Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

I just watched the whole interview with her on Anderson Cooper.

My thoughts are the title of the thread.

This woman is fcking delusional. It's almost scary. Say what up you want about Tump and his crazy talk, she is down right dillusional. It's scary as hell she was so close to the presidency.

Beginning to think you're secretly in love with her.

Trump is even scarier and he became president.

Hillary is just power and money hungry. Trump is delusional and completely incompetent to be president on just about every level. Trump is completely resistant to reality. That's far more dangerous.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Trump is even scarier and he became president.

Hillary is just power and money hungry. Trump is delusional and completely incompetent to be president on just about every level. Trump is completely resistant to reality. That's far more dangerous.

Lol there is no way Hilary isn't delusional. Proof? The laundry list of people she has blamed for her loss, that is delusional.

Obama is partially at fault for her loss for talking about a program she agreed with, merely because of how her comments about coal miners were taken. Let that sink in for a second, let the delusion go over you like a wave. She wasn't against the program, but Obama shouldn't have opened his mouth about it because it would have benefited Hilary Clintons career.

Even the media apparently went "too soft" on Trump. Lol, D to the E to the L plus usional.

Just saying that as horrible and corrupt as Clinton is, Trump is far more dangerous to the stability of this country.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Just saying that as horrible and corrupt as Clinton is, Trump is far more dangerous to the stability of this country.

Okay, but one can indeed say she is better than Trump without ignoring her obvious delusions. Since that kind of stuff is what helped land Trump in office.

Part of what made some dislike her so vehemently(that she will never understand) was people on the left acting totally shocked at the criticism and acting like it was some right wing conspiracy just to take her down because she was a "strong" woman". Essentially acting like one could only have a problem with her if you're sexist or racist or something.

I agree that her failings helped land Trump in office. The failure of the Left is a big reason why this civilization is crumbling, yes.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I agree that her failings helped land Trump in office. The failure of the Left is a big reason why this civilization is crumbling, yes.

If civilization is crumbling what does it say about Hilary Clinton that her biggest concern is a book whining about her loss?

Keep in mind she sorta agrees with you: "But I am not done with politics because I literally believe our countries future is at stake" -H Doggy Dogg.

The future of the country is literally at stake so...whine about your election loss to help? Sounds like the ramblings of a crazy person.

Originally posted by Surtur
If civilization is crumbling what does it say about Hilary Clinton that her biggest concern is a book whining about her loss?

Keep in mind she sorta agrees with you: "But I am not done with politics because I literally believe our countries future is at stake" -H Doggy Dogg.

The future of the country is literally at stake so...whine about your election loss to help? Sounds like the ramblings of a crazy person.

I didn't realize that's what the book was about.

I guess it's part of her narcissism. And it underscores why she is part of the problem and not part of the solution.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I didn't realize that's what the book was about.

I guess it's part of her narcissism. And it underscores why she is part of the problem and not part of the solution.

The book is about "what happened" in the election lol. She does the cliche "Well I take responsibility, but..." and then passes the buck. Obama, Bernie, white people in general, Comey, Russia, social media, the mainstream media, etc.

All to blame lol. If Trump lost and blamed blacks people would have an aneurysm.

Jesus. Yeah. The main culprit was her just absolutely slimy and narcissistic need to be president at all costs and her failure to address problems honestly. She just doesn't instill trust by her vary nature and her history as a Clinton, lol. And the fact that the Right spun the whole email controversy to make her seem totally untrustworthy really hurt her, too. For all Trump's failings, he did have a certain charm because he does speak his mind and appears honest. Delusional, idiotic, barbaric and dangerous, yes, but still honest in a sense.

But she did win the popular vote. Which is what we should go by.

My biggest problem with the electoral college, moreso than the different weighting of different people's votes based on what state they're in, is this winner take all bullshit. It makes people's votes in any states that aren't swing states basically worthless.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Trump is even scarier and he became president.

