Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Sanders
O'Malley
Chafee
Webb
Hilary

I think Hilary is going to get trashed and Web/Sanders will come out on top.

I know that when Cartoon Network shows commercials for this they make it look like its the 2nd Coming.

Doubt Hillary's going to get "smashed", she'll probably do even better now than she would have since the Republicans stuck a foot in their mouth about them using the Benghazi attack and deaths of American's as a political cudgel.

Her numbers have apparently climbed a little since McCarthy's goof.

Kinda hoping Sanders can nut up and alpha male Hilary.

Originally posted by Robtard
Doubt Hillary's going to get "smashed", she'll probably do even better now than she would have since the Republicans stuck a foot in their mouth about them using the Benghazi attack and deaths of American's as a political cudgel.

Her numbers have apparently climbed a little since McCarthy's goof.

I said "trashed" not "smashed"

She's unlikely to get trashed either.

It's not like Hillary is a debate rookie, and it's not like any of these opponents are Obama. And, interestingly, due to all the negative coverage of her of late, it makes it much easier to exceed expectations. It's often ironically more difficult if one goes in with good press.

The funny thing here is that the third in the polls isn't present- since he's not in the ring! (Biden)

Originally posted by Q99
She's unlikely to get trashed either.

It's not like Hillary is a debate rookie, and it's not like any of these opponents are Obama.

The funny thing here is that the third in the polls isn't present- since he's not in the ring! (Biden)
Do you really support that woman?

Originally posted by long pig
Do you really support that woman?


Well, in that post I was talking about likelyhoods and what I think will happen, rather than my personal preferences, but in short? Yes I do.

Her policies in terms of economics are much more closer to the successful ones of Bill Clinton and Barak Obama than any of her opponent's- Bernie, while he has some good ideas, also has some bad ones in respect to the Federal Reserve (which majorly assisted the recovery, something his changes would hamstring) and the bailout (the bank bailout was vitally important to our response to the economic crash, it played a key role in making it a great recession rather than Great Depression 2.0: Electric Boogaloo). The Republican economic policies have a proven history of slowing recoveries (see: Most of Europe who did austerity) and raising debt at the same time (see: Europe again, GWB's term, etc.). Supporting health care and social security- investing in our people- is a good thing, they're proven successful policies. I'll note Trump has decided to stick with social security and medicare too, one of the areas I give him a nod of making the right call.

Socially, she's reasonably solid on civil rights. Not the quickest to get there, and her Democratic competitors are normally around even, but beats the pants out of the Republicans with 'get rid of gay marriage,' the anti-hispanic pushes (which affect both immigrants who've lived here their whole lives, *and* hispanic citizens who've been here longer stuff), and similar.

It doesn't hurt that she's experienced and knows how to navigate government well, which, yes, is a skill, and it helps to have if one wants to get things done.



Also, on the scandals that are attached to her, many are blown out of proportion and serve mainly to convince people that already don't like her to feel good, but none are actually all that big, despite the attempts to try and blow them up. The e-mail server, for example, is improper procedure but involved no security breaches. Benghazi, beforehand she followed the standard policy of multiple prior administrations of both parties, and after there was some miscommunication by people under her but not involving her directly, etc.. Trying to paint her as this horrible figure- or even a Nixonian figure- doesn't work (sidenote: I'd take Nixon over the Republican field too).

Now, would I prefer someone without scandals like that? Definitely, without a doubt, it is a minus. But at the end of the day, "Solid policy, economics that work and good on social issues," beats out "gets embroiled in a lot of mid-level scandals."

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/12/d-n-c-officer-says-she-was-disinvited-from-debate-after-calling-for-more-of-them/

She was disinvited.

Wow.

Sexism at its finest in the DNC.

Sounds a lot more like 'someone supporting smaller candidates pushes to give them a better advantage*, gets pushback.'

*Fewer debates favors the big ones, more gives the smaller ones more chance to get seen and get name recognition.

She was disinvited and she's a hufe part of the DNC.

You know Hilary did not want to have another younger better looking female up there to show her up.

Hillary hasn't had her first debate yet and you're already flustered and sweating profusely. Tell me, does Hilldawg fill your nightmares. She has a VERY good chance at being the POTUS for the next 4-8 years right now. Sure it could change, but right now she's leading in her party.

http://a4.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE4MDAzNDEwMDU4NTc3NDIy.jpghttp://a4.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE4MDAzNDEwMDU4NTc3NDIy.jpghttp://a4.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE4MDAzNDEwMDU4NTc3NDIy.jpghttp://a4.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE4MDAzNDEwMDU4NTc3NDIy.jpg

Nice of you to ditch your boy Sanders and sell out to the women who finances her campaign on Saudi donations.

