Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

This is good for the equality of women and may end the massive rate of unemployed SJWs.

#draftmydaughter is currently top trend on twitter

Literally created from trolls on 4chan and wikileaks

this would be a bad idea because....?


also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted.

http://i63.tinypic.com/v7v2fo.jpg

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this would be a bad idea because....?


also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted.

Because "Clinton" is attached to it and he's in 4chan mode again.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this would be a bad idea because....?

Isn't this a strawman?

He never once said it was a bad idea and from his post, he literally says, "This is good for the equality of women..."

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted.

So? That's hardly an important distinction to the point, at all.


Good golly...you'll argue about anything as long as it is against a poster your have an immature feud with.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this would be a bad idea because....?


also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted. Because SJWs will be terrible in the war against Russia under Emailary.

Originally posted by Its2016
Because SJWs will be terrible in the war against Russia under Emailary.

ah so robtard was correct. 4chan in da hiz-ouse

Originally posted by Its2016
Because SJWs will be terrible in the war against Russia under Emailary.

From my experience, SJWs are the most violent, emotionally unstable people around. They are not suited for combat scenarios.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Isn't this a strawman?

He never once said it was a bad idea and from his post, he literally says, "This is good for the equality of women..."



So? That's hardly an important distinction to the point, at all.


Good golly...you'll argue about anything as long as it is against a poster your have an immature feud with.

https://mobile.twitter.com/alishabae69/status/791989652706107396

Feminists are against this.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
ah so robtard was correct. 4chan in da hiz-ouse its literally in the OP.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this would be a bad idea because....?


also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted.

Why are you so dumb?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are you so dumb?

awww is baby butthurt? i'm sowwy.

Im not actually. How does me asking you that equal butthurt?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Why are you so dumb?


Because, unlike you, he has no actual military combat experience so posting about these topics from the safety of his apartment is far more comfortable and fun for him than to have actually served the country.

http://i.imgur.com/4n00uz9.gif

Originally posted by dadudemon
Because, unlike you, he has no actual military combat experience so posting about these topics from the safety of his apartment is far more comfortable and fun for him than to have actually served the country.

Makes sense, which is why he voted for Hillary, cause he thinks war is what he sees in movies. People dont really die.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
ah so robtard was correct. 4chan in da hiz-ouse

*gloats like Trump*

Funny thing is Clinton will draft women and send them to war, but still pay them less then the Men.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
http://i.imgur.com/4n00uz9.gif


I found a gif of you:
http://i.imgur.com/gCc9dZc.gif

Originally posted by Its2016
https://mobile.twitter.com/alishabae69/status/791989652706107396

Feminists are against this.

Well damn, hell froze over because I agree with them for once.

Here is the thing: men and women aren't equal lol. Intellectually perhaps, but otherwise no. If we're going to fight a war I want to win.

We are not playing little league where everyone makes the team and there are no winners and losers.

Correct, Rhonda Rousey would kick your ass

This reminds me of the first time the Clintons brought up letting Women fight in the military and Rush Limbaugh made the suggestion of drafting Lorena Bobbitt and making her a commando armed with scissors and sending her out ahead of the troops....

Originally posted by Surtur
Well damn, hell froze over because I agree with them for once.

Here is the thing: men and women aren't equal lol. Intellectually perhaps, but otherwise no. If we're going to fight a war I want to win.

We are not playing little league where everyone makes the team and there are no winners and losers.

Lol this is wrong

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this would be a bad idea because....?


also there's a difference between registering for the draft and actually being drafted.
Plus, female Soldiers are already knee deep in shit and in harm's way on war zone deployments. As much as men? Maybe not, but some male Soldiers are safer than others, too, depending on their jobs.
Everyone contributes.

Originally posted by riv6672
Plus, female Soldiers are already knee deep in shit and in harm's way on war zone deployments. As much as men? Maybe not, but some male Soldiers are safer than others, too, depending on their jobs.
Everyone contributes.

☝

Originally posted by Surtur
Well damn, hell froze over because I agree with them for once.