Hillary is just power and money hungry. Trump is delusional and completely incompetent to be president on just about every level. Trump is completely resistant to reality. That's far more dangerous.

See you can't just say this and then not back it up. Explain how he's delusional. Hillary literally thought she was going to win without even winning. Deep down she still thinks she's President by winning the popular vote. Mind you those are not the rules.

On top of it she's blamed 55 other reasons for her loss without blaming herself.

Originally posted by Sable
See you can't just say this and then not back it up. Explain how he's delusional.

Um, everything he says..

Thats a non starter.

He lies like a child and is completely not in touch with reality. He doesn't use facts to form his opinions, he uses his opinions to form facts.

Example: He thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax.

I'm not a Clinton fan either, but to condemn her in favor of Trump is indefensible.

He does not think its a Chinese Hoax, he was bullshitting when he said that. I can't believe you actually think thats what he believes.

And for the record, you realize the climate has been changing for billions of years right? Like at one point the earth was in a ICE AGE for millions of years.

Clinton is dangerous because of the company she keeps. People like the Podestas, Weiners, Huma's and the ones we dont know about.

I agree the EC needs to go. However, I can't help but wonder if some of the leftists who want it gone would be embracing it if Hilary had won due to the EC.

I enjoy that despite Hillary losing and the fact that she's never going to be president, she still can #trigger the fck out of some people just by talking; about anything really. Clintonphobia is strong still; "I love it!".

Originally posted by Robtard
I enjoy that despite Hillary losing and the fact that she's never going to be president, she still can #trigger the fck out of some people just by talking; about anything really. Clintonphobia is strong still; "I love it!".

What is the point of coming in here and projecting some of your feelings onto other posters?

IOW: "No, you flip out over Clnton; not me!"

Originally posted by Sable
He does not think its a Chinese Hoax, he was bullshitting when he said that. I can't believe you actually think thats what he believes.

So are we supposed to guess what he means? You've proved my point that he is completely unpredictable and incomprehensible. And big business leaders have been afraid to come out against him because they're afraid of reprisal. What's more damaging to a free society than that?


Originally posted by Sable
And for the record, you realize the climate has been changing for billions of years right? Like at one point the earth was in a ICE AGE for millions of years.
B]

I can't believe people use this as a refutation against climate change, as if scientists studying it don't know the history of the earth. Yeah, no shit, but it happened over hundreds of thousands and even millions of years. It's happening now extremely rapidly within just a few generations. That's a bit of a difference.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "No, you flip out over Clnton; not me!"



More like you seem triggered by the topic. It's weird how when you guys talk shit about someone it's not an example of being triggered though, don't you think?

Now is the part where you play dumb and ask when you've done that.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So are we supposed to guess what he means? You've proved my point that he is completely unpredictable and incomprehensible. And big business leaders have been afraid to come out against him because they're afraid of reprisal. What's more damaging to a free society than that?


Classic example of Trump Denial Syndrome, that. Trump said it; he clearly meant it. Just like he clearly meant his insane comments about parts of his stupid wall being "see through" because of imagined dangers over falling sacks of drugs.

And yeah, Robtard has a good point. Why are you all so #triggered over Clinton anyway? She's not really in power now. She's just annoying. So ignore her.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So are we supposed to guess what he means? You've proved my point that he is completely unpredictable and incomprehensible. And big business leaders have been afraid to come out against him because they're afraid of reprisal. What's more damaging to a free society than that?




I can't believe people use this as a refutation against climate change, as if scientists studying it don't know the history of the earth. Yeah, no shit, but it happened over hundreds of thousands and even millions of years. It's happening now extremely rapidly within just a few generations. That's a bit of a difference.

Fine lets go with what he said, its a Chinese Hoax, how does it affect you?

Did you ever notice, its weather when its in the ocean and not affecting the US. But if it hits the US its climate change

Stupid much?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
And yeah, Robtard has a good point. Why are you all so #triggered over Clinton anyway? She's not really in power now. She's just annoying. So ignore her.

