Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v484/Ash_ED/Other/hateful-iimage-7-30.0_zps2wafpgc0.jpg~original

Can't wait 4 this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK68QwKyfsA

Originally posted by dynamix
zK68QwKyfsA


Looks like a fake, Some of the footage looks out of place, I see Channing Tatum from The Eagle & it must be Tim Roth from that Selma movie

So hateful.dame you eight...why couldn't it be seven

Fake trailer.

That's Sam Jackson from Black Snake Moan.

This is allegedly his last film, right?

edit- Nope. He apparently wants to retire either at age 60 or when he finishes his 10th film.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Looks like a fake, Some of the footage looks out of place, I see Channing Tatum from The Eagle & it must be Tim Roth from that Selma movie

wth! gawdammit lol

Far as i know there hasn't been a trailer released, Only a teaser which i remember seeing

this thing

nK9czBlzL9g

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v484/Ash_ED/Other/the-ewpic-01_zps0v8nl7li.jpg~original

My third most anticipated movie of the year

thats looks vicious! stoked!

Will watch.

Good to see Kurt Russell doing more movies.

Ennio Morricone is Scoring 'The Hateful Eight'

http://www.firstshowing.net/2015/tarantino-announces-ennio-morricone-is-scoring-the-hateful-eight/



Outfuqingstanding

What movies has he scored in the past?

Originally posted by Kazenji
What movies has he scored in the past? Are you serious, lol?

I have no idea who he is.

H-hans Zimmer or bust!

Originally posted by NemeBro
Are you serious, lol?

Yes, I'm ****ing serious.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Are you serious, lol? no one gives a shit about film composers. Even when i notice a really good score in a movie, i don't go and search for who did it.

Originally posted by Kazenji
What movies has he scored in the past?


- The Dollars trilogy: (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly), (For A Few Dollars More), (A Fistful of Dollars)

- Once Upon a Time in the West

- John Carpenters - The Thing

- The Untouchables


Just to name a few.

Originally posted by marwash22
no one gives a shit about film composers. Even when i notice a really good score in a movie, i don't go and search for who did it.

This is usually correct, but this ****er did miracles with the dollars trilogy. Those movies wouldn't be the same without his score.

Originally posted by marwash22
no one gives a shit about film composers. Even when i notice a really good score in a movie, i don't go and search for who did it. No one gives a shit about you, phaggot.

Originally posted by Inhuman
- The Dollars trilogy: (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly), (For A Few Dollars More), (A Fistful of Dollars)

- Once Upon a Time in the West

- John Carpenters - The Thing

- The Untouchables


Just to name a few.


John Carpenters The Thing is the only one i know of.

Originally posted by Kazenji
John Carpenters The Thing is the only one i know of.


qtired

Same to you.

Originally posted by marwash22
no one gives a shit about film composers. Even when i notice a really good score in a movie, i don't go and search for who did it.

Speak for yourself, John Williams has significantly elevated every movie he's scored. You may have been right about that 15 years ago, but today it's a different deal. Behind the scenes peeps are getting more and more attention from the general audiences. Even some of my most movie illiterate friends recognize Hans Zimmer and Alan Silvestri.

Originally posted by Inhuman
- The Dollars trilogy: (The Good, the Bad and the Ugly), (For A Few Dollars More), (A Fistful of Dollars)

- Once Upon a Time in the West

- John Carpenters - The Thing

- The Untouchables


Just to name a few.



This is usually correct, but this ****er did miracles with the dollars trilogy. Those movies wouldn't be the same without his score.
Agreed that score was quite good

Originally posted by Kazenji
John Carpenters The Thing is the only one i know of.



Not even The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?

The hell?

So?

I'm sure there's a movie you haven't seen and i have.

Not seeing a major movie is one thing. Not even knowing about it is quite another...

Originally posted by marwash22
no one gives a shit about film composers. Even when i notice a really good score in a movie, i don't go and search for who did it.

Clearly not a music fan, then, huh?

Tarantino, in particular, is pretty notorious for having at the very least interesting music, and making interesting music choices, and, imo, for the most part making great music choices. Although I don't think he'll ever top Pulp Fiction as far as music choices go.

Originally posted by ares834
Not seeing a major movie is one thing. Not even knowing about it is quite another...

Big whoop.

My most anticipated movie!

Guaranteed to get a 90% or higher on RT?

i hope your right.

did the trailer ever came out for this?

Nothing as of yet.

Originally posted by Inhuman
qtired

Wasn't it shown at Comic-con?...would'eve thought someone leaked it by now.

gnRbXn4-Yis

oh word!!!

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Clearly not a music fan, then, huh?

