Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Come on, we all know it's going to happen, and even polling tells us the majority of Americans think it'll happen as well. Place your bet in the poll and discuss below!

Just as long as it took to get Obama impeached for all the laws he broke while in office.

Oh wait...

Laws like what

I don't think Trump will be impeached. I think whatever Russia ties the investigation uncover will be more about people in his campaign rather than him, and he'll be able to claim just enough ignorance to cover himself.

I think he's more likely to die of a heart attack within the next couple of years than be impeached.

It's doubtful he will be impeached, it's a liberal pipe dream. Unless we get some smoking gun.

The fact that 4 people here apparently think he will be impeached is hilarious.

Impeachment is something neither side really wants to do.
Because if they do then that just gives the other side leeway for when the other side gets into power to use against them.

*** for Tat.

I just love how Comey, under oath, said nobody tried to interfere and this gets ignored by the hysterical left.

Yeah but being Hysterical is just the Modern Lefts Normal Mode of Behavior.

Impeachment also requires a super majority to do fully. It's set up in a way that one party can't just impeach the president of the other on a whim. It requires bipartisan support, at least the final senate portion of it. This is what happened to Bill Clinton. He was technically impeached by the house, which requires a simple majority vote, but then once it gets into the senate it requires 2/3rds vote to get the person out of office. So if Trump ever were to be impeached and forced to leave office, a large portion of republicans would need to be on board.

It's not unheard of, and I do think they'd probably do it if Trump was showed to have colluded with Russia and became too much of a liability for their chances of re-election, they probably would have done it with Nixon since he was extremely unpopular by that point as well, but it's not easy.

Originally posted by BackFire
So if Trump ever were to be impeached and forced to leave office, a large portion of republicans would need to be on board.


Which makes the Democrat hysteria even more puzzling. You aren't going to get people on your side that way.

The hysteria that you are talking about is little more than political posturing by House members from very liberal districts who want to score points among their constituents who hate Trump by calling for his impeachment. They know it's not happening.

Originally posted by BackFire
The hysteria that you are talking about is little more than political posturing by House members from very liberal districts who want to score points among their constituents who hate Trump by calling for his impeachment. They know it's not happening.

So in other words they are trying to manipulate people to get votes?

Originally posted by Surtur
So in other words they are trying to manipulate people to get votes?

More telling them what they want to hear. More accurately they are representing the views of their constituents who want him impeached.

The house, in general, is much more extreme than the senate, you have a lot of very far right and very far left people there because they represent a much smaller number of people than those in the senate. So if someone is from a district that wants Trump impeached, it's kind of their job to relay that desire to Washington. They are meant to speak for their districts.

IMO telling people what they want to hear as opposed to the truth is manipulation. It's okay man, you can say it: the Democrats are trying to use Trump to manipulate people and get more votes.

Originally posted by Surtur
IMO telling people what they want to hear as opposed to the truth is manipulation. It's okay man, you can say it: the Democrats are trying to use Trump to manipulate people and get more votes.

But they're doing what they were sent there to do. If they're from districts with a large majority of constituents saying "I want Trump impeached" then it's their job to go to Washington and say "I want Trump impeached". That's their job. If they went to Washington and told those constituents that Trump shouldn't get impeached then they'd just get voted out and replaced by someone who will relay those feelings to Washington.

But yes, there is a level of manipulation in politics no matter who you're talking about. Every single successful politician has to be able to manipulate people to some degree or another.

Surtur turns a thread about Trump possibly being impeached into "Democrats are the shitty ones!". Shocking and totally not expected.

Originally posted by Robtard
Surtur turns a thread about Trump possibly being impeached into "Democrats are the shitty ones!". Shocking and totally not expected.

buttered she-males

Originally posted by BackFire
But they're doing what they were sent there to do. If they're from districts with a large majority of constituents saying "I want Trump impeached" then it's their job to go to Washington and say "I want Trump impeached". That's their job. If they went to Washington and told those constituents that Trump shouldn't get impeached then they'd just get voted out and replaced by someone who will relay those feelings to Washington.