She is clearly in the news a lot now and doing interviews. She is valid to discuss.

But if people want to dismiss it as being triggered that is cool. Nobody has explained the rules to me of who is or is not okay to discuss without it being an example of being triggered. Is it only people in office? Because if Trump lost and then put out a book whining over it and did some crazy interviews I think people here would be discussing it.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech

I can't believe people use this as a refutation against climate change, as if scientists studying it don't know the history of the earth. Yeah, no shit, but it happened over hundreds of thousands and even millions of years. It's happening now extremely rapidly within just a few generations. That's a bit of a difference.

Oh the ever present "cos Scientists."

What scientist, NAME THEM.

IOW if you are a scientists, you are some fcking god now. Scientists

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
And yeah, Robtard has a good point. Why are you all so #triggered over Clinton anyway? She's not really in power now. She's just annoying. So ignore her.



She's just trying to sell her book, good for her if she can.

Originally posted by Robtard
I enjoy that despite Hillary losing and the fact that she's never going to be president, she still can #trigger the fck out of some people just by talking; about anything really. Clintonphobia is strong still; "I love it!".
I mean you can love it all you want, but the fact is that Clinton is wildly unpopular, and she is electoral poison. The more she sticks around sinking her teeth and claws into the American political system, the more negatively this will reflect on the image of the Democratic party.

Originally posted by Robtard


She's just trying to sell her book, good for her if she can.

But in her book she's blaming everyone else for her loss. Kind of a bad way to sell your book. Its everyone else fault but mine!

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean you can love it all you want, but the fact is that Clinton is wildly unpopular, and she is electoral poison.

The more she sticks around sinking her teeth and claws into the American political system, the more negatively this will reflect on the image of the Democratic party.

I love the shit out of it, seeing her trigger people because she does an interview is funny. These people still fear her and she won't ever be POTUS.

That's where you're wrong. She lost, so what? There's a loser in every election. She also won the popular vote in her election run, not every loser can say that; in fact very few can. She's also doing a book tour now, not running for office, it has virtually no reflection on the Dem party. Not in reality.

Originally posted by Sable
But in her book she's blaming everyone else for her loss. Kind of a bad way to sell your book. Its everyone else fault but mine!

Shh, you can't talk about it.

Originally posted by Sable
But in her book she's blaming everyone else for her loss. Kind of a bad way to sell your book. Its everyone else fault but mine!

Okay, and? If it flops it flops.

Originally posted by Surtur
Shh, you can't talk about it.

Who said that? No one. Just don't cry when you're mocked for clawing your eyes out over "that woman!" who can't do anything to you now.

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, and? If it flops it flops.



Who said that? No one. Just don't cry when you're mocked for clawing your eyes out over "that woman!" who can't do anything to you now.

Lol and there is the classic Rob. Nobody is really clawing their eyes out. But okay.

Originally posted by Sable
Oh the ever present "cos Scientists."

What scientist, NAME THEM.

IOW if you are a scientists, you are some fcking god now. Scientists

Okay, smarty pants. What experiments have you demonstrated to disprove it?

The point is: we have to depend upon what experts tell us. So I trust scientists as opposed to wacky and barely intelligible morons like Donald Trump.

What experiments have you done that prove Hurricanes are a result of Global Warming?

Again what Scientists?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Okay, smarty pants. What experiments have you demonstrated to disprove it?

The point is: we have to depend upon what experts tell us. So I trust scientists as opposed to wacky and barely intelligible morons like Donald Trump.

If you trust scientists...well, more than one of them have said the hurricanes are not being caused by climate change. What about them?

Originally posted by Sable
Again what Scientists?

Joseph Romm is a key one.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/nov/17/book-review-climate-change-what-everyone-needs-to-know

What about the scientists that disagree that hurricanes are from global warming. Did you know being hit by one is a crap shoot and all about luck? Did you know there are tons of hurricanes that you never knew about cause they never hit land?

