Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Here they are:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html



Some are pro-Bernie Sanders.


Some are pro-LGBT. Some where anti-Trump. Many were anti-Hillary. Many were xenophobic or border protection things.




All in all...seems like they were significantly left-leaning. So what's the problem, again? I thought these things were all about promoting Trump and shitting on Hillary. I thought I was supposed to be angry and have a pitch-fork ready. Why are the leftists buttmad, again?

The problem is.....lol f*ck if I know anymore. These imbeciles will whine over anything if they can try to imply it wasn't Clintons fault she lost.

Meanwhile, ACTUAL election interference by the Dems, and my topic about it has no responses from the usual suspects here.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f11/t647367.html

Weird.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Here they are:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html



Some are pro-Bernie Sanders.


Some are pro-LGBT. Some where anti-Trump. Many were anti-Hillary. Many were xenophobic or border protection things.




All in all...seems like they were significantly left-leaning. So what's the problem, again? I thought these things were all about promoting Trump and shitting on Hillary. I thought I was supposed to be angry and have a pitch-fork ready. Why are the leftists buttmad, again?

Sounds like something a partisan righty of a site would say, like....



....the new york... oh.

Never mind.

First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

^ This seems pretty excessive Fox. WTF dude?
Attack the argument, not the person.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

Actually, I respect her as well. Her and the DNC flat out interfering in our election(remember how this used to be a bad thing?) to push Bernie out had a ripple effect that put Trump in the WH. Trump's victory exposed leftists for their true colors, giving us tons of hilarious footage and all around vaporizing any moral high ground they might of been delusional enough to think they still had.

Thanks Hilary, I mean it. You did good, real good. Your sense of entitlement helped this country avoid you.

Originally posted by socool8520
^ This seems pretty excessive Fox. WTF dude?
Attack the argument, not the person. I'm not attacking him, he just should use the correct word, is all....

Originally posted by Surtur
Actually, I respect her as well. Her and the DNC flat out interfering in our election(remember how this used to be a bad thing?) to push Bernie out had a ripple effect that put Trump in the WH. Trump's victory exposed leftists for their true colors, giving us tons of hilarious footage and all around vaporizing any moral high ground they might of been delusional enough to think they still had.

Thanks Hilary, I mean it. You did good, real good. Your sense of entitlement helped this country avoid you. Well, sure. She exposed lefties for their true colours, but she actually put a lot of effort to put a woman in the whitehouse. I respect her for the work she put in.



Seriously.

Lol she didn't put a lot of effort to put a woman into office. She did a lot of effort to put herself into office. It's because she felt it was owed to her.

I also respect her for the work she put in, especially in Wisconsin. That was top notch stuff, agreed?

If you want to imply she is some overall champion of women, lol, yeah and Michael Moore is a champion of the Atkins diet. Remember: gay marriage(which includes females, as in lesbians) was wrong until it was to her advantage. Remember: women have the right to be believed, unless it's her husband being accused.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
I'm not attacking him, he just should use the correct word, is all....


A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch.

Originally posted by socool8520
A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch.

He is stressed, the recent terror attack in NYC reminded him in the UK they are due for their monthly Islamic terror incident soon most probably.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol she didn't put a lot of effort to put a woman into office. She did a lot of effort to put herself into office. It's because she felt it was owed to her.

I also respect her for the work she put in, especially in Wisconsin. That was top notch stuff, agreed?

If you want to imply she is some overall champion of women, lol, yeah and Michael Moore is a champion of the Atkins diet. Remember: gay marriage(which includes females, as in lesbians) was wrong until it was to her advantage. Remember: women have the right to be believed, unless it's her husband being accused. Okay, that seemed a bit "I hate hillary" but she did work hard to make herself president. I respect her efforts, is all I'm saying.

Originally posted by socool8520
A simple, hey bro, you should have used were instead of where would have sufficed. That was over-the-top. It could have been as simple as an auto correct error or something. people really have to learn to tone it down a notch. Bullshit. This is my style. Don't hate.

Lol well I don't hate her, it's about how you phrase things. If you said she worked hard...for herself, bingo was his name-o.

For women? Nope lol. She worked hard for her. Nothing wrong with that, but spades need to be called spades. Depicting her as an overall champion for women is just comedy though. In the same way Trump is a champion for illegal immigrants.

