Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Watch Antoine, the only reasonable SW 'Versus Series' YouTuber debunk Jensaarai's ridiculous Vader > Yoda arguments.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ijh-cgEKeP8

^ One of the best 30 mins of my life.

How sad is your life?

That's just being mean.

I thought you were dead. Welcome back.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
I thought you were dead. Welcome back. Forum was awful when I left. No passion and I doubt things have gotten any better. Also the Bulls are the best nba team of all time. They'd beat the warriors of last year.

Passion has been slightly reinvigorated in the star wars section around here.

Nah. Warriors (2017) > Bulls (1996).

Originally posted by quanchi112
Forum was awful when I left. No passion and I doubt things have gotten any better. Also the Bulls are the best nba team of all time. They'd beat the warriors of last year.

It's gotten MUCH worse.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Passion has been slightly reinvigorated in the star wars section around here.

Nah. Warriors (2017) > Bulls (1996). Nah. Defense wins. Better team physically and the greatest of all time player Michael Jordan definitely matters.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah. Defense wins. Better team physically and the greatest of all time player Michael Jordan definitely matters.

Warriors are almost as good defensively and have the best duo on the floor. Also the best trio. And the best quad. And the best shooters. And the best passers.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
Warriors are almost as good defensively and have the best duo on the floor. Also the best trio. And the best quad. And the best shooters. And the best passers. No way are they almost as good defensively. Harper, Jordan, and Pippen have the length and wingspan to guard court to court. Rodman is arguably the best rebounder of all time and would break Draymond Green's weak psyche. Warriors have a better chance with today's rules but they'd still falter due to the Bulls defense and Jordan just breaking them in clutch time.

There's only one basketball and you can't have everyone light it up. Too mentally tough and proven with a three peat. Cavs had very exploitable weaknesses and LeBron is no M.J.

Originally posted by TheNuisanceBird
^ One of the best 30 mins of my life.
Originally posted by MythLord
How sad is your life? LMFAO

RIP Ching

Lol why does this Badabing dude keep banning people

Because ThirdReich was a sock of a dude that was previously banned by him.

I think he should let this forum be and embrace the cancer. I like the idea of a forum with no rules and where anything goes.

Although I still think we should make annual sacrifices to Badabing.

It's not unlikely that you will become the next sacrifice

It's a year away, I still have a chance to redeem myself in the eyes of the populace.

Can't wait for Snoke and Kylo to eclipse Vader and Palpatine. I bet all you Ot diehards kinda know it to and are just hoping against the inevitable.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Can't wait for Snoke and Kylo to eclipse Vader and Palpatine. I bet all you Ot diehards kinda know it to and are just hoping against the inevitable.

Kylo's a Skywalker, so what's the problem?

Originally posted by thesithmaster
Kylo's a Skywalker, so what's the problem? That he's better than Vader. I've always said he was better character than pansy boy, Anakin.

^ I mean they could say outright that Snoke < Vader, (like they clearly said and showed with Maul), but you wouldn't accept it, and would claim the opposite.

So don't expect anyone to take your "rubbing in" seriously.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ I mean they could say outright that Snoke < Vader, (like they clearly said and showed with Maul), but you wouldn't accept it, and would claim the opposite.

So don't expect anyone to take your "rubbing in" seriously. Vader never beat Maul, dummy. Never. Ever. This isn't abc logic and Kenobi also beat the shit out of Vader in rots and only lost after he gave up in ANH.

Just as I stated the starkiller was far greater than the Death Star Snoke and Kylo will be greater than dead Vader and dead Palpatine.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Vader never beat Maul, dummy.