Tarantino, in particular, is pretty notorious for having at the very least interesting music, and making interesting music choices, and, imo, for the most part making great music choices. Although I don't think he'll ever top Pulp Fiction as far as music choices go. I'm a huge music fan, and like i said, i notice when a movie is well scored... but i just don't give a single fck about the composers. Call it disrespectful, you can say that i underappreciate them, whatever;. i just don't care enough to learn the names of composers.

Originally posted by marwash22
Call it disrespectful, you can say that i underappreciate them, whatever;. i just don't care enough to learn the name

That's basically what the last seven guys who used your ass said about you, Mouth

I've seen 'em all (except for Deathproof) and i own 5 of them, but i never realized Tarantino has only made 8 movies.


this one looks like a good time.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's basically what the last seven guys who used your ass said about you, Mouth but you know my name, rob.

I was lucky #8

I'm looking forward to this a lot, but the trailer didn't do much for me. Nice to see Bruce Stern though.

Originally posted by Zack M
I'm looking forward to this a lot, but the trailer didn't do much for me.

Walton Goggins and Tarantino is a great team up. He looks like the best character in it.

Will be entertaining as Tarantino flicks are but Kill Bill remains my favorite work of his.

Originally posted by jaden101
Walton Goggins and Tarantino is a great team up. He looks like the best character in it.

I was bummed he wasn't more utilized in Django. Glad he's getting a more meatier part this time around.

Just need some Timothy Olyphant and we're set

Two different versions of the movie



http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/tarantino-will-have-two-different-versions-of-the-hateful-eight-727

Saw this one in 70mm.

Quite a good film. Not Tarantino's best, but definitely entertaining and a good view in 70mm.

One thing I didn't like too much: the two opening chapters in the coach. I missed a sublime opening dialogue or monologue. And in chapter two there was an awful lot of exposition. But... Tarantino can wrote and I can't believe how fast the first 100 minutes (up until the official break) went by.

So very good stuff. But it's no Pulp Fiction.

I'm waiting for cheap theater on this. Look forward to seeing it.

It has lots of talking. In fact, it has MOSTLY talking. And a bit of gore.

other than lacking suspense and a dull third act it was a good movie. The acting is classic. The cinematography is beautiful and quentins dialogue is as engaging as ever but even with all of these right ingredients the movie still falls short with me. As a mystery/suspense movie it fails, although, i don't know if this was ever a goal of, Tarantinos'. There is rarely anything traditional about, Tarantinos movies and this one is no exception.

It's certainly a very good movie and if you're a Tarantino fan you'll be satisfied because the things this movie succeeds at it does so better than most. Although, i doubt the story will keep anyone interested. At least, for me, it was the characters and dialogue that kept me invested. The story completely falls apart once the third act starts. Definitely worth watching though and i have a feeling this one will get better with a second or third viewing.

Originally posted by queeq


It has lots of talking. In fact, it has MOSTLY talking. And a bit of gore.

What is so funny? His movies always have a lot of talking.

Yes, but they also usually have plot and character development.

I am just not sure how to consider this movie. It's very entertaining and extremely well acted. But...this movie also suffers from a huge amount of self-indulgence and exposition (Chapter 2 and the Flashback scene).

I couldn't wait for this film to end. Shitty.

It can't be as bad as guys are making it out to be. I didn't like the last 25 minutes of Django, but the rest of the movie was near perfect.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
It can't be as bad as guys are making it out to be. I didn't like the last 25 minutes of Django, but the rest of the movie was near perfect. Some people liked it I and my girl couldn't wait for this thing to end. Not impressed. At all.

I'm having a bit of a Star Trek Into Darkness feel about this movie. When I watched it, it was quite entertaining. But afterwards I feel a little screwed...

So I have to watch it again to know how I really feel about it.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
It can't be as bad as guys are making it out to be. I didn't like the last 25 minutes of Django, but the rest of the movie was near perfect.

All in all, it's not a terrible film, it's just not very good. Tarantino's flicks are dialogue driven and a good portion of the dialogue in this was not engaging.

Originally posted by queeq
I'm having a bit of a Star Trek Into Darkness feel about this movie. When I watched it, it was quite entertaining. But afterwards I feel a little screwed...

So I have to watch it again to know how I really feel about it.
Star Trek Into Darkness is a superb film and don't you dare compare it to this awful piece of cinema.

Originally posted by Robtard
All in all, it's not a terrible film, it's just not very good. Tarantino's flicks are dialogue driven and a good portion of the dialogue in this was not engaging.

To each to their own....

i found it engaging.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Star Trek Into Darkness is a superb film and don't you dare compare it to this awful piece of cinema.