They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol well I don't hate her, it's about how you phrase things. If you said she worked hard...for herself, bingo was his name-o.

For women? Nope lol. She worked hard for her. Nothing wrong with that, but spades need to be called spades. Well, she is a woman. Surely she put herself as a role model for women, whether you think it was bad or good, she did work for women......

Originally posted by Foxsteak
First of all....Da DUUUUDE M0N

were = past tense of are
where = question of here, there etc.

Please be correct with the english language, you oklahoma hick.

As for shitting on Hillary, I still respect her. She put Bernie in his place. Good for her, imo.

Clearly a typo. But we've been down this avenue before: I started correcting all the grammatical and spelling mistakes you made and you killed the "game." I think you forgot about that.


But we can go again and I start correcting all of your posts.
For example:

Oklahoma is a proper noun: capitalize it you uneducated chav-swine.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Well, she is a woman. Surely she put herself as a role model for women, whether you think it was bad or good, she did work for women......

Okay, but I'm speaking to motivations lol. She was motivated not because "I just wanna see females doing well". She felt entitled to it and was willing to use the "first female president thing" to exploit it.

She did portray herself as that. What I'm saying if the reality was Hilary just cared about Hilary. There is nothing wrong with that, it's just not true to say she was working for women as a whole. She didn't decide to throw her weight behind a non-toxic female candidate, lol.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Bullshit. This is my style. Don't hate.

Cool, but it should come as no surprise to you when people begin to troll/bash you.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

This might be a strange question, but: do you think there is any group(anywhere) where it is OKAY for them to meddle in a US election?

Like, the DNC interfered as well. Do they have more of a right to interfere in our elections? Because I don't think anyone, I don't care where you are from or what country, has that right.

And yet...if social media ads are interference, what would we label the utter hate-fest some of our media spewed out against certain candidates? Is that okay? Is there some "you live here so you can interfere" thing? Like, I can hit my baby brother, but you can't?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

Well, it would be a bit hypocritical of us to be outraged over this when we do the same thing to other countries. These two were trying to destroy each other with or without Russia's help. Just because they were Russian doesn't make it any more detestable imo.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
They look more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton to me. One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.

But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.

If a country like Qatar can buy ads lobbying against a blockade or whatever on our own television networks, then why shouldn't Russia be able to buy ads on Facebook?

Other countries buy ads and put out propaganda all the time.

Originally posted by Surtur
Okay, but I'm speaking to motivations lol. She was motivated not because "I just wanna see females doing well". She felt entitled to it and was willing to use the "first female president thing" to exploit it.

She did portray herself as that. What I'm saying if the reality was Hilary just cared about Hilary. There is nothing wrong with that, it's just not true to say she was working for women as a whole. She didn't decide to throw her weight behind a non-toxic female candidate, lol. Well, sure. If a man did that I respect that man. If hillary or thatcher did that, I'd give them respect, is all I'm saying.

Originally posted by socool8520
Cool, but it should come as no surprise to you when people begin to troll/bash you. I can handle that.

Originally posted by cdtm
If a country like Qatar can buy ads lobbying against a blockade or whatever on our own television networks, then why shouldn't Russia be able to buy ads on Facebook?

Other countries buy ads and put out propaganda all the time. Bu-but-but we want le trump to lose so we can have le last laugh, bro.

Well no, I get it. But you wouldn't say the man was doing it for all men lol. Hilary wanted it for H-Doggy Dog. Trump wanted it for Trump.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
One actually equated a win for Clinton being a win for Satan.
And who could argue with that?

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
But the question still remains. Why is Russia meddling in our election in the first place? It should not be.
My guess is that Russians meddle in everything they think will benefit them or create a chaos that is beneficial to them in some shape or form. Same with the US, same with the Chinease.

Originally posted by Surtur
Well no, I get it. But you wouldn't say the man was doing it for all men lol. Hilary wanted it for H-Doggy Dog. Trump wanted it for Trump. As a Trump fan, I respect her for her efforts.

Originally posted by Stigma
And who could argue with that?


My guess is that Russians meddle in everything they think will benefit them or create a chaos that is beneficial to them in some shape or form. Same with the US, same with the Chinease. Well, should we consider Russia an enemy? I don't, but as a Polish Earthian, you may disagree?

Originally posted by Foxsteak
As a Trump fan, I respect her for her efforts.
Indeed. She was resilient, that's for sure.