And you are doing that thing were you always find Hilldog guilt free.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Nice of you to ditch your boy Sanders and sell out to the women who finances her campaign on Saudi donations.

Again, pointing out that she's currently leading in the polls with her contemporaries and that she currently has a good chance of becoming POTUS is just a fact. A fact you need to prepare yourself for, because it could happen.

Would you claim I'm now a Trumper like you because I stated that Trump's still currently ahead in the polls despite his dip in the last three weeks? No, you would not.

Stating facts does not dictate political leanings, is what I am saying.

He's at 27%, he hasn't gone much of anywhere. And he is still leading in Media coverage and gaining popularity the more he tones back his overtones.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
And you are doing that thing were you always find Hilldog guilt free.


Because there's no sign that she's actually involved in this?


Yes, I find her guilt-free of a lot of stuff she either didn't do or did not do what you say. It turns out that if you accuse someone of everything you can, you're going to be wrong 90%+ of the time. And often exaggerating much of the rest.

This time? Someone was asked to maybe not come to an event where Hillary does not have a say on who to invite or not invite.

Originally posted by Q99
Because there's no sign that she's actually involved in this?


Yes, I find her guilt-free of a lot of stuff she either didn't do or did not do what you say. It turns out that if you accuse someone of everything you can, you're going to be wrong 90%+ of the time. And often exaggerating much of the rest.

This time? Someone was asked to maybe not come to an event where Hillary does not have a say on who to invite or not invite.
You silly gooth.

Originally posted by Q99
*Fewer debates favors the big ones, more gives the smaller ones more chance to get seen and get name recognition.

Ignoring everything else shouldn't there be a middle ground then? So one side doesn't benefit more?

This debate is Bernie's big chance to move beyond white voters among the Democrats

Originally posted by Surtur
Ignoring everything else shouldn't there be a middle ground then? So one side doesn't benefit more?


Well, that's a thing, there's no natural ideal, it's more 'how much do you want each factor in the mix?'. Different underdogs benefit from debates different amounts from their debate skills- and a non underdog who's good at debates can use it to expand their lead. Each one factors in debate performance more- and also increases the impact of each, one has fewer chances to recover from a poor debate. Another factor is when you have a lot, each tends to be more specific, so that potentially allows a more well-rounded candidate to win via wider knowledge. It's kinda like a baseball season vs an NFL one, more games vs fewer. You do want enough for all the candidate's debate performance to be clear... but how much beyond that is a fairly wide open question that has a variety of opinions.

And there is a possible disadvantage to the party to do too many whoever wins- it can make the party too divided and/or voters tired of seeing the candidates so much, and makes the candidates spend more effort on each other. Note this *really* bit the Republicans last time, the long primary season (20) turned it into a slog for them. Which is why they have under half as many as last time (9 this year), if not quite as few as the democrats (6).


Unless someone becomes a major rockstar candidate, a 20 debate season is probably way too much and goes past the point of diminishing returns. But how much is a proper balance...? I'd probably go more than 6, but not a ton more. 8-10 maybe.

Hm, heck, if it didn't require so much of a judgement call I'd probably do something like 'start with 6, add 2-4 more if it looks like it'll help the party after the first few.' "Judgement call" because doing so after the fact really will be based on debate results, while setting the number beforehand at least means it's done with ignorance of who will do best.

Originally posted by Q99
Because there's no sign that she's actually involved in this?


Yes, I find her guilt-free of a lot of stuff she either didn't do or did not do what you say. It turns out that if you accuse someone of everything you can, you're going to be wrong 90%+ of the time. And often exaggerating much of the rest.

This time? Someone was asked to maybe not come to an event where Hillary does not have a say on who to invite or not invite.

Must be nice she has tricked you all into thinking she's an angel. she sure as hell dont look like one either.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Must be nice she has tricked you all into thinking she's an angel. she sure as hell dont look like one either.


Angel? Hah, Hillary Clinton? She's no angel, she's a politician! Fairly cutthroat one at that.


She is, however, only guilty of what she's actually done, not what others may want her to have done, and she does have policies with supporting in her corner, economics I'd take over any of the others and good on social issues, as positives to counterbalance negatives.



