Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://static.currentaffairs.org/2017/12/the-cool-kids-philosopher

"Ben Shapiro's fans apparently think he is very smart. It is not clear why."

This article asks a good question, and certain folks will not like the answer.

Well the article pretty much shows how Biased it is in the VERY First Sentence...so yeah. I am betting this is just the typical Leftist Fascist Anti-Semite Bullshit that horrible people like Beny push on others.

Why You Hate the Jews Beny?

I don't hate Jews Flyboy but as it turns out:

'The "Arab Palestinian populace... by and large constitutes the most evil population on the face of the planet."'

Shapiro hates Arabs.

So you agree with Hitler and his Jew Population Control Process then?

Gotta keep in mind that Current Affairs has a strong left-wing bias.

Good thing one only need to read back what Shapiro has said to demonstrate he's a dumb bigot.

Especially when you take it out of context.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Good thing one only need to read back what Shapiro has said to demonstrate he's a dumb bigot.
I concede that Ben Shapiro has said some dumb and even bigoted shit. Still, I'd love to see you, or this Nathan J. Robinson fellow, take on Ben Shapiro in an actual debate.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I concede that Ben Shapiro has said some dumb and even bigoted shit. Still, I'd love to see you, or this Nathan J. Robinson fellow, take on Ben Shapiro in an actual debate.
Being an intellectually dishonest bigot is cool if you can win debates with people who don't do debates?

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
I concede that Ben Shapiro has said some dumb and even bigoted shit. Still, I'd love to see you, or this Nathan J. Robinson fellow, take on Ben Shapiro in an actual debate. "I would probably lose a debate with Ben Shapiro quite badly, as my instinct in public conversations is to try to listen to people."

Would be fun to see Beny waffle and squirm when Ben asked him on Arabic/Muslim Traditions and View points on how Women and Homosexuals are treated.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Especially when you take it out of context.
The article linked all the full quotes. If you had any interest in context you could look up the context and correct us.

Given though that the key snippets are entire paragraphs long, I find it hard to believe there's some context justifying his belief that arabs are inherently evil.

Other then their nature and history, but then according to some ALL Humanity has the inherent ability to be EVIL! Kind of like how certain groups claim that all COPS are Racist and Evil.


And you are right... I have no interest in context. Only in having fun.

Tell us more. And maybe in red text this time.

That is called DODGING Folks!!!!

Originally posted by Beniboybling
"I would probably lose a debate with Ben Shapiro quite badly, as my instinct in public conversations is to try to listen to people."

Least he admits that.
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Being an intellectually dishonest bigot is cool if you can win debates with people who don't do debates? No, but I genuinely believe that Ben would dismantle his positions in an actual debate.

I would love to debate Ben. We have similar "live" debate styles but I don't interrupt like he and Cenk do. That irritates me.


I have no real issues with Ben. Some of his positions are horrendous shite.

That sounds like it could be an issue.

Originally posted by dadudemon



I have no real issues with Ben. .
-> Has no issues with people that call for the total dislocation of a race of people
-> Calls other people bigots

I just love how Ben triggers people. The article I think got triggered by the NYT piece about Ben. The same one that caused the actress from Will & Grace to say she canceled her subscription over it. Debra Messing I think her name is.

It's always awesome.

Better to "dislocate people" like the Isreali's would do over how the Palestinians would choose to "Exterminate All The Jews".

Ben is not correct about everything. However, he is articulate, quick witted, and worst of all for them: not nasty. Not nasty like someone like Milo can get. That is why he gets the hatred. He can easily make a leftist look foolish while being kinda polite about it at times.

He just was on a podcast with Sam Harris, I wanna find it.

Originally posted by Surtur
not nasty.
-> Calls for the purge of an entire race of people
-> isn't nasty
-> Surt doesn't have double standards

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
-> Calls for the purge of an entire race of people
-> isn't nasty
-> Surt doesn't have double standards

Where did he call for an entire race to be killed? Ben Shapiro is pro genocide now?

I found it to be rather entertaining.

Originally posted by Surtur
Where did he call for an entire race to be killed? Ben Shapiro is pro genocide now?

If your bar for nasty is "stupid" and "jackass" well okay. My bar is much higher. Like Milo saying the chick from Ghostbusters is a dude(that was just funny). Or saying black women don't like him cuz he f*cks their brothers lol.