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Well, should we consider Russia an enemy? I don't, but as a Polish Earthian, you may disagree?
I don't either. Russian Communism is over. Now we have something else there, not necessarily as sinister.

I try to approach matters of politics in a pragmatic way. In order to do so, one must try to understand the other side.

That of course does not mean that one cannot make value judgements on Soviet Communism or Nazi Socialism, but it is not a mattter of nationality per se, but ideology.

Besides, consider this, unless one is really bend of sh***ing on his/her own country most people are nationalistic patriots either way.

Sure.

Respect to Russia imo like Nigel Farage respects Russia. Politics is very complicated, yet Russia's influences is not like a threat to us. I mean FFS, these retards are trying to argue that le ebul Russki are hacking arrr election wiv FBIbook.


Idiots. Bashar Teg and Robtard are idiots. Put them on ignore. /my advice

Originally posted by Surtur
This might be a strange question, but: do you think there is any group(anywhere) where it is OKAY for them to meddle in a US election?

Like, the DNC interfered as well. Do they have more of a right to interfere in our elections? Because I don't think anyone, I don't care where you are from or what country, has that right.

And yet...if social media ads are interference, what would we label the utter hate-fest some of our media spewed out against certain candidates? Is that okay? Is there some "you live here so you can interfere" thing? Like, I can hit my baby brother, but you can't?

I'm still genuinely curious about how people would answer this.

Since to me, the DNC interfering is not somehow less wrong than any other group doing so. They don't get a pass because they're Americans. In fact, it makes it even worse. Especially seeing them turn around and whine over Russian interference. Then having them also fund a dossier that used a british spy with a bunch of Russian connections, lol.

I am curious for any leftist to answer this: how does one continue to take Dems who whine about Russia seriously, in light of this?

Originally posted by cdtm
If a country like Qatar can buy ads lobbying against a blockade or whatever on our own television networks, then why shouldn't Russia be able to buy ads on Facebook?

Other countries buy ads and put out propaganda all the time.
Well, this is a really good point

Originally posted by Stigma
Well, this is a really good point

It's just because Trump won. That's the only reason. Butthurt and genuine stupidity.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's just because Trump won. That's the only reason. Butthurt and genuine stupidity.

It's just hilarious. Trump destroyed them. The democrat party will never be the same. Notice I called them the democrat party, and not the democratic party? Cuz you see..."democratic" is the furthest thing from what they are.

I'm making it a point to try to catch myself if I ever refer to them as democratic.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's just because Trump won. That's the only reason. Butthurt and genuine stupidity.
Yeah. Too bad indeed. I enjoy liberal butthurt as much as the next guy, but enough is enough.

I mean, it's been almost a year. They should give up on those silly games and tackle actual issues like gangs in Chicago or illegal migrants. And I mean both Dems and Republicans.

Originally posted by Stigma
Yeah. Too bad indeed. I enjoy liberal butthurt as much as the next guy, but enough is enough.

I mean, it's been almost a year. They should give up on those silly games and tackle actual issues like gangs in Chicago or illegal migrants. And I mean both Dems and Republicans.

This is also fair. I am also growing tired of the libtarded butthurt. The conservatarded butthurt lasted for years under Obama but it died down, massively, after a few months. Every now and again, some "he's gonna take our guns" shit would show up and the "he's not a citizen" bullshit would come up. But it died down almost completely a few months after he took office.



This is what happens when you have a large swathes of "me me me me" narcissistic people who want handouts and their feelings to be protected.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is also fair. I am also growing tired of the libtarded butthurt. The conservatarded butthurt lasted for years under Obama but it died down, massively, after a few months. Every now and again, some "he's gonna take our guns" shit would show up and the "he's not a citizen" bullshit would come up. But it died down almost completely a few months after he took office.



This is what happens when you have a large swathes of "me me me me" narcissistic people who want handouts and their feelings to be protected.
I see.


Yeah. It might be tied to the generational thing too. I know that millenials have a rather bad reputation, but I think there is something to it, given their overall "me, me, me" mindset.

Basically, a generation was manufactured that lives in an age of unparalleled abundace, but they lack discipline, integrity and developed critical faculties to engage with the world. Thus, they implode from the inside.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is also fair. I am also growing tired of the libtarded butthurt. The conservatarded butthurt lasted for years under Obama but it died down, massively, after a few months. Every now and again, some "he's gonna take our guns" shit would show up and the "he's not a citizen" bullshit would come up. But it died down almost completely a few months after he took office.



