Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Just a PSA.

The only thing these two have in common is that they both need to die

Canonic failure vs legendary failure?

i like redheads and blondes

Originally posted by JKBart
i like redheads and blondes

Originally posted by JKBart
i like redheads and blondes
I like brunettes more.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
I like brunettes more.

Canon Maul and Legends Maul are naturally connected trough the fact that his survival and stuff is all covered in canon.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Canon Maul and Legends Maul are naturally connected trough the fact that his survival and stuff is all covered in canon.

The difference between the two though is, we don't know what training he went through in Canon in his past.

Legends we do, Canon we don't....so no they aren't really the same.

By that I mean, details of what his training. We know he was trained by Sidious, but that's literally it.

No one needed to be told this.

Originally posted by Zenwolf
The difference between the two though is, we don't know what training he went through in Canon in his past.

Legends we do, Canon we don't....so no they aren't really the same.

By that I mean, details of what his training. We know he was trained by Sidious, but that's literally it.

Well things like Wrath of Darth Maul were written for his return in TCW S4, so considering canon Maul = TCW Maul I think you can expect the same kind of training until this would be contradicted. However canon does add the fact that Maul was trained to eventually takeover the RoT.

Legends Maul clone nearly beat Vader

Originally posted by Rebel95
Legends Maul clone nearly beat Vader
He basically did really

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
No one needed to be told this.

I beg to differ, given the number of people trying to lowball Maul in legends matchups through canon feats.

TCW is also Legends, smart one.

Source?

In either case, the Maul lowballing comes from Rebels.

Because TCW existed in the old EU and has spin offs in Legends? That's like saying the movies aren't Legends as well. What a stupid question. And nah. We've been lowballing Maul for years.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
That's like saying the movies aren't Legends as well.

I've got some news for you...



The "Maul Dies" movement is new.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
I've got some news for you...

The movies and TCW are valid to both continuities. Keep that semantics shit.

It's really not.

Originally posted by FreshestSlice
The movies and TCW are valid to both continuities. Keep that semantics shit.


Ask Tempest about it. Leland Chee did not incorporate the movies into Legends.



Find me three Bane-dies style troll threads on Maul from before August.

Originally posted by The Ellimist


Find me three Bane-dies style troll threads on Maul from before August.


Before August would be easy. It's since that damn Rebels episode where Kanan beat Maul

^ oh, right

Don't be so salty El. People might think you care.

of course the movies are valid in canon and legends, what the hell would the legends be based around if not the films and TV shows??

Originally posted by relentless1
of course the movies are valid in canon and legends, what the hell would the legends be based around if not the films and TV shows??



Legends seems to follow the movie novelisations rather than the actual movies.

The movie novelisations were always second to the movies, so that doesn't even make any sense.

Yeah the people who say Novels>Movies in any continuity make no sense.

The novelisation version of the films simply align more with Legends, probably because they are part of Legends. Whereas The actual films are Canon.

As far as I understand the new system, everything's now either Canon or Legends. I've not heard of the movies being both, but I might be wrong on that.

Maul basically sux all round.