Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Tony, in his Avengers armor, takes on all the angels outside the diner in the movie Legion. Eventually, he faces Gabriel himself..

Both are bloodlusted.

Who wins?

Were the angels not some what immortal? I remember Michael "dying" and coming back to life, and Gabriel being killed but not actually being killed and flying back to heaven.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Were the angels not some what immortal? I remember Michael "dying" and coming back to life, and Gabriel being killed but not actually being killed and flying back to heaven. No they were not immortal iirc. Michael was not an angel at the time of his death he was human.

And the wound Michael gave Gabriel didn't kill him.

Ironman wins then.

The lesser angels just possessed bodies of humans. If the human dies, the angel leaves. Gabriel was in his true form. He may be immortal, but he can be put down long enough to count as a win.

Gabriel's durability is in question here.. Did he show any level of durability outside of his wings that could take the damage from Ironmans weapons? Missiles/lasers/repulsers give ironman a definite advantage in range.

Jarvis doesn't fight Tony!

Originally posted by SevenShackles
Gabriel's durability is in question here.. Did he show any level of durability outside of his wings that could take the damage from Ironmans weapons? Missiles/lasers/repulsers give ironman a definite advantage in range.

Nah he got cut by a sword.

IM seems a lot faster than Gabriel.

Now you guys are saying that IM can beta a damn angel? The Avengers wanking has reached new heights.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Now you guys are saying that IM can beta a damn angel? The Avengers wanking has reached new heights.

The avengers are not in this fight. What feats does Gabriel have to stop Iron Man?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
The avengers are not in this fight. What feats does Gabriel have to stop Iron Man? When did I say the Avengers are in this fight?

Originally posted by The Spleen
Now you guys are saying that IM can beta a damn angel? The Avengers wanking has reached new heights.

Right here^ can you not read you're own writing?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Right here^ can you not read you're own writing?

I said IM, then I said Avengers wanking because every Avengers thread is full of people spanking their puds to the Avengers.

Originally posted by The Spleen
I said IM, then I said Avengers wanking because every Avengers thread is full of people spanking their puds to the Avengers.

But srsly, what durability and speed feats does Gabriel have compared to IM?

Originally posted by The Spleen
I said IM, then I said Avengers wanking because every Avengers thread is full of people spanking their puds to the Avengers.

Yes according to you a person that gets impaled by a sword has more durability then say Iron Man.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Yes according to you a person that gets impaled by a sword has more durability then say Iron Man. He was impaled and didn't even flinch.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
But srsly, what durability and speed feats does Gabriel have compared to IM?

None, tri beams ftw.

Ahahaha at you guys giving IM a handjob.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Ahahaha at you guys giving IM a handjob.

You lost RJ.

Lol sure I did!!! Hey, remember those pointy tooth humans in Legion? What was wrong with them? That shit was crazy!!!

Originally posted by The Spleen
Ahahaha at you guys giving IM a handjob.

Y U MAD BRO? NO PROOFZ?

Ok how does Gabriel best Ironman who kept up with Thor?

Doesn't have to. He simply possesses them.

/thread.

And before anyone denies this. what is IM? Human. What did the angels possess? Humans. Possession>>>IM.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Doesn't have to. He simply possesses them.

/thread.

And before anyone denies this. what is IM? Human. What did the angels possess? Humans. Possession>>>IM.

Tri beams invalidates your argument. Gabriel loses his head.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Tri beams invalidates your argument. Gabriel loses his head. Lol, no. The angels were possessing people while they were still in heaven. IM will be possessed before Gabriel is even within range of his weapons.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Lol, no. The angels were possessing people while they were still in heaven. IM will be possessed before Gabriel is even within range of his weapons.

Wrong that never happened, it was demon possession. Caught you lying again.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Doesn't have to. He simply possesses them.

/thread.

And before anyone denies this. what is IM? Human. What did the angels possess? Humans. Possession>>>IM.

