Originally posted by Nephthys
So? That wouldn't make it easier to defeat, just draw the fight out as they both have to fight carefully. Plus it is a machine.
Point is, Ti was at no bigger disadvantage than the droid. Thus, she still had trouble with a single Magnaguard.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Sure, because focusing on running away totally doesn't hinder your ability to fight.
Not really. Her mission was to protect with Chancellor. It's ridiculous to think that she wouldn't give everything she had in such an important mission.
Originally posted by Nephthys
And that automatically makes her inferior to him? You said that she has no feats or accolades to indicate that she's a skilled swordsman, I reminded you that you're wrong.
You're twisting my words. I never said she wasn't a skilled swordsman, I said that she has no accolades to prove a match for him.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Also recall that this was before she became much more powerful.
Prove it.
Originally posted by Nephthys
And that despite how l33t he is, he still had trouble against a non-Force sensitive in Vizla.
lol
It was combat of honor. Vizsla has already lost handily to Kenobi if I recall so.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Yeah, because Maul uses the Force all the damn time and Starkiller never uses it.
He attacks her with the Force in their duel, however he needed to direct most of it against the Saarlac.
He needed to? Prove it.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Why would he need to kill him to ragdoll him? If he's so much more powerful he should be able to wtf pwn him with the Force, shouldn't he?
What? He wtfpwned him twice in Revial alone: first he chokes him and throws him against the wall, in the end he hurls him so hard that the ceiling collapsed. If that's not a ragdolling I'm not sure what is.
Originally posted by Nephthys
And yes it is circumstantial. Maul doesn't have Savage Oppress here to fight with him like he did in that one. Clearly he was soooo disadvantaged though, right?
Are you actually serious? Why do you think that Kenobi has never beaten Maul in a duel? He has lost twice and stalemated him once.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Seriously, Maul is nowhere near the hot shit you make him out to be. He's Clone Wars Kenobi level.
He is. For a strict comparison, the difference between someone like he and Windu/Dooku in terms of technical skill is minimal. He's a ''high-end master of multiple forms'', his training consisted of intense physical training, one of the most highly trained Sith ever in history, he focused on developing his tactical abilities...
Originally posted by Nephthys
Prove that its an exaggeration. Even if it is, hyperbole doesn't equal nothing. Its still an immensely impressive description of his lightsaber sills.
Sure. Maul's skill are ''nonpareil''.
We can work out hyperboles all day, but it's not gonna help your case.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Well in terms of Force Power (which as of Path of Destruction is a huge part of lightsaber combat)
The same Path of Destruction in which it is said that a better duelist (Maul) can beat a more powerful force user (Starkiller)?
Originally posted by Nephthys
and in terms of physical strength. So, both.
As if this would actually matter. Maul's cybernetic legs has allowed him to nullify Opress' strength completely.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Prove that that was actually Maul.
What? I have no reason to believe it was not.
Originally posted by Nephthys
And then, as per canon Vader had diminished by the time that comic is set. The Vader Starkiller fought was superior to that version.
Prove it.