Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Obama wants more democratic voters for next year's Presidential election to help increase the chances that Hilldog (a fellow socialist of his) will get elected so he has streamlined a path to citizenship for millions of illegals:


http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/white-house-reveals-end-game-for-massive-immigration

From the article:

The fact that newly naturalized citizens routinely vote Democrat more than Republican by 3-to-1 is, no doubt, a pure coincidence and has nothing to do with the desire to "expedite" the creation on new citizens.



Looks like Obama is scared (like all other libs) of certain strong Republican candidates. Guess I don't really blame him. Democrats should be afraid with very popular Republican candidates like Trump, Carson, Rubio, and Fiorina running.

"redflagnews"

GTFO

If true just say to Obama he can do this, but their right to vote doesn't kick in until after the 2016 election.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"redflagnews"

GTFO
Would you prefer CNN or MSNBC for your LGBT news?

Originally posted by long pig
Would you prefer CNN or MSNBC for your LGBT news?




Yeah, LOL. I'm sure he would. I'm glad that libs are claiming certain sources can't be trusted because they don't like them or because it's not one of their left-wing lying sources. It sets a precedent which enables me to do exact same thing whenever they bring up CNN story or another left-wing source. If I don't like it, I"ll just do exact thing their doing and claim it's not a valid source.



Fair is fair, afterall.

Originally posted by Star428
Yeah, LOL. I'm sure he would. I'm glad that libs are claiming certain sources can't be trusted because they don't like them or because it's not one of their left-wing lying sources. It sets a precedent which enables me to do exact same thing whenever they bring up CNN story or another left-wing source. If I don't like it, I"ll just do exact thing their doing and claim it's not a valid source.



Fair is fair, afterall.
They aren't smart enough to know they're stupid.

Its sweet watching you two lick each other's wounds.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Its sweet watching you two lick each other's wounds.
Sorry we aren't into anal like yourself.

This is just ****ing sad.

Originally posted by long pig
Sorry we aren't into anal like yourself.

Originally posted by long pig
Sorry we aren't into anal like yourself.
No of course not, you prefer giving each other BJs. Much less prep work.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
No of course not, you prefer giving each other BJs. Much less prep work.
Its not gay if you don't make eye contact, bro.

Originally posted by long pig
Its not gay if you don't make eye contact, bro.



OV probably isn't in to humans at all. I bet he prefers 4 legged animals.


He probably swallows too.

Originally posted by Star428
OV probably isn't in to humans at all. I bet he prefers 4 legged animals. He probably swallows too.

You got that right! :high five:

Originally posted by long pig
Its not gay if you don't make eye contact, bro. Originally posted by Star428
OV probably isn't in to humans at all. I bet he prefers 4 legged animals.


He probably swallows too.
I like how that totally went over Star's head.

This thread just went from sad to gay... heh, get it?

http://memecrunch.com/meme/OORW/that-is-top-drawer/image.png?w=400&c=1

Originally posted by long pig
They aren't smart enough to know they're stupid.

That's why they watch the Daily Show and that other one with the fascist black guy for their information source.

Cause its info for the stupid.

Originally posted by Star428
Obama wants more democratic voters for next year's Presidential election to help increase the chances that Hilldog (a fellow socialist of his) will get elected so he has streamlined a path to citizenship for millions of illegals:

One, 'illegals' is a total misnomer. It is not a crime to cross the border undocumented- there's no trials for it, no sentence. It doesn't mean someone has the right to stay, but it's not criminal. Trying to make someone a criminal for what they are rather than what they do is known as a 'status offense,' and quite unconstitutional.


And two, "Oh no, it's so horrible that these people who've lived and work here for decades are now being acknowledged as living here," still strikes me as such a dumb view.


The idea that it can *only* be because of votes is a pretty petty attempt to discredit what honestly makes a lot of sense.


Heck, the only reason it gets disproportionate votes is because of all the anti-hispanic and anti-immigrant laws the GOP tries to pass.

Remember, back under GWB, he got over 40% of the hispanic population. Meaning if the Republicans had stuck closer to his approach.... then you'd be seeing something close to a 1:1 ratio in who they vote for.

A decade or two ago, a GOP candidate talking 'path to citizenship' and naturalizing immigrants, just this in other words, was perfectly normal.

Originally posted by Q99
One, 'illegals' is a total misnomer. It is not a crime to cross the border undocumented- there's no trials for it, no sentence. It doesn't mean someone has the right to stay, but it's not criminal. Trying to make someone a criminal for what they are rather than what they do is known as a 'status offense,' and quite unconstitutional.