Hm, you've got a bit of a fallacy of the excluded middle going there. Either someone thinks she's horrible and believes all the accusations, or they must be deluded and think she's a flawless angel who can do no wrong.... even if their actual words are rather more in the middle.

Her trade deal flip flop, oh Im sure you will use the "she's a politician."

Funny you always have an excuse to save your people.

I love how Obama has basically done nothing for the transgender community yet you don't say shit about it.

Hide, run, deflect, change the story all you want. Wont work.

I'll be watching this, it should be a riot. Can't really play a drinking game unless it just involves "drink every time blame is shifted on the republicans". But if it's going to be remotely serious, this is the time for Sanders to take the lead.

I'm sure the Republicans will be brought up a lot, question is whether the instances where it happens are accurate or to shift blame away from themselves.

That remains to be seen, but I'm willing to bet it's the latter.

Hmm, I'm willing to bet that you'll think it's the latter...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hmm, I'm willing to bet that you'll think it's the latter...

Just like I'm willing to bet you think it's the former.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Just like I'm willing to bet you think it's the former.

Eh, I don't know, they are still politicians, and will lie to make themselves seem good.

My bet is on Blame Bush game, is set 4 times or more.

I don't know, it's been so long now that I doubt that would be an effective tactic. For Clinton, the aim will be to appear like a frontrunner and try to convince the audience that she's still the best bet of getting a democrat into the White House. For Sanders, the aim will be to fire up the left wing of the party, which might entail going after Clinton in areas where she isn't liberal/progressive enough. For the rest, the aim will be to capture attention. Chaffee, Webb, and O'Malley all want the Fiorina effect where a solid debate performance catapults a fringe candidate into the forefront. I think O'Malley might be able to use this to drum up serious attention and make himself a credible third candidate--a centrist democrat alternative to Clinton for democrats who don't like the idea of a Clinton Dynasty and who are frightened by Sanders' activism.

For those three little guys this is going to be a do-or-die night.

They are going to hammer her on her trade deal flop, especially Omalley.

I wanna see Web do something interesting.

I hope Hilary starts to cry, I don't know why.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial

I hope Hilary starts to cry, I don't know why.


Cause you are sexist.

I hope Sanders wins this, who's with me.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I hope Sanders wins this, who's with me.

I also hope that.

My heart would like Bernie to win the nomination, but my mind would prefer someone else, as ultimately (and unfortunately) I don't think he'd have a prayer in the general election.

I would rather have a less-than-ideal democrat in office than any of the Republican candidates, frankly.

When is it?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
My heart would like Bernie to win the nomination, but my mind would prefer someone else, as ultimately (and unfortunately) I don't think he'd have a prayer in the general election.

I would rather have a less-than-ideal democrat in office than any of the Republican candidates, frankly.

You need to go back and look at videos of sanders, he's no pussy foot and he will get up In people's faces.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
My heart would like Bernie to win the nomination, but my mind would prefer someone else, as ultimately (and unfortunately) I don't think he'd have a prayer in the general election.

I would rather have a less-than-ideal democrat in office than any of the Republican candidates, frankly.

Yup, his age, goofy looks and being Jewish will all factor in making him unelectable, when those factors really shouldn't. Add those on top of the "extreme socialist" label and it doesn't look good.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup, his age, goofy looks and being Jewish will all factor in making him unelectable, when those factors really shouldn't. Add those on top of the "extreme socialist" label and it doesn't look good.

How about some positivity?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How about some positivity?

I'm positive, I also live in reality.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I read the first eight words and skipped the rest. Sorry


Short version- You were caught lying again (Obama and transgender, most obviously), independent fact-checkers disagree with you on most of the things that you accuse Hillary of, 'excuses' do not work how you think they work if the accusations are false to begin with, and I view policies as the main determining factor of who I support and have clearly and repeatedly stated how I judge candidates, and trying to accuse others of 'changing their story' for not viewing things how you want them to view things rather than how they actually did to begin with, is dumb.


Even shorter version- You hold massive double standards and love to make things up about other people's stances, but the truth of what other people say doesn't match what you project.



And new addum: When someone posts facts with links and stuff, you looov to hide behind pretending you didn't read them so you can profess ignorance of what the real case is ^^

Oh yes the old "you have a difference of opinion then me, so your a liar!"

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm positive, I also live in reality.

You are what you say? It's pretty distasteful and very cowardly to not even have a shill of confidence in Sanders.

At this point I am prolly a bigger fan of his cause that mother ****er has balls.

That which you lack.

Better yet just cast your sign for Hilary and let me take over repping sanders cause you are just sad.

