Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Thor has Stormbreaker

Who wins

Fight takes place in the Wakanda Fields

Thor doesn't make the same mistake twice, and goes for the head.

USE SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!!!

How is that a spoiler

Doomsday is not smart enough to last against Thor long after I W

Thor I doubt would have a lot of problems with Doomsday

stormbreaker ftw

Thanos didn't appear to be very durable, especially bulletproof. Superman was way more durable going by feats.
There is no guarantee that Thor can damage DD. And if he could then DD heals instantly. Thor can not make any lasting progress.

Doomsday never healed instantly, you really should watch these movies before commenting on them. You're just making yourself look exceedingly foolish

WW easily cut DD's hand off...Thor mauls him....

Thor wins with Stormbreaker. He gets trashed in any other scenario.

DD got stronger with every attack thrown at him- HE ADAPTED. Thor can use stormbreaker all he wants and throw his strongest attack, but if DD survives that, he's in trouble

Originally posted by Silent Master
Doomsday never healed instantly, you really should watch these movies before commenting on them. You're just making yourself look exceedingly foolish

My fault. I'm exaggerating. He healed though.

Originally posted by $on OF krypton
DD got stronger with every attack thrown at him- HE ADAPTED. Thor can use stormbreaker all he wants and throw his strongest attack, but if DD survives that, he's in trouble If WW could chop off his hand Thor would destroy him.

Originally posted by h1a8
My fault. I'm exaggerating. He healed though.


So when WW cuts of DD's arm, did DD regrow a fully functioning arm, complete with hand attached?

if stormbreaker has kryptonite attached, thor wins if not wakanda gets razed to the ground

Originally posted by Psychotron
Thor wins with Stormbreaker. He gets trashed in any other scenario.


This. Usual wank and outright lies on both sides. Thor oneshots with Storm breaker, gets Kursed without it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos didn't appear to be very durable, especially bulletproof. Superman was way more durable going by feats.
There is no guarantee that Thor can damage DD. And if he could then DD heals instantly. Thor can not make any lasting progress.

OMG!!!! BOY GO WATCH THE MOVIE AGAIN PLEASE!!!

IW Thor is insanely haxxed

Originally posted by The Ellimist
IW Thor is insanely haxxed

He got massively boosted i agree.

Thor wrecks the guy who killed Superman.

I don't think Thor could hurt DD tbh.
Being able to pierce Thanos doesn't prove otherwise since DD is significantly more durable.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor could hurt DD tbh.
Being able to pierce Thanos doesn't prove otherwise since DD is significantly more durable. WW cut a limb off. Thor wrecks him.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor could hurt DD tbh.
Being able to pierce Thanos doesn't prove otherwise since DD is significantly more durable.

I remember Diana amputating DDs arm.

Whilst Both Doomsday and Superman got nuked, Doomsday was less hurt.

That means DD's durability》Superman. And Diana's Sword《Stormbreaker.

So i doubt Superman can survive.

Thor needs to land a critical blow.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor could hurt DD tbh.
Being able to pierce Thanos doesn't prove otherwise since DD is significantly more durable.

You don't think Stormbreaker would be able to cut Doomsday?

Originally posted by playa1258
Thor needs to land a critical blow. He destroys DD.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't think Thor could hurt DD tbh.
Being able to pierce Thanos doesn't prove otherwise since DD is significantly more durable. It isn't harming Thanos that is particularly impressive, it's being able to overpower one of Thanos' blasts while doing so.

IW Thor is way too powerful for Doomsday.

Thor would one shot him.

Stormbreaker is OP af and Thor after Ragnarok and IW is OP af. If he by some chance received some super speed feats in the next movie (Hey, getting the better of Hulk in h2h without his hammer, enduring a Star and almost killing IG Thanos seemed more unlikely to me tbh), he would solo cinematic Universes.

Same DD who flat out stomped Supes? With no kryptonite involved? Insane regen? Adapting to each hit? There is nothing Thor can do to stop him. DD stomps.

If Diana can cut him like she didn(But failed on Ares and Steppenwolf somehow...), Stormbreaker kills him with one hit.

I completely forgot this:
https://gfycat.com/advancedunluckycaterpillar

Thor can also move as a bolt of lightning and has legit super speed as he struck a moving target accurately. Such an easily overlooked scene. I really wish he did that more often. OP AF move...

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Same DD who flat out stomped Supes? With no kryptonite involved? Insane regen? Adapting to each hit? There is nothing Thor can do to stop him. DD stomps.

Putting Stormbreaker through Doomsday's head wouldn't work?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
If Diana can cut him like she didn(But failed on Ares and Steppenwolf somehow...), Stormbreaker kills him with one hit.

