Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Sidious and Dooku come to mind, as Dooku was older then Dooku IIRC.

Was Tol Braga younger than that Dark Council ****?

Aayla and Vos?

Dooku was older then Sidious*

Palpatine and Dooku is probably the classic and main example. I can't think of many others.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Aayla and Vos? Vos found her as a child when he was already a Padawan.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Dooku was older then Dooku IIRC.

I doubt it.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
I doubt it. Hey listen buddy, we all have opinions.

Yours worse than most.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Yours worse than most.

Says the guy who is "Feats Only" and uses assumptions during debates.

"Duh, Revan only known for force power, so thats what he uses, he no beat Malak saber duel, Duh"

Nice comeback you made in that thread btw, top notch stuff there.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Hey listen buddy, we all have opinions.

Sure we do. But thinking Dooku is older than Dooku might be the most retarded opinion of all.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Sure we do. But thinking Dooku is older than Dooku might be the most retarded opinion of all. Do you frequent 4chan?

No.

Jman is filled with such rage.

Originally posted by Jmanghan
Says the guy who is "Feats Only" and uses assumptions during debates.

Literally everyone?

Given the above, I doubt you can actually read anyway, but I guess it's the thought that counts.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
Literally everyone?

Given the above, I doubt you can actually read anyway, but I guess it's the thought that counts.

By everyone, do you mean, just you?

Because you are the only one who has argued Feats-Only.

Even Tempest/Gideon said its stupid.

There's hype and feats, and to be a debater, you need to accept both, or just debate on characters who have feats.

And yes, that was me coming at you about the Ancient Sith.

You make baseless assumptions on shit that didn't happen.

Go back to the thread and counter my argument.

Oh wait, you can't, because your argument is based on some bs that never happened.

I argue feats only.

Apart from when taking a feat at face value displeases you.

I take all feats as they are.

How about that feat where Vader ragdolls Starkiller? mmm

Something that's contradicted by other sources of equal validity.

You really don't know what contradicted means, do you?

I imagine most people do including myself.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Aayla and Vos?

Vos wasn't younger than Aayla.

Thought I'd take a guess. They appeared to be around the same age.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
How about that feat where Vader ragdolls Starkiller? mmm You mean that feat where Vader throws him out a window and Starkiller lands on his feet?

Yes, it's called ragdolling.

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
Yes, it's called ragdolling. Yeah, not exactly an effective way to say that Vader's superior.

As people have been ragdolled previously by lesser combatants.

It hardly means Superiority.

Now if he was to say... PIN him against something, that'd be an actual feat.

https://giant.gfycat.com/FailingFixedBarnacle.gif

Originally posted by cs_zoltan
https://giant.gfycat.com/FailingFixedBarnacle.gif Savage ragdolled Asajj Ventress and Dooku at the same time, it hardly means superiority.

Jman. Please stop.

Originally posted by Syndicate
Jman. Please stop. No, let cz argue for himself.

I don't care about zoltan.

I care about you hurting my position.