Here is the thing: men and women aren't equal lol. Intellectually perhaps, but otherwise no. If we're going to fight a war I want to win.

We are not playing little league where everyone makes the team and there are no winners and losers. if youve ever had a conversation with your average woman, you know we are not intellectually equal. Women have a genetic disadvantage when it comes to logical thinking. I imagine some men on KMC might be their equal, however.

Originally posted by Its2016
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

This is good for the equality of women and may end the massive rate of unemployed SJWs.

#draftmydaughter is currently top trend on twitter

Literally created from trolls on 4chan and wikileaks

How dumb people must feel voting for this *******. She literally wants to send women off to war in the draft??

LET ME GUESS THIS IS ANOTHER TIME PEOPLE WILL IGNORE HER WAR MONGERING.

How's it feel bash to know you willfully have endorsed this complete lunatic??

WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH THIS WOMAN!? ALL SHE CAN TALK ABOUT IS ****ING WAR!!

The Hilldawg is just doing this so she can draft all the women that Bill molested so they can't cause any more probs.


Its what a Hilldawg does.

Chill.

This is a fake ad made by some tricksters at 4chan.

Buzzfeed gobbled it up almost instantly.

No its not made up..please wake the hell up and smell the napalm she wants to unleash on the world.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

CJahLkbc8YI

Totally fake ad.

Wake the hell up people. Wake the hell up.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/magazine/how-hillary-clinton-became-a-hawk.html

http://www.salon.com/2016/04/27/ democrats_this_is_why_you_need_to_fear_hillary_cli
nton_the_ny_times_is_absolutely_right_shes_a_bigge
r_hawk_than_the_republicanse/

Originally posted by krisblaze
Chill.

This is a fake ad made by some tricksters at 4chan.

Buzzfeed gobbled it up almost instantly.

Can you prove how its a fake story? Or is this one of those times you got caught lying again?

Originally posted by Its2016
CJahLkbc8YI

Totally fake ad.

Totally fake, thats not her, or her voice, its all made up.

Especially the part where she says "I am Hillary Clinton and I approve this message"

So fake

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Can you prove how its a fake story? Or is this one of those times you got caught lying again?

When did I get caught lying?

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-and-draftourdaughters/

Originally posted by Robtard
Because "Clinton" is attached to it and he's in 4chan mode again.

Politico is 4chan now, when did the buy out take place, I really was not aware..Like wouldn't it be breaking news or something?

Originally posted by krisblaze
When did I get caught lying?

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-and-draftourdaughters/

That tweet was never posted here, so you got caught lying, now twice. How about you read the OP before you look more embarrassing?

Here let me help, since you have a problem with reading and lying.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
That tweet was never posted here, so you got caught lying.

What are you talking about?

Originally posted by Its2016
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

This is good for the equality of women and may end the massive rate of unemployed SJWs.

#draftmydaughter is currently top trend on twitter

Literally created from trolls on 4chan and wikileaks

Like Dolos said, the #draftourdaughters ads were created by 4ch.

Originally posted by krisblaze
When did I get caught lying?

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-and-draftourdaughters/ Before you gullibly go to Snopes again, read this: Originally posted by Surtur
It can't be real, is what I immediately thought. I looked in the comments section of youtube and saw someone posting a link from Snopes showing it wasn't true, and I was like "yeah, ha, thought so".

Then I had a sort of revelation..Snopes has been used a lot to debunk things(especially lately with politics) so, I wonder how credible they are? Did some searching, and found stuff like this:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/

and this:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/07/31/bye-bye-snopes-youre-dead-to-me-now/

As a few of many articles about the site. So..yeah, I have learned that when it comes to non-political things I will trust them ,otherwise? Not so much.

Originally posted by krisblaze
What are you talking about?



Like Dolos said, the #draftourdaughters ads were created by 4ch. Im not Dolos. Dont insult my intelligence.

You are clearly Dolos.

At any rate the #draftourdaughters thing is made by 4chan.

I don't know why Time is buying it.

So I am not reading this right?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-draft_us_57617765e4b09c926cfdc0a8?28wpm8zdmahh0k9=

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

Yes, you are.