This is what happens when you have a large swathes of "me me me me" narcissistic people who want handouts and their feelings to be protected. A valid point, but at around 2011 I was very much pessemistic towards Obama. He was a business as usual president with the whole "I'm charismatic and blak so I'm awesome" and idiots ate it up.

Trump put Obama in his place. Call that racist....I dont care. Obama was a dissappointment.

Originally posted by dadudemon
This is also fair. I am also growing tired of the libtarded butthurt. The conservatarded butthurt lasted for years under Obama but it died down, massively, after a few months. Every now and again, some "he's gonna take our guns" shit would show up and the "he's not a citizen" bullshit would come up. But it died down almost completely a few months after he took office.



This is what happens when you have a large swathes of "me me me me" narcissistic people who want handouts and their feelings to be protected.

When it comes to Obama and guns, I think Steven Crowder made a good point about that. I don't think Obama ever came out and said that. But didn't he praise a system in another country...where they essentially took their guns? Like Australia, or some shit?

Originally posted by Foxsteak
A valid point, but at around 2011 I was very much pessemistic towards Obama. He was a business as usual president with the whole "I'm charismatic and blak so I'm awesome" and idiots ate it up.

Trump put Obama in his place. Call that racist....I dont care. Obama was a dissappointment.



Obama was a massive disappointment. Did not like him. He was the type that played the media game, was politically correct, while murdering tens of thousands, and shitting all over our Constitution.

He really was Bush Jr. 2.0.

Originally posted by dadudemon


Obama was a massive disappointment. Did not like him. He was the type that played the media game, was politically correct, while murdering tens of thousands, and shitting all over our Constitution.

He really was Bush Jr. 2.0.

Lol and they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. You can't make this stuff up.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol and they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize. You can't make this stuff up.

You know why my Probama friends said when I brought up Obama's murdering right shitting ways? "So? Bush killed HUNDREDS of thousands."


Right...Bush was worse, for sure. So I guess Obama is a level 7 piece of shit instead of a level 8 like Bush?

Originally posted by dadudemon
You know why my Probama friends said when I brought up Obama's murdering right shitting ways? "So? Bush killed HUNDREDS of thousands."


Right...Bush was worse, for sure. So I guess Obama is a level 7 piece of shit instead of a level 8 like Bush?

It's what I never understood about some on the left. They act like they have the moral high ground, yet when confronted with their own wrongdoing they suddenly decide that the benchmark for behavior they want to use should be the people they think of as horrible people.

Next they'll be saying that Harvey Weinstein treated women well compared to Ted Bundy.

Somehow I don't think Росси́йская Федера́ция would use a proxy which could easily (and conveniently) be traced back to them.

That amount of pants shitting in just the first two pages is rather impressive. Kudos, not seen its like in some time.

And don't worry guys, I'm emailing Mueller right now and letting him know that you all cracked the case, Putin was in fact helping Clinton to get elected. Good job

Trumpwon, cos Russia. UMAD?

Originally posted by Robtard
That amount of pants shitting in just the first two pages is rather impressive. Kudos, not seen its like in some time.

And don't worry guys, I'm emailing Mueller right now and letting him know that you all cracked the case, Putin was in fact helping Clinton to get elected. Good job

LOL! Still triggered over the fact you voted for a piece of shit who undermined the democracy of our country?

That's never going to stop being funny, you guys have a valid reason to scream like little kids at the sky. Last week at this time you guys were all giddy about charges being filed, then that pesky "our own party did the same shit we've been whining about" kinda stole some of that thunder.

Remember how you'd go on and on about how Trumpers need to take responsibility for the stuff Trump did because they voted for him? Are you intending to take any responsibility for voting for Hilary?

Also not even sure why you're mentioning emailing Mueller. Mueller is investigating if the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. He's not investigating how effective any measures the Russians undertook might have been.

So, a thread laughing at the sad desperation of trying to suggest these ads played any actual role in the election has nothing to do with "shitting your pants", unless it's shitting them from laughter. I love how any discussion of the shadyness or stupidity of the Democrats is always dismissed by you as people just "shitting the bed" lol.