I mean, there seemed to be more valid criticisms in there, some that I actually need to evaluate and look into and shit when I have more time, but that opening criticism is total bullshit. When a violent activist groups behavior causes a university to have to spend several hundred thousand dollars on security for an event, I actually applaud Ben Shapiro for going off on them like that.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang


Okay, so they twisted shit he said to make it seem like he was pro genocide. I get it. That's kinda silly. The shit about God and Jews is him talking about shit from scripture or whatever you wanna call it. He is not pro genocide. Anyone who has listened to more than a few sound bites from the guy would know it.

Nothing was twisted Surt, learn to apply logic.

If arabs are inherently muederers and Jews have a divine duty to kill all that would kill all who seek to kill then, what would be the logical course of action?

Whether his beliefs are based on scripture or not is irrelevant.

Originally posted by Surtur
Where did he call for an entire race to be killed? Ben Shapiro is pro genocide now?

He's a savage jew.

Joking aside I'm not terribly familiar with him. From what little I've seen though he seems more grounded and less bombastic than a lot of other politlcal commentators/youtubers and does come across as fairly articulate. Meaning he at least attempts to make cogent arguments rather than just try to be controversial/loud for the sake of attention.

His problem, which I suppose is a problem for probably all of these commentators who have to talk about things for several hours a day for money, is that he oftentimes wades into a topic he clearly has little to no actual understanding of. He recently did this with Net Neutrality and made some hilariously bad points, so bad that a tech based youtuber who actually has a deep understanding about the internet and how it works and who is usually pretty apolitical did a point by point retort of his points and it became pretty clear Shapiro just didn't know what he was talking about.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Nothing was twisted Surt, learn to apply logic.

If arabs are inherently muederers and Jews have a divine duty to kill all that would kill all who seek to kill then, what would be the logical course of action?

It's the opposite of logic to say he is pro genocide. They didn't even provide any real context to the things he said.

An article claiming the guy is pro genocide is utter nonsense.

Originally posted by BackFire
He's a savage jew.

Joking aside I'm not terribly familiar with him. From what little I've seen though he seems more grounded and less bombastic than a lot of other politlcal commentators/youtubers and does come across as fairly articulate. Meaning he at least attempts to make cogent arguments rather than just try to be controversial/loud for the sake of attention.

His problem, which I suppose is a problem for probably all of these commentators who have to talk about things for several hours a day for money, is that he oftentimes wades into a topic he clearly has little to no actual understanding of. He recently did this with Net Neutrality and made some hilariously bad points, so bad that a tech based youtuber who actually has a deep understanding about the internet and how it works and who is usually pretty apolitical did a point by point retort of his points and it became pretty clear Shapiro just didn't know what he was talking about.

I don't doubt he has big f*ck ups like that. Those are better to highlight than trying to say he is pro genocide.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean, there seemed to be more valid criticisms in there, some that I actually need to evaluate and look into and shit when I have more time, but that opening criticism is total bullshit. When a violent activist groups behavior causes a university to have to spend several hundred thousand dollars on security for an event, I actually applaud Ben Shapiro for going off on them like that.
Shapiro's just scared because his Hitller-esque beliefs make him a target.

And yes, calling for a mass exodus of a race which you claim to be universally evil, murderous, and obligated by divine powers to be victims of genocide is completely and totally Hitler-Esque.

Originally posted by Surtur


An article claiming the guy is pro genocide is utter nonsense.
You're right Surt, he isn't pro genocide. He just believes Jews have a divine obligation to kill all the people that fit under a certain category that he believes all arabs happen to fall under.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Least he admits that.
No, but I genuinely believe that Ben would dismantle his positions in an actual debate.
Well, that's because the writer isn't a debater. I'm willing to bet if they had a written debate, Ben would find himself dismantled.

I would love to see Jon Stewart take this guy down a notch though.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Well, that's because the writer isn't a debater. I'm willing to bet if they had a written debate, Ben would find himself dismantled.

I would love to see Jon Stewart take this guy down a notch though. Jon Stewart would make ben shapiro look like a sad *****

Originally posted by Beniboybling
https://static.currentaffairs.org/2017/12/the-cool-kids-philosopher

"Ben Shapiro's fans apparently think he is very smart. It is not clear why."

This article asks a good question, and certain folks will not like the answer.

I have been saying this for quite some time. His fans seem impressed by any conservative who can speak in complete sentences. He should change the title of the article to "Ben Shapiro: The Kids Table Philosopher."