My point proven.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
My point proven. Windu never beat Han Solo but that doesn't mean he wouldn't. Wait and see. I know you won't ever admit Snoke and Kylo are superior no matter what they do. That's what fanboys do lie to themselves first and then the world.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Vader never beat Maul, dummy. Never. Ever.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Windu never beat Han Solo but that doesn't mean he wouldn't.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
My point proven.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
So you admit my opinion is just as valid as yours since there isn't any direct evidence of these two going up against each other. And both are very skilled with light sabers. Vader's mobility is also an issue and my case is pretty solid. Vader is overrated. That's all he's ever been.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you admit my opinion is just as valid as yours since there isn't any direct evidence of these two going up against each other. And both are very skilled with light sabers. Vader's mobility is also an issue and my case is pretty solid. Vader is overrated. That's all he's ever been.



It's time to accept the Vader hype is more real than ever. I myself wasn't happy about how Ben vs Maul went down. But it is what it is. Vader and Ben fought equally (and that's being generous to Ben who clearly knew he couldn't win otherwise he wouldn't have sacrificed himself). And Ben never moved any faster or more acrobatic/mobile than Vader either.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
It's time to accept the Vader hype is more real than ever. I myself wasn't happy about how Ben vs Maul went down. But it is what it is. Vader and Ben fought equally (and that's being generous to Ben who clearly knew he couldn't win otherwise he wouldn't have sacrificed himself). And Ben never moved any faster or more acrobatic/mobile than Vader either. We heard why Maul lost. And once again it's comparing two different chasrdwtrs with different styles like its the same thing. Ben was out of his prime as well. It's clear Kenobi, Maul, and Vader weren't in their primes in the ot. Lucas was clear on that but they were wiser and more experienced. Maul was at a bad place and stuck in the past according to the creator of that scene.


Vader is overrated and he dominated an era with little to no competition save Luke who once he was ready wiped his ass with his pitiful father.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ben who clearly knew he couldn't win otherwise he wouldn't have sacrificed himself). And Ben never moved any faster or more acrobatic/mobile than Vader either.
Not necessarily. It's plausible that it was simply to stop Luke from suicidally hanging around with the hope Ben would escape. That would be supported by this quote:
http://www.starwars.com/films/star-wars-episode-4-a-new-hope-story-gallery

I've not been able to find anything in canon that says Ben<ANH Vader.

Just so we're clear though, this doesn't apply to ROTJ Vader who has had several years to grow in powerful.

Ben also knew he'd be more detrimental to Luke and the rebels dead than alive. He said he'd be more powerful and unable to be attacked. Why does everyone ignore his own words in favor of this false narrative that Vader was greater than him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Ben also knew he'd be more detrimental to Luke and the rebels dead than alive. He said he'd be more powerful and unable to be attacked. Why does everyone ignore his own words in favor of this false narrative that Vader was greater than him.
Why do you keep ignoring canon? Ben deepened his connection to the force and grew as a swordsman becoming very good in comparison to his past incarnations. In canon, Ben Kenobi is prime Kenobi.

By virte of stalemating Ben pre-prime, a pre-prime Vader is already an rots+ Kenobi duelist and his feats several years pre-rebels, such as pulling freighters out of the sky remain vastly above what SOD maul, who you consider to be Maul in his prime, has ever demonstrated.

So I'm wondering what basis you have to assume that Vader can't just make Maul his plaything with the force?

Originally posted by quanchi112
And once again it's comparing two different chasrdwtrs with different styles like its the same thing.


Well Maul fought a lot more evenly with Ahsoka who Vader KO'd in a similar length of time. So it's 2 combatants with very different styles that both Maul and Vader have fought, and Vader looked superior against both.

And I'm not even getting into the power scales the director and voice actors have given.

Like I said I didn't like it, but it's clear there is a significant gap between Maul and Vader (as of Rebels at least). And I don't see how a fight between the younger versions of both characters would be much different, given the raw power at ROTS Anakin's disposal and how he trounced Dooku, and classified by Lucas as a duelist on par with Mace, Palpatine and Yoda.

I think if you want to big up Maul then make a case for him beating Count Dooku or ROTS Obi-Wan. But Anakin/Vader is simply off the chart.

Ha ha.