I completely forgot this:
https://gfycat.com/advancedunluckycaterpillar

Thor can also move as a bolt of lightning and has legit super speed as he struck a moving target accurately. Such an easily overlooked scene. I really wish he did that more often. OP AF move... Did all of you really miss that Diana only fully awakened her powers at the end of her movie? She went from being ragdolled and dominated by Ares to literally vaporizing his projectiles with her aura.

Anyway, Thor obviously has legitimate super speed (so does Hulk for the record), but hitting a moving truck with a lightning-fast projectile isn't particularly impressive as a reaction-time feat. If he can move like that with sustained flight and weave between buildings during you'd have something special.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Did all of you really miss that Diana only fully awakened her powers at the end of her movie? She went from being ragdolled and dominated by Ares to literally vaporizing his projectiles with her aura.


That makes it even worse. You telling me she fully opened her powers then and still couldn't speedblitz Steppenwolf?

Originally posted by FrothByte
That makes it even worse. You telling me she fully opened her powers then and still couldn't speedblitz Steppenwolf? Do you have any evidence that Steppenwolf is notably slow?

Originally posted by NemeBro
Do you have any evidence that Steppenwolf is notably slow?

Not exactly slow but no super speed either. He had trouble catching the amazons and Aquaman was able to keep up with Steppenwolf. Unless you want to claim they're all speedsters as well?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Not exactly slow but no super speed either. He had trouble catching the amazons and Aquaman was able to keep up with Steppenwolf. Unless you want to claim they're all speedsters as well? So the answer is no.

DD not only survived a nuke but adapted,and the blast ofa nuke is supposedly hotter than the core of the sun.....bottom line thor would have to drain stormbreaker of all energy and hit DD with that. If DD survives that thor is toast.

Iw Thor easily.

Originally posted by The Spectre+
DD not only survived a nuke but adapted,and the blast ofa nuke is supposedly hotter than the core of the sun.....bottom line thor would have to drain stormbreaker of all energy and hit DD with that. If DD survives that thor is toast.


Stormbreaker was able to overpower a blast from the completed IG and retain enough force to impale Thanos. If it connects, Doomsday gets his head cut off.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Thor doesn't make the same mistake twice, and goes for the head.



Thor wins...

Originally posted by Silent Master
Stormbreaker was able to overpower a blast from the completed IG and retain enough force to impale Thanos. If it connects, Doomsday gets his head cut off.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Stormbreaker was able to overpower a blast from the completed IG and retain enough force to impale Thanos. If it connects, Doomsday gets his head cut off. What concussive feats does Thanos' blasts have?
How much pushing or striking force were they shown to do?

Otherwise, it was just a beam of energy with little to no concussive force, but energy to destroy or disintegrate. It could be a durability feat for stormbreaker for all we know.

Originally posted by h1a8
What concussive feats does Thanos' blasts have?
How much pushing or striking force were they shown to do?

Otherwise, it was just a beam of energy with little to no concussive force, but energy to destroy or disintegrate. It could be a durability feat for stormbreaker for all we know. The Infinity Gauntlet was shown to do all kinds of things. Alter reality, Turn attacks into bubbles....and yet Stormbreaker pushed through that and still impaled Thanos. A full Guantlet killed half of the universe just by Thanos willing it. Doomsday is dead.

Originally posted by h1a8
What concussive feats does Thanos' blasts have?
How much pushing or striking force were they shown to do?

Otherwise, it was just a beam of energy with little to no concussive force, but energy to destroy or disintegrate. It could be a durability feat for stormbreaker for all we know.

The complete IG is a universal level weapon, even if we assume Thanos was only using .00000000000000000000001% of it's power. that is still more impressive than all of Doomsday's feats put together.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
The Infinity Gauntlet was shown to do all kinds of things. Alter reality, Turn attacks into bubbles....and yet Stormbreaker pushed through that and still impaled Thanos. A full Guantlet killed half of the universe just by Thanos willing it. Doomsday is dead.

Yes but those weren't blasts. Like I said it could be a durability feat. We don't know if Thanos tried to stop it or destroy it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes but those weren't blasts. Like I said it could be a durability feat. We don't know if Thanos tried to stop it or destroy it.

Thanos destroyed a moon like nothing, and tossed it at Tony like a toddler throwing a baseball. The pure force that the IG can generate was made abundantly clear, don't be a boob.

THe RG can destroy the Universe, the PG can casually destroy planets...

Hmm...I wish we had proof of the IGs destructive capabilities.