I still think he makes good points at times. Leftists seem to hate him.

Originally posted by Surtur
Leftists seem to hate him.
Stupid leftists, hating the blatant bigotry of someone who wants to cast an entire race of people out of their homes and who considers all members of said race to be inherently murderous and worthy of god inspired genocide.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Stupid leftists, hating the blatant bigotry of someone who wants to cast an entire race of people out of their homes and who considers all members of said race to be inherently murderous and worthy of god inspired genocide.

The same people who shame entire groups, like white people, white men, conservatives, etc.?

Yeah, no room to wag your tongue about that.

Why would I want to debate with Ben when I can just beat him up.

Because violence isn't how people are supposed to handle disagreements in a western liberal democracy?

But what am I saying? You're a self-avowed socialist, you don't believe in liberalism.

Originally posted by Surtur
I mean, to me that isn't nasty. He used the word jackass. Oh my! You are right, it was very articulate and quick witted.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
You are right, it was very articulate and quick witted.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
What the f*ck has this got to do with the OP?


Trollolololololololololol!

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Well, that's because the writer isn't a debater. I'm willing to bet if they had a written debate, Ben would find himself dismantled.

I would love to see Jon Stewart take this guy down a notch though.
That remains to be seen.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Trollolololololololololol! uhuh

My favourite was when he talked about how to debate climate change. He stated he wasn't an expert but had an opinion then went on to talk about the most irrelevant and meandering nonsense you've ever heard while contradicting himself constantly.

Dem gawd dayam Ay-rabs!

Originally posted by Beniboybling
uhuh

Be less obvious about it. At least put more efforts into you troll attempts to make your posts look more legit.

I do not agree everything Ben Shapiro says but the man wrecks people who get into his way. He definitely got the better of Cenk who was rattled and started bashing the audience in their debate. It is hypocritical how people try to shut down his speeches and get insane. Be civil and have a discussion.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not agree everything Ben Shapiro says but the man wrecks people who get into his way. He definitely got the better of Cenk who was rattled and started bashing the audience in their debate. It is hypocritical how people try to shut down his speeches and get insane. Be civil and have a discussion.
Agreed...


And loving the new profile Quan. Your former apprentice Kurk still has the best profile shit on KMC though.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Be less obvious about it. At least put more efforts into you troll attempts to make your posts look more legit.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Be less obvious about it. At least put more efforts into you troll attempts to make your posts look more legit.
Calling out deflectionary tactics isn't trolling double d.

Your skill at name calling is noted though.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Calling out deflectionary tactics isn't trolling double d.

Your skill at name calling is noted though.

Yes, Beniboybling seems very devastated about the "troll" name calling.

Your butthole has been thoroughly noted, though.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I do not agree everything Ben Shapiro says but the man wrecks people who get into his way. He definitely got the better of Cenk who was rattled and started bashing the audience in their debate. It is hypocritical how people try to shut down his speeches and get insane. Be civil and have a discussion.
Right, becasuse asking if someone is a moose is "being civil and having a discussion."

And for some reason, nobody wants to talk about how Shapiro has idelogical beliefs frighteningly similar to Hitler's

So I see a common complaint/issue that people have is that Ben Shapiro descends into tongue-in-cheek insults for either humor or just being boorish. And that automatically means that anything else he says, no matter the intelligence or wit behind it, is crap. Because the only thing that is important is that he boorishly insults people.

Am I catching this criticism right?


Also, I am probably remarkably similar to Hitler in some ways, as well. So that must mean I'm going to commit genocide at any moment.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Right, becasuse asking if someone is a moose is "being civil and having a discussion."

And for some reason, nobody wants to talk about how Shapiro has idelogical beliefs frighteningly similar to Hitler's He doesn't promote violence so please don't start with the double standards and overreacting. I've seen the bleeding hearts out there and it's pathetic. He has the right to his opinion just as you do. Don't get it twisted, sport. The irony is you are the one blindly hating here to compare him to Hitler. You probably won't see it but I don't care.

I guess I have a higher bar for the nasty stuff. Ben is spewing stuff like "you're dumb and pathetic". Okay, doesn't seem that nasty. Maybe for 2nd grade, but not for adults.

You aint seen the kind of shit that is being taught in 2nd grade any more. This aint the "Nasty Shit" no more.

Originally posted by Surtur
I guess I have a higher bar for the nasty stuff. Ben is spewing stuff like "you're dumb and pathetic". Okay, doesn't seem that nasty. Maybe for 2nd grade, but not for adults.

