Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Gauntlet runner:

http://a.dilcdn.com/bl/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2013/11/10.jpg

-Everyone in their prime, unless specified otherwise

_________

Round 1:
Darth Bane, Darth Zannah and Darth Cognus

Round 2:
Darth Tenebrous and Darth Plagueis

Round 3:
Darth Plagueis and Darth Sidious as of The Phantom Menace, before he killed his Master

Boss:
Darth Sidious as of The Phantom Menace, after killing his Master and gaining an increase in power

2

2 kills boss as well

Originally posted by Ursumeles
2

2 kills boss as well

Lol no

Ehm, probably 1. And the boss is arguably the weakest leg of this gauntlet, lol; he's certainly inferior to #2.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Ehm, 1.

Reasons?



He's also arguably the strongest

That'd be a pretty dumb argument.

Actually, it's a pretty good one.

Round 1 yeah

Originally posted by Ursumeles
2

Fixed.

Bane is ragdolled immediately.

Originally posted by NewGuy01
Ehm, probably 1.

facepalm

Terribly out of order, and he loses at 1.

How does he lose at 1?

what has Yoda ever did that suggest he can't take on 3 of the most powerful Sith Lords ever, simultaneously?

One that can attack his mind, and the other that can dampen his very ability to draw on the Force? I mean, if Cognos, with rudimentary training was pulling the showings she was against Bane - imagine what a significantly more powerful version of the character can do?

Well given Yoda >> Dooku > Tenebrous >>>>>>>>>>> them all. Not a lot surely.

numbers and matchup matters. If Yoda doesn't come out swinging - which he doesn't in character - Zannah's sorcery in conjunction with Cognos' Force dampening could phuck him up.

Star Wars isn't DBZ, smh.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Well given Yoda >> Dooku > Tenebrous >>>>>>>>>>> them all. Not a lot surely. Dooku > Tenebrous
I'd love to hear an argument for this

on topic, yoda takes the bonus and round 1 and round 2 imo, stops at 3

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Dooku > Tenebrous
I'd love to hear an argument for this

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=639081

Edit: nm, missread.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Dooku > Tenebrous
I'd love to hear an argument for this Same friend. Same.

Originally posted by Deronn_solo
what has Yoda ever did that suggest he can't take on 3 of the most powerful Sith Lords ever, simultaneously?

Taken on a single Sith who shits on the three of them, individually or collectively.



Yoda powered through amplified Palpatine's and Dooku's augmented Sorcery, and has faced his worst demons in battle and conquered them. He's also at least a dozen times more powerful than Zannah, so I don't think her Spells will be doing shit to Yoda.

Bane easily repelled Cognus' attempts to suppress him, lol. She may have grown more powerful since then, but Yoda is still gargantually more powerful than she is. And Yoda has repelled Palpatine's Force Suppression powers, so again, the best Cognus could do is maybe slightly irritate Yoda.

Yoda murks 1, dies at two and three prolly, beats boss.

Originally posted by MythLord
Yoda murks 1, dies at two and three prolly, beats boss.

Why does he beat boss but die at 2 and 3?

Becuase 2 and 3 boss, obviously.

Originally posted by MythLord
Becuase 2 and 3 boss, obviously.

Wat

He means "2 and 3 beat boss".

So because in his opinion, 2 and 3 beat boss, they can also beat someone who he thinks is stronger than the boss. That's kinda flawed logic.

That's not what he meant

Stops at 2 or 3

Originally posted by Azronger
So because in his opinion, 2 and 3 beat boss, they can also beat someone who he thinks is stronger than the boss. That's kinda flawed logic.

No, 2 and 3 are > boss because they can beat Yoda who is > boss. :/

stops at 2

Originally posted by MythLord
No, 2 and 3 are > boss because they can beat Yoda who is > boss. :/

Okay. But why?

Because they're better. :3

How so?

Stops at 2 or 3.