Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://i.imgur.com/Fubq2sg.jpg


I'm 100% for this.

Obviously, it won't stop violent crime or even reduce it because removing guns from circulation doesn't reduce violent crime in a noticable way, it just transfers it at best and creates more violence through black markets and trafficking, at worst.


But it's still contributing positively to the world a little bit better. Who knows, the dogs may create comfort or calmness in a home that would prevent a violent crime? Maybe it can indirectly help with violence that way.


Thoughts? Disagree with guns for dogs program?

I'm more of a cat person myself

Originally posted by dadudemon



Thoughts? Disagree with guns for dogs program?

Yeah, it can be a positive event. It would probably get 5-6 dogs adopted

Dude is such a mangina he doesn't realise that the problem is we need more guns. Better yet, have more guns and more dogs. Give the dogs guns.

This is a copout that will just lead to more suffering.

A dog with dual automated assault rifle turrets on its back is even better!

But My Guns don't bark all night!?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
A dog with dual automated assault rifle turrets on its back is even better!

Agreed. Get this into legislation, ASAP.

Originally posted by Kurk
I'm more of a cat person myself

#metoo


haermm

Originally posted by Nibedicus
A dog with dual automated assault rifle turrets on its back is even better!

I would rather go old school.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2d/K-9.jpg

Who cares if dogs get euthanised lol its humane

Better to weaponize than euthenise I always say.

sickem boy

But what about all those K9 Miss fires that go off on small children?

Like with the Assualt K9's such as the Pit Bulls!?

Guns don't kill people. Dogs kill people.

We would need reasonable dog control. Maybe K9 barkground checks?

That poster is very clever and well designed.

Originally posted by dadudemon
https://i.imgur.com/Fubq2sg.jpg


I'm 100% for this.

Obviously, it won't stop violent crime or even reduce it because removing guns from circulation doesn't reduce violent crime in a noticable way, it just transfers it at best and creates more violence through black markets and trafficking, at worst.


But it's still contributing positively to the world a little bit better. Who knows, the dogs may create comfort or calmness in a home that would prevent a violent crime? Maybe it can indirectly help with violence that way.


Thoughts? Disagree with guns for dogs program?

Ever see a kid with a dog?

Nothing calming about that.

Originally posted by dadudemon
https://i.imgur.com/Fubq2sg.jpg


I'm 100% for this.

Obviously, it won't stop violent crime or even reduce it because removing guns from circulation doesn't reduce violent crime in a noticable way, it just transfers it at best and creates more violence through black markets and trafficking, at worst.


But it's still contributing positively to the world a little bit better. Who knows, the dogs may create comfort or calmness in a home that would prevent a violent crime? Maybe it can indirectly help with violence that way.


Thoughts? Disagree with guns for dogs program?

You're f*cking racist. What about people who live in apartments that don't allow pets? What about people allergic to dogs?

You f*cking monster.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Guns don't kill people. Dogs kill people.

We would need reasonable dog control. Maybe K9 barkground checks?

This is an incredible pun. A+

Originally posted by BackFire
That poster is very clever and well designed.

I thought so, too. Many commented the same.

can i trade in a water gun? don't really have the whole led contraption on my person

You just know these people are VEGANS!!


Restaurant Receives Death Treats ...casue its Not Anti Gun.

Originally posted by Robtard
People who don't like dogs should be shipped to Iran or N. Korea.

Ironic that you want them shipped to Korea where they do eat dogs.

Originally posted by Robtard
People who don't like dogs should be shipped to Iran or N. Korea.

Why not to a country that eats dogs like China or South Korea? You're not a benevolent god.

You're a chaotic evil god.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
Ironic that you want them shipped to Korea where they do eat dogs.

That would make sense then, wouldn't it? But N. Korea doesn't have any dogs, they've all been eaten long ago by the starving population.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why not to a country that eats dogs like China or South Korea? You're not a benevolent god.

You're a chaotic evil god.

^ This guy. This guy gets it.

Originally posted by Robtard
That would make sense then, wouldn't it? But N. Korea doesn't have any dogs, they've all been eaten long ago by the starving population.

I'm sure Kim might have some around.