Bring up the lame desperation of suggesting these ads had a significant impact? Ha you're just shitting the bed. It's like you can't face reality so you need to assume it's everyone else who actually can't face reality.

Wow! Is it okay to reply or are you going to continue to edit? Cos that's four times now you added to rant more

Originally posted by Robtard
Wow! Is it okay to reply or are you going to continue to edit? Cos that's four times now you added to rant more

I give you permission to reply Rob.

I waited until the 15mins was up, just in case you needed to add one final rant.

A) It's rather sad that you're so desperate to not feel shitty about your own decisions, you're now using "but others did the same!" imagined tactics. Like, why not just think before doing something you very likely knew was a poor choice to begin with? If you screwed up, be accountable for your own actions.

B) Other people don't have to be "responsible" for your imagined sleights. Doesn't work that way in the real world.

Originally posted by Robtard
I waited until the 15mins was up, just in case you needed to add one final rant.

A) It's rather sad that you're so desperate to not feel shitty about your own decisions, you're now using "but others did the same!" imagined tactics. Like, why not just think before doing something you very likely knew was a poor choice to begin with? If you screwed up, be accountable for your own actions.

B) Other people don't have to be "responsible" for your imagined sleights. Doesn't work that way in the real world.

Oh man, hilarious. The irony overload, especially from A.

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh man, hilarious. The irony overload, especially from A.

Good retort, you really proved me wrong there.

Originally posted by Robtard
Good retort, you really proved me wrong there.

Your own posting history proves you wrong, I don't need to do so. Your entire schtick has become pretending others are angry and upset over something lol. At this point it's all you have left.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your own posting history proves you wrong, I don't need to do so. Your entire schtick has become pretending others are angry and upset over something lol. At this point it's all you have left.

You quit literally opened your post to me here by implying I was angry; it was only about 30 mins ago...

Do you have poor memory retention?

Originally posted by Robtard
You quit literally opened your post to me here by implying I was angry; it was only about 30 mins ago...

Do you have poor memory retention?

*sigh* Are you willfully ignorant? I said your *entire* schtick has become that. It doesn't mean suddenly nobody can ever suggest someone is angry. It means this is all you do now.

Here is my advice to you Rob...given how your "gotchas" often turn out: don't do them, lol.

Wait wait, prediction time. You're going to come back with some variation of "herp special rules!". Despite the fact it wasn't even said you could never point out anger and the comment was more about how it's all you seem to do now, I feel you're going to go that route anyways.

Will you still do so now that I've pointed it out? We'll see.

I literally have not said you or anyone else is angry in here...

Originally posted by Robtard
I literally have not said you or anyone else is angry in here...

Yeah see to me "shitting the bed" is saying people are upset over something. Upset and/or afraid. I get it, you'll say you just meant afraid. It's okay Rob, you don't even need to bother.

"Upset" doesn't mean angry... "Afraid" doesn't mean angry...

upset (adj)- unhappy, disappointed, or worried.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Upset" doesn't mean angry... "Afraid" doesn't mean angry...

And some people use it to refer to being mad, etc. So, we're not even going to be debating that lol.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
upset (adj)- unhappy, disappointed, or worried.

And again: some people do use it to refer to being angry, mad, etc.

It's okay, you tried to help your bro out. Failed, but it's the thought that counts Bash.

Originally posted by Robtard
That amount of pants shitting in just the first two pages is rather impressive. Kudos, not seen its like in some time.

And don't worry guys, I'm emailing Mueller right now and letting him know that you all cracked the case, Putin was in fact helping Clinton to get elected. Good job

I did not shit my pants. I kept reading, on KMC, about all these "Russian ads" and how they tried to use social media to influence the election.

So I looked it up. To see what this hubbub was about. Seems it's a huge amount of bullshit from butthurt leftists. Lots of pro-Bernie content. Some anti-Trump. Some anti-Hillary. I mean, they are right there for you to see. Look at.

If this is the bullshit the idiot leftists were shitting their pants about, I'm rather disappointed. "Influenced the election" my ass. That's just bullshit. It's butthurt over Trump winning. There's nothing substantive at all about the "social media Russian election influencing" whining.


That's not me shitting my pants, that's me pointing out how ridiculous it is for the leftists to be shitting their pants over this.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
upset (adj)- unhappy, disappointed, or worried.

Bingo.