You lack the resolve to be a true fan.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You are what you say? It's pretty distasteful and very cowardly to not even have a shill of confidence in Sanders.

At this point I am prolly a bigger fan of his cause that mother ****er has balls.

That which you lack.

Better yet just cast your sign for Hilary and let me take over repping sanders cause you are just sad.

You lack the resolve to be a true fan.

This is where you're being weird and childish again, as if anything short of being a ranting loon means you don't support a candidate.

Wanting someone to win while having a realistic idea of their chances should go hand-in-hand. Learn it, otherwise you're probably going to implode when Trump doesn't get the nomination.

You are a fareweather supporter, and a weak one.

It's now confirmed I am a bigger sanders fan then you.

I support Sanders, but I also realize the odds don't support his election. Kinda common sense.

Love for him to win though.

Then you don't realize who Sanders is. Go back and watch his highlights. He is brawler.

The gloves will come off tonight then everyone here can join the Sanders fan club that I now am president of.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You are a fareweather supporter, and a weak one.

It's now confirmed I am a bigger sanders fan then you.

That implies that I don't support Sanders at times, when I've told you told I want him to win so far; for some time now. It's also incredibly odd because Sanders is doing better now than when we first had this discussion about who I want to win and Sanders was it.

You really need to work on your trolling skills, as the troll, you're supposed to get the other person upset, worked up, riled etc.

I'm at the gym working out. I'm pretty happy. This stuff makes me laugh and keeps me entertained.

Back on point, you don't have the resolve to support s grassroots candidate. You will just go with what the DNC tells you.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Then you don't realize who Sanders is. Go back and watch his highlights. He is brawler.

The gloves will come off tonight then everyone here can join the Sanders fan club that I now am president of.
You seem to think that "being a brawler" means someone can win on that merit alone.

Tell me, do you think an openly gay Asian woman Hindu could win the Oval Office even is she were the greatest "brawler" of her adversaries?

What's it like to live without a dream like you do?

You obviously don't know who Bernie Sanders is, now I see why you arnt a true fan. He has balls, which you apparently lack.

He can rally people, unlike Hilary who has to troll trump tower to get attention.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Then you don't realize who Sanders is. Go back and watch his highlights. He is brawler.

The gloves will come off tonight then everyone here can join the Sanders fan club that I now am president of.

I had a dream that Hillary won the Presidency and nutters like you went apeshit with crying foul and doomsday predictions; it was hilarious.

ps She takes all your guns away

Unless you want a civil war in your hands pray that never happens. I guess you are all for presidents shitting all over the constitution hence your fanboism for all things Barack.

No, no, no, in the dream I had she secured enough votes in the senate, house and states to amend the Constitution regarding gun rights. It was completely legal. Sure, many a gun-nutter cried while handing over their guns, but they all ceded in the end. There was no civil war.

ps She tried to have Obama as her VP, but the 22nd Amendment blocked that. Maybe in my next dream she'll amend the 22nd? Who knows.

Moving on, few more hours and sanders will be up. Everyone here can ride my coat tails.

Hey, if you've abandoned that clown Trump now that his numbers are slipping and are for Sanders now, then welcome aboard

What you can't understand or have selective memory about, which surprises me because you save all my quotes like a no lifer.

I said I want it to be sanders vs trump.

Good job trying to lie though.

So you're playing both sides.

Good now I that you admit you lied. Well move on to the next claim.

I think everyone even you plays both sides. Like your open supper for Hilary and Sanders.

I believe in the process so whoever wins, wins.

Every nominee has the chance to be the best president that ever lived.

I don't mind Sanders. I'd vote for him over bush. I'd vote for anyone over Hilldog.

Yea if it was sanders vs bush, if vote for sanders.

Bush is RNC joke.

I'm actually offended they even offered him a spot.

Proves they don't give a shit about change.

Just more of the same political idiots and families.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I believe in the process so whoever wins, wins.

Every nominee has the chance to be the best president that ever lived.

Remember these words if Hillary wins the Presidency

Originally posted by Robtard
Remember these words if Hillary wins the Presidency

I will never support her. Even if she's nominated. I will blame corruption and them fooling the American people into thinking they give a shit about us.

I'm pretty offended you would even support her.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I will never support her. Even if she's nominated. I will blame corruption and them fooling the American people into thinking they give a shit about us.

I'm pretty offended you would even support her.

So when you said:

"I believe in the process so whoever wins, wins. Every nominee has the chance to be the best president that ever lived."

