Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Are homosexuals happier than heterosexuals or something?

Or is that just how it's to be depicted by media and slang induction?

Subliminal misrepresentation of the philia?

Has this been a plot to control blood lines from the beginning?

It is a self descriptive positive description used to counter past negatives like *** and queer. I am in favour of the word gay and in favour of equality in all things for gays.

Originally posted by Alpha Debater
It is a self descriptive positive That's a bit arrogant.

Proclaiming that homosexuals are better because they're happier.

I'm ****ing with you.

Originally posted by Oneness
That's a bit arrogant. No, it's a way to counter non self descriptive negatives.

I need to get drunk again.

Originally posted by Oneness
That's a bit arrogant.

Proclaiming that homosexuals are better because they're happier.

I'm ****ing with you.

Ha, O.K. fair enough.

N-g-dIU6v_0

Aids trailer.

Now heterosexuals can't even call themselves gay anymore when they're happy.

Originally posted by Oneness
I need to get drunk again.

You of all people should avoid drinking alcohol, especially in excess

Originally posted by Robtard
You of all people should avoid drinking alcohol, especially in excess yHUc9r48jCM

Ironically enough, that particular actor, Jim Parsons, happens to be interested only in other members of his gender.

Originally posted by Oneness
Are homosexuals happier than heterosexuals or something?

Or is that just how it's to be depicted by media and slang induction?

Subliminal misrepresentation of the philia?

Has this been a plot to control blood lines from the beginning? Interesting question. I googled it to find an interesting answer (courtesy of wikipedia). Basically, the evolution of the word/association went something like this...

Gay: carefree --> hedonist --> loose sexual morals --> homosexual.

Time frame: last few hundred years, with rapid development in the last few decades.

Originally posted by Mindship
Interesting question. I googled it to find an interesting answer (courtesy of wikipedia). Basically, the evolution of the word/association went something like this...

Gay: carefree --> hedonist --> loose sexual morals --> homosexual.

Time frame: last few hundred years, with rapid development in the last few decades. Informative.

I believe in hedonism, I am hyper-sexually immoral but I'm not homosexual or bisexual.

Would I fall in the gay category? For the word's original meaning, yes I would. However, now, I'll just catch a ton of bullshit for it.

I blame the rednecks for being stigmatic, not the homosexuals for trimming my competition.

Neanderthals walk among us.

Why is it called gay? Because words can mean more than one thing, and/or evolve over time?

Originally posted by Oneness
Has this been a plot to control blood lines from the beginning?

Ya know, or that.