#MeToo Breaking News

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Trocity
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=vUV7W5XhBMjVjwSt6qXwCA&q=asia+argento&oq=asia+argento&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i131k1l4j0l5.1269.3553.0.3688.15.8.1.5.6.0.147.689.2j4.6.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..3.12.764.0..0i10k1.0.Q4VYegYLuFE



Thoughts?

cdtm
Obviously disgusting, if true.

That doesn't make her allegations false, it just adds another spin on how low something can go..

Robtard
Pretty much that. She's a piece of shit if this is true, but that doesn't mean Weinstein's not a sexual predator because of it.

Trocity
Weinstein is definitely a piece of shit, just found it interesting that someone who was part of that movement and very vocal could be the same kind of person she is condemning.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Trocity
Weinstein is definitely a piece of shit, just found it interesting that someone who was part of that movement and very vocal could be the same kind of person she is condemning.

Yes, there's plenty of pieces of shit behaviors to go around. No one gets a monopoly on it, for sure.

The Oprah meme comes to mind: "You're a piece of shit, you're a piece of shit, everyone's a piece of shit!"

SquallX

samhain
Sad because both sides of this argument will try to spin this their way. The #metoo movement will say 'But she was a victim, it's all Harvey's fault really.' and the incels and misogynists will say 'See, no such thing as rape.' while simultaneously campaigning to have her thrown in prison.

Mindship
So much for the Matriarchy.

stick out tongue

SquallX

-Pr-
Originally posted by Trocity
Weinstein is definitely a piece of shit, just found it interesting that someone who was part of that movement and very vocal could be the same kind of person she is condemning.

There's that whole "protesting too much" thing. People that are guilty of something will often shout the loudest about how terrible it is, and try to use it as a kind of shield.

It saddens me that even with all this going on, Hollywood isn't likely to change. A system exists in which these people are allowed to flourish, whether they're preying on children OR adults, with little to no accountability. Yeah, people will say "but they got Weinstein", but nobody talks about all the people that enabled him, and to me they're just as guilty.

SquallX

Surtur
Originally posted by samhain
Sad because both sides of this argument will try to spin this their way. The #metoo movement will say 'But she was a victim, it's all Harvey's fault really.' and the incels and misogynists will say 'See, no such thing as rape.' while simultaneously campaigning to have her thrown in prison.

The thing is, it's the Me Too'ers making the worst of this lol. And that is just god damn gold. Sure some will try to dismiss MeToo over this, but far more damage is being done by the proponents of MeToo.

Rose McGowan actually told people to "be gentle" on this kunt lol. Just let that sink in. She pulled the "we need to wait and see, be gentle". And yep, same chick who in the past said "survivors need to be believed".

And every single jackass who felt the need to point out "well harvey is still guilty too!" upon news of this is also part of the problem. And this shit isn't only being said to people trying to dismiss MeToo over this, it's just the VERY first reaction some morons have had lol.

It's pathetic, it's disgusting, it's hypocritical, but also hilarious at how they clown themselves.

Silent Master
Originally posted by samhain
Sad because both sides of this argument will try to spin this their way. The #metoo movement will say 'But she was a victim, it's all Harvey's fault really.' and the incels and misogynists will say 'See, no such thing as rape.' while simultaneously campaigning to have her thrown in prison.

So basically, you're saying that people are either #metoo or they're incels/misogynists.

Which side is for people that think all accusations should be properly investigated and that only those found to be guilty should be punished?

Robtard
Originally posted by samhain
Sad because both sides of this argument will try to spin this their way. The #metoo movement will say 'But she was a victim, it's all Harvey's fault really.' and the incels and misogynists will say 'See, no such thing as rape.' while simultaneously campaigning to have her thrown in prison.

laughing out loud

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
The thing is, it's the Me Too'ers making the worst of this lol. And that is just god damn gold. Sure some will try to dismiss MeToo over this, but far more damage is being done by the proponents of MeToo.

Rose McGowan actually told people to "be gentle" on this kunt lol. Just let that sink in. She pulled the "we need to wait and see, be gentle". And yep, same chick who in the past said "survivors need to be believed".

And every single jackass who felt the need to point out "well harvey is still guilty too!" upon news of this is also part of the problem. And this shit isn't only being said to people trying to dismiss MeToo over this, it's just the VERY first reaction some morons have had lol.

