Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Has anyone the link to the interview in which it's claimed that the best of the Inquisitors are comparable to Ventress?

It was a RebelForce Radio interview with Filoni.
Apparently the link is no longer active.

Ohh that sucks

I wonder if we'll see anymore Inquisitors.

It says the best of the Inquisitors aren't on her level.

Pretty sure Filoni said the best Inquisitor was around Ventress level, but he thinks Ventress is probably still more powerful.

I'm pretty sure it said that even the best Inquisitor wouldn't be on her level. They might have said around. I don't have a problem with that if it is GI tbh given Kanan's own ridiculous force feats and the scan that proves GI is more powerful then Kanan.

Filoni said something along the lines that the best Inquisitor is around Ventress' level but he still thinks she's more powerful, or something.

TBH, I wouldn't be okay with any of the Inquisitors we've seen so far being Ventress tier.

Not on, but around for the GI wouldn't be bad. His ability was left generally unspecified.

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Filoni said something along the lines that the best Inquisitor is around Ventress' level but he still thinks she's more powerful, or something.

TBH, I wouldn't be okay with any of the Inquisitors we've seen so far being Ventress tier.

He also said the spinning lightsaber was a 'cheat' mode for doing moves that Darth Maul could do on his own so Maul > GI and by extent Ventress.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
so Maul > GI and by extent Ventress.


Doubt anyone ever argued that anyway.

Sure but it confirms his solid superiority over her

GI =/= Ventress lmfao.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Sure but it confirms his solid superiority over her


I think both Maul and Kenobi proved they were solidly above Ventress in "Revival" when they both stomped Opress. Ventress never proved herself capable of even winning against Opress.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
GI =/= Ventress lmfao.

No, but he's close apparently.

Nah, though I enjoy the continued double standard regarding Filoni's commentary.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
GI =/= Ventress lmfao. I can't imagine him doing anything but get rekt by Anakin or Obi-Wan...

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nah, though I enjoy the continued double standard regarding Filoni's commentary.

But aren't you showing the same double standards? You've clung to the statement by Filoni that Only Vader and Palpatine can match/beat Ahsoka in that era, yet you're ignoring his statement that the best Inquisitor is just a little under Ventress??

Because Filoni's commentary/opinion isn't contradicted by feats & accolades Beni

Originally posted by Darth Thor
But aren't you showing the same double standards? You've clung to the statement by Filoni that Only Vader and Palpatine can match/beat Ahsoka in that era, yet you're ignoring his statement that the best Inquisitor is just a little under Ventress?? Nope, I'm just aware of what he actually said, and the contexts in which he said it.

Any of the Inqs being on the same level as Ventress is goddamn retarded.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nope, I'm just aware of what he actually said, and the contexts in which he said it.

The context you think he said it in, there's a difference.

Nope the contexts were very clear.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nope, I'm just aware of what he actually said, and the contexts in which he said it.


Well contexts can be argued both ways.

DD is arguing a different context of his Ahsoka statement to you. So neither of you are using double standards. You're just disagreeing on his meaning.

I on the other hand just think he's biased as f*** when it comes to Ahsoka.

Nah, he said Filoni's words aren't Canon so they don't matter.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Nah, he said Filoni's words aren't Canon so they don't matter.


Well that's an interesting debate tbh. Is all of his commentary and interviews on Rebels canon? If so, then is Abrams commentary and interviews on TFA also canon, and Lucas's commentary and interviews on the OT and PT also still canon?

And do these commentaries supersede feats, showings, the story group statements, source books e.t.c. Or do those things supersede the commentaries, or are they all on par with each other?

There are not Canon, but that doesn't mean they don't matter.

I said that they theoretically shouldn't matter anyway not to mention that there is obviously a difference if his opinion is contradicted by feats or his opinion is merely an addition to a certain fact (e.g. How the Inquisitor's rotating lightsaber is a 'cheat mode').

Or in other words when they don't align with your perspective.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Sure but it confirms his solid superiority over her

What are you talking about?

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I think both Maul and Kenobi proved they were solidly above Ventress in "Revival" when they both stomped Opress. Ventress never proved herself capable of even winning against Opress.

That's due to the various disadvantages she had going against her in that fight and a lack of time to adjust to using a single blade after using dual blades in combat for nearly the entirety of the Clone Wars.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
What are you talking about?
Maul >> Ventress >/= GI.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
No, but he's close apparently.

Nah he said that the greatest Inquisitor is approaching her level but still not really close.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That's due to the various disadvantages she had going against her in that fight and a lack of time to adjust to using a single blade after using dual blades in combat for nearly the entirety of the Clone Wars. Source?

Originally posted by Ursumeles
Maul >> Ventress >/= GI.

Not at all and I would have a debate on that subject with you. Ventress vs Maul lightsabers only. Any version you want.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Source?

TCW and the RotS Novel.

Quotes please. Ventress isn't even in the RotS novel lmao.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Not at all and I would have a debate on that subject with you. Ventress vs Maul lightsabers only. Any version you want.
I am just saying, what he thinks about this.
Obviously, Ventress >>> GI, lol.

No but confirmation that Makashi is weak to a great output of kinetic energy is.