Originally posted by h1a8
Yes but those weren't blasts. Like I said it could be a durability feat. We don't know if Thanos tried to stop it or destroy it. LOL, either way it doesn't matter. IT powered through Thanos TRYING to stop it with the most powerful artifact in existence and FAILED.. That spells death for the Teenage Mutant Ninja Cave Troll.

Anything Thor hits DD with will just make him more powerful

Originally posted by Manga11
Anything Thor hits DD with will just make him more powerful Correction, makes him more dead.

Nope, thats not how DD powers work

No Limits fallacy

Originally posted by Manga11
Nope, thats not how DD powers work Oh right, because he'll survive getting his head chopped off. Good to know. Even if Thor COULDN"T kill him which he could, he could just teleport DD away with the bifrost. But he CAN kill him and he will.

Thor couldnt even cut the head off Thanos standing still, how is Thor cuttings DD's head off whos much faster then him?

Yalls arguments are such wank jobs.

Originally posted by Manga11
Thor couldnt even cut the head off Thanos standing still, how is Thor cuttings DD's head off whos much faster then him?

Yalls arguments are such wank jobs. Had Thor hit Thanos in the head he would have, but then we'd have no part 2 movie..... Diana cut Doomsday with EASE with a MUCH LESS POWERFUL weapon. Thor is going to annihilate him.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The complete IG is a universal level weapon, even if we assume Thanos was only using .00000000000000000000001% of it's power. that is still more impressive than all of Doomsday's feats put together.

Able to affect kill half the living beings in the universe doesn't imply that Thanos can or DID shoot a beam capable of exerting more than 1 ton of pushing force. The beam could have been intended to destroy the hammer. And the power of scope =/= power in concentration in general.

Bottomline: we can't prove the pushing force of the blast. It could be a durability feat though.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Thanos destroyed a moon like nothing, and tossed it at Tony like a toddler throwing a baseball. The pure force that the IG can generate was made abundantly clear, don't be a boob.

Like I said. Destroying force, not pushing force. It could be a durability showing for SB.
And you can't equate two different showings as if they are the same.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Had Thor hit Thanos in the head he would have, but then we'd have no part 2 movie..... Diana cut Doomsday with EASE with a MUCH LESS POWERFUL weapon. Thor is going to annihilate him.

She never touched his head or got close to it, and shes much faster then Thor. Its like you are completely incapable of comparing feats and seeing the vast differences in the characters making them.

Originally posted by h1a8
Like I said. Destroying force, not pushing force. It could be a durability showing for SB.
And you can't equate two different showings as if they are the same.

You do it all the time.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You do it all the time.

Not true. Others do it and I call them on it.

Originally posted by Manga11
She never touched his head or got close to it, and shes much faster then Thor. Its like you are completely incapable of comparing feats and seeing the vast differences in the characters making them. Thor can move at lighting speed. He did it in AOU. He also moves incredibly quickly in Ragnarok when he choses. He hasn't ever shown running speed as fast as Diana, but that doesn't matter. Doomsday wasn't moving fast the entire time, and Thor just needs a hit or 2 and it's over.

Move at light speed, lol. That never happened anywhere, at any time.

Thor decimates.

Originally posted by Manga11
Move at light speed, lol. That never happened anywhere, at any time. Someone posted the gif but it does happen early on in the movie. I will try to find it.

Posting gifs isnt going to prove he was moving at light speed unless he went from the earth to the moon in back in an instant.

Originally posted by h1a8
Not true. Others do it and I call them on it.

It's very true and you've been called on it and many times.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's very true and you've been called on it and many times.

I don't recall. Please refresh my memory.

Seriously, is your memory that bad? You were called on it multiple times while talking about Bane and Batman.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't recall. Please refresh my memory. No one believes anything you say, kid.

How do people feel about Thor tanking the direct power of a star?

Originally posted by Newjak
How do people feel about Thor tanking the direct power of a star?


We feel its superior to tanking a Nuke.

Originally posted by Newjak
How do people feel about Thor tanking the direct power of a star?

h1 is doing his normal downplaying of characters he doesn't like.

Originally posted by Newjak
How do people feel about Thor tanking the direct power of a star?

Was just the heat of a star. Nothing more.
Nukes are hotter.

Originally posted by h1a8
Was just the heat of a star. Nothing more.
Nukes are hotter. Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Was just the heat of a star. Nothing more.
Nukes are hotter.

Quote where the movie says Thor only withstood the Heat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Quote where the movie says Thor only withstood the Heat.