But yes, there is a level of manipulation in politics no matter who you're talking about. Every single successful politician has to be able to manipulate people to some degree or another.

Funny though, not all Dems felt this way about the electoral college. Then it was "vote with your conscience, not what your constituents wanted".

Originally posted by Surtur
Funny though, not all Dems felt this way about the electoral college. Then it was "vote with your conscience, not what your constituents wanted".

I'm not sure what you're getting at, here. The House of Representatives has nothing to do with the electoral college.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
buttered she-males

Now Bashy is making fun of people that are Trans-gender or gender inspecific.

For SHAME!

*reported*

Originally posted by BackFire
I'm not sure what you're getting at, here. The House of Representatives has nothing to do with the electoral college.

My point is you're using the excuse of "they are giving the people what they want". Dems only do that when it suits them.

It is indeed manipulation. We can say all politicians do it, and that is fine, but changes nothing IMO.

Originally posted by Surtur
My point is you're using the excuse of "they are giving the people what they want". Dems only do that when it suits them.

It is indeed manipulation. We can say all politicians do it, and that is fine, but changes nothing IMO.

Well ok, but you're comparing two disparate situations and institutions here. And it's kind of bewildering. The members of the House of Representatives have one specific job - to relay their constituents' feelings to Washington. If they are from a district that wants Trump impeached, then they are simply doing their job by saying that.

The electoral college has a completely different reason for existing and was actually partially put in place as a last resort to keep someone who is unfit from becoming president because the masses voted for them. It was created to guard against populism, so people saying to the electoral college that they think the president-elect is unfit and that they should vote against him isn't really out there, it's part of their jobs to consider such things.

"The House of Representatives has nothing to do with the electoral college." -Bf

Introductory to Government by Backfire

If the special counsel investigation shows signs of bearing fruit, Trump will become politically toxic to Republicans, and they and his lawyers will pressure him to resign.

He will reluctantly do so, while claiming persecution, and Pence, if he avoids being implicated, will pardon Trump the same way Ford pardoned Nixon.

Then he will be free to live out the rest of his days being a political and social pariah eating fast food at Mar-a-Lago with his mail-order wife and their Aspy son.

Originally posted by BackFire
Well ok, but you're comparing two disparate situations and institutions here. And it's kind of bewildering. The members of the House of Representatives have one specific job - to relay their constituents' feelings to Washington. If they are from a district that wants Trump impeached, then they are simply doing their job by saying that.

The electoral college has a completely different reason for existing and was actually partially put in place as a last resort to keep someone who is unfit from becoming president because the masses voted for them. It was created to guard against populism, so people saying to the electoral college that they think the president-elect is unfit and that they should vote against him isn't really out there, it's part of their jobs to consider such things.

I felt this was kinda clear, but I guess I gotta explain: I'm talking Democrats in general. There can be no "well it's what the constituents want" for one thing, but "f*ck what they want" for other things.

In other words, I'm tired of the hypocrisy of Democrats across the board.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
and their Aspy son.

aww c'mon man :'(

Lol, I love it when liberals show themselves as just as big a piece of shit as conservatives. Top notch Adam

The best part? Will be the following responses and attempts to defend.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, I love it when liberals show themselves as just as big a piece of shit as conservatives. Top notch Adam

toxic internet fake news peddled by:
adam: 0
surt: 24358335

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
toxic internet fake news peddled by:
adam: 0
surt: 24358335

Okay, so your defense is to deflect to stuff about fake news, top notch

Other defenses I expect from folk: Trump is vulgar, so it's okay.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay, so your defense is to deflect to stuff about fake news, top notch

making a tasteless jape about an autistic kid vs being a compulsive contrarian of truth, science, and democracy. of course i deflect to your shitshow.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
making a tasteless jape about an autistic kid vs being a compulsive contrarian of truth, science, and democracy. of course i deflect to your shitshow.

Nice deflection, keep it up

I've also now learned it's okay to deflect if you think you're highlighting someone elses shitshow. Good, I'll keep this in mind the next time you whine about deflecting.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
making a tasteless jape about an autistic kid vs being a compulsive contrarian of truth, science, and democracy. of course i deflect to your shitshow.