Although I do agree that Tony might get possessed , but I think it's 50% possible since Loki's scepter didn't work on him and that's kinda like possession but still it's possible Tony get possessed

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
Although I do agree that Tony might get possessed , but I think it's 50% possible since Loki's scepter didn't work on him and that's kinda like possession but still it's possible Tony get possessed

It was demon possession, not angels. He's lying as usual.

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
Although I do agree that Tony might get possessed , but I think it's 50% possible since Loki's scepter didn't work on him and that's kinda like possession but still it's possible Tony get possessed

Think about it: Loki must be close to his victim and actually touch them in order to possess them. The angels can do it from heaven. This implies that angelic possession>>>>>>>>>>>Loki possession.

Originally posted by The Spleen
Think about it: Loki must be close to his victim and actually touch them in order to possess them. The angels can do it from heaven. This implies that angelic possession>>>>>>>>>>>Loki possession.

Implies nothing, no angels posses anyone. Quit lying.

In a straight physical combat scenario, Gabriel Keamy gets dismembered by the tri beam

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Implies nothing, no angels posses anyone. Quit lying.



BNsrK6P9QvI

Gabriel never possessed anyone. you got caught again lying.

Is Gabriel an angel?

Originally posted by The Spleen
He was impaled and didn't even flinch.

Barely flinched?

He was on his hands and knee's begging.


0TurtBj24DA

How do you know all Legionverse angels can possess people? There appears to be different levels.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Barely flinched?


0TurtBj24DA That was not the impaling scene, dumbass. We are talking about the scene where Gabriel stabs through himself in order to kill Michael.

Originally posted by The Spleen
That was not the impaling scene, dumbass. We are talking about the scene where Gabriel stabs through himself in order to kill Michael.

You didn't watch the movie. And apparently can't watch the video.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
You didn't watch the movie. And apparently can't watch the video. I did in fact, many times. In the kitchen fight, Michael has Gabriel in a choke hold and Gabriel stabs himself in order to kill Michael. Then in the last fight, Michael slashes Gabriel in the gut with his sword.

One is an impale, one a slash.

Originally posted by The Spleen
I did in fact, many times. In the kitchen fight, Michael has Gabriel in a choke hold and Gabriel stabs himself in order to kill Michael. Then in the last fight, Michael slashes Gabriel in the gut with his sword.

One is an impale, one a slash.

And how does it change the outcome of this fight?

Tri Beams cuts him in half.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
And how does it change the outcome of this fight?

Tri Beams cuts him in half. Not if IM is possessed. Wait, WHEN IM is possessed. IM is human and the angels literally possessed "legions" of humans while they were still in heaven.

Now, prove to me IM can resist angelic possession.

So basically Keamy has to cheat because he can't get a legitimate win here

Originally posted by The Spleen
Not if IM is possessed. Wait, WHEN IM is possessed. IM is human and the angels literally possessed "legions" of humans while they were still in heaven.

Now, prove to me IM can resist angelic possession.

He resisted the mind gem's possession by Loki.

Gods>angels

Originally posted by The Spleen
Doesn't have to. He simply possesses them.

/thread.

And before anyone denies this. what is IM? Human. What did the angels possess? Humans. Possession>>>IM.

Lmao.

So when has Gabriel possessed anyone on-screen again?

IIRC, we have no idea if the possession was innate of angels or simply God-induced for Plot Drama. Gabriel, when on screen, looked rather corporeal.

The big metal SFX was a dead giveaway.

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
Actually Tony did resist the scepter's possession but you just have a different reason why that happenned but anyway I don't remember Loki possessing others with touching the scepter on the other parts of the victims except than their chests.

There was a scene had Erik Selvig under his control which lead him to the tesseract at the end of Thor before he had the Spear of Destiny.

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
Actually Tony did resist the scepter's possession but you just have a different reason why that happenned but anyway I don't remember Loki possessing others with touching the scepter on the other parts of the victims except than their chests.