Along with Dooku himself being thrown across the room by a blow from Opress and Ventress never having demonstrated using a single saber in combat and the fact that she was deprived of said saber and was given no time for adjustment before entering combat.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
I am just saying, what he thinks about this.
Obviously, Ventress >>> GI, lol.

Sorry. Wasn't sure what you were saying.

I am saying Anakin >> Dooku >> Ventress

Yeah but Ventress is still a notch above the pathetic Inqs.

I don't think the Inq's are as bad as you're making out tbh.

Though yes Ventress is above them all by a good margin.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
I don't think the Inq's are as bad as you're making out tbh.

Though yes Ventress is above them all by a good margin.

Well, they might not suck, but they're just barely above-average tbh.

They've got impressive Force power tbh and GI seems to be solidly skilled.

The GI is skilled and a good combatant, although I'm still not entirely convinced he's so good, but he's better than his counterparts for sure.

They have ups and downs. They were battling Kanan and Ahsoka evenly right before Maul jumped in and helped the Jedi.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
They have ups and downs. They were battling Kanan and Ahsoka evenly right before Maul jumped in and helped the Jedi.

That's not a good indication, though. Maul was battling the three of them almost evenly for a short time and Ahsoka curbs the FB and SS almost simultaneously prior to that encounter. And it wasn't so even because they actually had to run away from the Jedi.

Originally posted by Petrus
That's not a good indication, though. Maul was battling the three of them almost evenly for a short time and Ahsoka curbs the FB and SS almost simultaneously prior to that encounter. And it wasn't so even because they actually had to run away from the Jedi. That's what I mean when I said they have ups and downs. One minute their fighting to notch foes and the next they are running from the same foes.

Originally posted by Petrus
That's not a good indication, though. Maul was battling the three of them almost evenly for a short time and Ahsoka curbs the FB and SS almost simultaneously prior to that encounter. And it wasn't so even because they actually had to run away from the Jedi.

Maul couldn't keep up that pace. By the end he was saber locked with the other Inquisitors flanking him. And GI's substantially above any of them.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
Maul couldn't keep up that pace. By the end he was saber locked with the other Inquisitors flanking him. And GI's substantially above any of them.

I know, but he was at least capable of matching the three in combat for a short period of time. And individually, just like Ahsoka, he stomps them. Ahsoka stomped two of them simultaneously. That means Ahsoka's very good, of course, but it also demonstrates the Inqs are significantly below people like Maul or Ahsoka, who in turn aren't that far above Ventress. I think Ventress would be able to defeat any of the Inqs in 1v1 combat, at least. Including GI.

Originally posted by Petrus
I know, but he was at least capable of matching the three in combat for a short period of time. And individually, just like Ahsoka, he stomps them. Ahsoka stomped two of them simultaneously. That means Ahsoka's very good, of course, but it also demonstrates the Inqs are significantly below people like Maul or Ahsoka, who in turn aren't that far above Ventress. I think Ventress would be able to defeat any of the Inqs in 1v1 combat, at least. Including GI. Like I said before Ahsoka and Kanan were battling the Fifth Brother and Eighth Brother on equal ground for a good amount of time before Maul jumped in. Ahsoka didn't seem capable of replicating her feat of easily beating them the first time she met even by herself.

Here is the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_3KjokTsmA

Yeah, I've seen the whole season. I think the fact that the Inqs seemed more competent against Ahsoka even with the aid of Kanan, helps prove the idea that Malachor is indeed a significant DS nexus.

Originally posted by Petrus
I know, but he was at least capable of matching the three in combat for a short period of time. And individually, just like Ahsoka, he stomps them. Ahsoka stomped two of them simultaneously. That means Ahsoka's very good, of course, but it also demonstrates the Inqs are significantly below people like Maul or Ahsoka, who in turn aren't that far above Ventress. I think Ventress would be able to defeat any of the Inqs in 1v1 combat, at least. Including GI.

Well of course. But that's more due to Ventress's own ability.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
There are not Canon, but that doesn't mean they don't matter.




That's exactly how I look at them.

Originally posted by Petrus
Yeah, I've seen the whole season. I think the fact that the Inqs seemed more competent against Ahsoka even with the aid of Kanan, helps prove the idea that Malachor is indeed a significant DS nexus. That so called dark side nexus didn't seem to help Maul when he fought Kanan.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That's due to the various disadvantages she had going against her in that fight and a lack of time to adjust to using a single blade after using dual blades in combat for nearly the entirety of the Clone Wars.


There were 2 fights. And Opress had disadvantages too.

But say you're right, even if she can beat him, it clearly wouldn't be a stomp on the level of Maul or Kenobi.

Originally posted by juggernaut74
That so called dark side nexus didn't seem to help Maul when he fought Kanan.

A point I've been making do a while

Originally posted by Darth Thor
There were 2 fights. And Opress had disadvantages too.

But say you're right, even if she can beat him, it clearly wouldn't be a stomp on the level of Maul or Kenobi.

Maybe, maybe not. If not that's due to the fact that she wouldn't be able to be quite as offensive as she normally would do to having to focus more on redirecting Savage's strikes.