This from the Person who makes Gay, Transgender and Mental Handicap Jokes at the people he/she/it disagrees with.


FOR SHAME BASHY!!

SHAME!

Originally posted by Surtur
Nice deflection, keep it up

I've also now learned it's okay to deflect if you think you're highlighting someone elses shitshow. Good, I'll keep this in mind the next time you whine about deflecting.

i just said it was a deflection you ridiculous ass.

And now we can add Sexist Comments to his/her/its list of Name Calling Crimes.

The Report to Mod button is going to melt.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i just said it was a deflection you ridiculous ass.

You did indeed, but I felt I needed to repeat the logic you're putting forth. Why? Because I know you're pathetic enough that in the future you will shout "deflection" over something, even if that something is deflecting to someone elses shitshow.

We will have this as a reminder: it's okay to deflect if you are bringing up the "shitshow" of someone else.

Originally posted by Surtur
I felt this was kinda clear, but I guess I gotta explain: I'm talking Democrats in general. There can be no "well it's what the constituents want" for one thing, but "f*ck what they want" for other things.

In other words, I'm tired of the hypocrisy of Democrats across the board.

No, it wasn't clear because the point itself is muddled and not very good. And there are a couple reasons why.

The first problem is you are comparing two totally separate institutions and conflating them when they, by design, are inherently very conflicting in their purpose and function. Essentially you are, presumably intentionally, ignoring context to try and score cheap "lol hypocrites" points as a substitute for a sound and coherent argument. The house is meant to reflect the voices of a group of people, the electoral college is a safeguard against the will of the people.

The second reason why your point is bad is because you are taking a group with 10s of millions of members (democrats) and saying they are all hypocrites because one may have said something that goes against the face value of a statement another may have said. For your cry of hypocrisy to have any merit it needs to be applied to specific individuals or it's just lazy generalizations, again, in place of a reasoned and coherent argument.

Originally posted by Surtur
You did indeed, but I felt I needed to repeat the logic you're putting forth. Why? Because I know you're pathetic enough that in the future you will shout "deflection" over something, even if that something is deflecting to someone elses shitshow.

We will have this as a reminder: it's okay to deflect if you are bringing up the "shitshow" of someone else.

it served a greater point: you have no moral or ethical high ground to peck at anyone for being distasteful, being a deliberate merchant of misinformation and all. try getting over yourself for a second and focus on the topic.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it served a greater point: you have no moral or ethical high ground to peck at anyone for being distasteful, being a deliberate merchant of misinformation and all. try getting over yourself for a second and focus on the topic.

But if this is the logic, you also have zero moral high ground to talk shit about anybody.

But I love the excuses you tried to trot out, made the thread worth it

Kettle Pot Black Moment achieved.

Originally posted by BackFire
No, it wasn't clear because the point itself is muddled and not very good. And there are a couple reasons why.

The first problem is you are comparing two totally separate institutions and conflating them when they, by design, are inherently very conflicting in their purpose and function. Essentially you are, presumably intentionally, ignoring context to try and score cheap "lol hypocrites" points as a substitute for a sound and coherent argument. The house is meant to reflect the voices of a group of people, the electoral college is a safeguard against the will of the people.

The second reason why your point is bad is because you are taking a group with 10s of millions of members (democrats) and saying they are all hypocrites because one may have said something that goes against the face value of a statement another may have said. For your cry of hypocrisy to have any merit it needs to be applied to specific individuals or it's just lazy generalizations, again, in place of a reasoned and coherent argument.

Lazy generalizations like..."half these people are deplorable" you mean?

Zing! It's okay to deflect cuz Hilary had a shit show.

Originally posted by Surtur
But if this is the logic, you also have zero moral high ground to talk shit about anybody.

i do not peddle lies and dodge criticism via stunts/throwing tantrums when said lies are proven false. you made a career out of it here.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i do not peddle lies and dodge criticism via stunts and throw tantrums when said lies are proven false. you made a career out of it here.

You lost your moral high ground for different reasons bro.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lazy generalizations like..."half these people are deplorable" you mean?