Oh my. It was due to Loki taping the arc reactor and not due to Tony having some special resistance is the point. The loud "clinks" was the giveaway.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Wrong that never happened, it was demon possession. Caught you lying again.
It was angels
God had sent the angels as the second plague to scour mankindOriginally posted by The Spleen
Think about it: Loki must be close to his victim and actually touch them in order to possess them. The angels can do it from heaven. This implies that angelic possession>>>>>>>>>>>Loki possession.
The spear thing needed to go through a mans hearts or some bullshizzle like that and because of the arc reactor the spear thingy did nothing to him

Did no one watch these movies?

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
IIRC, we have no idea if the possession was innate of angels or simply God-induced for Plot Drama. Gabriel, when on screen, looked rather corporeal. When Quaid and CO. first meet Michael he literally tells them that angels are possessing people. Then there's the scene where the cops try to stop Michael and one is possessed by an angel.

Originally posted by The Spleen
When Quaid and CO. first meet Michael he literally tells them that angels are possessing people. Then there's the scene where the cops try to stop Michael and one is possessed by an angel.

So okay Jarvis wins

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
So okay Jarvis wins So Jarvis is gonna know Tony has been possessed? How?

Originally posted by The Spleen
So Jarvis is gonna know Tony has been possessed? How?

I meant Paul Bettany, the actor who voices Jarvis and plays Gabriel wins means Gabriel wins

Paul Bettany played Michael. Gabriel was played by "Damn good eggs" Keamy.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Paul Bettany played Michael. Gabriel was played by "Damn good eggs" Keamy.

I confused the two character all along so if that's the case Gabriel wins easily without possession.

Originally posted by The Spleen
When Quaid and CO. first meet Michael he literally tells them that angels are possessing people. Then there's the scene where the cops try to stop Michael and one is possessed by an angel.

Right, but we don't see Gabriel doing the same, and we know from the end-scene that God directly controls their powers, allowing Michael to be reborn, etc.

So saying "they possess people, so Gabriel can" requires evidence that they can do so without God's direct intervention/will.

Originally posted by DrDeadpool
I meant Paul Bettany, the actor who voices Jarvis and plays Gabriel wins means Gabriel wins

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Right, but we don't see Gabriel doing the same, and we know from the end-scene that God directly controls their powers, allowing Michael to be reborn, etc.

So saying "they possess people, so Gabriel can" requires evidence that they can do so without God's direct intervention/will.

He dodges all the real questions cause he bases his opinions on imagination and not screen feats.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Right, but we don't see Gabriel doing the same, and we know from the end-scene that God directly controls their powers, allowing Michael to be reborn, etc.

So saying "they possess people, so Gabriel can" requires evidence that they can do so without God's direct intervention/will.


You're reaching, dude. Gabriel is the second most powerful angel behind Michael, you saying he cannot do what his underlings can? It's like saying "Hey, a padawan can force pull, but Mace Windu cannot because he was never shown doing so."

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
He dodges all the real questions cause he bases his opinions on imagination and not screen feats. I'm lying? Dude, You're the one who said the people were being possessed by demons. You don't know WHAT you're talking about and you DARE debate with me?

Go away.

Originally posted by The Spleen
You're reaching, dude. Gabriel is the second most powerful angel behind Michael, you saying he cannot do what his underlings can? It's like saying "Hey, a padawan can force pull, but Mace Windu cannot because he was never shown doing so."

Produce a screen feat then, oh right, you can't.

Originally posted by The Spleen
I'm lying? Dude, You're the one who said the people were being possessed by demons. You don't know WHAT you're talking about and you DARE debate with me?

Go away.

You said Gabriel was possessing people now you admit he never did, so ya you are lying.

Read what I said, Noobie. And ask yourself this: Can Mace Windu force push droids away from him? I know he is not in the thread, but the question relates.

Both of you are as bad a each other

Originally posted by The Spleen
You're reaching, dude. Gabriel is the second most powerful angel behind Michael, you saying he cannot do what his underlings can? It's like saying "Hey, a padawan can force pull, but Mace Windu cannot because he was never shown doing so."

1. You can't rule out God as being the source of said power. We don't know if it's a common innate ability for angels or something God allowed because plot.

2. Reply if you disagree and I'll concede.

EDIT: Wait, you're banned.

I WIN!