I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary wants women in the war.

I'm saying that the ads with #draftourdaughters was made by 4chan.

Originally posted by krisblaze
You are clearly Dolos.

At any rate the #draftourdaughters thing is made by 4chan.

I don't know why Time is buying it. Im not Dolos.

Snopes has no political credibility and is Clinton biased, I provided links for that.
I also provided a Hillary video you have failed to address.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So I am not reading this right?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-draft_us_57617765e4b09c926cfdc0a8?28wpm8zdmahh0k9=

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hillary-clinton-women-draft-register-224390

So I am not reading this right?

Originally posted by krisblaze
Yes, you are.

I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary wants women in the war.

I'm saying that the ads with #draftourdaughters was made by 4chan. Do you have a problem with drafting women for war?

Originally posted by krisblaze
Yes, you are.

I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary wants women in the war.

I'm saying that the ads with #draftourdaughters was made by 4chan.

Point to where I said anything about 4chan or any other side track bullshit. She clearly says she wants women in the draft cause she's a war mongering *****. And none of you effing people can figure that the fck out, cause none of you care, you dont know what war is, the only thing you know about war is you see it on the same screen you see war movies on. Thats all you know

http://static2.politico.com/dims4/default/2117d71/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2Fae%2Fe7%2Fd1132daa402fb8f140300a9ae5ff%2F1-nate-beeler-columbus-dispatch.jpg

1. Hillary Clinton has done deals with Arabian governments closely linked to terrorism
2. As secretary of State, Clinton directly caused Arab uprising and made nuclear deals with Iran (this is Oli North type treason)
3. Russia has been trying to stop this with Assad
4. FBI found reason to investigate Hillarys private email server
5. Hillary bleached her server
6. Hillary is running for president
7. Donald Trump also announces he will run and tweets this: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/628231488794923008
8. Donald Trump says we need to cut off ties with the middle east until congress can figure out whats going on.
9. He asks about Clintons emails and calls her crooked.
10. Media finds any story they can to post a narrative of Trump hating women and being a warmonger with ties to Russia
11. Wikileaks systematically leak more and more emails showing how horrible Hillarys campaign is.
12. FBI has reopened the case
13. Were almost full circle. The story Trump mentioned is out in he open.
14. Hillary claims how bad Russia is because of the wikileaks which are fake anyway.
15. Hillary wants to send Men and women to war.

Liberal logic: Trump is a warmonger who hates Hillary and has ties with Russia. Vote for Hillary Clinton!

I made an assumption off of Dolos' topic and your subsequent response.

For someone who's against war I've seen you do nothing but glorify it and advocate american ingress into other countries.

Originally posted by krisblaze
I made an assumption off of Dolos' topic and your subsequent response.

For someone who's against war I've seen you do nothing but glorify it and advocate american ingress into other countries. I dont advocate war, im not Dolos.

Calling me Dolos is not an argument.

Originally posted by Its2016
I dont advocate war, im not Dolos.

Calling me Dolos is not an argument.

My post was actually directed at Time.

I'm not arguing against either you or Time. I simply pointed out that the ads were made by 4ch, and then suffered some absurd accusations from you and Time.

You are also clearly Dolos.

Originally posted by krisblaze
I made an assumption off of Dolos' topic and your subsequent response.

For someone who's against war I've seen you do nothing but glorify it and advocate american ingress into other countries.

Bullshit, quote me.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Bullshit, quote me.

No.

If you're against war then we're on the same side

Thats all I have been posting about, every single day, I post about how she is leading us into a world war, no one fcking believes me..everyone just says the same old dismissive act "its all talk cause there is no money in it"

Then I'm with you.

I'd be surprised if hillary doesn't start talking about taking down another supposed dictator 3 months after her inauguration.

Strongly agree

What's worse is when she does, it won't be her fault, just like Libya is Trumps fault according to the left now.

We got a guy here named Adam Poe who literally blames "the republicans" for Benghazi...

Originally posted by krisblaze
My post was actually directed at Time.

I'm not arguing against either you or Time. I simply pointed out that the ads were made by 4ch, and then suffered some absurd accusations from you and Time.