Zing! It's okay to deflect cuz Hilary had a shit show.

Yes, congratulations on being no better than Hillary Clinton.

Originally posted by Surtur
You lost your moral high ground for different reasons bro.

lol 'because reasons' spoken in earnest. never saw that stunt before.

Originally posted by BackFire
Yes, congratulations on being no better than Hillary Clinton.

Isn't it sad though? Cuz I'm just some random dude on the internet, she was in politics for 30 years and pulling that dumb bullshit.

Do you really think you had a "gotcha" moment and also somehow countered BF's points with that reply? For real?

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you really think you had a "gotcha" moment and also somehow countered BF's points with that reply? For real?


shhhhh he's playing pretend. let the child stimulate his own imagination.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
lol 'because reasons' spoken in earnest. never saw that stunt before.

If you want them listed: You celebrate pretend wins constantly, yet constantly claim others are doing so. You use bullshit tactics, strawmans, etc. yet whine when others do the same. You whine about deflections, yet do it when it suits you and give lame excuses as to why.

Even worse is you've asked for examples of your behavior like this in the past, and when given them you dismiss them. So I'm going to laugh if you once again ask for examples of your bullshit.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you really think you had a "gotcha" moment and also somehow countered BF's points with that reply? For real?

Lol dude, I had no more of a "gotcha" moment than you and Bash have had here.

EDIT: Since I know this will need to be spelled out for you: by "here" I mean this forum, not necessarily this thread.

Well good, makes me hopeful that you realize you were just dancing to save face.

Originally posted by Robtard
Well good, makes me hopeful that you realize you were just dancing to save face.

This would mean anytime you or Bash have attempted a "gotcha" it was for the same reason. But let me guess: it totally was different, right? It always is.

Your "no you!" has been noted as the one right before it.

/noted

Originally posted by Robtard
Your "no you!" has been noted as the one right before it.

/noted

Nice dodge, it has also been noted

I'd rather have you dodge than sadly try to come up with reasons why it's different.

i relish in the failure of idiots. however i have no illusions that this means i won a debate. pretend-winning is your game, surt.

Originally posted by Surtur
You use bullshit tactics, strawmans, etc.

this from the guy who is well renowned for calling logic and reason "bullshit tactics". and strawman? you strawman all day/week/year here. it's all you do in that "sjw" thread, which is itself a huge strawman shitshow. god you're ridiculous.

Lol the irony overload here is getting to epic proportions.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol the irony overload here is getting to epic proportions.

ah there it is: surtur's last stand

Why? Surt has been surrouned by you Leftist Hypocrites since day one. You haven't managed to chase him off yet.

What makes you think you have finally managed to do so now?

I DO WONDER!?

No, I'm just bemused at how delusional you are. Especially because you've tried to say I'm delusional and lack self awareness in the past.

They could put a picture of you next to an explanation of what the phrase "pot calling the kettle black" means.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Why? Surt has been surrouned by you Leftist Hypocrites since day one. You haven't managed to chase him off yet.

What makes you think you have finally managed to do so now?

I DO WONDER!?

Just seeing the failed "gotcha" attempts makes it worth it to stick around. But I love it when they try to defend the same behavior they talk shit for others doing.

It's always always different lol. There is always some justification for it, however thinly stretched. Hell it's fun to bring it up even if they just shout "dodge" or "deflection" considering they deflect when the mood strikes them.

They will then sit there, without irony, and call others smug and righteous.

The only reason guys like You and Me are still allowed to post here is because they would eventually get bored with their Lefty's Only Circle jerk with no one around to try and bully.

That is the truth of it plain and simple.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
The only reason guys like You and Me are still allowed to post here is because they would eventually get bored with their Lefty's Only Circle jerk with no one around to try and bully.

That is the truth of it plain and simple.

They also come here for us lol. Not to debate each other. Yet they still carry this completely undeserved sense of superiority.

I find it fascinating. When they click that SJW thread, they are doing it solely to find something to latch onto.

Leeches do need their blood.

http://i.imgur.com/rTDKclt.jpg

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Leeches do need their blood.