"Dumb and pathetic" is a a nothing insult to you, yet you shit your pants while clutching your pearls at the word "deplorable"? Okay then, go with that.

OK. Now Robbie is just making shit up.

He is a Leftist and that means He is "triggered" 24/7

Originally posted by Surtur
I guess I have a higher bar for the nasty stuff. Ben is spewing stuff like "you're dumb and pathetic". Okay, doesn't seem that nasty. Maybe for 2nd grade, but not for adults. Surt has a point, I'm certain that Shapiro was attempting to be mean, but his middle school vocabulary kinda spoils the effect.

Yes. Its only OK for "INTELLECTUAL ELITES" to be MEAN!!!!!!

Big Words are always Better!!

Green text man no like big words.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Green text man no like big words.



IS THIS BETTER!?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Ah I see, your doing that weird thing were you conflate all people of a left-leaning persuasion into a single person.

Yeah, kind of reminds me of people doing something similar to anyone who voted for Trump. hmm

IMO, it's very important we separate Trumpers from say regular Conservatives and Republicans, as an example.

Originally posted by dadudemon


Your butthole has been thoroughly noted, though.

U WOT MATE?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yeah, kind of reminds me of people doing something similar to anyone who voted for Trump. hmm With who, his supporters?

Originally posted by Robtard
IMO, it's very important we separate Trumpers from say regular Conservatives and Republicans, as an example.

Okay, I think that is fair. I mean...so many damn people voted for Trump. So many. Almost none of them are "Trumpers", imo.

Also, my brother is a conservative AND a Republican. He still didn't vote for Trump. Obviously, this is a shit anecdote but I think he is like a lot of GOP peeps who just do not like Trump and never did.

Originally posted by jaden101
U WOT MATE?

HIS BUTTHOLE! THE ANUS!

Originally posted by Beniboybling
With who, his supporters?

I'm too stupid to understand your question.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Okay, I think that is fair. I mean...so many damn people voted for Trump. So many. Almost none of them are "Trumpers", imo.

Also, my brother is a conservative AND a Republican. He still didn't vote for Trump. Obviously, this is a shit anecdote but I think he is like a lot of GOP peeps who just do not like Trump and never did.

If you voted/supported Trump back then, maybe, okay. If you're still supporting Trump and especially mucking for him, then you're a Trumper. This is a fact.

I know several myself as well. eg My father-in-law is a Republican, has voted Republican since at least the late 70's, but he didn't support or vote for Trump. He sees Trump as an embarrassment and stain on the Party.

Originally posted by quanchi112

By blindly hating you mean paying attention to what Shapiro himself has said?

Shapiro considers an entire race of people to be murderous and inherently evil, considers it the divine duty of jews to kill these people, and calls for them to all be thrown out of their homes and relocated somewhere else.

It takes blind stupidity to not see the similarities there.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm too stupid to understand your question. People who voted Trump = people who support Trump.

Fair?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Surt has a point, I'm certain that Shapiro was attempting to be mean, but his middle school vocabulary kinda spoils the effect.

Especially when I compare him to Milo.

And I did not say it to imply Ben is childish. He is not. Rather, like I said, he is more or less nice lol. "You're stupid" is his "you're a f*cking piece of shit".

Originally posted by Beniboybling
Ah I see, your doing that weird thing were you conflate all people of a left-leaning persuasion into a single person.

It's already been said by others, but this is exactly what the left does to others lol. With Trump voters or just white people in general.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's already been said by others, but this is exactly what the left does to others lol. With Trump voters or just white people in general. Wow. Did you just criticise a thing people do while doing it in the very same sentence?

Surely not.

Originally posted by Surtur
Especially when I compare him to Milo.

And I did not say it to imply Ben is childish. He is not. Rather, like I said, he is more or less nice lol. "You're stupid" is his "you're a f*cking piece of shit". No you were right the first time, he's a baby man, as his childish outbursts show. baby

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
By blindly hating you mean paying attention to what Shapiro himself has said?

Shapiro considers an entire race of people to be murderous and inherently evil, considers it the divine duty of jews to kill these people, and calls for them to all be thrown out of their homes and relocated somewhere else.

It takes blind stupidity to not see the similarities there. What the hell are you talking about ?

He thinks Ben Shapiro is pro genocide. This is just crazy. There are frickin valid criticisms to make about him. People don't have to try to say he an utter monster who is pro genocide in order to criticize Ben.

