Board Walker
With the addition of every new societal cohort there is a myriad of trends that become increasingly visible, and one of those is that humans are becoming increasingly more "whorish". One could state that due to the effect of globalization there has been a melding of societal values, perceptions, desires, and most importantly the strategies used to actualize them. The prior preconceived notions that were conceptually attached to "Sexuality" have for the most part either decreased in value, and or have been supplanted with a paradigm that better fits the demands of today's populations.
Point in being that humans particularly females have become increasingly promiscuous in their sexual behavioral patterns, and more so in their societally open utilization of sex as a means to actualizing demands. In prior cohorts sexuality was often something that was experienced at a later stage of social bonding, and was often actualized in a "monogamous manner". That is not to say that all or the majority of relationships were purely between two partners, but rather that there was a more defined set of parameters regarding the risk and the level of investment between the partners involved.
Contrastingly both males as well as females of the present paradigm have displayed several interesting behavioral patterns, and they are patterns that have only increased in statistical prevalence with every cohort revolution. The first of these patterns is that males, and more so females have become increasingly risk averse in their mate selection behaviors. In particular they would rather sustain a collection of many low maintenance, low risk, and easy to terminate trade partners rather than committing to one or a few high risk high reward trade partners.
I am curious as to if you are accepting of this societal "evolution" in terms of social survival, and if you are even aware of these cross generational patterns that are occurring on a macro scale. On the other hand I am curious if perhaps you have chosen to deny this paradigm shift, and have remained true to your outlier "convictions".
Point in being that humans particularly females have become increasingly promiscuous in their sexual behavioral patterns, and more so in their societally open utilization of sex as a means to actualizing demands. In prior cohorts sexuality was often something that was experienced at a later stage of social bonding, and was often actualized in a "monogamous manner". That is not to say that all or the majority of relationships were purely between two partners, but rather that there was a more defined set of parameters regarding the risk and the level of investment between the partners involved.
Contrastingly both males as well as females of the present paradigm have displayed several interesting behavioral patterns, and they are patterns that have only increased in statistical prevalence with every cohort revolution. The first of these patterns is that males, and more so females have become increasingly risk averse in their mate selection behaviors. In particular they would rather sustain a collection of many low maintenance, low risk, and easy to terminate trade partners rather than committing to one or a few high risk high reward trade partners.
I am curious as to if you are accepting of this societal "evolution" in terms of social survival, and if you are even aware of these cross generational patterns that are occurring on a macro scale. On the other hand I am curious if perhaps you have chosen to deny this paradigm shift, and have remained true to your outlier "convictions".