You are also clearly Dolos. Im xyz. Literally every member here knows that.

Prove it, dolos.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Strongly agree

What's worse is when she does, it won't be her fault, just like Libya is Trumps fault according to the left now.

Do you think it's bad to draft women though? the ones that fit the bill and match the requirements.

The friends I have who have been drafted are generally against it, but it's always from a physical/mental point of view.

Originally posted by krisblaze
Prove it, dolos.



Do you think it's bad to draft women though? the ones that fit the bill and match the requirements.

The friends I have who have been drafted are generally against it, but it's always from a physical/mental point of view.


He really is xyz man..I don't think we should have the draft period. We need to end the god damn wars all together. It's ruined countless lives.

We shouldnt have the draft. The point is stronk feminists would probably reconsider equality if they were being drafted into the military, fight in the middle east and possibly fight Russia in a cold war type scenario or directly.

Maybe Im wrong. Maybe there are women all over America who want to be generals in the FSA. Im saying this is what youre going to get with Hillary. More military, and an army of men and women. Maybe they would be able to take down ISIS. Who knows?

Originally posted by riv6672
Plus, female Soldiers are already knee deep in shit and in harm's way on war zone deployments. As much as men? Maybe not, but some male Soldiers are safer than others, too, depending on their jobs.
Everyone contributes.
Originally posted by Sin I AM
☝

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Lol this is wrong

So wait, women aren't even intellectually equal to men? Damn.

Originally posted by Surtur
So wait, women aren't even intellectually equal to men? Damn.

If academic results are any indicator women are a ****ton smarter than men.

I don't buy that propaganda though

Originally posted by Surtur
So wait, women aren't even intellectually equal to men? Damn.

Trolling should be beneath you surtur. Im not one for being baited. Carry on

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Trolling should be beneath you surtur. Im not one for being baited. Carry on

I was just making a joke, but I don't know how you can say what I said was wrong. I implied that men and women are not physically equal, which they aren't.

That doesn't mean there aren't any women out there who are stronger than men, but on average we just aren't equal physically.

^^^Spoken like a man who's gotten his ass kicked by many women.

And, to whatever your reply is, may i just say...
Originally posted by Surtur
I was just making a joke

I want one to try, I believe in equal rights. And equal lefts, uppercuts, etc.

No I'm just kidding, I'd probably be thrown in jail because equality.

After you got out of the hospital from the woman kicking your ass, yeah.

Originally posted by Surtur
I was just making a joke

I made the mistake of grabbing her by the pussy. She later commented that if I was wealthy it would have been okay. I was shocked to find out a woman would put up with so much just to date a man with money.

Here is what I just don't understand..how can we ever have equality between the sexes if basically we have different sets of rules for different people based on gender?

Just reading a story: a 20 yr. old man has been charged with attempted murder because he tried to secretly get his pregnant GF to drink some bleach to abort the baby. The girl was 2 months pregnant or less. He was charged with attempted murder of the fetus. Would she have been charged with murder if she had gone to a planned parenthood clinic to get rid of it? Nope.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Because, unlike you, he has no actual military combat experience so posting about these topics from the safety of his apartment is far more comfortable and fun for him than to have actually served the country.

Appeals to personal authority are especially silly when the "authority" is TI.

Here is an idea: each country on the planet chooses one female to rep them.

Whenever issues arise, we have a mud wrestling match. That could be the future of war!!!!

No fat chicks though.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Appeals to personal authority are especially silly when the "authority" is TI.

Shit up you idiot

Originally posted by Surtur
...a woman would put up with so much just to date a man with money.
Goes hand in hand with men being willing to do anything to get laid.

Originally posted by Surtur
I was just making a joke, but I don't know how you can say what I said was wrong. I implied that men and women are not physically equal, which they aren't.

That doesn't mean there aren't any women out there who are stronger than men, but on average we just aren't equal physically.

I honestly think it varies. Training, strength, endurance...i dont think u can make a blanket statement and say men are stronger.

Originally posted by riv6672
Goes hand in hand with men being willing to do anything to get laid.