Lol, why are you so fixated on hurricanes?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Lol, why are you so fixated on hurricanes?

I can't speak for Sable, but what bothers me is how with these hurricanes people were blaming climate change. More than one scientist has come out to say no these recent things were not caused by it.

It can cause unwarranted hysteria. Also you are clearly passionate about climate change so I would think it would bug you too. Since if there is actual evidence out there about climate change and people are trying to push something as evidence that isn't truly evidence...it can hurt the overall cause.

Well, it's not just about hurricanes. It's about rising water levels and drought, too.

But it's true that these hurricanes thrive on warmth in the oceans and that's why they're getting bigger and stronger. Irma was massive. I even heard a meteorologist on TV say that he thought the size (400 miles from the eye) was a mistake. He had seen 200 miles before, but Irma was double that.

But is it a direct result of climate change? I don't know. And it doesn't really matter. Proving that a particular storm is or isn't a result of climate change is not the point. The point is it's what can be expected to happen assuming Climate Change is true.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Well, it's not just about hurricanes. It's about rising water levels and drought, too.

But it's true that these hurricanes thrive on warmth in the oceans and that's why they're getting bigger and stronger. Irma was massive. I even heard a meteorologist on TV say that he thought the size (400 miles from the eye) was a mistake. He had seen 200 miles before, but Irma was double that.

But is it a direct result of climate change? I don't know. And it doesn't really matter. Proving that a particular storm is or isn't a result of climate change is not the point. The point is it's what can be expected to happen assuming Climate Change is true.

I understand, but like I said I think it harms the cause when people push false narratives.

Climate change is still a valid discussion to have...*after* the natural disaster. As the disaster is going on and people are dying I don't think a climate change debate is needed unless it involves a weather manipulation machine that can fix the problem, otherwise it can wait.

It also most likely hurts the cause when people use it as a political tool, like some did.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Trump is even scarier and he became president.

Hillary is just power and money hungry. Trump is delusional and completely incompetent to be president on just about every level. Trump is completely resistant to reality. That's far more dangerous.

Depends on what you look for for compentency. They say the hurricane responses under Trump were very efficient.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Joseph Romm is a key one.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/nov/17/book-review-climate-change-what-everyone-needs-to-know

See, they ask, you provide and then they dismiss. It's a losing battle.

Again, do wonder if they're so dismissive of doctors and lab workers who are in charge of their health. Do they go "fuk you, doc, I'm doing my own cancer screening".

Originally posted by Robtard
Classic example of Trump Denial Syndrome, that. Trump said it; he clearly meant it. Just like he clearly meant his insane comments about parts of his stupid wall being "see through" because of imagined dangers over falling sacks of drugs.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGO8I6KU0AAasJQ.jpg

Yeah because "doctors and lab workers" never MISDIAGNOSE things or some such. They got a 100% accuracy rate.


Oh wait...

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGO8I6KU0AAasJQ.jpg


Where have I heard that before???

Oh yeah....See The First Clinton time the Clintons showed up back in the 90's...

Originally posted by Robtard
I love the shit out of it, seeing her trigger people because she does an interview is funny. These people still fear her and she won't ever be POTUS.

That's where you're wrong. She lost, so what? There's a loser in every election. She also won the popular vote in her election run, not every loser can say that; in fact very few can. She's also doing a book tour now, not running for office, it has virtually no reflection on the Dem party. Not in reality.

Clinton Derangement Syndrome in full-effect!

Says the guy how brought up Trump in the Clinton Thread.


WOO WOOO ITS CASEY JONES TIME!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOO!!!!

(that is a train sound effect for the unknowing)

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Says the guy how brought up Trump in the Clinton Thread.


WOO WOOO ITS CASEY JONES TIME!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOO!!!!