It's pathetic, it's disgusting, it's hypocritical, but also hilarious at how they clown themselves.

^ Surt's #teamincel

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
^ Surt's #teamincel

Except I didn't say there is no such thing as rape.

My overall point is the people doing the majority of damage to this "movement" are not the detractors of the movement, but the hypocrites that are a part of it.

Robtard
You've been attacking the #metoo movement since it started, so you can leave your silly games at the door.

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
You've been attacking the #metoo movement since it started, so you can leave your silly games at the door.

I never said rape wasn't rape. Once again: my point is this thing is only gonna be torn apart from within.

SquallX

Surtur
Asia Argento Denies Sexual Assault Allegations, Says Anthony Bourdain Paid Off Accuser

You just can't make this up lol.

Nibedicus
laughing out loud at the comments section.

Guy's got a point, they really should come up with a better name for the movement than "pound me too".

Surtur

dadudemon

Surtur
Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't think I know any of these people. Those are probably coworkers or people who know him from "work."

Martin Scorcese is on the list. Also Wes Anderson. Darren Aronofsky. Tilda Swinton.

Silent Master
Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't think I know any of these people. Those are probably coworkers or people who know him from "work."

Even Woody Allen and Martin Scorcese?

Surtur
David Lynch. John Landis.

Surtur
Terry Gilliam rings a bell.

Surtur
Never heard of this guy but tee hee @ the name:

Just Jaeckin

dadudemon
Originally posted by Surtur
Martin Scorcese is on the list. Also Wes Anderson. Darren Aronofsky. Tilda Swinton.


I took random samples with my eyes. 1 out of 7 I read. Most likely, those names showed up in the other 6 out of 7 I didn't read. big grin

SquallX

SquallX

Surtur
Natalie Portman is also on the list.

Putinbot1
I wonder if it was knowledge of this that caused Bourdain to top himself. He was one of my favourite celebs and I honestly could see this breaking his heart.

BackFire
These allegations should be treated with the same seriousness as all the others. The fact that she's trying to throw Bourdain under the bus like that is so slimy. I hope she gets blacklisted/arrested like anyone else would be for these allegations.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by BackFire
These allegations should be treated with the same seriousness as all the others. The fact that she's trying to throw Bourdain under the bus like that is so slimy. I hope she gets blacklisted/arrested like anyone else would be for these allegations. Without wanting to sound like Surtur, she is a thunder-****.

samhain
Originally posted by Silent Master
So basically, you're saying that people are either #metoo or they're incels/misogynists.


Not what I said.

Silent Master
Originally posted by samhain
Sad because both sides of this argument will try to spin this their way. The #metoo movement will say 'But she was a victim, it's all Harvey's fault really.' and the incels and misogynists will say 'See, no such thing as rape.' while simultaneously campaigning to have her thrown in prison.


Hmmmm.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by samhain
Not what I said. Silent Master is trolling you Sam, literalism is his go-to trick.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I wonder if it was knowledge of this that caused Bourdain to top himself. He was one of my favourite celebs and I honestly could see this breaking his heart.

Final installment was paid the month he died.

I wonder if she convinced him the kid was lying and he found out he wasn't lying.

She duped him. Worth only 1.2 million when he died, paid out nearly 400k over this kunt.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
Final installment was paid the month he died.

I wonder if she convinced him the kid was lying and he found out he wasn't lying.

She duped him. Worth only 1.2 million when he died, paid out nearly 400k over this kunt.

It looks like she did.

samhain
Originally posted by Silent Master
Hmmmm.


So how does both sides of an argument equate to ALL people on the planet?

samhain
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Silent Master is trolling you Sam, literalism is his go-to trick.


Yeah, I get that, but there'd need to be some substance/element of truth to what he is saying for him to be trolling IMO.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by samhain
Yeah, I get that, but there'd need to be some substance/element of truth to what he is saying for him to be trolling IMO. Going to disagree Sam, which is rare for me with your posts, S&M trolls with strawmen and other joke constructs all the time.

samhain
Yeah true, I guess I should have said that I barely notice this style of trolling without any substance to it.

Silent Master
Originally posted by samhain
So how does both sides of an argument equate to ALL people on the planet?

Now I see why you only quoted part of my response, it was so you could create a strawman by pretending I was talking about all the people on the planet, rather than someone involved in the argument. Here is my full response.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So basically, you're saying that people are either #metoo or they're incels/misogynists.