I know what he thinks but he needs to cite specific examples not just debate out of pure emotion. Let's see if he can list some evidence to back his hate filled claims of Ben. It's ridiculous.

People should read the article, Shapiro hates the Arabs like he hates the Gays.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
People who voted Trump = people who support Trump.

Fair?

Not exactly. Voted is past tense. Support is present. You can't change who you voted for, but you can decide to no longer support that individual.

Originally posted by Beniboybling
People should read the article, Shapiro hates the Arabs like he hates the Gays. Does he condone violence against them ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I know what he thinks but he needs to cite specific examples not just debate out of pure emotion. Let's see if he can list some evidence to back his hate filled claims of Ben. It's ridiculous.
So, I take it you didnt' actually read the article given you need me to summarize it for you?

Fine, I'll oblige.

Shapiro's own words:

He's basing this plan off


His belief that arabs are inherently evil:




Note Shapiros use of repeated the term "population" which would refer to all of the arabs in Palestine, not just terrorists.

This is even worse because, according to Shapiro, who thinks all palestians value the murder of Israelis. jews have a divine duty to kill all who want to attack them:


Shapiro believes
A. Arabs are all murderers who seek to kill jews.
B. Jews must kill all those who seek to kill them

Therefore, going by Shapiro's own stated beliefs,

C. Jews must kill all arabs in Palestine.

Who wanted to force an entire population out of their homes?

Hitler.

Who painted an entire race of people as inherently bad?

Hitler.

Who used this as justification to advocate for genocide?

Hitler.

Shapiro has an ideology strikingly similar to arguably the worst dictator in history.

But keep defending him

It sounds like he would condone killing any arab who tries to do him or any Jew harm. It does not sound like he wants to wipe them all off the map.

Have you listened to the guy or are you just going off this article?

The fact that you managed to twist him into some kind of Hitler is just astounding to me.

Originally posted by Surtur
It sounds like he would condone killing any arab who tries to do him or any Jew harm. And naturally you ignore

He's talking about the ones that kill Jews. He's not saying literally every single arab is evil and should be wiped out.

I mean if Ben is now Hitler the left has truly gone nuts.

Originally posted by Surtur
He's talking about the ones that kill Jews.
Nope, that specification is included nowhere. He references the entire population multiple times. This has nothing to do with the "left", this has to do with your ability to read.

ben shapiro is a divisive shitstain who would improve society by drinking draino. a true lord of edgelords right up there with milo.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
ben shapiro is a divisive shitstain who would improve society by drinking draino. a true lord of edgelords right up there with milo.

Do you think he is basically Hitler?

Originally posted by Robtard
I was just explaining to Surtur in the other thread how some people just hate Palestians, they don't want compromise or peace, they want them all eradicated. Period.

So you indeed feel that Ben Shapiro is pro genocide?

Originally posted by Surtur
So you indeed feel that Ben Shapiro is pro genocide?

Not sure if he's pro genocide, but from those comments above he clearly despises Palestians, because they're Palestinians.

tl;dr version: Pro Gen? Not sure. A shit lord? Yeah, he seems to be.

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure if he's pro genocide, but from those comments above he clearly despises Palestians, because they're Palestinians.

More like he despises the one that hate Jews just for being Jews. That is what it sounds like to me. If he had the power I do not think he would be rounding the arabs up to wipe them out.

Originally posted by Surtur
More like he despises the one that hate Jews just for being Jews. That is what it sounds like to me. If he had the power I do not think he would be rounding the arabs up to wipe them out.
Surt, Shapiro is under the impression that all Arabs in palestine hate Jews:


Per Shapiro, the entire population shares the ideology of the terrorists who want to kill jews. Hence, Shapiro's comments don't just apply to the "arabs" who actually hurt people, but the entire population of Arabs in Palestine. Hence when he wants Jews to kill all who seek to kill them, thaose would include all Arabs in Palestine as, per Shapiro, all arabs in Palestine wants to kill jews.

It doesn't mean he wants every man woman and child who are arabs dead. He's just passionate about people who want to kill Jews just for being Jews.

Yes or no: if Shapiro had the power would he exterminate all arabs in Palestine?

Originally posted by Beniboybling
People who voted Trump = people who support Trump.

Fair?

Some voters who voted for Trump did not vote for Trump because they supported him. They just didn't like Hillary that severely.