(that is a train sound effect for the unknowing)

I love how they constantly run their mouths about people, but freak when Hilary gets talked about. Then they pat each other on the back and pretend they accomplished something. It's adorable.

Yes. That is called "CHILDISH Behavior"... and the Left excels at it!

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Clinton Derangement Syndrome in full-effect!

Trump Derangement Syndrome in full effect

Originally posted by Sable
Trump Derangement Syndrome in full effect

I love how Trump has broken so many people. And they will be broken for years over it. Guaranteed. They can't even comprehend how he won. They struggle to do it.

Adam thinks Hillary is president.

Well Adam is English so yeah....

Adam is one of those people who hated Bernie and wanted Hillary to get the nom over him. Speaks volumes for how screwed up that is. He was all in "I'm with her" I bet he wore the pink shirts too.

Originally posted by Sable
Adam is one of those people who hated Bernie and wanted Hillary to get the nom over him. Speaks volumes for how screwed up that is. He was all in "I'm with her" I bet he wore the pink shirts too.

Well like I said...He is ENGLISH so...

Lol, so delusional, so funny.

677W_M53uDc

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Well like I said...He is ENGLISH so...

So you get banned for "ect", but Adam isn't banned for being British.

No justice, I tells ya.

Originally posted by cdtm
So you get banned for "ect", but Adam isn't banned for being British.

No justice, I tells ya.

Don't question it, someone here was able to threaten murder multiple times without getting banned.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol, so delusional, so funny.

677W_M53uDc

Let's see who's dillusional.

Trump is President and won fair and square.

Hillary isn't President but thinks she is the rightful President.

Who's delusional again?

How in the **** did this forum get infiltrated so robustly with whataboutism and the politically ignorant? Jesus.

Originally posted by Sable
Let's see who's dillusional.

Trump is President and won fair and square.

Hillary isn't President but thinks she is the rightful President.

Who's delusional again?

I just do not believe she is finished with politics. She claims she is, but she is a liar.

Originally posted by The Lost
How in the **** did this forum get infiltrated so robustly with whataboutism and the politically ignorant? Jesus.

What subjects should we discuss then? What are acceptable?

Originally posted by cdtm
So you get banned for "ect", but Adam isn't banned for being British.

No justice, I tells ya.

I know. World aint Fair!

But I do admit.. When I "ETC" I ETC HARD CORE!!!!!!

Originally posted by Surtur
What subjects should we discuss then? What are acceptable?

The implications of those questions contribute to proving my point. Seriously. No subject has to change nor are there "acceptable" ones. Just ones discussed without whataboutism or a total lack of any political knowledge.

Originally posted by The Lost
The implications of those questions contribute to proving my point. Seriously. No subject has to change nor are there "acceptable" ones. Just ones discussed without whataboutism or a total lack of any political knowledge.

So you say no subjects have to change, and then you list some that need to change.

Its politics and those will never change.

Originally posted by Surtur
So you say no subjects have to change, and then you list some that need to change.

The ****? The things I mentioned aren't subjects.

It's an all or nothing thing, unfortunately. If there is something you don't like do not click it. It's simple. Or at least it should be.

Originally posted by The Lost
The ****? The things I mentioned aren't subjects.

But it is, because the whole thing of "total lack of political knowledge"is subjective.

Who decides that? Do you? If so, why?

I blame the SJW's.

Originally posted by Surtur
But it is, because the whole thing of "total lack of political knowledge"is subjective.

Who decides that? Do you? If so, why?

Someone being politically ignorant is subjective?

Man, this forum now. Christ.

Also, why are we discussing subjectivity right now? Did you misunderstand how I was using "subjective?" (The latter question is facetious, by the way. In case you fail to apply your "subjective" knowledge to figure that out.)
Originally posted by Flyattractor
I blame the SJW's.

For what?

Originally posted by The Lost
Someone being politically ignorant is subjective?

Man, this forum now. Christ.