Bill Burr

Originally posted by Sin I AM
I honestly think it varies. Training, strength, endurance...i dont think u can make a blanket statement and say men are stronger.
Certainly not HIM!

Originally posted by Sin I AM
I honestly think it varies. Training, strength, endurance...i dont think u can make a blanket statement and say men are stronger.

The average man is stronger than the average women though. So when it comes down to training, most women won't cut it.

Sexist! If Sin I Am wants to fight in a war, she should, goddamnit! Originally posted by SquallX
The average man is stronger than the average women though. So when it comes down to training, most women won't cut it.

Another problem i have with this, is we know for a fact that out of the 100% of Women in the Military, less than 1% can pass the male standard PFT. Yet were allowing these women in combat arms?

Here's an example, we just got back from NTC, and we found out we had a PT test 3 days later. I max my PU and Sit up, and i got a 1545 on my run. That's after a month of not working out. Where as the Ladies in the S shops could barely do 45 PU and SU, and there run were in the 17's.

Am not saying PT is all you need to survive Overseas, but when shit hit the fan, you need to be able to carry you're own weight, and you might need to carry you're battle buddy. I weight 200, 250 and up with full battle rattle on. Do anyone actually believe that a woman that can barely do 45 push up can drag me from the battle field?

There may be a very small percentage of women who will be able to pass, but that's small. I honestly don't see women going FMJ style training and passing with ease, especially in a draft situation. There will be a lot of crying. Shit, girls cry when they see slugs or spiders ffs. It's a horrible idea. It's not true, but I'm glad some people would be happy with such an idea.

Originally posted by SquallX
Another problem i have with this, is we know for a fact that out of the 100% of Women in the Military, less than 1% can pass the male standard PFT. Yet were allowing these women in combat arms?

Here's an example, we just got back from NTC, and we found out we had a PT test 3 days later. I max my PU and Sit up, and i got a 1545 on my run. That's after a month of not working out. Where as the Ladies in the S shops could barely do 45 PU and SU, and there run were in the 17's.

Am not saying PT is all you need to survive Overseas, but when shit hit the fan, you need to be able to carry you're own weight, and you might need to carry you're battle buddy. I weight 200, 250 and up with full battle rattle on. Do anyone actually believe that a woman that can barely do 45 push up can drag me from the battle field?

Ntc so you're in the Army? I didnt known that. Hooah high speed. Thx for your service. Imo the apft is not a good gauge of physical fitness. Especially combat pt. It takes alot more endurance than running on the hardball with shorts and sneakers to gear someone up for war.

Also The key word u use is s shops. Those arent "combat" mos's. So they arent expected to train nearly as hard as a grunt or cannon cocker. In my experience the best prep for war is actual prep for war. Boots and utes runs..field training, ruck marches etc. As far as pulling a fat ass out of the fire when bullets fly down range youd be surprised how much strength u get during and adrenaline rush.

Originally posted by Andytalks
There may be a very small percentage of women who will be able to pass, but that's small. I honestly don't see women going FMJ style training and passing with ease, especially in a draft situation. There will be a lot of crying. Shit, girls cry when they see slugs or spiders ffs. It's a horrible idea. It's not true, but I'm glad some people would be happy with such an idea.

That's a common misconception. Unless you're ib a sf unit, combat arms or a marine. There is very little to no "FULL METAL JACKET" type training. It's non existent. The larger forces arent built like that. Thats wht they have specialized jobs. That way a soldier, sailor, airman or Marine can focus on the job at hand. It gives the theatre command more leg room and ability to support a large scale long term engagement. The average joe aint doing a hundred pushups in 2 minutes.

But there are marines, right? To ambush, right? Originally posted by Sin I AM
That's a common misconception. Unless you're ib a sf unit, combat arms or a marine. There is very little to no "FULL METAL JACKET" type training. It's non existent. The larger forces arent built like that. Thats wht they have specialized jobs. That way a soldier, sailor, airman or Marine can focus on the job at hand. It gives the theatre command more leg room and ability to support a large scale long term engagement. The average joe aint doing a hundred pushups in 2 minutes.