You can even see the hilarity in Bashes latest post right above. That picture could easily have been posted a thousand times over in reference to him and Rob.

The sad part? He genuinely will not see that fact. That is the undeserved sense of superiority I'm talking about. He truly seems to feel he is different, which is funny.

Now sit back and wait for "pretend victory" comments from the person who holds the record for most pretend victories.

Originally posted by Surtur
You can even see the hilarity in Bashes latest post right above. That picture could easily have been posted a thousand times over in reference to him and Rob.

The sad part? He genuinely will not see that fact. That is the undeserved sense of superiority I'm talking about. He truly seems to feel he is different, which is funny.

Now sit back and wait for "pretend victory" comments from the person who holds the record for most pretend victories.

http://i.imgur.com/LGFqHL4.png

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
aww c'mon man :'(

It is only a value judgment to one who thinks there is something wrong with having Asperger syndrome. See example:

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, I love it when liberals show themselves as just as big a piece of shit as conservatives. Top notch Adam

The answer is the sooner the better.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
The answer is the sooner the better.
You want Pence?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
You want Pence?

Freudian slip?

Is he really a liberal?

Originally posted by BackFire
....I think he's more likely to die of a heart attack within the next couple of years than be impeached.
I see a heart attack as highly likely.

Originally posted by cdtm
Freudian slip?

Is he really a liberal?
Don't ask that question or you'll get Adam in here starting a witchhunt for the conservative in disguise.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is only a value judgment to one who thinks there is something wrong with having Asperger syndrome. See example: i was defending the kid for age and not autism, but also disappointed that you chose baron instead of roasting those 2 other psychopathic reptile sons, as well as the heavily sedated daughter that donald's f***ing. also I just notice that surt implied that all conservatives pieces of shit.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
The answer is the sooner the better.

Do you want Pence as well?

For the sake of our national security, I hope Trump gets impeached ASAP.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Do you want Pence as well?

We'll need to impeach him too.

That would be ideal yeah.

Anyone wondering if this is all going according to plan, with Pence as the endgame?

We don't really elect based on vp's. So put in someone who can win, then get him impeached so you can have your real choice.

Perhaps with Trumps cooperation. I'm sure he'd think it makes good publicity, how he got impeached.

Pence is the Russian agent yeah.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
also I just notice that surt implied that all conservatives pieces of shit.

I saw that too and was going to ask him why, but I figured he'd just start spinning and we had enough of that in this thread. Self loathing is a real ***** I hear.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Do you want Pence as well?

Rumor is Pence is already getting worn down from the nonsense. So maybe he'll just rage-quit.

Can imagine Trump making him out to either be a liar or an uninformed idiot hours after he stood up for Trump didn't sit well.

As Ben Shapiro puts it, the media is Trump's enemy, but Trump is also his own enemy.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Ben Shapiro

Originally posted by Emperordmb
As Ben Shapiro puts it, the media is Trump's enemy, but Trump is also his own enemy. This "the media!" angle/excuse is old and tired. The media is also Trump's supporter. Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh and a slew of others are all stumping for Trump regarding the Russian connection. From claiming fake news, to mitigating the importance of needing an investigation to character assassinating Comey.

Originally posted by Robtard
This "the media!" angle/excuse is old and tired. The media is also Trump's supporter. Fox, Breitbart, Limbaugh and a slew of others are all stumping for Trump regarding the Russian connection. From claiming fake news, to mitigating the importance of needing an investigation to character assassinating Comey.
It's not really an excuse, moreso a statement that I'm displeased with both the media and the Trump administration, and a clarification that even if every claim about the media trying to **** over Trump is accurate, he's still shooting himself in the foot.

Originally posted by Beniboybling

U triggered?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It's not really an excuse, moreso a statement that I'm displeased with both the media and the Trump administration, and a clarification that even if every claim about the media trying to **** over Trump is accurate, he's still shooting himself in the foot.

fair enough

Originally posted by Robtard
I saw that too and was going to ask him why, but I figured he'd just start spinning and we had enough of that in this thread. Self loathing is a real ***** I hear.

Spinning what? I've said before both sides are bad.