It was shown, but with some push force. Heat is energy. And force = energy as meant by Etri

Originally posted by h1a8
It was shown, but with some push force. Heat is energy. And force = energy as meant by Etri Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
It was shown, but with some push force. Heat is energy. And force = energy as meant by Etri

Yes, it was shown that Doomsday could be cut by a regular sword. After all physics says he couldn't have been pushing with much force as force is determined by mass times acceleration.

Again, be consistent.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, it was shown that Doomsday could be cut by a regular sword. After all physics says he couldn't have been pushing with much force as force is determined by mass times acceleration.

Again, be consistent.

It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword.

Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword. What are you talking about ?

Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword.

Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

My standards? No such thing.

Originally posted by h1a8
My standards? No such thing.


Did you really think admitting to having no standards was a good thing?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Tell the devil on your shoulder to stop telling you lies....imo thors feats are good BUT i think its getting exagerrated...so all of a sudden thor will beat superman,WW and (batman)?? ALONE??

Originally posted by Silent Master
Did you really think admitting to having no standards was a good thing?
I don't own any standards.
I use logic and reasoning. The logic I use is universal and correct, its not a standard of mine.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't own any standards.
I use logic and reasoning. The logic I use is universal and correct, its not a standard of mine. Lies.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't own any standards.
I use logic and reasoning. The logic I use is universal and correct, its not a standard of mine.

Great, so standards is another word you don't know the meaning of.

Just wanted to bring this back up

Originally posted by Silent Master
Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

The standard I was using was RL Physics. IOW, "logic and reason".

Originally posted by h1a8
My standards? No such thing.

By admitting that he has no standards for judging evidence, h1 is basically admitting his criteria for judging evidence is variable.

Which is something I believe we all knew, but it's nice of h1 to confirm it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Great, so standards is another word you don't know the meaning of. Applying logic and owning a standard are two different things.

Your words imply that I'm the only one that uses a particular form of logic. i.e. It's mine alone.

What type of physics should we use to quantify Thor's feat?
What is the force of a star (not heat)? How much is it? Don't give me units of energy since that's not force

Originally posted by h1a8
Applying logic and owning a standard are two different things.

Your words imply that I'm the only one that uses a particular form of logic. i.e. It's mine alone.

What type of physics should we use to quantify Thor's feat?
What is the force of a star (not heat)? How much is it? Don't give me units of energy since that's not force

I never said you "owned" anything. nice try.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I never said you "owned" anything. nice try.

"Your" implies ownership

Originally posted by h1a8
"Your" implies ownership

You infering something doesn't mean that is what was implied. "your standards" just means the standards you're using. it doesn't imply anything.

I thought you were smart?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You infering something doesn't mean that is what was implied. "your standards" just means the standards you're using. it doesn't imply anything.

I thought you were smart?

There aren't any other standards of measurement though.
How else would you quantify the amount of force a star emits when stars don't emit much force at all? I'm all ears.

nothing doomsday can do except lose

Originally posted by h1a8
There aren't any other standards of measurement though.
How else would you quantify the amount of force a star emits when stars don't emit much force at all? I'm all ears.

I see, we are back to you not knowing what words mean.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/force


a (1) : strength or energy exerted or brought to bear

Originally posted by h1a8
There aren't any other standards of measurement though.
How else would you quantify the amount of force a star emits when stars don't emit much force at all? I'm all ears. You are very dumb.

Doomsday dies again.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I see, we are back to you not knowing what words mean.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/force


a (1) : strength or energy exerted or brought to bear

It has multiple definitions, as do many words do.
Which definition did Etri mean?
If energy, then it's a shit feat.
If force as in the physics definition then it's a shit feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
It has multiple definitions, as do many words do.
Which definition did Etri mean?
If energy, then it's a shit feat.
If force as in the physics definition then it's a shit feat.

Why would it be a shit feat?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Why would it be a shit feat?
Assuming the energy definition
Because it has no bearing on Thor's durability against blunt force.
It just shows how much heat energy Thor can take before dying. He's very resistant against conventional heat. But this will only help him against the hv attack. Nothing more.

Originally posted by h1a8
Assuming the energy definition
Because it has no bearing on Thor's durability against blunt force.
It just shows how much heat energy Thor can take before dying. He's very resistant against conventional heat. But this will only help him against the hv attack. Nothing more.

Thanks for proving that you don't know anything about neutron stars.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Thanks for proving that you don't know anything about neutron stars.
Thor experienced heat of the star, with a little push force.
Anyone who saw the movie would think so.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor experienced heat of the star, with a little push force.
Anyone who saw the movie would think so.

How many watts/joules of energy did Thor withstand?

