Female Police Officer: San Juan Mayor didn't allow the food to be distrubted.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Sable
5Uc1pPsKt_s

Sable
FEMA official: San Juan mayor has not been participated substantially in the joint field office. All the other Mayors of Puerto Rico are participating. the JFO is in San Juan.

OJToyGJQqIg


I bet bash feels real sheepish now.

Sable
Geraldo Wipes the Floor with San Juan Mayor.

oA29iiwvP_A

Liberal Narrative Destroyed. The Mayor was the problem in San Juan, not Trump.

She is so far over her head, she sounds like a Total Social Justice Warrior.

Surtur
So she is a lying little kunt. She wore a "nasty" t-shirt the other day. Thank god Puerto Rico's t-shirt district was spared in this disaster.

Sable
She's a complete liar, she got exposed, but don't worry, people will believe her over another person because reasons.

Surtur
Also in the Geraldo scene aren't those...crates of supplies in the background? Lol.

Sable
I remember Bash became unhinged about this, looks like he fell for fake news.

Surtur
Originally posted by Sable
I remember Bash became unhinged about this, looks like he fell for fake news.

A bunch of leftists did. It is hilarious how their every narrative seems to crumble.

Sable
Dodge City in here now with this big reveal. Im sure it was a Russian who called in a random radio show, spoke fluent Spanish trying to cover for the President.

Sable
http://www.mobiletownguide.com/user_images/1454516540_DC_silhouettes.jpg

Surtur
K8E_zMLCRNg

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
So she is a lying little kunt. She wore a "nasty" t-shirt the other day. Thank god Puerto Rico's t-shirt district was spared in this disaster.

She wore that shirt specifically because Trump called her "nasty", right? If so, see below:

What's the problem with her wearing a shirt with a word on it, when you had no problem with Trump calling her that word in the first place? Explain it to me.

Sable
She's a fcking liar

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
She wore that shirt specifically because Trump called her "nasty", right? If so, see below:

What's the problem with her wearing a shirt with a word on it, when you had no problem with Trump calling her that word in the first place? Explain it to me.

The t-shirt district comment was a joke, I actually find it amusing she is trying to play the victim in this situation.

Sable
She's a fcking reprobate

Surtur
Originally posted by Sable
She's a fcking reprobate

Also didn't she wear a "help us we're dying" t-shirt?

Sable
Geraldo went there and said no one was dying

Raisen
Originally posted by Robtard
She wore that shirt specifically because Trump called her "nasty", right? If so, see below:

What's the problem with her wearing a shirt with a word on it, when you had no problem with Trump calling her that word in the first place? Explain it to me.

I don't see anything Wrong with it. it's just silly of her to do it.

Surtur
Originally posted by Sable
Geraldo went there and said no one was dying

I know, but even without that interview...considering what we now know about her behavior it makes her wearing that shirt all the more disturbing.

Sable
Mayor: "We have no supplies, We are dying."
Common Sense: Where did you find the time to make those tee shirts
Mayor: Trump!

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
The t-shirt district comment was a joke, I actually find it amusing she is trying to play the victim in this situation.

Wasn't talking about that the humor comment, just that you've brought up her using the "nasty" shirt as some form of negative before and I found it odd.

Doesn't seem to be playing a victim, more of mocking Trump for his unpresidentialness.

Raisen
Originally posted by Robtard
Wasn't talking about that the humor comment, just that you've brought up her using the "nasty" shirt as some form of negative before and I found it odd.

Doesn't seem to be playing a victim, more of mocking Trump for his unpresidentialness.

why are we to the point that people are completely for trump and anyone who says anything against him is automatically an enemy

and then there are those who are against trump and they support anybody who doesn't like trump

really. why do people let themselves be like this?

Robtard
I assume you're referring to me in the the second line. Here specifically, the President's office should be above petty things like insulting other people with names, especially other Americans. He makes himself and the Oval Office look a fool when he engages in these petty squabbles.

It's one thing to refer to terrorist as "losers", though he should really use his 'better words' there imo, but this is democratically elected official and she's an American. You're the president, be above it.

Raisen
Originally posted by Robtard
I assume you're referring to me in the the second line. Here specifically, the President's office should be above petty things like insulting other people with names, especially other Americans. He makes himself and the Oval Office look a fool when he engages in these petty squabbles.

It's one thing to refer to terrorist as "losers", though he should really use his 'better words' there imo, but this is democratically elected official and she's an American. You're the president, be above it.

not just you. but I've never seen you agree with anything trump says or does. you bash him about everything. it's the same thing anti-Obama people did to obama

Robtard
Originally posted by Raisen
not just you. but I've never seen you agree with anything trump says or does. you bash him about everything. it's the same thing anti-Obama people did to obama

I can totally see how you could feel that way. In my defense, I've seen little to praise Trump over since he's taken office.

I cautiously bought into the "it's just an act, he will clean himself up once he takes office" after the election, but he hasn't. President Trump is basically the same as Campaign Trump, a clown; a dangerous one. Until that changes, I don't see my opinion changing.

Sable
Isn't being a progressive ignorant and dangerous though? Not saying you are one.

Robtard
Well depends, what is a "progressive person"? Explain.

What I see/understand it: A progressive person is someone who is into ideas like civil equality and changes that affect that directly, willing to change with the times (simplest form). "Progressive" has it's roots in "progress". So I'd have to disagree with you so far.

Sable
Names can be "in name only" though.

Like Republicans in Congress are RINOs.

You usually vote Democrat right?

Robtard
Then they're not really it, if it's in name only.

Yes. Had a fairly neutral/negative-neutral opinion of GWB, until 9/11 and the war. McCain was kinda feasible, but then he added an utter retard to his ticket, also the stain of the GWB admin didn't help at all. Romney seemed turdish as did that smarmy faced Ryan. If you don't recall, I thought Kasich was decent (you attacked me for this) and wanted him to win the nomination as he could be an acceptable replacement for Bernie losing, as I wanted it to be Sanders Vs Kasich.

Sable
Who would you have voted for if it was Kasich vs Sanders in the general?

Robtard
Sanders. But would have been alright with Kasich, was willing to give him a shot. He was the one guy on the Republican side who always remained poised and consistently tried to talk about the economy, foreign affairs etc., not the BS name calling and buffoonery.

Sable
I remember you telling me you are fiscally conservative and socially liberal, which Kasich is both.

Sanders isnt a fiscal conservative

Why would you have voted for Sanders over Kasich? Kasich has more executive experience actually running a state.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.