Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

FORM I: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/i10.jpg

FORM II: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/ii10.jpg

FORM III: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/iii10.jpg

FORM IV: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/iv10.jpg

FORM V: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/v10.jpg

FORM VI: http://i35.servimg.com/u/f35/17/73/92/12/vi10.jpg

Djem So, Juyo, and Vaapad weren't listed.

Thanks

Well nice that they contradict the Jedi Path. Is it too hard to check other sources to make them consistent?

What parts contradict?

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Well nice that they contradict the Jedi Path. Is it too hard to check other sources to make them consistent?

And Jedi vs Sith. And pretty much every other source that goes into detail on the forms

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
What parts contradict?

Shii-Cho and Soresu were the biggest offenders, imo.

From what I know of Niman, it seemed on point.

At first glance it says not everyone can master Shii-Cho, yet in the Jedi Path it says every initiate must master Shii-Cho before they can even become a padawan. IIrc.

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
What parts contradict?

Well on phone so didn't really look, but they said Form 1 all can't master it. Which according to the Jedi Path younglings have to show mastery of the Form.

Well, there are different levels of mastery.

Well yeah, but it's still contradicting. Unless it's meaning to master it as a sole focus form to the Ninth degree.

Eh, pretty sure Younglings are only expected to learn Form 1, not master it.

http://puu.sh/qBtZc/d91a3e1331.jpg

mmm Fair enough. Although there is probably room for interpretation here.

It takes most Jedi at least a decade to master even the least-demanding form. (Neiman)

I'm perfectly fine with these descriptions, myself. Never seen Makashi performed with a shoto, though.

It makes sense considering Makashi is based on real-world fencing, which often employs a dagger alongside a sword.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
It takes most Jedi at least a decade to master even the least-demanding form. (Neiman)

I'm perfectly fine with these descriptions, myself. Never seen Makashi performed with a shoto, though.

Well given that Younglings are given swords as soon as they could wield them, them mastering Form 1 isn't much a stretch since by the time they are Padawans, they are already pretty much 16+ years old

Except they only spend a few years learning Shii-Cho, and 1-2 years each on the other forms.

I'm also pretty sure the cut off point for becoming a Padawan is 12-13.

I don't think so, since Ahsoka at 14 was considered young for a Padawan.

Obi-Wan was considered old for one at 13, IIRC.

https://media.giphy.com/media/XlfWbwvsqFhFS/giphy.gif

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Obi-Wan was considered old for one at 13, IIRC.

Actually the JA books note that if he didn't get a master that year he would become too old for someone to take as a padawan so Ahsoka coulda easily been in the same position given how she was dumped on Anakin.

Just my two cents

Why are people acting like that's the only inconsistency in these cancer descriptions? mmm

...wait, since when did form I specialize in saber-to-saber combat?

Since now, *****

SINCE KIT ****ING FISTO.

http://i.imgur.com/mQcRVd5h.jpg

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/5a/a9/fa/5aa9facd76d21678f2700a9c79c84f33.jpg

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Obi-Wan was considered old for one at 13, IIRC.
TCW>shit EU one offs.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
...wait, since when did form I specialize in saber-to-saber combat? I don't think that's what it means when it says melee.

It does mention that Shii-Cho doesn't consider a lightsaber's ability to deflect energy blasts, so I can't imagine it'd specialize in deflecting energy blades.

There it is.

Now for maul more lowballing.