Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv4wr2pVUAILBd6.jpg

Trump was right

About?

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=622324&pagenumber=24#post15987195

About Anthony Weiner having access to classified info from Huma, I guess that makes him a buffoon?

And how do you suppose Trump knew of this? Seems like weird info for someone like Trump to have, wouldn't you agree?

Nice flip. Instead of giving him props for calling it, you flip it on him?

I guess we are done for the day.

Not a flip, it's a serious "wtf" that should alarm everyone, especially Trump supporters. Like how in the world did Trump know this before say the FBI.

So its un reasonable that Huma had access to this info and she was married to a perv who was in close proximity to have access?

Huma was married to a disgusting sexual predator, that's not in question. Huma being in contact with the Hillary info is also not in question.

I'm asking how Trump knew about this before the FBI and how that isn't sounding off alarms to you.

Smh Rob. Now you believe in conspiracies? How nice.

Can I ask you why it makes you so mad when Trump calls things and gets it right? Like this, the whole investigation, the voter fraud.

Why is he a baffoon for getting things right, and now why are you suggesting its a conspiracy which it really seems like you are hinting at.

It's not a conspriracy, either Trump just happened to guess correctly, or he somehow gained inside information that potentially deals with State Secrets before the FBI.

Its not a far stretch to think that someone that should not be anywhere near classified info was married to a person who was forgetting her unsecured laptops in their cars, smashing blackberries, and being Hillarys girlfriend.

Its pretty unfair to suggest what you are saying though Rob.

Once again, I'm not questioning what's on the supposed emails, we haven't heard yet, so I have no comment.

I'm asking how Trump knew of this before the FBI, as I don't believe Trump just made a crazy guess or is actually clairvoyant. I don't think you do either, so how?

Maybe he has a time machine?

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/4yv5xl/donald_trump_might_possibly_have_a_time_machine/

So no honest response. Okay.

How would I know, did you even read it? How am I supposed to answer that question??

Originally posted by Robtard
And how do you suppose Trump knew of this? Seems like weird info for someone like Trump to have, wouldn't you agree? He knew in Aug 2015.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/628231488794923008

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv5_eApWAAA1iXy.jpg:large
Today after the news broke...just look at this, it looks horrific..

https://twitter.com/ObamaMalik/status/792152971832233985

What did he mean by this?

I feel bad for huma after seeing that pic

Lol. Democrats riggin the election. Why am I not surprised?

HAHAHAHAH

FBI HAS 650,000 Emails to sort through on her shared computer with the pedo

http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
Lol. Democrats riggin the election. Why am I not surprised?

God damn Democrats, trying to steal the election again like they did in 2000.

Let's sit back and enjoy Trey Gowdy's take on these 600,000+ emails.

NVICU6bdVaA

Holy shit watch that video lol. "I did not know Mormons used drugs". This man needs to be president.

The ownage starts to happen at about 4:10 into that video.

Even better is that FOX news then puts the quote on the bottom of the screen, lmao.

This is just priceless though, I haven't even finished the video, I've got like 5 minutes left and they still have "DID NOT KNOW MORMONS USED DRUGS" in big letters at the bottom of the screen.

I just want to thank Hilary Clinton and her campaign for making this possible.

The idea that this is a hit-piece to hurt Clinton right before the election isn't far fetched. The FBI knew about Weiner's email for weeks now, but release it now; coupled with a somewhat vague harming statement. Then we have Donald someone guessing this back in August of last year.

It's a hit-piece, imo. Clinton win or lose, in a few weeks to months she'll be cleared again. But the damage is already done.

If it's a hit piece, she brought it on herself.

But still holy shit "did not know mormons used drugs" lol.

Clinton knew about his pedofilia since at least 2011. And she is the one that introduced Weiner to Huma.

The fault is shoulders on her shoulders only.

https://twitter.com/charliespiering/status/793091429564309505/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Shes a pos.

What would happen if Obama pardons her as last act of president?

So why hasn't Hilary just told Huma to just put out all these emails? It's no biggie, just do it.

Originally posted by Surtur
If it's a hit piece, she brought it on herself.

But still holy shit "did not know mormons used drugs" lol.

Notice how Rob is trying to deflect the blame?

Originally posted by Andytalks
What would happen if Obama pardons her as last act of president?

Well shit, probably the same thing that happened when Ford pardoned Nixon: a lot of people would be extremely pissed.

