The Polls!

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Time-Immemorial
10 Point swing for Trump in 4 days in the Abc/WP post polllaughing out loud

So the real number are more like a twenty point swing.. The Weiner Schlonging of 2016 will be the final nail in the Corrupt Clinton Campaign..

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/29/abc-newswashington-post-tracking-poll-ten-point-swing-donald-trump-four-days/

Time-Immemorial
'Anger, disbelief in Clinton camp'

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/303402-anger-disbelief-in-clinton-camp

laughing out loudlaughing out loud

She's mad cause she had clear intent to break the law, hide her emails, delete them, lie about them then gets mad when she has to keep dealing with this.

Bernie Sanders looks like an idiot right now. He could have won this ****ing thing and he sunk himself with "I don't give a damn about your emails"

Shows Sanders really dont give a damn about winning or the law either.

Surtur
You know the drill though, it will be the same song and dance: story negated because it came from Breitbart.

Despite the fact I've still yet to see evidence of them posting false stories.

Time-Immemorial
Oh you want the source? Ok SURE!

http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1184a72016ElectionTrackingNo7.pdf

Time-Immemorial
Originally posted by Surtur
You know the drill though, it will be the same song and dance: story negated because it came from Breitbart.

Despite the fact I've still yet to see evidence of them posting false stories.

Notice how if it comes from CNN its still legit though?

Surtur
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Notice how if it comes from CNN its still legit though?

Remember people even defended CNN when they altered quotes by Donald Trump.

Time-Immemorial
Oh yea, and when they told us it was illegal to read the emailslaughing out loud

Or when they edited Bill Clintons interview from "sick often" to "not often"

Or when they deleted pro sanders comments on their facebook.

Or the other 1000000 things they lied about.

BackFire
I think what you're seeing in regards to this particular poll is that it being at +12 was something of an outlier, she was probably never actually ahead by that much, it was just the poll showing it randomly, +4 is more in line with what other polls have been showing - a race that is somewhere in the +3-6 range for Clinton. I imagine the gap will close more in polls next week because of the FBI stuff.

Time-Immemorial
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/10/30/upshot/florida-poll.html?smid=tw-share

OH SHITlaughing out loud

Stigma
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/10/30/upshot/florida-poll.html?smid=tw-share

OH SHITlaughing out loud


Cool thumb up

BackFire
And the poll was taken before the FBI stuff reemerged. The polls in the coming week will be very telling.

Time-Immemorial
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwGtZ05WYAAXxF-.jpg

Surtur
I don't put much stock in polls, but I did see this article today:

Clinton loses popularity edge in tight race with Trump, new Post-ABC Tracking Poll finds

Time-Immemorial
The poll I posted mattered cause its tracking voter turnout.

Andytalks
That Virginia difference!

Time-Immemorial
Wash Post / Abc Trump 46% Clinton 45%

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/01/post-abc-tracking-poll-clinton-falls-behind-trump-in-enthusiasm-but-has-edge-in-early-voting/?client=safari

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.