Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

...

Maul, Kenobi is better then Grievous and Ventress.

None of them.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
None of them.

Originally posted by Ursumeles
None of them.
Who then?

Originally posted by Ursumeles
None of them.

This.

He's better than all of them with a lightsaber, but loses to Maul in a Force battle.

There's a rough parity between prime Kenobi and Maul.

You'd be a fool to dispute it.

The f-uck is Ventress doing here?

Grievous and Maul, the former has been confirmed to be Obi-Wan's equal as a fighter during The Clone Wars and Obi-Wan only defeated him in RotS by driving him towards an environment which was hindering his usual fighting style.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Grievous and Maul, the former has been confirmed to be Obi-Wan's equal as a fighter during The Clone Wars and Obi-Wan only defeated him in RotS by driving him towards an environment which was hindering his usual fighting style. Actually, he TKed him into submission before that (at which point Grievous pussied out).

Ventress is the closest to him all around, yes.

Ventress was a match for anakin+obi wan, ventress being>obi wan is obvious

Kenobi's closer to Maul than Ventress

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
Ventress is the closest to him all around, yes.
Do you have Grievous and Maul above or below Ventress?

GG below, only because he lacks Force defenses. Maul above because he's substantially more powerful in the Force.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
GG below, only because he lacks Force defenses. Maul above because he's substantially more powerful in the Force.
Wow. I actually agree with you

Equal to Maul.

its worth noting grevious had a style disadavtage vs kenobi, one he wouldn't have vs maul