Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

So true.

Not really though.

Also drags on too much. And has a lame, and grammatically problematic, punchline.

You just don't have a sense of humor.

As is depicted by your sig pic.

Ok

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You just don't have a sense of humor.

As is depicted by your sig pic.

You should see what he looks like in person.

Stopped reading after four lines and skipped to the punchline. Not a very good joke. Was hoping for some actual humor.

Also, you guys really, really, really need to get over that the "black guy" won; he won twice. It's been 7ish years. LoL!

I would vote for Carson, so your joke just failed.

Pity you, dumbo.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You should see what he looks like in person.

Not until I get my obamacare and can get free meds for when I go blind..

Originally posted by Robtard
Stopped reading after four lines and skipped to the punchline. Not a very good joke. Was hoping for some actual humor.

Also, you guys really, really, really need to get over that the "black guy" won; he won twice. It's been 7ish years. LoL!

Typical Liberal. Too lazy to actually read a document.
If it isn't ENTERTAINING doesn't bother with it. then plays the Race Card.

Typical.

So jokes are supposed to not be entertaining? LoL!

But seriously, the "black guy" won and he's leaving soon. Get over it already.

Im down for Carson, but you wont vote for him cause you consider him a token candidate, that I am sure of.

Ideally, Trump/Carson would be the perfect ticket.

Originally posted by Robtard
So jokes are supposed to not be entertaining? LoL!

But seriously, the "black guy" won and he's leaving soon. Get over it already.

Entertainment is in the "eye of the beholder" You didn't WANT to be entertained and you gave up before getting all the way thru it. Hence the "Lazy Liberal" Jibe.

And with the MESS that your "BLACK GUY" will be leaving the country in. "Getting Over It" is going to take a very , VERY LONG TIME!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Entertainment is in the "eye of the beholder" You didn't WANT to be entertained and you gave up before getting all the way thru it. Hence the "Lazy Liberal" Jibe.

And with the MESS that your "BLACK GUY" will be leaving the country in. "Getting Over It" is going to take a very , VERY LONG TIME!

Don't worry, Hillary will take care of it.

When are people going to wake up that Obama is destroying Hilary?

How is this not anymore clear?

Hell even a book was written on it..
http://www.amazon.com/Blood-Feud-The-Clintons-Obamas/dp/1491542209

Originally posted by Bardock42
Don't worry, Hillary will take care of it.

Will be fun to see her run the country from a prison cell.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Will be fun to see her run the country from a prison cell.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Don't worry, Hillary will take care of it.

This was actually funnier then the op joke.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Don't worry, Hillary will take care of it. Originally posted by Flyattractor
Will be fun to see her run the country from a prison cell.

These two bits are more humorous.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You just don't have a sense of humor.



Protip: It helps if the punchline- and many of the leadups- aren't factually false


---
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters who don't pay taxes and get free stuff from taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt administration in American history?"

Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE!"
---

One, Obama's not even remotely close... corrupting is a measurable thing. The Grant administration was corrupt as heck, Harding too, James Buchanan was horrible, of course Nixon himself got impeached, and Reagan of all people has the most indictments and convictions of people in his administration. Obama's rates below GWB's, remember, Bush had Alberto Gonzales, a corrupt Attorney General for irony's sake (also more minorly but also ironically, GWB and Cheney themselves... had a scandal where they have a server they used to keep millions of e-mails, which they then destroyed. You know, a lot like Hillary's current scandal, only with destruction of evidence in the mix).

Obama's is not even the worst this century, and this century can't compete with prior centuries, GW Bush and Obama are saints compared to some of their predecessors.

Here is a list of federal political scandals, if you wish to compare. Now, some bits are subjective, who considers what worse is sometimes opinion, and it doesn't go into too much depth in the old ones, but it's not a bad place to check out.

Characterizing Obama voters as not-tax payers is lazy... and also overlooks that Obama-voting states tend to pay more into Federal taxes than they get out from Federal funding, while Red states tended to be subsidized by the same, ironically being the ones who get more free stuff.


And the above says a lot about who the real low-information voters are, if you can't even get the basics of your zinger right.

Long, witless joke with no payoff. The best kind of joke.

Originally posted by BackFire
Long, witless joke with no payoff. The best kind of joke.

Maybe it's a meta joke? The joke is the joke is on them

Originally posted by Q99
Protip: It helps if the punchline- and many of the leadups- aren't factually false


---
Bob: "No, the other one."
Jim: "I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters who don't pay taxes and get free stuff from taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt administration in American history?"

Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE!"
---

One, Obama's not even remotely close... corrupting is a measurable thing. The Grant administration was corrupt as heck, Harding too, James Buchanan was horrible, of course Nixon himself got impeached, and Reagan of all people has the most indictments and convictions of people in his administration. Obama's rates below GWB's, remember, Bush had Alberto Gonzales, a corrupt Attorney General for irony's sake (also more minorly but also ironically, GWB and Cheney themselves... had a scandal where they have a server they used to keep millions of e-mails, which they then destroyed. You know, a lot like Hillary's current scandal, only with destruction of evidence in the mix).

Obama's is not even the worst this century, and this century can't compete with prior centuries, GW Bush and Obama are saints compared to some of their predecessors.

Here is a list of federal political scandals, if you wish to compare. Now, some bits are subjective, who considers what worse is sometimes opinion, and it doesn't go into too much depth in the old ones, but it's not a bad place to check out.

Characterizing Obama voters as not-tax payers is lazy... and also overlooks that Obama-voting states tend to pay more into Federal taxes than they get out from Federal funding, while Red states tended to be subsidized by the same, ironically being the ones who get more free stuff.


And the above says a lot about who the real low-information voters are, if you can't even get the basics of your zinger right.

I could say that I took the "Liberal route" and was to lazy to read thru all that.

But I did read thru it.

It made me laugh.

Notice how his links dont even work?

All hype, no substance or source.

Oh wait I forgot Obama had military experience. And was a jr senator in office for 143 days that won by default.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh wait I forgot Obama had military experience. And was a jr senator in office for 143 days that won by default.

Governors are elected president most, followed by Senators. Since neither Trump or Carson has any public office experience whatsoever, they would have to military experience to be competitive. Had they known that before they developed presidential aspirations, then perhaps they would not have invested so much energy in draft deferments.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Governors are elected president most, followed by Senators. Since neither Trump or Carson has any public office experience whatsoever, they would have to military experience to be competitive. Had they known that before they developed presidential aspirations, then perhaps they would not have invested so much energy in draft deferments.

Back up sneaky.

You just said Trump/Carson had no military experience.

Quit lying to yourself about Obama.

He had zero experience and according to you is the best president ever lived.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Back up sneaky.

You just said Trump/Carson had no military experience.

Quit lying to yourself about Obama.

He had zero experience and according to you is the best president ever lived.

You are misinterpreting what he said. He said that candidates for the presidency to be competitive need to EITHER have gubernatorial experience, senatorial experience or military experience. Trump and Carson have neither of those. Obama was a senator.

The Hillary joke was much better than these. Pacing is everything in humor damn it, keep it short!

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Governors are elected president most, followed by Senators. Since neither Trump or Carson has any public office experience whatsoever, they would have to military experience to be competitive. Had they known that before they developed presidential aspirations, then perhaps they would not have invested so much energy in draft deferments.


I will argue that military experience is considered less important nowadays. Last race was notable in being the first that had two non-veterans running against each other.


Business experience is considered valuable, but it's usually viewed as a plus when paired with governmental experience. If Trump wins the nomination, he'll be the first to get the party nod on business experience alone.





Originally posted by Flyattractor
I could say that I took the "Liberal route" and was to lazy to read thru all that.

But I did read thru it.

It made me laugh.



Which says a lot more about you than it does the jokoid

Originally posted by Q99
Business experience is considered valuable, but it's usually viewed as a plus when paired with governmental experience. If Trump wins the nomination, he'll be the first to get the party nod on business experience alone.

It did not work for Mitt Romney, I do not see it working for Donald Trump, whose business credentials are questionable at best.

Mitt Romney was destroyed for outsourcing American jobs when he worked for Bain Capital.

The unsecured creditors, including the small businesses and contractors, who were not paid when Donald Trump defaulted on his debts four times to the tune of over $3.5 billion would call him a job killer. He got them to complete work for him and they did not get paid.

If he makes it to the general election, all the opposition has to do is trot out any of the people who lost their jobs or the businesses due to his bankruptcies in their ads, and his business credentials, the one thing he has going for him, is shot.

Nice running from you previous post Poe

Originally posted by Q99







Which says a lot more about you than it does the jokoid


I would post my full response to that comment but You will just have to wait until I implement said post so you can then find out what is in it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Nice running from you previous post Poe


Originally posted by Bardock42

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Back up sneaky.

You just said Trump/Carson had no military experience.

Quit lying to yourself about Obama.

He had zero experience and according to you is the best president ever lived.

You are misinterpreting what he said. He said that candidates for the presidency to be competitive need to EITHER have gubernatorial experience, senatorial experience or military experience. Trump and Carson have neither of those. Obama was a senator.

Nice try, indeed.

Obama had zero experience as a Senator and voted "present" his entire tenure.