Also, why are we discussing subjectivity right now? Did you misunderstand how I was using "subjective?" (The latter question is facetious, by the way. In case you fail to apply your "subjective" knowledge to figure that out.)


For what?

It's sad, but yeah it is subjective here. Dipshits on the forum accuse folk of all kinds of shit that isn't valid.

Out of curiosity, you left or right? Politically.

Originally posted by The Lost



For what?

Whatchyagot?

Originally posted by Surtur
It's sad, but yeah it is subjective here. Dipshits on the forum accuse folk of all kinds of shit that isn't valid.

It's sad that you think that because it thoroughly depends. If I say the room feels warm, that's me expressing subjective knowledge. If I say the room is warm because it's 71 degrees according to my ability to read a nearby thermometer, that's objective knowledge.



False dilemma and, since that's happening, you're likely the type to make up your mind after seeing me express a couple anecdotes where I discuss my opinion or perspective about something so there's legitimately no point in disclosing where I stand and how strong/weak that stance is.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Whatchyagot?

The **** does that even mean? I asked you what you meant by your statement and you are asking me what I've got?

It is sad that it is subjective, but it is what this forum has devolved into. Don't whine about it because it is pointless.

False dilemma? So you won't say which side you swing, which means you swing left.

Originally posted by The Lost
The **** does that even mean? I asked you what you meant by your statement and you are asking me what I've got?

Originally posted by Surtur
It is sad that it is subjective, but it is what this forum has devolved into. Don't whine about it because it is pointless.

Saying something more doesn't make it more true.



Yes, that. Assuming there are only two things when there is at least one alternative... thing.

See, that was even earlier than I figured, which means it's worse than I thought. It makes it easier for you to force individuals you come across into categorical labels. It makes it even simpler when there's two because it makes it merely a 50/50 gamble for you. Not too bad!

Originally posted by Surtur
It is sad that it is subjective, but it is what this forum has devolved into. Don't whine about it because it is pointless.

False dilemma? So you won't say which side you swing, which means you swing left.

^

This post really illustrates your ignorance and myopic view of well, just about everything. Your "Us Vs Them" approach to all subjects is also in full display. What if he's neither?

Do better, Surt. At least try.

Oh my god, this thread just delved into complete what-the-f#ckery.

Surt doesn't understanding the different between changing subjects and speaking more intelligently about them. Wow.

Originally posted by Robtard
^

This post really illustrates your ignorance and myopic view of well, just about everything. Your "Us Vs Them" approach to all subjects is also in full display. What if he's neither?

Do better, Surt. At least try.

Yup.




But it wasn't all a loss, cause this is spot on...



Originally posted by Adam_PoE
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGO8I6KU0AAasJQ.jpg

Sable did that exact thing early in this thread...

Originally posted by Sable
He does not think its a Chinese Hoax, he was bullshitting when he said that. I can't believe you actually think thats what he believes.Originally posted by Patient_Leech
So are we supposed to guess what he means? You've proved my point that he is completely unpredictable and incomprehensible. And big business leaders have been afraid to come out against him because they're afraid of reprisal. What's more damaging to a free society than that?

Yup

Anyways, we can both laugh, but lets leave the climate change debate out of this thread please, I made one specifically for that.

Hillary is still out of her fcking mind. Meanwhile the US is doing ok.

^ Wow, an honest concession. You get respect, Sable.

Originally posted by The Lost


Saying something more doesn't make it more true.

A lesson more here need to learn.



It was a simple question.

Originally posted by Robtard
^

This post really illustrates your ignorance and myopic view of well, just about everything. Your "Us Vs Them" approach to all subjects is also in full display. What if he's neither?

Do better, Surt. At least try.

If he was neither then the answer should have been "neither" lol. It's not like if he said neither I would have said "wrong! choose!". Most swing one way or the other, and I made an assumption based on a failure to answer.

If folk don't like it...answer the question, then? Or don't respond at all, but don't dodge around it.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Surt doesn't understanding the different between changing subjects and speaking more intelligently about them. Wow.