Originally posted by Andytalks
What would happen if Obama pardons her as last act of president?

You cannot pardon until after someone is convicted.

I just want that on a t-shirt. "Did not know Mormons did drugs".

Originally posted by Surtur
If it's a hit piece, she brought it on herself.

But still holy shit "did not know mormons used drugs" lol.

So the truth be damned, as long as it hurts Clinton. Fair enough.

Which FBI investigation is Trump under?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Notice how Rob is trying to deflect the blame?

I notice how you don't care about the truth as long as it hurts Clinton.

Originally posted by Robtard

It's a hit-piece, imo. Clinton win or lose, in a few weeks to months she'll be cleared again. But the damage is already done.

Interesting opinion, like all the hit pieces on Trump that wre proven false and never retracted.

This is by the Actual FBI.

It isn't a hit piece, you really need to get off this "one sided bias."

Be happy he cleared her the first time

Originally posted by Robtard
I notice how you don't care about the truth as long as it hurts Clinton.

What truth are you talking about, and what did I lie about?

Also I am not the FBI

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Interesting opinion, like all the hit pieces on Trump that wre proven false and never retracted.

This is by the Actual FBI.

It isn't a hit piece, you really need to get off this "one sided bias."

Be happy he cleared her the first time

Such as?

Yes, the FBI that you condemn as Democrat stooges or approve of the next day.

Oh no, it's a hit-piece.

She'll he cleared again after the election, but alas, that's not the point. Damage is already done

Originally posted by Robtard
So the truth be damned, as long as it hurts Clinton. Fair enough.

I never said truth be damned, I said if it's a hit piece she brought it on herself.

That doesn't actually say anything about truth, nor does it even say if hit pieces are right or wrong. It merely addresses the reality of the situation.

Originally posted by Robtard
Such as?

Yes, the FBI that you condemn as Democrat stooges or approve of the next day.

Oh no, it's a hit-piece.

She'll he cleared again after the election, but alas, that's not the point. Damage is already done

Like the FBI that was praised by the democrats for being beyond reproach by Cumming, Hillary, Harry Reid, and every other democrat.

So what changed.

If he is above repoach, why are you crying?

I still think he is corrupt, and my opinion has not changed, so stfu with your lies of me approving of anything

I am glad he did this cause its going to screw both of them.

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said truth be damned, I said if it's a hit piece she brought it on herself.

That doesn't actually say anything about truth, nor does it even say if hit pieces are right or wrong. It merely addresses the reality of the situation.

Dude, it's obvious you don't care as long as it hurts Clinton.

Originally posted by Robtard
but alas, that's not the point. Damage is already done

That's a reason for a thumbs up, not a thumbs down.

4jH_DBR4pSI

WATCH THIS, HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA



Corrupt Comey ftw

Originally posted by Robtard
Dude, it's obvious you don't care as long as it hurts Clinton.

Its obvious you dont care as long as things hurt Trump

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Like the FBI that was praised by the democrats for being beyond reproach by Cumming, Hillary, Harry Reid, and every other democrat.

So what changed.

If he is above repoach, why are you crying?

I still think he is corrupt, and my opinion has not changed, so stfu with your lies of me approving of anything

I am glad he did this cause its going to screw both of them.

Trump's reach is impressive and just like Surter, you don't care as long as it hurts Clinton.

Look how mad you are

I know you voted for her, pathetic

Originally posted by Robtard
Dude, it's obvious you don't care as long as it hurts Clinton.

On the contrary, I'd prefer Clinton be damaged by things that are true.

allowing the FBI to influence elections hurts more than just clinton. also, it's against the law. ironic.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
4jH_DBR4pSI

WATCH THIS, HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA



Corrupt Comey ftw


DAMN WHAT HAPPENED!!! THEY LOVE CORRUPT COMEY

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
allowing the FBI to influence elections hurts more than just clinton. also, it's against the law. ironic.

Cry me a river

THE BUTTHURT IS EPIC!!

oh snap!

4jH_DBR4pSI

another intelligent retort.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Its obvious you dont care as long as things hurt Trump

If you're going to do a "no you!" you could at least give an example of when I did that? I don't hide that I dislike Trump and believe he'd be a dangerous orangutan to have as POTUS, but when have I condemned him for something not true?

Every single time something has come out about Trump that was straight up bullshit

oh snap!

