Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/02/05/art-or-pornography-controversy-erupts-over-racy-student-video-shot-at-columbia/

Some additional quotes from Young:


http://www.uproxx.com/filmdrunk/2014/02/nude-college-girls-filmed-porn-columbia-library-art/

Additional info:
http://gawker.com/some-nude-college-girls-filmed-a-feminist-porno-in-colu-1515084075

Why can't it be both?

lol modern art

I hope art is not their major.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Why can't it be both?
That depends. Do you consider a bunch of women randomly stripping and making out in a public place to be art?
Originally posted by Mindship
I hope art is not their major.
It is of one of the co-creators of the film(she also starred in it), and probably of one of the actresses as well.

I find it ironic that in the name of protesting/satirizing Columbia University's alleged patriarchal academic/social structure, these women end up playing straight into their hands.

This quote from one of the links I provided drives home the point:

Originally posted by Epicurus
That depends. Do you consider a bunch of women randomly stripping and making out in a public place to be art?

I definitely think it could have artistic merit in some contexts, yes.

Originally posted by Epicurus
This quote from one of the links I provided drives home the point:

"What is a parody?"

"Correct."

"I'll take basic literally concepts for 200, please."

"Oh, you've hit the daily double. How much will you wager?"

"All of it."

"Okay. If you double that would give you a total of $200 if you win and $0 if you lose. You ready for the question?"

"Yes."

"Through this literally or art form, it is possible to critique a fetish while indulging in it."

"What is satire?...wait...wasn't that the same as the first?"

"Correct. And, yes. Don't question it! You now have $200."

Originally posted by dadudemon

"What is a parody?"

"Correct."

"I'll take basic literally concepts for 200, please."

"Oh, you've hit the daily double. How much will you wager?"

"All of it."

"Okay. If you double that would give you a total of $200 if you win and $0 if you lose. You ready for the question?"

"Yes."

"Through this literally or art form, it is possible to critique a fetish while indulging in it."

"What is satire?...wait...wasn't that the same as the first?"

"Correct. And, yes. Don't question it! You now have $200."
Not sure whether to roll my eyes, facepalm or just have a plain old confused look on my face.

Or all 3 of the above. Combos are the best afterall.facepalm

Also, your quote function is slightly off.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Not sure whether to roll my eyes, facepalm or just have a plain old confused look on my face.

Or all 3 of the above. Combos are the best afterall.facepalm

Also, your quote function is slightly off.


You would have been better off using another childish spelling or grammar come back.

"That's not how you spell literary!"

Originally posted by dadudemon
You would have been better off using another childish spelling or grammar come back.

"That's not how you spell literary!"
You would have been better off not posting in this thread at all tbh.

Originally posted by Epicurus
That depends. Do you consider a bunch of women randomly stripping and making out in a public place to be art?
...

Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know.

Everything is art according to the laziest and most inclusive definition.

But good art is more selective. This just looks like stupid college idiocy at its finest.

None of you have an educated opinion on what qualifies as fine art.

The only way to judge it is to post it so I can watch it.

Originally posted by NemeBro
None of you have an educated opinion on what qualifies as fine art.

The only way to judge it is to post it so I can watch it.

http://cdn2.holytaco.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/221.jpg

Originally posted by NemeBro
None of you have an educated opinion on what qualifies as fine art.

The only way to judge it is to post it so I can watch it.

I have a degree in fine arts. Now that doesn't mean I am qualified to judge fine art, but I do know what they teach in art school.

Originally posted by NemeBro
None of you have an educated opinion on what qualifies as fine art.

The only way to judge it is to post it so I can watch it.

Exactly. I require more material for, uhhh, artistic research. With my dick.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
http://cdn2.holytaco.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/221.jpg Got me rock hard.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You would have been better off not posting in this thread at all tbh.


You mean you didn't like me answering your question with the obvious answer that clearly escaped you, tbh.

Can I also be frank?

And what should I do with this 2 cents?

Originally posted by dadudemon
You mean you didn't like me answering your question with the obvious answer that clearly escaped you, tbh.

Can I also be frank?

And what should I do with this 2 cents?