Still, some who voted for Trump but did not like either. He was viewed as the lesser of two evils.

Still, some voted for Trump because they liked various things about him but shortly after he took office, their opinion soured.

And, lastly, we have the supporters who have and still support Trump: this group is the "supporters" group and it is for sure, a small group (from 44% high to 29%, now). It just so happens we have numbers to back this up with the break down on approval ratings.



Here is some rabbit hole reading for you:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_history

http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-better-hillary-clinton-polls-voters-support-white-house-639710

Point being, the issue is not nearly as clear-cut as Robinson would portend. There are many factors at play here, and racism/discrimination has not been cited as the main one in any of the studies I have looked at. The reason I do not believe the primary factor is discrimination is that the African-American unemployment was comparable to white unemployment before the Civil Right Act. The difference was usually about 1% between the two races. Surely, discrimination would affect unemployment greater than that? Walter Williams has had some fantastic commentary on this subject,



He points to the minimum wage laws as to why fewer blacks are employed per capita today then there were before the Civil Rights Act.



The last reason he cites is the low education standard which plagues African-Americans today.



The poor education given to African-Americans in conjunction with steep minimum wage laws seems like a far better and more realistic conclusion than "discrimination." To learn more, I would read: Race & Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination?

Originally posted by Surtur
More like he despises the one that hate Jews just for being Jews. That is what it sounds like to me. If he had the power I do not think he would be rounding the arabs up to wipe them out.

No, he despises them all. It's in his words, he makes no distinction between Islamic Jihadist and the Palestinian father trying to scrap out a living for his family. They're all scum in his eyes

Originally posted by Robtard
No, he despises them all. It's in his words, he makes no distinction between Islamic Jihadist and the Palestinian father trying to scrap out a living for his family. They're all scum in his eyes

So you do indeed think he is pro genocide? Yes or no, is Ben Shaprio pro genocide?

Originally posted by Surtur
So you do indeed think he is pro genocide? Yes or no, is Ben Shaprio pro genocide?

Are you being willfully stupid and pathetic? I already answered that; here is the post:

Originally posted by Robtard
Not sure if he's pro genocide, but from those comments above he clearly despises Palestians, because they're Palestinians.

tl;dr version: Pro Gen? Not sure. A shit lord? Yeah, he seems to be.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you being willfully stupid and pathetic? I already answered that; here is the post:

Yes you did, and then since then you have made other posts.

Do you agree with Rocky yes or no? Simple question. You are behaving like you do so I just want to set the record straight.

Rocky thinks he is pro genocide and more or less compared him to Hitler. Are these things you are on board with?

Originally posted by Surtur
So what would you say to people trying to say he is pro genocide?

Btw, damn fine work debunking all that. It was beautiful

That'll be the next part of my post. Lots of ****ing work. Its a pain to work on.

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
That'll be the next part of my post. Lots of ****ing work. Its a pain to work on.

No worries take your time, it's not that important. It'll be interesting to read whenever it's posted though. I get the feeling ownage will commence.

Yeah DarthSkywalker0 just kinda shits on literally anyone else here kek

I'm just waiting for his opponents to go "TLDR"... even though they were willing to read the lengthier article on Ben Shapiro and circle jerk to it.

Originally posted by Surtur
No worries take your time, it's not that important. It'll be interesting to read whenever it's posted though. I get the feeling ownage will commence.

You just love sucking on ziggy's dickhole; it's amusing

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes you did, and then since then you have made other posts.

Do you agree with Rocky yes or no? Simple question. You are behaving like you do so I just want to set the record straight.

Rocky thinks he is pro genocide and more or less compared him to Hitler. Are these things you are on board with?

'I don't know' is my answer. I can say he definitely blankets all Palestians with one broad stroke and he clearly despises them. That's the move of a shitlord.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just love sucking on ziggy's dickhole; it's amusing
That's not Ziggy my dude...

It's not the Russians either... don't worry, they aren't interfering in our political discourse and DarthSkywalker0 isn't colluding with em

Sure. Sure.

Originally posted by Robtard
You just love sucking on ziggy's dickhole; it's amusing

If I was Ziggy, you would have a point...

Originally posted by Robtard
You just love sucking on ziggy's dickhole; it's amusing

Feel free to refute his points.