4jH_DBR4pSI
^you included.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're going to do a "no you!" you could at least give an example of when I did that? I don't hide that I dislike Trump and believe he'd be a dangerous orangutan to have as POTUS, but when have I condemned him for something not true?

How many wars has he gotten us into? Name them.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Look how mad you are

I know you voted for her, pathetic

Yes, yes, "you mad". I'm disgusted by our corrupt system, actually.

Haven't voted yet, mailing it out tomorrow. Might just vote Clinton now instead of 3rd party due to this treachery.

Where were you on this one Rob?

http://www.mediaite.com/online/cnn-screws-up-says-trump-encourages-voters-to-vote-multiple-times-except-he-didnt/

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, yes, "you mad". I'm disgusted by our corrupt system, actually.

Haven't voted yet, mailing it out tomorrow. Might just vote Clinton now instead of 3rd party due to this treachery.

Called it

Tired of the corruption, so vote for the Corruption.

I been saying all along you were going to vote for her, I was right

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
How many wars has he gotten us into? Name them.

What does that have to do with my question for you to prove your claim?

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, yes, "you mad". I'm disgusted by our corrupt system, actually.

Haven't voted yet, mailing it out tomorrow. Might just vote Clinton now instead of 3rd party due to this treachery. Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Called it

Tired of the corruption, so vote for the Corruption.

I been saying all along you were going to vote for her, I was right

How right was I

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
allowing the FBI to influence elections hurts more than just clinton. also, it's against the law. ironic.

This is why I love it though. Because we can't have this discussion without bringing up our own influences on many many elections of other countries in the past 50-60 years.

We can't complain about it without talking about how Hilary and her people had zero problems doing more or less the same shit they are complaining about.

Rob is tired of the corruption, so he is voting for more corruption.

Priceless

Originally posted by Surtur
This is why I love it though. Because we can't have this discussion without bringing up our own influences on many many elections of other countries in the past 50-60 years.

We can't complain about it without talking about how Hilary and her people had zero problems doing more or less the same shit they are complaining about.

We cant talk about Hillary did this to herself, we have to talk about how wrong everyone else is for questioning it. And Rob is voting for her

Just going to remind people of this:

1mRlYktvN-Q

Rob is voting for her

Originally posted by Surtur
This is why I love it though. Because we can't have this discussion without bringing up our own influences on many many elections of other countries in the past 50-60 years.

We can't complain about it without talking about how Hilary and her people had zero problems doing more or less the same shit they are complaining about.

that really has nothing to do with the FBI illegally influencing our own elections with partisan stunts. the fact that you appear happy about this is very disturbing.

It appears you have no respect for the law, which is why you are voting for a candidate who does everything to get around the law, and is above the law herself.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that really has nothing to do with the FBI illegally influencing our own elections with partisan stunts. the fact that you appear happy about this is very disturbing.

I'm happy because the hypocritical bullshit is finally being exposed. It's no fun when someone f*cks with your election, is it?

That's just the thing, as much as I dislike Trump, I'd be against the FBI doing this to him; it's bad for everyone.

Before it was the Russians, now its the FBI influencing the election!

Originally posted by Robtard
That's just the thing, as much as I dislike Trump, I'd be against the FBI doing this to him; it's bad for everyone.

Thats a complete lie and we both know it, we know you have no integrity, hence you are voting for Clinton, who brought this on herself. Before it was the Russians now its the FBI's fault

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm happy because the hypocritical bullshit is finally being exposed. It's no fun when someone f*cks with your election, is it?

They can't take the hypocrisy, they run through it and try to ignore it.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm happy because the hypocritical bullshit is finally being exposed. It's no fun when someone f*cks with your election, is it?


very mature way to address federal police hijacking democracy. i'm sure they'll continue serving your best interests.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Thats a complete lie and we both know it, we know you have no integrity, hence you are voting for Clinton, who brought this on herself. Before it was the Russians now its the FBI's fault

Give me one example where I supported a blatant hit-piece on Trump?

And the personal attacks on my character let me know you know you're being a hypocrite.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
very mature way to address federal police hijacking democracy. i'm sure they'll continue serving your best interests.

The timing seems strange. A far right leader would certainly always be an advantage for security services.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
very mature way to address federal police hijacking democracy. i'm sure they'll continue serving your best interests.

Oh so now you suddenly are concerned for democracy? Okay.