ST:ID is the ultimate rip-off movie. If you think TFA is a copy of ANH, ST:IT copied just about EVERY scene from previous ST movies or television episodes.

So here's my deepest fear for the SW franchise. JJ set op ST and rebooted it with a new timeline. The future of Kirk, Bones and Spoke was completely open. And what did JJ do in the sequel: rehash all the old stuff (Khan of all people!!!) and ruined his own reboot.

ST:ID is a very entertaining movie. I give you that. But that's about it. They need a bit more imagination in Hollywood.

Originally posted by Robtard
All in all, it's not a terrible film, it's just not very good. Tarantino's flicks are dialogue driven and a good portion of the dialogue in this was not engaging.


I know the dialogue only works if you like the characters or actors. I found the problem to be the story.The character development didn't rely on the story.

^ That's kind of an interesting criticism, actually. I might have to think about that.

To me, the most interesting part of the flick is the Lincoln Letter subplot. It says so much about the time period of Reconstruction, and everyone's reactions to it and their reactions to finding out it was a lie are very telling.

Originally posted by queeq
ST:ID is the ultimate rip-off movie. If you think TFA is a copy of ANH, ST:IT copied just about EVERY scene from previous ST movies or television episodes.

So here's my deepest fear for the SW franchise. JJ set op ST and rebooted it with a new timeline. The future of Kirk, Bones and Spoke was completely open. And what did JJ do in the sequel: rehash all the old stuff (Khan of all people!!!) and ruined his own reboot.

ST:ID is a very entertaining movie. I give you that. But that's about it. They need a bit more imagination in Hollywood. The end was cleverly done. Spock also never confronted Khan in a hand to hand matchup. Khan at no point in the previous timeline was discovered by Marcus. The only thing that mirrored the previous film was near the end when Kirk died instead of Spock. Khan wasn't hell bent on killing Kirk either as his motivation was entirely focused on him in a very unhealthy way. It worked both as an entertaining film and as a callback to the previous timeline with the added changes the newer fans wouldn't be aware of anyways.

I loved it. Something either works or it doesn't and this movie clearly worked. I don't pay any attention to the haters on this film as this movie was simply gold.

Well, it wasn't. It was fake gold. It shimmered the same, but every element from this movie was taken from one of the ST series or movies. From the attack on the Federation meeting, to the people in the missiles... etc etc...

It was a cowardly effort, they should have gone with ST where no man has gone before. That was what the first reboot movie was all about. And then they chickened out.

Originally posted by queeq
Well, it wasn't. It was fake gold. It shimmered the same, but every element from this movie was taken from one of the ST series or movies. From the attack on the Federation meeting, to the people in the missiles... etc etc...

It was a cowardly effort, they should have gone with ST where no man has gone before. That was what the first reboot movie was all about. And then they chickened out. Iyo not mine. I know lots of people who loved it. Casual fans seemed to love it but the hardcore nerds were the ones crying the loudest about this. Let them cry, it was magic.

This film was a lot better than the Force Awakens.

I dunno... I'm just a casual ST viewer. But bringing back KAHN of all people... that is pretty LAME!

Originally posted by queeq
I dunno... I'm just a casual ST viewer. But bringing back KAHN of all people... that is pretty LAME! Why is that lame ? Khan was the biggest villain in the Star Trek universe and it's a new playground. The performance Benedict gave was awesome. He stole every scene he was in.

Because... ST1 rebooted the series with a new timeline. From this moment on the filmmakers could go anywhere they wanted with Spock and Kirk, release them from any burdens of 50 years of ST. And what did they do: they brought back the one iconic character from the series and even CONTRADICTED the original ST timeline. Because everything before ST1 is still the same. So Kahn would be somewhere sleeping on a distant spaceship.

So reusing the most iconic character AND contradicting the original ST lore while they've just opened a door to something new, they choose for old stuff. Lack of originality... the same complaint some have about TFA... but way way worse.

It would have been like bringing Vader back, or Palpy, as a reincarnated villain in TFA.

Just watched this. Thought it was really good. Felt a little like all the best parts from Django, Inglorious, Reservoir, and a hint of Pulp all rolled into one. The performances were all great. Even though I knew most of the actors from other Tarantino films it didn't distract much.

I should report queeq for derailing this thread with his Khan, Star Trek, or Wars stuff

sneer

Would be tempted to buy the Blu-ray for this, but Tarantino seems to have a thing for not putting squat worth of special features and I dig that stuff.

Watched this again and I still have the same feelings. the story is flawed and sabotaged from the start but the dialogue and acting carry the movie and kept me engaged