Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Setting: Naboo plains

Who wins this sabers only fight?

Malgus.

Revan breaks the rules and beats Malgus down with the force.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Revan breaks the rules and beats Malgus down with the force.

Malgus

If Vitiate is overlooking the fight, Revan wins.

Malgus

Revan.

How so, Nubitch?

Malgus is noob laemo

I forgot sas joined the maul >>>> Malgus movement

I was thinking of making this thread myself but a bump will suffice.

Revan murderstomps, Malgus is Exar Kun tier at best.

I go Malgus myself, for pure sabers.

Neither is overly impressive in raw or technical skill, but Revan's command of the Force would allow him to beat Malgus in a duel

Malgus defeated the top duelists of his time and was said to have flawless skill. 45 years from his prime he beat Kao Cen Darach, the Jedi Battlemaster who showed incredible saber ability in the fight. He was one of the best fighters in the order even before the Sith revealed themselves. Malgus is clearly a very impressive duelist.

He's got more solid and superior feats of skill than Revan does.

Originally posted by MythLord
Neither is overly impressive in raw or technical skill, but Revan's command of the Force would allow him to beat Malgus in a duel

Both of them are better than Bane in skill/feats tbh

Once again, Revan's saber abilities are far too ambiguous to say with certainty that he's better than Malgus. He probably is, though.

Malgus.

Originally posted by Nephthys
I go Malgus myself, for pure sabers.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Malgus defeated the top duelists of his time and was said to have flawless skill. 45 years from his prime he beat Kao Cen Darach, the Jedi Battlemaster who showed incredible saber ability in the fight. He was one of the best fighters in the order even before the Sith revealed themselves. Malgus is clearly a very impressive duelist.

He's got more solid and superior feats of skill than Revan does.

Eh he didn't really beat Kao via way of out skilling him though, he more or less just bashed through the latter's defenses.

Though his strength along with his skill in his prime, should be enough here anyway.

Eh. Revan's more powerful in the Force and has more technical skill. Sounds like a win for him to me.

Malgus, clearly.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Malgus defeated the top duelists of his time and was said to have flawless skill. 45 years from his prime he beat Kao Cen Darach, the Jedi Battlemaster who showed incredible saber ability in the fight. He was one of the best fighters in the order even before the Sith revealed themselves. Malgus is clearly a very impressive duelist.

He's got more solid and superior feats of skill than Revan does.

> won't shut the **** up about Malgus facing a strike team
> uses quotes from a conversation where Malgus got solod

k

Originally posted by carthage
Both of them are better than Bane in skill/feats tbh http://static1.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11117/111178634/5207812-2279703178-Bane..PNG

Which means shit considering he's demonstrated nothing in the books that places him above Exar or any ancient Sith in skill/power

And Vader has never demonstrated shit to suggest he's actually worth 4/5s of RotS/RotJ Sidious, or be better than Gethzerion in power, yet he is.
What's canon is canon. Do not reach with your feats.

I don't buy he is a 4/5th of Sidious's power and either Geth/Sidious have feats that place them above him in power. Bane's force feats while unamped aren't even Dooku tier. Whose the one reaching when none of the force feats (Drain, death field, essence transfer) he's never used without a nexus amp, and when his unamped force feats consist of throwing couches/breaking tents?

Bane is trash

LOL, even his feats are better than Dooku's, tho. You're just over-blowing the nexus argument(which has been debunked how many times by now?).
And I don't care what you buy or don't buy, a third person source stating something is canon makes it canon.

Then again, you're probably not even being genuine and are just lowballing for the sake of lowballing. Debating with you is like yelling at a child that won't listen.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Once again, Revan's saber abilities are far too ambiguous to say with certainty that he's better than Malgus. He probably is, though.

I'm leaning towards this answer as well, tbh.

Originally posted by MythLord
LOL, even his feats are better than Dooku's, tho. You're just over-blowing the nexus argument(which has been debunked how many times by now?).
And I don't care what you buy or don't buy, a third person source stating something is canon makes it canon.

Then again, you're probably not even being genuine and are just lowballing for the sake of lowballing. Debating with you is like yelling at a child that won't listen.

Only his lightning is better, he's never dominated any force user more powerful than Kenobi, has poor telekinetic feats like throwing couches/breaking tents, and he's never demonstrated his "masterful force techniques" without aid of a nexus like Prakith or Lehon. I don't care if you believe an unsubstantiated accolade or not, also lmao @lowballing citing his poor feats in the book and how they don't compare to greater force users isn't lowballing.

Originally posted by MythLord
LOL, even his feats are better than Dooku's, tho. You're just over-blowing the nexus argument(which has been debunked how many times by now?)

Not even once, actually. Although, if you want to compare nexus feats, Dooku's cruiser-tossing on Korriban is still more impressive than Bane shattering some ancient stone walls and supports on Lehon.



Canon, but still subject to interpretation.

Exactly. The statement is not absolute. We're missing context, therefore it's open for interpretation and not infallible in terms of canon.

We're not missing context; we have the other pages, they're just not being posted because reasons.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
We're not missing context; we have the other pages, they're just not being posted because reasons.

But we don't know if those other pages provide context or not. Or do we? And we are missing context, considering the statement isn't as conclusive or logical as it should be.

Yeah, they describe Bane's rise to power through the Brotherhood, and note that he's surpassed the rest of the Sith.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Not even once, actually.

Pretty sure they have. Bane with just one or two Orbalisk shells attatched to him felt a lot more power than ever before. That includes his Lehon amped self

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Although, if you want to compare nexus feats, Dooku's cruiser-tossing on Korriban is still more impressive than Bane shattering some ancient stone walls and supports on Lehon.

Well the size of the cruisers is in question, plus Bane was injured and while Dooku was only 4 years from his prime, Bane was over two decades away. Plus Bane didn't just shatter stone, he completely collapsed a temple that was over 20 meters tall.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Canon, but still subject to interpretation.
Here there is no interpretation. The section which the quote appears under is Deadly Darth which makes note of Bane betraying the Brotherhood then growing vastly in knowledge from learning of older Sith like Nadd and Revan. This is obviously on a broader scope than just the Brotherhood.

As of SoR, the temple was way the **** bigger than 20 meters and it tanked turbolaser fire. Bane's feat is more impressive.

Plus more than half the temple, and it's base are located underground. And Bane crushed/collapsed this as well. It's a tremendous feat, especially when we have confirmation that he grew a lot in power since then, to the point he surpassed his nexus-amped self.