It's clear to anyone who can understand basic English that my use of "shitting the bed" was in regards to "worried". Cos Mueller, he's like a shark and someone's "bleeding from their wherever".

Originally posted by dadudemon
I did not shit my pants. I kept reading, on KMC, about all these "Russian ads" and how they tried to use social media to influence the election.

So I looked it up. To see what this hubbub was about. Seems it's a huge amount of bullshit from butthurt leftists. Lots of pro-Bernie content. Some anti-Trump. Some anti-Hillary. I mean, they are right there for you to see. Look at.

If this is the bullshit the idiot leftists were shitting their pants about, I'm rather disappointed. "Influenced the election" my ass. That's just bullshit. It's butthurt over Trump winning. There's nothing substantive at all about the "social media Russian election influencing" whining.


That's not me shitting my pants, that's me pointing out how ridiculous it is for the leftists to be shitting their pants over this.

Bingo

Originally posted by Surtur
And again: some people do use it to refer to being angry, mad, etc.

It's okay, you tried to help your bro out. Failed, but it's the thought that counts Bash.

that sure proved the english dictionary wrong. it's written by libtard cucks.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
that sure proved the english dictionary wrong. it's written by libtard cucks.

Nobody said it proved any dictionary wrong. I spoke of how some use the word lol. End of story.

Originally posted by Robtard
Bingo.

It's clear to anyone who can understand basic English that my use of "shitting the bed" was in regards to "worried". Cos Mueller, he's like a shark and someone's "bleeding from their wherever".

to say "upset" instead of saying "mad" is like saying "looks like you got a booboo" to someone with their leg in a sling. however ironic humor does not alter the actual definition. surt will try though.

Originally posted by Surtur
Nobody said it proved any dictionary wrong. I spoke of how some use the word lol. End of story.

IOW: "I get to dictate context!"

ps Have a good weekend, Surt. Try to get outside a bit and keep the posting down to a minimum

Originally posted by dadudemon
I did not shit my pants. I kept reading, on KMC, about all these "Russian ads" and how they tried to use social media to influence the election.

So I looked it up. To see what this hubbub was about. Seems it's a huge amount of bullshit from butthurt leftists. Lots of pro-Bernie content. Some anti-Trump. Some anti-Hillary. I mean, they are right there for you to see. Look at.

If this is the bullshit the idiot leftists were shitting their pants about, I'm rather disappointed. "Influenced the election" my ass. That's just bullshit. It's butthurt over Trump winning. There's nothing substantive at all about the "social media Russian election influencing" whining.


That's not me shitting my pants, that's me pointing out how ridiculous it is for the leftists to be shitting their pants over this. This.

OMGARDZ it aint da fact we dumber, we just realised dat da russkies hacked your minds with FB(I).

So recount, no Trump or Brexit. Blame Russia.

Lol nope, I get to say true things like "sometimes people use it to mean angry".

Originally posted by Foxsteak
This.

OMGARDZ it aint da fact we dumber, we just realised dat da russkies hacked your minds with FB(I).

So recount, no Trump or Brexit. Blame Russia.

Pretty much anything you don't like that happened can just be blamed on the Russians now.

you seem a wee bit frazzled tonight

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you seem a wee bit frazzled tonight

Nice projecting, keep on coping

Maybe we just hate you Bashar Teg. Maybe you were wrong about all the Bernie shit and we were right that Trump would win.

to say "frazzled" is to suggesting that you seem exhausted and overtaxed. you'd be outraged and insulted by a bouquet of flowers.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you'd be outraged and insulted by a bouquet of flowers.

The irony of a leftist saying this...oh my lol.

Damn, don't you guys get tired of the constant dick-waiving and back and forth? All day long. Non-stop. Surely you guys get tired of it?


How about the topic? I now have actual adverts to reference about this Facebook-Twitter-Russia-Gate and it just did not add (pun intended) with the anti-Trump-colluding-with-Russians-to-win narrative. In fact, it goes the opposite with how pro-Bernie it seems.

So the Russians wanted Bernie to win. Why isn't the news talking about that?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Damn, don't you guys get tired of the constant dick-waiving and back and forth? All day long. Non-stop. Surely you guys get tired of it?


How about the topic? I now have actual adverts to reference about this Facebook-Twitter-Russia-Gate and it just did not add (pun intended) with the anti-Trump-colluding-with-Russians-to-win narrative. In fact, it goes the opposite with how pro-Bernie it seems.