Originally posted by Robtard
Give me one example where I supported a blatant hit-piece on Trump?

And the personal attacks on my character let me know you know you're being a hypocrite.

All the bullshit sexual assault claims, you supported with zero evidence, besides "words"

Originally posted by Robtard
Give me one example where I supported a blatant hit-piece on Trump?

And the personal attacks on my character let me know you know you're being a hypocrite.

I am interested, what has your integrity got to do with you voting choice? Am I missing something?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh so now you suddenly are concerned for democracy? Okay.

baseless 'no-you' accusations, and for what? to prove that i share the same slimy disposition as you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh so now you suddenly are concerned for democracy? Okay.

He cares about democracy as much as his pos candidate did about democracy in other countries wanting to rig the election..

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
All the bullshit sexual assault claims, you supported with zero evidence, besides "words"

Incorrect. I attacked Trump on his own words about bragging about being a sexual assaulter.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
baseless 'no-you' accusations, and for what? to prove that i share the same slimy disposition as you?

You have no where to go but to psmiths warehouse

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. I attacked Trump on his own words about bragging about being a sexual assaulter.

More lies he never bragged about being a sexual assaulter, let me ask you, are you purposely ignorant, or willfully?

"They let you" is not "I do without permission"

One is consent, the other isn't.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
You have no where to go but to psmiths warehouse

What is a PSmith Warehouse? Is it something to do with the Election?

Originally posted by Negan
I am interested, what has your integrity got to do with you voting choice? Am I missing something?

He's trying to get me into a defensive position about my character so I stop pointing out the hypocrisy/topic. Deflection tactics.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's trying to get me into a defensive position about my character so I stop pointing out the hypocrisy.

that's his entire M.O.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's trying to get me into a defensive position about my character so I stop pointing out the hypocrisy/topic

Ahh, why?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
baseless 'no-you' accusations, and for what? to prove that i share the same slimy disposition as you?

I just find this entire situation hilarious. Especially with you lecturing me about maturity and stuff, this is pure gold.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's trying to get me into a defensive position about my character so I stop pointing out the hypocrisy/topic. Deflection tactics.

Where is the hypocrisy? Besides on the democrats who praised comey, I bet you cant answer that one.

Originally posted by Negan
Ahh, why?

Anything to pull away from the topic that if Trump wins now, it will have happened due to treachery and backhanded tactics.

Originally posted by Negan
Ahh, why?

victory, of course. if he succeeds, trump wins. or so you would think, reading all this.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just find this entire situation hilarious. Especially with you lecturing me about maturity and stuff, this is pure gold.

He has problems being dominated by females in his life. Hence the outbursts.

Originally posted by Robtard
Anything to pull away from the topic that if Trump wins now, it will have happened due to treachery and backhanded tactics.

Nice, blame Trump

What treachery are you talking about

4jH_DBR4pSI

^this?

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Where is the hypocrisy? Besides on the democrats who praised comey, I bet you cant answer that one.

Really? How many threads have you made alone about Trump being "cheated" in some way of another. But now, "who cares about cheating" when it's obvious this is a hit-piece right before the election.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just find this entire situation hilarious. Especially with you lecturing me about maturity and stuff, this is pure gold.

the fact that you find it 'hilarious' is what exposes you as immature and dangerously short-sighted. but at least you're proud about it.

Originally posted by Robtard
Anything to pull away from the topic that if Trump wins now, it will have happened due to treachery and backhanded tactics.

As opposed to Hilary's squeaky clean win?

Originally posted by Robtard
Really? How many threads have you made alone about Trump being "cheated" in some way of another. But now, "who cares about cheating" when it's obvious this is a hit-piece right before the election.

What proof do you have its a hit piece?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
victory, of course. if he succeeds, trump wins. or so you would think, reading all this.

B-but this board will not influence the election result. Unless he is aiming for some kind of butterfly effect involving his thoughts, a voodoo doll, being naked and Osmosis.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the fact that you find it 'hilarious' is what exposes you as immature and dangerously short-sited. but at least you're proud about it.

Look at this baby

https://ageofshitlords.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/triggering.png

Originally posted by Negan
B-but this board will not influence the election result. Unless he is aiming for some kind of butterfly effect involving his thoughts, a voodoo doll, being naked and Osmosis.

probably butterfly effect. sooner or later he's gonna make someone change their mind (by aggressively harassing and insulting them of course), and then just watch the dominoes fall.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just find this entire situation hilarious. Especially with you lecturing me about maturity and stuff, this is pure gold.

