murder, we don't put potential victims at risk by that legislation. And they still have the right to protect themselves.

On a side note, there should be no laws against victimless crimes.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
That picture didn't miss the point of gun regulation laws at all.

When you look at the world through rose colored glasses, no.

On another side note, liberals put the right of self-defense of the common man (iow, those not benefiting from the legal double standard protecting the elite), well below state control of said common man. Even Hitler, the liberal bugaboo (who of course, was a fascist brand of socialist), confiscated weapons as his first step to power. So, was Hitler wrong? Before you answer, consider Chicago and it's totally anti-gun laws.

BTW, what is the point of gun-legislation?

If you want to have a serious debate, don't do a ridiculous troll on your first post. Aside from being poor arguing, it just looks pathetic. Closed.