Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

MCU Thor with stormbreaker

VS

DCEU Wonder Woman
DCEU Zod

Thor destroys them.

Thor can beat either one on one but he'll have trouble taking them out together. Still doable but it's possible that the duo will win as well.

can SB get through Diana's shield??????

Thor will kneel before Zod here.

Originally posted by The Spectre+
can SB get through Diana's shield??????

Either of the DCEU characters solo here.

Originally posted by Arachnid1
Either of the DCEU characters solo here. Ridiculous and fanboyism.

If Thor has Storm breaker they die badly.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
If Thor has Storm breaker they die badly. Very badly.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
If Thor has Storm breaker they die badly.

Either one could beat Thor solo.
For example, WW has speed, bracers, lasso, sword, etc.

Originally posted by h1a8
Either one could beat Thor solo.
For example, WW has speed, bracers, lasso, sword, etc. Prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
Either one could beat Thor solo.
For example, WW has speed, bracers, lasso, sword, etc.

Ok, I challenge you to a BZ. Thor vs Zod. do you accept?

Originally posted by h1a8
Either one could beat Thor solo.
For example, WW has speed, bracers, lasso, sword, etc.

She can't fly, and has shit durability. A single shot from SB and she's dead.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Ok, I challenge you to a BZ. Thor vs Zod. do you accept?

We can just debate it here. Go ahead and make a case for Thor over Zod.

Originally posted by h1a8
We can just debate it here. Go ahead and make a case for Thor over Zod. Coward.

Originally posted by h1a8
We can just debate it here. Go ahead and make a case for Thor over Zod.

I'll take your refusal to Battle Zone as a concession.

Tough fight. Diana's sword is the only real problem here. And I suppose the lasso. Everything else Thor can take all day long.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm guessing you're saying Zod wins because in your mind Zod=Superman. The problem is Superman has better feats than Zod.

Nope

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm guessing you're saying Zod wins because in your mind Zod=Superman. The problem is Superman has better feats than Zod.

He's saying it because he's a troll.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's saying it because he's a troll.

You are the actual troll. No one addresses it because the majority of posters here are Marvel bias (like you). But everyone here knows.

You hardly ever debate. You always ask redundant and also rhetorical questions, you play childish antics, you twist people's words, etc. You never take a side and argue why. You talk in riddles instead of being direct. You flame others. You derail the threads with flaming material. You create strawman. You ignore (don't address) people's points and copy and paste the same posts. You state that the evidence people post is not proof without giving any reason why. You often champion (jump on the bandwagon) other poster's arguments and not one of your own. Everyone here can agree to this, but most will be Silent about it (pun intended).

You my friend are the definition of a troll.

Does Thor have the durability and the firepower to take both Zod and Diana in an open area, epic brawl? Yes, yes I think he does.

However, if Diana gets in quick with her sword, she can hack cut if not hack some body parts off Thor if the fight with Doomsday is any indication, so if her and Zod work together, I see them winning, especially considering their speed advantage as well.

Originally posted by h1a8
Either one could beat Thor solo.
For example, WW has speed, bracers, lasso, sword, etc.



DCEU Wonder Woman cant even fly so she has no chance on her own.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are the actual troll. No one addresses it because the majority of posters here are Marvel bias (like you). But everyone here knows.

You hardly ever debate. You always ask redundant and also rhetorical questions, you play childish antics, you twist people's words, etc. You never take a side and argue why. You talk in riddles instead of being direct. You flame others. You derail the threads with flaming material. You create strawman. You ignore (don't address) people's points and copy and paste the same posts. You state that the evidence people post is not proof without giving any reason why. You often champion (jump on the bandwagon) other poster's arguments and not one of your own. Everyone here can agree to this, but most will be Silent about it (pun intended).

You my friend are the definition of a troll. h1 just destroyed Sm.

Originally posted by John Murdoch
Does Thor have the durability and the firepower to take both Zod and Diana in an open area, epic brawl? Yes, yes I think he does.