Which side is for people that think all accusations should be properly investigated and that only those found to be guilty should be punished?

Next time, Try reading the whole post before responding.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by samhain
Yeah true, I guess I should have said that I barely notice this style of trolling without any substance to it. Now that is very true, it is a very ineffectual technique.

samhain
Originally posted by Silent Master
Next time, Try reading the whole post before responding.

Yeah, this is good advice for you, I'd also advise getting a better command of the English language for you as well.

samhain
Originally posted by Silent Master
So basically, you're saying that people are either #metoo or they're incels/misogynists.


See?

Silent Master
Originally posted by Silent Master
So basically, you're saying that people are either #metoo or they're incels/misogynists.

Which side is for people that think all accusations should be properly investigated and that only those found to be guilty should be punished?

See?

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Silent Master
Now I see why you only quoted part of my response, it was so you could create a strawman by pretending I was talking about all the people on the planet, rather than someone involved in the argument. Here is my full response.



Next time, Try reading the whole post before responding. Try reading the whole thing S&M, comprehension has always been a problem for you. As you well know.

Silent Master
Lol!!!

samhain
Sorry for the lateness of this reply, I was busy having a pleasant conversation with a woman. If you'd like to know what either of those things are SM, a basic google search will provide you with answers.

Surtur
Lol so you know how Asia denied it?

Yeah, now the photo has leaked of her in bed with the kid. LMFAO!

Boom, over.

https://images.tmz.com/2018/08/21/0821-asia-argento-jimmy-bennett-tmz-wm3-3.jpg

samhain
Yeah, if a pic of Harvey came out like that with one of his accusers, the world would fall apart. Although in all honesty, he hardly looks distraught. He might even be the one taking the picture, LOL.

Surtur
Originally posted by samhain
Yeah, if a pic of Harvey came out like that with one of his accusers, the world would fall apart. Although in all honesty, he hardly looks distraught. He might even be the one taking the picture, LOL.

He has a weird uncomfortable look on his face IMO. Like a fake smile.

samhain
That might be the look I would have had being a 17 year old who has just banged a woman twice his age though. Like, 'Holy shit, did that just happen?'.

Surtur
Originally posted by samhain
That might be the look I would have had being a 17 year old who has just banged a woman twice his age though. Like, 'Holy shit, did that just happen?'.

Or it might be the look you just had if you were confused that you just f*cked some woman you've known since you were 7 and who you've called mommy.

Putinbot1
He looks wistful... and satiated... No wonder AB topped himself, this woman is a snake.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
He looks wistful... and satiated... No wonder AB topped himself, this woman is a snake.

Don't insult snakes ever again.

Surtur
Well hey you guys be glad it's just Asia Argento f*cking things up.

Wouldn't it suck if someone like Keith Ellison was accused of abusing a woman he dated and it barely got covered by the media? Now THAT might harm the movement.

Putinbot1
Sex crimes will never be something any party can say is one-sided, I truly believe Politicians like priests have a disproportionate number of deviants and downright paedos, rapists etc within their ranks. Look at Trump, Clinton etc.

Surtur
Maybe if they made it okay for priests to bang regular folk they wouldn't be banging little kids.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
Maybe if they made it okay for priests to bang regular folk they wouldn't be banging little kids. Yeah, maybe, what about popstars... They love it Ian Watkins, Gary Glitter, Michael Jackson etc.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, maybe, what about popstars... They love it Ian Watkins, Gary Glitter, Michael Jackson etc.

MJ got f*cked over since childhood. Seems like the guy never had the chance to be a kid so upon becoming an adult who can do whatever he wanted he decided to become an eternal child.

Someone who calls themselves Gary Glitter is just shouting from the rooftops he's a pedo.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
MJ got f*cked over since childhood. Seems like the guy never had the chance to be a kid so upon becoming an adult who can do whatever he wanted he decided to become an eternal child.

Someone who calls themselves Gary Glitter is just shouting from the rooftops he's a pedo. He was massive in the 70's... Second only to Bowie as a glam rock Icon. Ian Watkins took it to another level though ****ing babies and all, he was one twisted ****.

Surtur

Putinbot1
Poor Anthony Bourdain.

Surtur
I feel sorry for the cuck who ends up married to Argento. Cuz you know some guy is gonna be dumb enough to do that.