Originally posted by Andytalks
But there are marines, right? To ambush, right?

Im not understanding your question

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Ntc so you're in the Army? I didnt known that. Hooah high speed. Thx for your service. Imo the apft is not a good gauge of physical fitness. Especially combat pt. It takes alot more endurance than running on the hardball with shorts and sneakers to gear someone up for war.

Also The key word u use is s shops. Those arent "combat" mos's. So they arent expected to train nearly as hard as a grunt or cannon cocker. In my experience the best prep for war is actual prep for war. Boots and utes runs..field training, ruck marches etc. As far as pulling a fat ass out of the fire when bullets fly down range youd be surprised how much strength u get during and adrenaline rush.

I understand that, i was just giving a general example. Don't get me wrong, i don't care if a women wants too be in a combat MOS. What i do care about is me and my fellow brothers being force to bend over backwards to accommodate there needs.

Another example, i was trying out for the Sniper section in my unit. Since it was opened for anyone to tryout , this E5 sergeant who happens to be female was automatically given a spot even after she fail to report to the 12 Miles Ruck March. Her excuse was she had her period.

After the 12 miles, the next day we got smoked some more for a slot, she still didn't show up, and she had the nerve to still ask for a spot.

In the end, i see female being in combat arms more as a liability. For instance, in NTC, we spend 2 wks without shower, just baby wipes and deodorant. Yet the females had portable showers to use. That is not fair, and that falls under special favors. If it was the other way around, people would be crying foul left and right.

I really doubt women will be able to handle marine type combat. I seriously doubt drafting women for the marines is a good idea. Your point of different sections is valid, but it kind of destroys the equality argument if women in the most dangerous masculine field is so alien to us Originally posted by Sin I AM
Im not understanding your question

Originally posted by SquallX
I understand that, i was just giving a general example. Don't get me wrong, i don't care if a women wants too be in a combat MOS. What i do care about is me and my fellow brothers being force to bend over backwards to accommodate there needs.

Another example, i was trying out for the Sniper section in my unit. Since it was opened for anyone to tryout , this E5 sergeant who happens to be female was automatically given a spot even after she fail to report to the 12 Miles Ruck March. Her excuse was she had her period.

After the 12 miles, the next day we got smoked some more for a slot, she still didn't show up, and she had the nerve to still ask for a spot.

In the end, i see female being in combat arms more as a liability. For instance, in NTC, we spend 2 wks without shower, just baby wipes and deodorant. Yet the females had portable showers to use. That is not fair, and that falls under special favors. If it was the other way around, people would be crying foul left and right.

You didnt say shit? I chock that up to shitty leadership. Whoever your platoon sgt was for selection must suck ass or know her personally. Even if weak nco courses like wlc if you're late you're out. Dropped the first day and sent back to your unit.

A ruck march isnt physical. It's mental. It's seeing that hummvee rolling behind you and knowing you could get in and chill if u quit. Ive seem males and females fail and suceed at it despite size, weight. A fat kid who barely makes tape could out ruck a fit 13 minute apfter as long as he put his head down and kept moving.

I spent a month without showering in oif 1. So it can be done. The army just has lax, weak ass standards.

Originally posted by Andytalks
I really doubt women will be able to handle marine type combat. I seriously doubt drafting women for the marines is a good idea. Your point of different sections is valid, but it kind of destroys the equality argument if women in the most dangerous masculine field is so alien to us

Describe "marine" tyoe combat?

Any draft is a shit idea. Male or female.

Ambush.Originally posted by Sin I AM
Describe "marine" tyoe combat?

Any draft is a shit idea. Male or female.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
I honestly think it varies. Training, strength, endurance...i dont think u can make a blanket statement and say men are stronger.

Wait what? Yes, yes you can make the blanket statement men are generally stronger. Especially untrained men vs untrained women. Yeah, there's a physical superiority there.

Originally posted by Andytalks
Ambush.

This doesn't make any sense. I dont believe you know what youre talking about.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambush

Will women be able to fare well in using this or defending against this? I'd imagine not. And I'd also imagine if campers were sexing then their guards would be down.