Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Sith Lords: Maul, Savage, and Dooku VS Jedis: Kit Fisto, Mace Windu, and Obi Wan Kenobi

I actually gotta give you props for this one it's not that bad of a fight.

Yeah, this is pretty good.

Dooku vs Windu is a bust, Maul vs Obi-Wan is.... very hard to call and Savage vs Fisto is highly debatable.

Kit could probably take Savage on the account of Shii-Cho being helpful against additional blades.

Shii-Cho is good against multiple opponents, and Grievous's four separate blades attacking from separate angles imitated what a fight against multiple adversaries would be like. Savage has only two blades that are not separate, but are rather part of the same weapon. This does not really mimic multiple adversaries, so I don't see how Shii-Cho is a game-changer here.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Shii-Cho is good against multiple opponents, and Grievous's four separate blades attacking from separate angles imitated what a fight against multiple adversaries would be like. Savage has only two blades that are not separate, but are rather part of the same weapon. This does not really mimic multiple adversaries, so I don't see how Shii-Cho is a game-changer here.
It's not necessarily multiple opponents, it's just multile angles it's good against, which is why it's good at deflecting blaster bolts from a lot of shooters, etc.

Originally posted by Intrepid37
It's not necessarily multiple opponents, it's just multile angles it's good against, which is why it's good at deflecting blaster bolts from a lot of shooters, etc.
A saberstaff still doesn't qualify as multiple angles.

It does when there's multiple enemies for Savage to strike from.

Which has nothing to do with Kit Fisto's use of Shii-cho.

I didn't mean to say enemies, lol. Have no idea where that came from.

What did you mean to say?

Angles.

Ah.

A saberstaff can only attack from one angle at a time.

That doesn't matter.

Windu and Dooku would be fighting for a long time.

Kenobi loses to TCW Maul

and its a 50.50 for Savage to Fisto. I think Fisto would lose after a while, and or if he does hes ****ed against Maul.

Leaving Dooku and Maul against Mace which is 60-40 for team, unless Mace gets an amp from Maul. That is if Fisto doesn't kill Savage, in which case the team turns Mace into chop suey

Originally posted by Intrepid37
That doesn't matter.
Yes it does. You're saying Fisto has an advantage because Shii-Cho is great for dealing with multiple angles of attack at once, which a saberstaff doesn't provide. In fact Shii-Cho is noted to not be very good for one on one combat, so I again don't see how Shii-Cho is a game-changer in Fisto's favor. As someone who has called Vaapad overrated before, I don't see how you could think that "Fisto beats people with more than one blade because Shii-Cho."

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Yes it does. You're saying Fisto has an advantage because Shii-Cho is great for dealing with multiple angles of attack at once, which a saberstaff doesn't provide. In fact Shii-Cho is noted to not be very good for one on one combat, so I again don't see how Shii-Cho is a game-changer in Fisto's favor. As someone who has called Vaapad overrated before, I don't see how you could think that "Fisto beats people with more than one blade because Shii-Cho."
I never claimed that Fisto would beat everyone with more than one blade, so how 'bout you stick the pipe in and stop quoting me out of context?