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor experienced heat of the star, with a little push force.
Anyone who saw the movie would think so. Everyine rose disagrees so you dint speak for anyone. Your self awareness is pretty terrible as is your math, your brain, your life.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thor experienced heat of the star, with a little push force.
Anyone who saw the movie would think so.


I have no idea why anyone would think that.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I have no idea why anyone would think that.

Then either you are lying or a pure fool.

I like how most people KNOW that Thor wins this and H1 is like "Thor didn't get burned, he took the force of a lighter".

Originally posted by h1a8
Then either you are lying or a pure fool. You are the poster child for morons.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
I like how most people KNOW that Thor wins this and H1 is like "Thor didn't get burned, he took the force of a lighter".

Wtf. I didn't say that

Sm tried blaming Khazra for that trash post.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
Wtf. I didn't say that

H1 said it. but his post couldn't be quoted. so I quoted your post and then pasted in H1's comment. I guess I forgot to switch names.

Sorry about that.

SM fake news, confirmed.

That meme is old.

Originally posted by Silent Master
H1 said it. but his post couldn't be quoted. so I quoted your post and then pasted in H1's comment. I guess I forgot to switch names.

Sorry about that.

Lol, no worries.

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
More math and science stuff. Video in the link

https://nerdist.com/science-forge-thor-infinity-war-axe/

Originally posted by Silent Master
Basically Thor resisted heat energy as I been saying all along.
Thor proved to be greatly resistant against heat energy.

That wasn't enough time to actually watch the video, thanks for proving to the entire board that you can't be trusted

Originally posted by Silent Master
That wasn't enough time to actually watch the video, thanks for proving to the entire board that you can't be trusted

I saw the video prior to you posting it

Prove it

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove it

I watched it in the other thread.
Someone posted it.

Prove it, tell us exactly how much energy it said Thor withstood.

Originally posted by h1a8
Basically Thor resisted heat energy as I been saying all along.
Thor proved to be greatly resistant against heat energy. Thor took the concentrated power of a Neutron star for several minutes. Quit lowballing clown. You're more desperate than ever.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Thor took the concentrated power of a Neutron star for several minutes. Quit lowballing clown. You're more desperate than ever.

OH!! so now its "concentrated"? whatever happend to "full"?

Etri specifically said the "FULL force of a Star". He emphasized what Thor was just about to endure.

The fact that there is debate as to what happened, when it was literally on film and verbally clarified is impressive even by KMC standards. Hopefully in the next movie, when Thor is about to do something, subtitles will appear clarifying the details of the feat down to the nearest 0.001 decimal. Only for H1 to be like "NOPE! They didn't round it up correctly, no bueno!"

Originally posted by The Spectre+
OH!! so now its "concentrated"? whatever happend to "full"? Concentrated by watching the movie with my eyes. FULL FORCE based on the movie as well from Eitri's mouth. Either way there are some lowballing ****tards trying their best mental gymnastics to make it look less impressive. What wording would you prefer my lord, Concentrated or Full Force? Either works for me.

The funny thing is if Superman had survived the same feat as Thor with the "Full Force of a Star" , H1 would be massively pushing and glorifying that feat, even more so than how impressive is actually is.
Since it isnt one of his favorite characters, he is doing his best to low ball the feat lulz. Classic H1.

Originally posted by Inhuman
The funny thing is if Superman had survived the same feat as Thor with the "Full Force of a Star" , H1 would be massively pushing and glorifying that feat, even more so than how impressive is actually is.
Since it isnt one of his favorite characters, he is doing his best to low ball the feat lulz. Classic H1. Yah, well on the plus side the entire forum knows that H1 is basically just a troll so it's all good. No one takes him seriously.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Yah, well on the plus side the entire forum knows that H1 is basically just a troll so it's all good. No one takes him seriously.

I like how he claimed to have seen the video and that it proved him right. only to run away when I asked him to post how much energy the clip said was in the beam that hit Thor.

I posted this in another thread. I dont pretend to be an expert on Neutron stars so I dont know if its right but sounds good to me.

https://nerdist.com/science-forge-thor-infinity-war-axe/

How much energy was in the beam Thor was hit by?

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
I posted this in another thread. I dont pretend to be an expert on Neutron stars so I dont know if its right but sounds good to me.

https://nerdist.com/science-forge-thor-infinity-war-axe/

I reposted that here. h1 claims to have watched all 12 minutes of the video in under 4 minutes and that it backs up his claim that the neutron star feat is less impressive than Superman's nuke feat.


IOW: H1 is more biased than quan.

How much energy was in the beam that hit Thor?

Is that your stance, Thor was hit with an infinite amount of energy?