You actually didn't mean it. Alright then.

Not when it comes to a Clinton. They are dirty and they lie, under oath.

Bet you didn't know Chelesys husband is a hedge fund manager..

Thanks Obama?

Should we go through all he Clinton scandals?

Or should we start with Bill lying under oath and then being impeached.

Yes, let us go through them all.

Bill's not running and he isn't even eligible for a VP spot. You don't need to fear the Bill any longer.

Bernie seems like a fairly cool guy (for a CIS shit-lord) but I find his disinclination to double-down on the extermination of all straight white males in America to be rather problematic.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, let us go through them all.

Bill's not running and he isn't even eligible for a VP spot. You don't need to fear the Bill any longer.

This made me laugh.

T-35 minutes

This is going to be a fun drinking game.

I hope Hilldog trips on the way to the stage, smashing her disgusting face on the floor.

While i wouldn't go that far, there will be plenty mention of republicans and trump that i could die from alcohol poisoning.

Its already been passed down from the DNC that they are not allowed to take shots at Hilary, or there will be consequences. So now its going to be on Cooper's hands to get them to attack each other, if they have not bought him off already.

Originally posted by psmith81992
While i wouldn't go that far, there will be plenty mention of republicans and trump that i could die from alcohol poisoning.
We having a drinking game???

How much you wanna bet all the liberals skip out on this debate.

Originally posted by psmith81992
This is going to be a fun drinking game. What are the stips? I'll join you.

Who takes the first jab at Hill dog?

Omalley or Sanders?

HERE WE GO!

**** HILARY!

Originally posted by Tzeentch
What are the stips? I'll join you. admittedly, much less than the republican debates. Ill take a shot everytime trump is mentioned by the candidates and everytime hilary shifts blame back on the republicans. Its not fair to include all candidates in this regard.

Blame Bush at least 4 times

Trump brought up, at least 20 times

Hilary making excuses and blaming republicans at least 10 times.

She's wearing a moo moo? Wtf?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Oh yes the old "you have a difference of opinion then me, so your a liar!"

Nope, that's what you often pull. I'm talking 'I pulled something independently fact-checked that you've been shown before.' That, and 'you say things about my stance which is not in line with what I've said, and is simply made up. '


Frankly, as long as you don't even read my big posts and explanations, you can't even know what my reasons for many of my stances are, so you making judgements on what I do believe or support is hot air- how can you judge something when you don't even know what it is?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I will never support her. Even if she's nominated. I will blame corruption and them fooling the American people into thinking they give a shit about us.

I'm pretty offended you would even support her.


People support her because she's got good policies on economics, civil rights, and similar.

Things that really help people in other words, regardless of whether or not you blame her.


Sorta like how the Republican's unceasing hate of Obama didn't stop job numbers from going up and the economy from recovering better than most countries. Whether or not you're committed to disliking someone does not stop them from achieving good performance, it seems.



Heck, I'll point to Nixon- Cleanest President? Of course not. Loved? Nope. But he *did* know how to govern and run a country.


Though like I posted before, she's actually way more honest than you give her credit for... according to independent third-party fact checkers.

Nobody is going to look beyond hilary and bernie but the minor stipulation should be just fine.

Also q99, unceasing hate? Really? I understand saying that is necessary to make your point but come on.

Hilary prolly has adult diapers on right now.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
HERE WE GO!

**** HILARY!
**** hilldog!!!!!!!!


Not literally tho!!!!!

This guy talking I would vote for him over Hilary any day of the week and I don't even know who he is.

I like Webb. Speak it baby!

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
This guy talking I would vote for him over Hilary any day of the week and I don't even know who he is.
Lol who is this fool that I'd DEFINITELY vote for over hillcunt?

I didn't know Webb was a vietnam vet and on the regan administration. Much respect to that. He sounds 100% republican.

Massage therapist?

Rub n tug??

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Blame Bush at least 4 times

Trump brought up, at least 20 times

Hilary making excuses and blaming republicans at least 10 times.




I'm not watching this because I think it's irrelevant who the democratic nominee is. Republican is going to win the election anyway but it doesn't surprise me that Hilldog would start blaming republicans for everything. I bet she hasn't said anything about Benghazi has she?

Jim Webb is killing it. He has working class kids.

Hilary's son in law is a hedge fund manager and Chelsey has some bad ass elite job cause of cronyism.

Originally posted by Star428
I'm not watching this because I think it's irrelevant who the democratic nominee is. Republican is going to win the election anyway but it doesn't surprise me that Hilldog would start blaming republicans for everything. I bet she hasn't said anything about Benghazi has she?