Lol you and I have had discussions before on multiple topics. I think you know this isn't really true.

I guess reactions surprise me, I ask if someone is right or left and suddenly it is being implied I am trying to "force" people into this. Like I'm waterboarding them until they give in and pick a side. I only assumed a side once the question wasn't answered. Giving the wacking someone from the left was taking in here I thought maybe someone didn't want to fully admit to it. I fully admit I could be wrong.

Thing is, this isn't twitter though lol. You get more than 140 characters. A more nuanced response to the question would have been fine. I would not have gotten my panties in a twist if someone asked if I was left or right, but meh.

Originally posted by Surtur

It was a simple question.

Your simple question was simply loaded.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol you and I have had discussions before on multiple topics. I think you know this isn't really true.

I guess reactions surprise me, I ask if someone is right or left and suddenly it is being implied I am trying to "force" people into this. Like I'm waterboarding them until they give in and pick a side. I only assumed a side once the question wasn't answered. Giving the wacking someone from the left was taking in here I thought maybe someone didn't want to fully admit to it. I fully admit I could be wrong.

Thing is, this isn't twitter though lol. You get more than 140 characters. A more nuanced response to the question would have been fine. I would not have gotten my panties in a twist if someone asked if I was left or right, but meh.

To ask "left" or "right" is not useful, because you should really pick a topic or two and see how someone responds. People assume too much if you say simply "left" or "right." Issues should be discussed, not loyalties to movements.

Originally posted by The Lost
Your simple question was simply loaded.

I understand where you are coming from and I apologize.

Originally posted by Surtur
I understand where you are coming from and I apologize.

If you're being genuine, I accept your apology and appreciate it.

Originally posted by The Lost
If you're being genuine, I accept your apology and appreciate it.

I am indeed being genuine, I have no issues with you.

What am I seeing? Common courtesy on a political message board?

https://giant.gfycat.com/ScentedCrispHare.gif

http://i.imgur.com/UFaRx.gif

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
He lies like a child and is completely not in touch with reality. He doesn't use facts to form his opinions, he uses his opinions to form facts.

Example: He thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax.

I'm not a Clinton fan either, but to condemn her in favor of Trump is indefensible. This, /end thread!

Originally posted by Surtur
I understand where you are coming from and I apologize. Originally posted by The Lost
If you're being genuine, I accept your apology and appreciate it. Originally posted by Surtur
I am indeed being genuine, I have no issues with you.
This makes me happy. We need more of this.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGO8I6KU0AAasJQ.jpg dumb facebook meme.

Trump said mexicans are rapists
Where did he day that?
On cnn
Can you show me him saying that on cnn?
Ok it was in a speech
Where in the speech?
Here
Actually he said mexico is bringing rapists into the US, which is true
Hes implying theyre all rapists
How do you know that?
Omg youre a drumpftard, imma go on facebook to moan about you and find a funny meme

https://orig00.deviantart.net/65da/f/2017/260/4/5/jimsonic2_by_darkstormzero-dbnpff1.gif

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
https://orig00.deviantart.net/65da/f/2017/260/4/5/jimsonic2_by_darkstormzero-dbnpff1.gif
Jesus...

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Jesus...

That is what these threads have been reduced to these days.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
That is what these threads have been reduced to these days.

How does one reduce a thread to a fictional character?

Originally posted by Surtur
How does one reduce a thread to a fictional character?

Oh? I wasn't aware James Stanton pretending to buttf**k a Sonic plushie toy was fiction :P

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Oh? I wasn't aware James Stanton pretending to buttf**k a Sonic plushie toy was fiction :P

It's as real as the biblical Jesus.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's as real as the biblical Jesus.

Ah, but there is video evidence :P

https://youtu.be/2odAxDpssVo?list=PL4C68FCCCD3E13304&t=67

2odAxDpssVo