And two, "Oh no, it's so horrible that these people who've lived and work here for decades are now being acknowledged as living here," still strikes me as such a dumb view.


The idea that it can *only* be because of votes is a pretty petty attempt to discredit what honestly makes a lot of sense.


Heck, the only reason it gets disproportionate votes is because of all the anti-hispanic and anti-immigrant laws the GOP tries to pass.

Remember, back under GWB, he got over 40% of the hispanic population. Meaning if the Republicans had stuck closer to his approach.... then you'd be seeing something close to a 1:1 ratio in who they vote for.

A decade or two ago, a GOP candidate talking 'path to citizenship' and naturalizing immigrants, just this in other words, was perfectly normal.
Lol the Hispanic vote doesn't matter.

Round up all the illegal aliens and force them to work for free for as long as they've been here, then deport them.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol the Hispanic vote doesn't matter.
Reality disagrees with you. But then that happens often so you've probably stopped noticing when it does.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol the Hispanic vote doesn't matter.

Round up all the illegal aliens and force them to work for free for as long as they've been here, then deport them.


Ah yes, forced labor/slavery.


Always useful for when your 'I am the bad side' sign is broken, to prevent confusion.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol the Hispanic vote doesn't matter.

Round up all the illegal aliens and force them to work for free for as long as they've been here, then deport them.




Sounds like a plan. A good one.

Originally posted by long pig
Lol the Hispanic vote doesn't matter.

lol

Originally posted by long pig


Great idea, we can streamline the "dey tuk er jerbs" process.

Here is a tool that lets you play around with demographic voting proportions and turnouts, so you can mess around and see different scenarios. Move the white vote to 64% proportion Republicans would give the Republicans a 309 - 229 landslide win... but if their share of the hispanic vote drops to 21% in the process, it goes to 270-268, a squeeker. If the hispanic turnout raises to 59% too- Still below the white and black turnouts- then the Republicans would significantly lose 241-297.

A higher Hispanic turnout would be really devastating for any Republican candidate's chances. The Democrats would be well advised to do everything they can to encourage Hispanics to get out and vote.

Like when they will legalize all the ILLEGAL CRIMINAL MIGRANTS that BROKE THE LAW by crossing the U.S Border ILLEGALLY!


Democrats. They like it when criminals vote for them.

Best said about how illegal immigrants affect our process:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/illegal-immigrants-could-elect-hillary-clinton-213216

After reading that if you think illegals are good then you are probably an idiot.

I still say if they do it then just say they can't vote in the next election.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Best said about how illegal immigrants affect our process:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/illegal-immigrants-could-elect-hillary-clinton-213216

After reading that if you think illegals are good then you are probably an idiot.




I'm sure democrats still think they're good despite all their drawbacks. Afterall, it helps them out in the election and they sure as HEll are going to need all the help they can get in next year's.

I mean if this was just about caring so much for illegals and not for some political agenda surely they'd be quite quick to embrace the "you can be legal, but can't vote in this election" stipulation. Only people who should be bothered by it are the ones trying to take advantage of a situation. After all, why would an illegal care they can't vote in the 2016 election if it means being LEGAL?

People always go on about "this country was built on immigrants" and all that. I'm sure people will still want to do the right thing even if they can't politically benefit from it, right? After all this is about people who..gosh darn just want a better life. Votes don't matter and surely nobody would use this in an attempt to drastically increase the amount of votes a certain party would get.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Best said about how illegal immigrants affect our process:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/illegal-immigrants-could-elect-hillary-clinton-213216

After reading that if you think illegals are good then you are probably an idiot.
Your facts are not welcome in this debate.

In all seriousness though if making them legal would dramatically shift the amount of votes certain parties would get then at least don't make them legal until after the next election.

Since otherwise you can't tell me it is coincidental they just happen to be wanting to do this with the election only a year away.

Originally posted by Surtur
In all seriousness though if making them legal would dramatically shift the amount of votes certain parties would get then at least don't make them legal until after the next election.

Since otherwise you can't tell me it is coincidental they just happen to be wanting to do this with the election only a year away.
Latinos don't vote anyway. Who cares.

Like I said though since this is 100% about just doing the right thing and just giving these people a chance at a better life..I don't expect any politician would take issue with saying they can't vote in the 2016 election.

I mean as of now they are illegal, not like those votes would be exactly missed anyways, right? Surely someone like Hilary could win on her own merits.