I think for a high school kid you seem very mature. I bet you are top of your class and on the honor roll and Deans list.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the fact that you find it 'hilarious' is what exposes you as immature and dangerously short-sited. but at least you're proud about it.

Nope, it's hilarious because it's hilarious, not due to immaturity.

Originally posted by Surtur
As opposed to Hilary's squeaky clean win?

I'm sure you can give examples? And please don't drop Pussygate as a reason.

Originally posted by Robtard
Really? How many threads have you made alone about Trump being "cheated" in some way of another. But now, "who cares about cheating" when it's obvious this is a hit-piece right before the election.

Originally posted by Robtard
Really? How many threads have you made alone about Trump being "cheated" in some way of another. But now, "who cares about cheating" when it's obvious this is a hit-piece right before the election.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
What proof do you have its a hit piece?

WqGZV5bpNzg

Originally posted by Negan
I think for a high school kid you seem very mature. I bet you are top of your class and on the honor roll and Deans list.

Damn dude, I'm willing to ignore this post and let you have another shot at putting something funny.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm sure you can give examples? And please don't drop Pussygate as a reason.

Oh look, Rob is using those words again, he cant help himself.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nope, it's hilarious because it's hilarious, not due to immaturity.

Oh, come on! Admit it's a little to do with immaturity!

Originally posted by Surtur
Damn dude, I'm willing to ignore this post and let you have another shot at putting something funny.

Thanks Pal I'll try harder

"It feels like Hillary is flat out lying" Mika

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/mika-it-feels-like-clinton-is-lying-straight-out-693313091808

Originally posted by Negan
Oh, come on! Admit it's a little to do with immaturity!



Please continue to post.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
What proof do you have its a hit piece?

-Trump being Trump and talking about Wiener's email back in August of last year, he somehow knew before the FBI

-The FBI sitting on this for weeks and releasing it a week before the election

-The method the FBI released it where it could be taken in negative views

/obvious-hit-piece-is-obvious. But alas, who cares about the truth, as long as Trump wins

edit: If you're going to quote me multiple times before and after I reply, it's going to get really messy and garbled in here. Or is that your intention?

Originally posted by Robtard
-Trump being Trump and talking about Wiener's email back in August of last year, he somehow knew before the FBI

-The FBI sitting on this for weeks and releasing it a week before the election

-The method the FBI released it where it could be taken in negative views


/obvious-hit-piece-is-obvious

But alas, who cares about the truth, as long as Trump wins

Not proof

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm sure you can give examples? And please don't drop Pussygate as a reason.

This isn't a serious question, right? Just the fact people who worked for her were talking about starting riots and shit at rallies show me her victory wouldn't be squeaky clean.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
probably butterfly effect. sooner or later he's gonna make someone change their mind (by aggressively harassing and insulting them of course), and then just watch the dominoes fall.

I'm hoping for a Donald win, I haven't been truly fearful of a nuclear war since the good old days of Ronnie Raygun and the USSR. Oh the excitement kids born after 1975 have missed out on being able to remember.

Originally posted by Negan
I'm hoping for a Donald win, I haven't been truly fearful of a nuclear war since the good old days of Ronnie Raygun and the USSR. Oh the excitement kids born after 1975 have missed out on being able to remember.

Pretty ignorant statement.

Originally posted by Negan
I'm hoping for a Donald win, I haven't been truly fearful of a nuclear war since the good old days of Ronnie Raygun and the USSR. Oh the excitement kids born after 1975 have missed out on being able to remember.

Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

Originally posted by Surtur


Please continue to post.

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

Ronnie didn't, who's to say Trump won't either?

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

k4aIIpCDsLU

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Was posted, you wanting to ignore it doesn't change that.

Originally posted by Surtur
Thanks for showing us all how smart you are by implying Trump will start a nuclear war.

#PoorReadingComprehension

Originally posted by Robtard
-Trump being Trump and talking about Wiener's email back in August of last year, he somehow knew before the FBI

-The FBI sitting on this for weeks and releasing it a week before the election

-The method the FBI released it where it could be taken in negative views

/obvious-hit-piece-is-obvious. But alas, who cares about the truth, as long as Trump wins

edit: If you're going to quote me multiple times before and after I reply, it's going to get really messy and garbled in here. Or is that your intention?