Originally posted by BackFire
The hysteria that you are talking about is little more than political posturing by House members from very liberal districts who want to score points among their constituents who hate Trump by calling for his impeachment. They know it's not happening. Originally posted by Surtur
So in other words they are trying to manipulate people to get votes?

Have you considered getting into showbiz, you slimy little shit? I hear Bill O'reilly's job is up for grabs, and you'd fit right in.

http://i.imgur.com/NnoGhN1.gif

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i was defending the kid for age and not autism . . .

If being on the Autism spectrum is not a value judgment, then there is nothing to defend, and the age of the subject is irrelevant.




Originally posted by Bashar Teg
. . . but also disappointed that you chose baron instead of roasting those 2 other psychopathic reptile sons, as well as the heavily sedated daughter that donald's f***ing.

I did not include his adult children in the scenario, because they do not live with their parent.




Originally posted by Bashar Teg
also I just notice that surt implied that all conservatives pieces of shit.

I baited Flyattractor into a similar admission in the Do Trumpers Suffer from Mental Illness? thread.

They are so obsessed with the notion of liberal hypocrisy that they will leap at every opportunity to point it out without thinking it through first.

They do not learn, that is why this continues to work every single time.

it's such a sad point of argument. "yeah we're pieces of shit, but so are you".

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I baited Flyattractor

Finally admitting your guilt is the first step towards recovery.

you gonna report him to, Thinskin McTenderbuns?

What? Now why would that need to be done!?

because he hurt your feefees, of course.

Don't be silly. I am a Heterosexual American Male... I don't have any "FeeFees" ! Now you be nice cause I don't want to sick the Polite PoPo on YOU!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Finally admitting your guilt is the first step towards recovery.


Guilty of what exactly? As I have said many times, just because someone lays a trap for you, it does not mean you have to step in it.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Guilty of what exactly? As I have said many times, just because someone lays a trap for you, it does not mean you have to step in it.

*dive into it head-first and flailing

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Guilty of what exactly? As I have said many times, just because someone lays a trap for you, it does not mean you have to step in it.

But I love to play in your traps. They so warm and fuzzy!!!!!

And just to ask.. So by using your logic, do you fall for Surtur's "BAIT" everytime you reply to one of his posts?

Or is that completely different when you do it?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
*dive into it head-first and flailing

You love getting head and you know it.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
But I love to play in your traps. They so warm and fuzzy!!!!!

I don't like you like that.




Originally posted by Flyattractor
You love getting head and you know it.

Sounds gay.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I don't like you like that.

Liar.






You would know.

Originally posted by Flyattractor

You would know. wow man, you're sharp.

And your his #1 consultant on the subject.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
And your his #1 consultant on the subject.

Remember, if he mockingly says a comment of yours is smart, sharp, etc. it's okay. If anyone did the same back, we'd hear whining about pretend victories.

Wrong thread.

Originally posted by Surtur
Remember, if he mockingly says a comment of yours is smart, sharp, etc. it's okay. If anyone did the same back, we'd hear whining about pretend victories.

it's called "sarcasm", delicate buttercup. i'm very sorry that it made you cry. (more sarcasm)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's called "sarcasm", delicate buttercup. i'm very sorry that it made you cry. (more sarcasm)

It's okay if you want to avoid your own behavior being pointed out by talking about crying.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's okay if you want to avoid your own behavior being pointed out by talking about crying.

you suggested that i was being sarcastic, and that means you somehow won again? wow, good job! (yet more sarcasm)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you suggested that i was being sarcastic, and that means you somehow won again? wow, good job! (yet more sarcasm)

It wasn't really about your sarcasm, it's about the fact that you have taken sarcasm when used by others and done your whole "pretend victory" spiel.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
You want Pence?
best case scenario the administration fooled around with Russia too much and they wash hands with everybody and start over

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
it's called "sarcasm", delicate buttercup. i'm very sorry that it made you cry. (more sarcasm)

*reported for name calling*

Poor Bashy. He just can't seem to stop this issue.

Better watch it Bashy. Laws are being written to stop this Criminal Behavior of yours.