So the Russians wanted Bernie to win. Why isn't the news talking about that?

I get ya, we'll get back to it. But you already know why the news isn't talking about it lol. Why would they discuss something that goes against the narrative they have been going on about for a long time? Plus imagine how it makes some politicians look.

Remember: they took this so seriously they had senators questioning people from Twitter and Facebook and shit lol. How ridiculous does that make them look?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg



Wrong thread:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=645007&pagenumber=1

Originally posted by dadudemon
Wrong thread:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=645007&pagenumber=1

He's implying the Russians are 100% behind Antifa, lol. Or at least this event. Cuz leftists would never come up with a "whine at the sky" event. 'Dem Russians!

more from mother russia

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNLe-2qWsAEAN_q.jpg
https://twitter.com/Jali_Cat/status/924046058052882433/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcrooksandliars.com%2F2017%2F11%2Fare-you-ready-tomorrows-antifa-apocalypse

Originally posted by dadudemon
(pun intended) Die in a fire.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
more from mother russia

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNLe-2qWsAEAN_q.jpg
https://twitter.com/Jali_Cat/status/924046058052882433/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcrooksandliars.com%2F2017%2F11%2Fare-you-ready-tomorrows-antifa-apocalypse

Of course I can't say with certainty this isn't Russian shenanigans, but the thing is...a lot of Antifa members are communists lol. So it's not a huge stretch for them to do this.

I clicked on that twitter link and found one of the responses to it posted this:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNMSYFbUIAAHUeA.jpg

Is this a joke? Any meme that is pro-Trump is Russia?

https://i.imgflip.com/1cn6sc.jpg

Originally posted by Foxsteak
Is this a joke? Any meme that is pro-Trump is Russia?

https://i.imgflip.com/1cn6sc.jpg

He's saying that the Russians are creating these in order to stir up the alt right and get them to show up and commit violence against the people screaming at the sky tomorrow.

But like I said, it doesn't need to be Russians because Antifa are mostly communists. They are perfectly capable of this insanity all on their own.

explain away reality all you wish, but russia's goal is to help divide and destabilize the country by playing all sides and inciting violence, and you are helping them by forwarding their propaganda.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
explain away reality all you wish, but russia's goal is to help divide and destabilize the country by playing all sides and inciting violence, and you are helping them by forwarding their propaganda.

The reality is these people are also communists.

Stephen Colbert was praising socialism the other day, was that Russia too?

Oh and now I love how you frame it so that the implication is by even discussing this people are going to cause harm lol.

whatever you say, comrade. good luck helping to crush the capitalists.

I welcome my Russian overlords.

Go Russia.

Socialism is taking over the country so its already kind of here.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
whatever you say, comrade. good luck helping to crush the capitalists.

I appreciate you wishing me good fortune and I will feel no satisfaction the day you're thrown into a gulag.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Socialism is taking over the country so its already kind of here.


Stephen Colbert used Trump Jr's Halloween tweet joke about socialism as an excuse to extoll the virtues of socialism lol. It was quite bizarre. Steven Crowder discusses it in the latest episode he put up on youtube today:

vUYfQEj76lM

Also Gary Sinise is in the episode and has appeared on the show before, the dude builds smart houses for vets. The thing about Stephen Colbert starts at 11:30.

It's weird as hell though because they have decided to stop pretending lol, Trump broke them. Thank you Trump for exposing communists within our midst, and he did it just by existing.

So glad I signed up for CRTV.

Thankfully it seems they have insured that if youtube begins f*cking people over(more than they already are) they'll still be earning enough revenue to keep their shows going.

Youtube is Nazi Tube.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
https://i.imgur.com/ignpNCWl.jpg

http://www.businessinsider.com/russia-trolls-senate-intelligence-committee-hearing-2017-11

Indeed, thanks for showing us the Russians did that in May of 2016.

Now would you kindly post evidence showing they are doing it currently, with this specific event, in November 2017?

thats from 3 days ago. learn to read.

now before you rush to respond with your next little squirt-rant, RTFA.

Lol...

"Russian actors organized both anti-Islam and pro-Islam protests in the same location at the same time on May 21, 2016, using separate Facebook pages operated from a so-called troll farm in St. Petersburg, the Senate Intelligence Committee disclosed on Wednesday. "

they found out what happened 3 days ago. it was not news beforehand, you ridiculous time-wasting troll.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they found out what happened 3 days ago. it was not news beforehand, you ridiculous time-wasting troll.