However, if Diana gets in quick with her sword, she can hack cut if not hack some body parts off Thor if the fight with Doomsday is any indication, so if her and Zod work together, I see them winning, especially considering their speed advantage as well.

Yeah but then you have the fight against Steppenwolf where her sword wasn't really doing much damage to him despite landing direct hits.

Not saying it won't work on Thor, just saying we shouldn't automatically assume it will work simply because it worked on DD.

Anyway, I still think Thor wins one on one but probably loses a slight majority in 2 on 1.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Yeah but then you have the fight against Steppenwolf where her sword wasn't really doing much damage to him despite landing direct hits.

Not saying it won't work on Thor, just saying we shouldn't automatically assume it will work simply because it worked on DD.

Anyway, I still think Thor wins one on one but probably loses a slight majority in 2 on 1.

Ya good point. And we've all pointed out in multiple threads the level of durability that Thor has from a laundry list of film feats. His only issue is slicing and piercing durability, as Hela had no problem stabbing him. However, Hela's powers of weapon manifestation are different from Diana having a sword as a weapon, so it's hardly comparing apples to apples.

So, where I stand at are these two options:

- If Zod and Diana work together well enough, I can see them landing enough hits on Thor until Zod can distract/restrain him enough for Diana to get some critical stabs/slashes in.
- If Zod and Diana just engage in a brawl, Thor w/ Stormbreaker has too much durability, too many ranged attack options, a weapon that can potentially maim Zod and Diana, and too much strength for them to put him down for good.

Originally posted by John Murdoch
Ya good point. And we've all pointed out in multiple threads the level of durability that Thor has from a laundry list of film feats. His only issue is slicing and piercing durability, as Hela had no problem stabbing him. However, Hela's powers of weapon manifestation are different from Diana having a sword as a weapon, so it's hardly comparing apples to apples.

My personal take on this is that Diana's sword can cut and pierce Thor but she'll need a number of strikes to make them serious enough. This is evidenced by how Thor can take on numerous stabs from the likes of Loki and Hela yet continues to fight afterwards.

So do I think she can cut Thor? Definitely. Do I think she can cut off his head (or other body parts) with one clean hit? Doubtful.

But I guess we're pretty much in agreement with how the fight goes down anyway.

Originally posted by FrothByte
My personal take on this is that Diana's sword can cut and pierce Thor but she'll need a number of strikes to make them serious enough. This is evidenced by how Thor can take on numerous stabs from the likes of Loki and Hela yet continues to fight afterwards.

So do I think she can cut Thor? Definitely. Do I think she can cut off his head (or other body parts) with one clean hit? Doubtful.

But I guess we're pretty much in agreement with how the fight goes down anyway.

Yes sir, I agree on all accounts with your statement here.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are the actual troll. No one addresses it because the majority of posters here are Marvel bias (like you). But everyone here knows.

You hardly ever debate. You always ask redundant and also rhetorical questions, you play childish antics, you twist people's words, etc. You never take a side and argue why. You talk in riddles instead of being direct. You flame others. You derail the threads with flaming material. You create strawman. You ignore (don't address) people's points and copy and paste the same posts. You state that the evidence people post is not proof without giving any reason why. You often champion (jump on the bandwagon) other poster's arguments and not one of your own. Everyone here can agree to this, but most will be Silent about it (pun intended).

You my friend are the definition of a troll.

If you're done having your little temper tantrum, everyone is still waiting for you to back up your claim in regards to Zod being able to solo.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you're done having your little temper tantrum, everyone is still waiting for you to back up your claim in regards to Zod being able to solo.

Speed and strength and relentless.

Originally posted by h1a8
Speed and strength and relentless.


How is he stronger.

He didnt display any outstanding speed IIrc.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
How is he stronger.

He didnt display any outstanding speed IIrc.
He uppercut Clark all the way up to the top of a skyscraper. Clark busted the top really well proving that he would have went up another half skyscraper distance (at least) if he didn't make contact with the skyscraper.
Thor has nothing that comes close to this.

He fought Clark at speeds far faster than Thor's speed. It was like watching a dragon ball z level fight.