It's almost as if people think if Trump is impeached Hilary will just stroll into the White House. No, then we get Pence. Pence has some beliefs that are more backwards than even Trumps when it comes to stuff like social justice.

I would have no prob with a President Pence.

What has Trump done that impeachable?

Originally posted by ESB -1138
What has Trump done that impeachable?

i'm sure people tried the same with the topic of watergate before nixon resigned. good luck

What did Nixon do that was IMPEACHABLE?

Other then not Toe the Line that Leftist Progressive Soci-Nazis like Bashy insists that they adhere to but they do not.

Actually Nixon DID do something that was clearly impeachable. That is the funny thing...in that it's funny when stupid liberals try to compare this to Watergate and thus show their ignorance.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
What did Nixon do that was IMPEACHABLE?

Other then not Toe the Line that Leftist Progressive Soci-Nazis like Bashy insists that they adhere to but they do not.

he ordered a burglary. you should read up on it when you're not smoking crack and being a general waste of organic matter.

So what? Hillary and Obama got people killed with their criminal actions. I don't hear you calling for JUSTICE over that shit?

Oh wait that is because you are a HYPOCRITE!


I nearly forgot.


Oh and Nixon didn't get IMPEACHED! He RESIGNED! AKA Quit so He would't have to put up with Intolerant Leftist Nazis like You Bashy.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he ordered a burglary. you should read up on it when you're not smoking crack and being a general waste of organic matter.

Just stop, you are the one who needs to read up. We really do not know if he ordered the burglary. We know he ordered a cover up of that burglary.

Originally posted by Surtur
Just stop, you are the one who needs to read up. We really do not know if he ordered the burglary. We know he ordered a cover up of that burglary.

he resigned in order to not be tried and found obviously guilty via presidential pardon.
but good luck with your time wasting troll-tactic. i'm sure it will help trump just as much as it helped nixon

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually Nixon DID do something that was clearly impeachable. That is the funny thing...in that it's funny when stupid liberals try to compare this to Watergate and thus show their ignorance.

It took an investigation to show that Nixon was lying. Maybe you should wait until this investigation is over before doing your victory dance? Or don't, as I'm certain you'll cry "liars" if Mueller's probe shows Trump in a negative light.

Now do your expected "no you!" retort so we can move on. Thanks.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he resigned in order to not be tried and found obviously guilty. but good luck with your time wasting troll-tactic. i'm sure it will help trump just as much as it helped nixon

Okay, but again: the guilt wouldn't have been for actually ordering the burglary. There was not enough evidence of that.

So next time you come here telling others to read up I suggest you know what you are talking about before you do, okay?

Originally posted by Robtard
It took an investigation to show that Nixon was lying. Maybe you should wait until this investigation is over before doing your victory dance? Or don't, as I'm certain you'll cry "liars" if Mueller's probe shows Trump in a negative light.

that's the fallacy they're playing on today. must be a big trend on 4chan and r/The_Donald.

Obama has done way worse then Nixon. His actions have lead to the MURDER of Dozens of U.S Citizens. Obama should be imprisoned for Life for his Heinous Actions.

But then AssHats like Robbie and Bashy don't care when their actions hurt others. Just as long as they can pretend that they CARE more then you!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that's the fallacy they're playing on today. must be a big trend on 4chan and r/The_Donald.

Sheesh ...keep this kind of talk up Bashy and you will be starting Boxing Fetish Thread next...

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
i'm sure people tried the same with the topic of watergate before nixon resigned. good luck

We can talk about Andrew Johnson's impeachment as well if you'd like. But I'll ask again - what has Trump done that is impeachable?

Originally posted by ESB -1138
We can talk about Andrew Johnson's impeachment as well if you'd like. But I'll ask again - what has Trump done that is impeachable?

possible collusion with a hostile nation. that's impeachable.

but do continue your "where's the proof" tactic, as if that negates the investigation and all the suspicious ties that led to it.

me "it looks like oj did it"
you "you have no proof"
me: "dang, you won"

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
possible collusion with a hostile nation. that's impeachable.

but do continue your "where's the proof" tactic, as if that negates the investigation and all the suspicious ties that led to it.

