Originally posted by Cogito
Well, the term "omniverse" wasn't used back then, so the general consensus, I believe, is that multiverse and omniverse meant the same thing.
... more or less ... bout right.
Originally posted by Cogito
That being said, the Beyonder on panel did not appear to be nearly as powerful as he was claimed to be in writing. He claimed to be millions of times more powerful than the multiverse,
but he was matched pretty much evenly with a single being within the multiverse (PR MM).

... way off.
Originally posted by Cogito
He was powerful, for sure, but all the rest was self-hyperbole.
He claimed to be omniscient but was proven to not be,
he claimed to be omnipotent but wasn't.
.. not sure if you're aware friend,
... but Beyonder de-powered himself severely near the start of the series in order to fit in. (still above all others though)
Beyonder didn't understand the concept of "desire" ... and this is because,
Beyonder was the embodied totality of the infinite beyond, he had no beginning, and always was.
ie. ... Beyonder was a supreme being! ...
... but PIS was a necessity to fill in nearly 50 issues with some kind of interesting substance involving an all powerful entity.
Originally posted by Cogito
Don't know why we're supposed to take the "millions of times more powerful" comment at face value when nothing he said deserved to be taken seriously.
But hey, what do I know. Been a long time since I've read the issues.
Indeed good friend. You need to re-visit the entire series plus the many tie-ins.