Nah I'm familiar with both DarthSkywalker0 and Ziggy from the SW debating community and they're two very different people with very different perspectives on politics. They both agree intersectional social justice is bullshit, but DarthSkywalker0 is libertarian whereas Ziggy is alt-right. DarthSkywalker0 doesn't play the identity politics game like Ziggy does nor shriek about how whites need to collectivize or some such shit.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Nah I'm familiar with both DarthSkywalker0 and Ziggy from the SW debating community and they're two very different people with very different perspectives on politics. They both agree intersectional social justice is bullshit, but DarthSkywalker0 is libertarian whereas Ziggy is alt-right. DarthSkywalker0 doesn't play the identity politics game like Ziggy does nor shriek about how whites need to collectivize or some such shit.

I get the feeling they are attacking him because of how he destroys their arguments and they sense another narrative is about to be destroyed.

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
That'll be the next part of my post. Lots of ****ing work. Its a pain to work on.

Agreed with Surts: damn fine work. That definitely took you forever. Effort and facts are awesome.


This time, I read everything you posted.


I am looking forward to your 'genocide' commentary.

Originally posted by Surtur
Feel free to refute his points.

Was I arguing with him here/now? Weird.

And do feel free to always suck his dickhole, regardless. By no means was I implying you should cease and desist the sucking.

Are you slow or something? It's not Ziggy kek

Originally posted by Robtard
Was I arguing with him here/now? Weird.

And do feel free to always suck his dickhole, regardless. By no means was I implying you should cease and desist the sucking.

You see Rob this is an example of someone being triggered. I said he had good points and I looked forward to seeing more. You are upset because you can't refute anything this person says.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Are you slow or something? It's not Ziggy kek

Is that what Jesus would do

Originally posted by Surtur
You see Rob this is an example of someone being triggered. I said he had good points and I looked forward to seeing more. You are upset because you can't refute anything this person says.

It's too exhausting to even attempt to refute his points. Why would any sane person make that attempt who had to do anything else with their time besides even try to attempt to refute the points? It would be an absurdly time consuming task.

Originally posted by Surtur
You see Rob this is an example of someone being triggered. I said he had good points and I looked forward to seeing more. You are upset because you can't refute anything this person says.

*slurp* *slurp* *slurp* That's a good lad.

But I can't refute someone's post I've not read, sport.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's too exhausting to even attempt to refute his points. Why would any sane person make that attempt who had to do anything else with their time besides even try to attempt to refute the points? It would be an absurdly time consuming task.

I'd settle for refuting just one.

I don't even need a long thing. Someone just point out a point they think he got wrong.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's too exhausting to even attempt to refute his points. Why would any sane person make that attempt who had to do anything else with their time besides even try to attempt to refute the points? It would be an absurdly time consuming task.
Here's the thing though, everyone circlejerking each other here took the time to read through the much longer original article, so they don't really have an excuse to go "TLDR"

^^Also true.

It's cute that you think people actually read the original article.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's cute that you think people actually read the original article.
Well if they didn't their circlejerking is unsubstantiated.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's cute that you think people actually read the original article.

Since they have often mocked other posters when they think they post an article and don't read it...surely you are wrong.

DarthSkywalker0 isn't Ziggy.

Surt's been cheating on Ziggy then. Rather deplorable to do that, imho

Originally posted by Robtard
Surt's been cheating on Ziggy then. Rather deplorable to do that, imho

Why does this Ziggy person trigger you so much?

Are we now pretending you don't know who he is and you don't suck his cock-n-balls whenever he makes another account? Cute.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are we now pretending you don't know who he is and you don't suck his cock-n-balls whenever he makes another account? Cute.

You seem to suggest he is someone who is a sock. I don't know all the history here. What did he do to you and why are you so upset over him?

Who was he before this? What was his previous name here?

Originally posted by Robtard
Are we now pretending you don't know who he is and you don't suck his cock-n-balls whenever he makes another account? Cute.

It is not very difficult. I am not Ziggy.

And facts are facts anyways. These folk really don't like their narratives being shut down lol.

Understandable I suppose. Also quite entertaining.

Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
It is not very difficult. I am not Ziggy.

We've moved past that, guy. Apologies on me mixing you with him then.

I'm talking about how Surt's pretending he doesn't know who Ziggy is, when they've had convos and Surt generally loves sucking on his tiny Alt-right cock. Hence my mistake

Originally posted by Surtur
And facts are facts anyways. These folk really don't like their narratives being shut down lol.

Understandable I suppose. Also quite entertaining.

Or "Alt Facts", Surt. Did you forget already?