Show me one single bit of evidence to support a Trump/Russia collusion. I'll wait.

wow your tactic worked. the federal criminal investigation has been nullified by your internet shenanigans. congratulation, sir. good job!

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
wow your tactic worked. the federal criminal investigation has been nullified by your internet shenanigans. congratulation, sir. good job!

Still waiting...

keep re-asserting your childish fallacy, champ

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
keep re-asserting your childish fallacy, champ

Yep. Evidence is a very childish fallacy. We have evidence to show that the DNC conspired during the primary in favor of Hillary. We have evidence to show that CNN was working with the Hillary campaign and provided her questions. We have evidence to show that the Obama White House was spying on Trump. And in eight months we had plenty of evidence that at least pointed to a cover-up in Watergate. And yet, eight months into the Russia/Trump collusion story, we have nothing.

Man, and I thought Alex Jones fans were the ones who just believe anything.

aaaand still the criminal investigation is ongoing, despite your cutesy tactic. try harder

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
aaaand still the criminal investigation is ongoing, despite your cutesy tactic. try harder

Look at all this evidence to show a Trump/Russia collusion!

k have fun with your silly troll-trap.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
k have fun with your silly troll-trap.

Yep, evidence is a troll-trap.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
Yep, evidence is a troll-trap.

the purpose of a criminal investigation is to gather evidence. despite your childish tactic, the investigation continues.

now repeat your same impotant fallacy, champ. show me what winning is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the purpose of a criminal investigation is to gather evidence. despite your childish tactic, the investigation continues.

now repeat your same impotant fallacy, champ. show me what winning is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

And I deal with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty. Nothing has even come up to suggest a possibility of a Trump/Russia collusion. And eight months is plenty of time to gather something. And yet nothing. Still nothing. Still waiting for this evidence.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
And I deal with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty. Nothing has even come up to suggest a possibility of a Trump/Russia collusion. And eight months is plenty of time to gather something. And yet nothing. Still nothing. Still waiting for this evidence.

internet speculation does not equate to a denial of due process. (hence the investigation).

and again: appeal to ignorance is still an easily dismissible troll-tactic, regardless of how super-hard you're trying to derail/win with it.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
internet speculation does not equate to a denial of due process. (hence the investigation).

and again: appeal to ignorance is still an easily dismissible troll-tactic, regardless of how super-hard you're trying to derail/win.

I'll keep waiting for that evidence. Let me know if it ever shows up.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
And I deal with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty. Nothing has even come up to suggest a possibility of a Trump/Russia collusion. And eight months is plenty of time to gather something. And yet nothing. Still nothing. Still waiting for this evidence.

There is also the issue of leaks. I fully believe if they had solid evidence it would have leaked so far.

Just to be clear to others: this is my opinion. I am not saying it is fact or that it means Trump didn't do anything wrong. You could easily argue that because of previous leaks they are keeping any evidence much more secure.

Do you personally think anything will come of this investigation? Just curious.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
I'll keep waiting for that evidence. Let me know if it ever shows up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Beats having an argument without evidence. Still waiting.

I guess I'm confused, it's ignorance to say Trump is innocent until proven guilty and so far no evidence has come out to show his guilt?

Since what I just said is a far cry from someone stating that Trump is for sure innocent.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
Beats having an argument without evidence. Still waiting.

oh i get it. you know your argument is fallacious drivel, but you're one of those "last word=win" people.

okay fine. allow me (and congratulations):

Originally posted by CHAMP -1138
you personally have no proof of criminal wrongdoing, so the criminal investigation is not valid and i win. still waiting.

Originally posted by Surtur
I guess I'm confused, it's ignorance to say Trump is innocent until proven guilty and so far no evidence has come out to show his guilt?

Since what I just said is a far cry from someone stating that Trump is for sure innocent.

Trump is innocent until proven guilty, that doesn't mean investigations into possible wrongdoings can't happen. How is this hard to understand?

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump is innocent until proven guilty, that doesn't mean investigations into possible wrongdoings can't happen. How is this hard to understand?

But who said the investigation can't happen?