In Europe some folk probably thinks it's more acceptable for a 37 yr. old to ride a 16 yr. old

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
I feel sorry for the cuck who ends up married to Argento. Cuz you know some guy is gonna be dumb enough to do that.

In Europe some folk probably thinks it's more acceptable for a 37 yr. old to ride a 16 yr. old Come on mate, Europe and the States both have places where that's seen as fine. You have Hillbillies we have Chavs.

Silent Master
Places like Hollywood.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Silent Master
Places like Hollywood. The Houses of Parliament!

Robtard
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Come on mate, Europe and the States both have places where that's seen as fine. You have Hillbillies we have Chavs.

Many a state has the Age of Consent at 16. Some states have special exceptions where 14 or 15 is allowed if the other person is no more than 4 years older. Alabama is 14 if the parents consent. Ewww. Alabama, Roy 'The Pedo' Moore country.

Glad I live in California and not one of those pedo-states, AoC is 18 here.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
Many a state has the Age of Consent at 16. Some states have special exceptions where 14 or 15 is allowed if the other person is no more than 4 years older. Alabama is 14 if the parents consent. Ewww. Alabama, Roy 'The Pedo' Moore country.

Glad I live in California and not one of those pedo-states, AoC is 18 here. Well Goodness Gracious, Great Balls of Fire!

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
MJ got f*cked over since childhood. Seems like the guy never had the chance to be a kid so upon becoming an adult who can do whatever he wanted he decided to become an eternal child.

Someone who calls themselves Gary Glitter is just shouting from the rooftops he's a pedo.

Having a very shitty childhood isn't an excuse to diddle children later in life though. Even if you were raped yourself as one. Not that you were going there?

samhain
Originally posted by Robtard
Glad I live in California and not one of those pedo-states, AoC is 18 here.


18 is too old IMO and kind of unnatural, if two 15-year old's want to have sex with each other, who can really stop them? And let them, they probably have crap lives anyway, would hate to be a teenager these days. What we need is better education and not to condition young men and women into the various roles that society/the media does. But hey, as long as the very idea of sex will make money why would we do anything different?

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Come on mate, Europe and the States both have places where that's seen as fine. You have Hillbillies we have Chavs.

You telling me affairs between a young dude with some old pathetic cougar aren't seen differently in Europe? Okie dokie! That was just one of the excuses I saw over Asia Argento. "She's italian, it's different".

Surtur

Robtard
Originally posted by samhain
18 is too old IMO and kind of unnatural, if two 15-year old's want to have sex with each other, who can really stop them? And let them, they probably have crap lives anyway, would hate to be a teenager these days. What we need is better education and not to condition young men and women into the various roles that society/the media does. But hey, as long as the very idea of sex will make money why would we do anything different?

Age of consent generally applies to an adult(18+) having sex with someone under age (17 and below).

Putinbot1
I'll be honest for me 15 to 20-year-olds is a grey area with each other. Once you are above 21 anyone below the legal age of consent should be off limits. Young males and females can be predatory to older men and women. It's just those older people should be strong enough morally not to do shit because any way it's cut sex with minors no matter how adult they appear for anyone over 21 is wrong.

Putinbot1
http://oi45.tinypic.com/21jvv5u.jpg Wonder what this guy would say.

Surtur
Who is he?

Robtard
Former member named AlphaCentauri

Surtur
He actually posted a gif of himself? Lol.


Also [email protected] the beanie.

Robtard
No, he made some video about comics at a comic store, someone made the gif off of it

He's the "AC" you've heard talked about before, typically not in a positive light.

shiv
Asia Argento

She knew the victim since he was 7

She viewed nude photos of the boy on her phone taken when the boy was 13

She viewed child porn

She took on the role of matriarch when the boy was 17

She supplied the boy (a minor) with alchohol

She had un-protected sex with a minor

She sexually assaulted the youngster repeatedly

She Gaslighted Anthony Bourdain to suicide.

After his death she took down her posts on social media

She libelled him after his death

A study of her statements alonside her record of conduct

Asia Argento is in no particular order:


controlling - a pathological liar - a narcissist - a psycopath - a pedophile - a fantasist - she is a person who speaks in opposittes

He Jumped Me

Now where and when have I heard that before?

Putinbot1
Pretty much Shiv.

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.