Not proof

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Originally posted by Surtur
This isn't a serious question, right? Just the fact people who worked for her were talking about starting riots and shit at rallies show me her victory wouldn't be squeaky clean.

So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
#PoorReadingComprehension

#dominatedbywomen

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Pretty ignorant statement.

Not really, if you're old enough to remember the cold war.

Originally posted by Robtard
So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

So no actual proof on your baseless accusations?

Originally posted by Robtard
So no actual proof, just accusations that never fully panned out.

No actual, proof, the only proof we have is that this same man visited the White House 340 times, etc. and is a convicted felon on top of that.

But yeah , now people are suddenly worried about corruption?

Originally posted by Negan
Not really, if you're old enough to remember the cold war.

Hillary will get us into a war with Russia, we both know this.

Most of us were shitting bricks with Raygun in Office and he was only senile.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Again, if you're going to quote and reply multiple times to a post I made, even after I've replied it's going to get garbled in here, but I think that's your intention, anything to draw away from the topic that this is a hit-piece against Clinton and that if Trump wins now (I still doubt it, but who knows) it will be through treachery.

Originally posted by Surtur
No actual, proof, the only proof we have is that this same man visited the White House 340 times, etc. and is a convicted felon on top of that.

But yeah , now people are suddenly worried about corruption?

Rob does not believe the official whitehouse visitor log, nor the videos, nor anything involving the corruption of the clintons or the democratic party.

Originally posted by Robtard
Again, if you're going to quote and reply multiple times to a post I made, even after I've replied it's going to get garbled in here, but I think that's your intention, anything to draw away from the topic that this is a hit-piece against Clinton and that if Trump wins now (I still doubt it, but who knows) it will be through treachery.

Not proof

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said.

Of course Hillary is corrupt and not fit for Office, that doesn't make her the wrong choice in this Election.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Not proof

An educated guess of 5% was his statement that he would have access since married to one of these irresponsible and reckless people

Comey didn't know about it until Thursday.

What proof do you have its a hit piece besides the speculation and lies you just said. Already posted and pointed out that your dismal of proof doesn't make it go away

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/28/ flashback_august_2015_donald_trump_talks_about_ant
hony_weiner_accessing_classified_info_through_huma
_abedin.html

I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
#dominatedbywomen

oh no, another attack on my character from someone with zero credibility. i better divert from the topic of your hypocrisy to address this. or not.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/10/28/ flashback_august_2015_donald_trump_talks_about_ant
hony_weiner_accessing_classified_info_through_huma
_abedin.html

I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong. Your link gives back a "HTTP 403 Forbidden"

Originally posted by Negan
Of course Hillary is corrupt and not fit for Office, that doesn't make her the wrong choice in this Election.

SO you want to go to war with Russia? Are you dumb or just ignorant to the truth?

Originally posted by Robtard
Your link gives back a "HTTP 403 Forbidden"

Wrong

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.


I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong.

it's still a broken link, TI. better get mad about it and spew more personal attacks.

But I mean damn "Did not know mormons did drugs" is still hilarious too.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Wrong

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT.


I just proved you wrong, now retract your bogus statement.

You didn't offer proof, and I proved your speculation wrong.

Dude, it's still giving back "HTTP 403 Forbidden"

https://goo.gl/ue3Vom

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
https://goo.gl/ue3Vom

"Do you think its even 5% chance weiner could have had access" DJT

That supports what I said, so thanks?

Somehow Trump knew of this 14ish months before the FBI. But of course that doesn't ring WTF alarm bells with you, cos it's Trump and he's beyond dirty tactics and corruption.

I have a hard time believing you are this dumb dude. Every day its mental gymnastics with you.

How does saying a is there even 5% chance prove anything, its called a claim that someone made, that ended up being True. Now you are saying he knew from the FBI when this was months ago is pathetic and dishonest.

This must be the most corrupt weiner in the world.

Originally posted by Robtard
That supports what I said, so thanks?

Somehow Trump knew of this 14ish months before the FBI. But of course that doesn't ring WTF alarm bells with you, cos it's Trump and he's beyond dirty tactics and corruption.

No trump isn't Robtard. He is very corrupt.

-jm

Making a claim of 5% means you were tipped off by the FBI now

Baseless retarded logic leap ftw.