We don't know where those pennies have been.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know.
It's a bunch of college coeds taking off their clothes, doing lewd things to each other(which me likeys), and running around in their undies in the hallways carrying a dead chicken and rubbing it on the walls, and beating each other with it. It also consists of them applying egg yol/albumen on each other's hair/bodies as if it were everyday body lotion.

So tell me, do you consider it to be "good art"?

Originally posted by NemeBro
None of you have an educated opinion on what qualifies as fine art.

The only way to judge it is to post it so I can watch it.
Originally posted by Epicurus
Additional info:
http://gawker.com/some-nude-college-girls-filmed-a-feminist-porno-in-colu-1515084075

Originally posted by Epicurus
It's a bunch of college coeds taking off their clothes, doing lewd things to each other(which me likeys), and running around in their undies in the hallways carrying a dead chicken and rubbing it on the walls, and beating each other with it. It also consists of them applying egg yol/albumen on each other's hair/bodies as if it were everyday body lotion.

So tell me, do you consider it to be "good art"?

"Good Art?" What in the hell is good art? I know what great art is, but I don't care about "good art". Many artists that can't make great art, make crappy art to get their names known. Think about it, we are now talking about their crappy art. People all over the world are talking about their crappy art.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
"Good Art?" What in the hell is good art?
That's an interesting question. You should ask this guy, since he brought it up:
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know.

Burn.

Originally posted by Epicurus
That's an interesting question. You should ask this guy, since he brought it up:

You are confused. You mistakenly think that art has to be good.

I'll answer that for you guys: no, it's not good art. It's shite.

Originally posted by Epicurus
That's an interesting question. You should ask this guy, since he brought it up:

Originally posted by Epicurus
...So tell me, do you consider it to be "good art"?

You are the person who asked me the question, and now you are saying I brought it up.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are the person who asked me the question, and now you are saying I brought it up.
You brought up the idea of whether it was "good art" or not, which is why I asked said question. I quoted the very post you mentioned it in as well.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Think about it, we are now talking about their crappy art. People all over the world are talking about their crappy art.
I agree.

Originally posted by Epicurus
You brought up the idea of whether it was "good art" or not, which is why I asked said question. I quoted the very post you mentioned it in as well.

"Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know."

This was in response to your question. You asked if it was good art.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
"Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know."

This was in response to your question. You asked if it was good art.
Actually, that was in response to my 1st question; whether or not you considered this to even be art to begin with. You brought up "good art" in response to that, to which my 2nd question(So tell me, do you consider it to be "good art"? ) was aimed. I hope that clears things up.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Actually, that was in response to my 1st question; whether or not you considered this to even be art to begin with. You brought up "good art" in response to that, to which my 2nd question(So tell me, do you consider it to be "good art"? ) was aimed. I hope that clears things up.

NO!

Here are all of my posts in this thread in order:

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have a degree in fine arts. Now that doesn't mean I am qualified to judge fine art, but I do know what they teach in art school.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
We don't know where those pennies have been.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
"Good Art?" What in the hell is good art? I know what great art is, but I don't care about "good art". Many artists that can't make great art, make crappy art to get their names known. Think about it, we are now talking about their crappy art. People all over the world are talking about their crappy art.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are confused. You mistakenly think that art has to be good.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You are the person who asked me the question, and now you are saying I brought it up.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
"Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know."

This was in response to your question. You asked if it was good art.

My first post was in response to your second question. So, I did NOT bring up good art, you did!
You must be confusing me with someone else.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
My first post was in response to your second question. So, I did NOT bring up good art, you did!
You must be confusing me with someone else.
This proves you wrong:
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Originally posted by Epicurus
That depends. Do you consider a bunch of women randomly stripping and making out in a public place to be art?
...
Yes, it can be art. Art is communication of ideas. Now, is it good art? I don't know.

Here's a screen shot for further proof:
http://i1160.photobucket.com/albums/q487/TheGodKiller666/shakya_confusion_zpsedc5d8b1.jpg

After using the hair wigs now usually I do not need to have my hair cut to often to gain the ideal hair style I want as I can always find the cheap hair wigs that can change my hair style to the way I like. Really a good method long wigs and you can have a try.