And I said the Russians did it in 2016. I never made any comments on when it was found out, lol. You see, the point was that them doing something last year is not proof they did the specific thing you are referencing now.

Do you have any evidence the Russians are behind what you are claiming they are behind? Yes or no.

you're trying to play it off as irrelevant to the nonstop stream of destabilizing misinformation from the same source. more cutesy bullshit from the time-wasting squirt.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're trying to play it off as irrelevant to the nonstop stream of destabilizing misinformation from the same source. more cutesy bullshit from the time-wasting squirt.

I'm not playing it off as anything. I'm saying if you want to claim the Russians are behind this event then "they did this other thing" is not evidence. I've said before it wouldn't be shocking if they did do this, but it doesn't mean they actually did it lol.

Do you or do you not have ANY EVIDENCE to support your claims about this event? Yes or no.

up until 3 days ago there was no public evidence that the conspiracy behind that story took place.
demanding on-the-fly evidence for recent identical events as a dismissal tactic means that you're just being a massive phaggot again.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
up until 3 days ago there was no public evidence that the conspiracy behind that story took place.
demanding on-the-fly evidence for recent identical events as a dismissal tactic means that you're just being a massive phaggot again.

Lol, but you see: you're the biggest phaggot in the history of phaggots though if you think what you just said gives you free reign to make these claims and then not provide evidence.

This is not up for debate lol. You simply will not be even remotely hinting you do not need to prove your claims because it would take a long time to discover the truth.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not playing it off as anything. I'm saying if you want to claim the Russians are behind this event then "they did this other thing" is not evidence. I've said before it wouldn't be shocking if they did do this, but it doesn't mean they actually did it lol.

Do you or do you not have ANY EVIDENCE to support your claims about this event? Yes or no. Ummm... the evidence has constantly been accumulating, hence the recent developments. Let's see exactly what's known.

Keep the faith



Stay Whirly

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Ummm... the evidence has constantly been accumulating, hence the recent developments. Let's see exactly what's known.

Keep the faith



Stay Whirly

The evidence of them being behind this event has been accumulating? Show it.

Originally posted by Surtur
The evidence of them being behind this event has been accumulating? Show it. I'll wait for the cases to be heard.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
I'll wait for the cases to be heard.

Wow, since "I'll wait for the cases to be heard" more or less translates to "I'll wait for actual evidence to be shown" we are in actual agreement.

Like I said in my first post let's see what's there. For it to go this far clearly something is.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Like I said in my first post let's see what's there. For it to go this far clearly something is.

Indeed, I also want to see any evidence that is there about this event

Originally posted by Surtur
Indeed, I also want to see any evidence that is there about this event Then bizarrely we are in agreement

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
I'll wait for the cases to be heard.

knowing what you know now, would you post sourceless jpg flyers which claim that political activists are planning nefarious and violent operations (like surt does)?

https://i.imgur.com/KxLTvO9.jpg

Since I fully believe Antifa are communist pieces of shit and totally capable of doing that without Russian help: I have no problem posting it.

Note to the 4 people here who saw it: don't get violent.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
knowing what you know now, would you post sourceless jpg flyers which claim that political activists are planning nefarious and violent operations (like surt does)?

https://i.imgur.com/KxLTvO9.jpg No, but given my clear political leanings Bash, I wouldn't post them anyway.

The problem with all this is the rightwingers cognitive dissonance, it's going to take a long time for the penny to drop.

Originally posted by Steve Zodiac
Then bizarrely we are in agreement

Lol, that remains to be seen actually. If you're going to start responding and pretend like since Russia instigated other things it means they instigated this too(like your pal is) that's a big nope, and it goes against your "lets wait for evidence" thing.

So Bash: we have evidence islamic terrorists committed terror attacks in the past. Does this mean it's okay to assume every terror attack is Islamic without evidence? Since you have whined at me for when you feel I do that lol.

Now is such a thing okay...because Russians? Make up your mind lol. I literally do not care which you choose, but frickin choose.

We know some of the things ISIS have claimed responsibility for..they actually did. Hey, so they claimed they were responsible for Las Vegas too. Guess they are now responsible and we don't need evidence.