Just turn it on and join the fun.

Originally posted by long pig
**** hilldog!!!!!!!!


Not literally tho!!!!!




NO kidding. No one could pay me to touch that old bag.

Obama isnt a magician? He sure made his birth certificate disappear.

All the liberals bailed, they could hack the debate or the fear.

That's one jewy Jew.

GOD DAMN RIGHT SANDERS, YOU TELL US HOW ITS GONNA BE.

Hilary up next...I might have to mute it.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
GOD DAMN RIGHT SANDERS, YOU TELL US HOW ITS GONNA BE.
Jew da man!

My ears are already bleeding from her speaking.

All lies..

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Hilary up next...I might have to mute it.

Who's this ugly guy?

Here comes her southern drawl.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
My ears are already bleeding from her speaking.

All lies..

Originally posted by long pig
Who's this ugly guy?

That's not a guy..

Paid family leave?

How about no more taxes and no more giving money to planned parenthood?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
That's not a guy..
D'oh!

Debate starting now.

Go Cooper!!

Slamming Hilary out the door!!!

He called her out bad.

He keeps calling her out on the flip flops. She responds by bullshitting

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Debate starting now.

Go Cooper!!

Slamming Hilary out the door!!!

He called her out bad.
Its coopers first time pounding a woman.

She swings at republicans.

+1

Go sandman!!!!

Damn right Sanders!!

Blow that ***** out the water!

Sand-man jewing Hilldog out of the top spot!

I already forgot what she said. It was so irrelevant.

Sanders already polling in lead.

Now Hilary is going to try and make herself seem "not so capitalist" meanwhile her hedge fund manager son is raking in the dough.

Bernie lost me.

Oi vey, casino capitalist hillcunt on the attack!

**** denmark

Here comes Sanders on the attack.

Cooper the pooper snooper is on fiyah!

Chafee is abysmal.

X

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Chafee is abysmal.

X
Who? I blacked out.

Cooper is destroying these candidates, the only one who stood up to it was Sanders and O'Malley, Hilldog failed.

I'm going to fire bomb the toilet. Brb

Whites!

Sanddoller, you got an A+ in not being Hillary!

Ooh, good openings from Sanders and Clinton.

Anderson Cooper is definitely starting with hard-hitters.

I think the smaller three really need to push hard, they're in danger of being overshadowed.

Originally posted by long pig
Sanddoller, you got an A+ in not being Hillary!

I like his responses on gun control.

**** yea sanders.

He supports gun ownership and voted against he brady bill.

Originally posted by Q99
Ooh, good openings from Sanders and Clinton.

Anderson Cooper is definitely starting with hard-hitters.

I think the smaller three really need to push hard, they're in danger of being overshadowed.
Yeah, thats one fiery fairy.

Hilary and Sanders about to get into a brawl.

Donald Trump tweeting on the debate:

"If you got rid of commercials you'd have nothing worth watching."

I am liking webb here.

"Keep hands out of the hands of people who should not have guns!"

"Help the mentally ill.'

Damn right Sanders.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Nobody is going to look beyond hilary and bernie but the minor stipulation should be just fine.

They should get some awareness, but I doubt it's enough.




Um, yes? The Republican party has campaign on a no-compromise-with-Obama policy for the last 8 years. They try and paint him as not an American, and so on.

They outright said they used the debate on health care purely as an attempt to try and sink Obama, and haven't been any more interested in working with him since.

And remember how much hate Chris Christie got for hugging Obama for *helping him deal with hurricane aftermath*, and how people treat that as a giant black mark on his record.

Not everyone, but there is a very, very large chunk of your party that keeps a nice steady hatred of Obama going at all times.

I mean, some people here, obviously so.

*****, Sanders been everywhere!

Sanders just destroyed Omalley on gun control.

"When you have been in the United States Senate, come talk to me."
Sanders to Omalley

I think that the chunk isn't huge at all. Not everyone is boehner. In fact last i checked, most people aren't boehner. And again I'm liking webb.

Piss on Hillary, assert your dominance!

Web and Sanders on guns

Omalley Hilary

Originally posted by long pig
Piss on Hillary, assert your dominance!

She is center stage and they already forgot about her on guns.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Sanders just destroyed Omalley on gun control.

"When you have been in the United States Senate, come talk to me."
Sanders to Omalley
Sand-man dropping punchlines like Eminem in 8 mile!