Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Huge error for Alan horn to fire the man. I wish Gunn the best. He was fantastic and his career should flourish.

Dave Bautista wants in!

As much as I wanted Gunn to finish up the GoTG Trilogy, Disney's lose is WB's gain.

Huge win for WB/DC if they can get him. Also a big middle finger to everyone at Marvel/Disney.

WB is no doubt loving this.

First Whedon and now Gunn

DC & Warner Bros. bringing in talent that has already made successful Marvel properties - it looks like poaching to get Marvel's secret formula and has rarely worked out.

Originally posted by playa1258
Huge win for WB/DC if they can get him. Also a big middle finger to everyone at Marvel/Disney.

WB is no doubt loving this.

Yep. Gunn would do well with the SS property. It's going to be interesting.

Smart move.

That's a pretty good call.

I think we do Whedon a disservice by claiming failing results for joining the WB side. With a movie that's already all chopped up and mostly filmed, was a tough thing to enter and just, upend.

This could be interesting. I'd like to see what Gunn could do with those characters, because I feel like that first SS film had so much potential that ended up being completely wasted.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Huge error for Alan horn to fire the man. I wish Gunn the best. He was fantastic and his career should flourish.



Originally posted by Robtard
As much as I wanted Gunn to finish up the GoTG Trilogy, Disney's lose is WB's gain.

Disney is still going to use his script, right?

They should give him something else, like maybe Lobo, or a Constantine reboot. I don't know why WB is so hell-bent on turning Suicide Squad into the DC version of GotG.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
They should give him something else, like maybe Lobo, or a Constantine reboot. I don't know why WB is so hell-bent on turning Suicide Squad into the DC version of GotG.

I'm surprised they're still trying to save DCEU, tbh.

They should either start anew, do a hard reboot or go back to making stand-alone films.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
They should give him something else, like maybe Lobo, or a Constantine reboot. I don't know why WB is so hell-bent on turning Suicide Squad into the DC version of GotG.


Was probably Gunns choice.


Whats funny is the previous writers just recently finished and handed in their script. Clearly no one will be reading that lol

I read that the reason the previous script will not be used is because it ended up being very similar to the Birds of Prey script.

Might actually get a decent SS squad film...maybe

Dave Bautista In Talks To Play Bane In James Gunn's Suicide Squad

Originally posted by Senor Cage
Dave Bautista In Talks To Play Bane In James Gunn's Suicide Squad

Oh, wow.

This would've been awesome.

http://whatculture.com/film/james-gunns-suicide-squad-2-might-not-even-be-a-sequel

This would be interesting...to be honest only Harley and Waller were well cast, **** the rest imo. Especially that god awful Jared Leto as the joker.

Originally posted by Khazra Reborn
They should give him something else, like maybe Lobo, or a Constantine reboot. I don't know why WB is so hell-bent on turning Suicide Squad into the DC version of GotG. The first film did well though it stunk imo. I would rather personally see him do something else but wish him luck either way.

Syfy show.

It's not the DC property I would have chosen for him, but it's nice. I would have let him do some New Gods movies. That would be right up his alley.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's not the DC property I would have chosen for him, but it's nice. I would have let him do some New Gods movies. That would be right up his alley.


I would have thought Green Lantern corps would be right up his alley.

But again, WB would have given him the choice of whatever DC project he wanted.

Given how cheap the budgets are if they did a new gods movie I bet the cgi would be cringe worthy at parts. I do not think warner can compete with the budgets Disney has greenlit these days. Dceu products will be second tier and noticeably so.

Sad to see that WB is stooping to hire A Disney Fired Pedophile.

Truly Hollywood is a Horrible place.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Sad to see that WB is stooping to hire A Disney Fired Pedophile.

Truly Hollywood is a Horrible place. Your fee fees are silly. The man was clearly joking but your sensitivity is your own problem not mine.

You obviously haven't seen his Rape Party Pics.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You obviously haven't seen his Rape Party Pics. You do not even care, troll.

No. I Don't Care. It is just Hollywood Hypocrisy.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
No. I Don't Care. It is just Hollywood Hypocrisy. Hollywood is not an entity. I know in your loser mind you think they are a collective hive mind but just stop. Your so hurt by this it is hilarious.

I do enjoy your delusional hypocrisy. That much is true.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
I do enjoy your delusional hypocrisy. That much is true. So triggered by Gunn.

That was almost funny. Def would be if you actually intended it to be...

Originally posted by Flyattractor
That was almost funny. Def would be if you actually intended it to be... Gunn owns you.

I am to old for him.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
I am to old for him. Quit being weird.

nah.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
nah. I am looking forward to this if Gunn gets the gig.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The first film did well though it stunk imo. I would rather personally see him do something else but wish him luck either way.

SS was legitimately one of the worst movies I've ever seen, Gunn is a talented writer/director, at this point he can only elevate the DCEU.

True that....I actually think Ayer should be ashamed for directing such a hot pile of dog shit.

SS might be the wrong project for him. Only Harley has any real character to her. the rest are awful and their comic-book personalities aren't exactly fun or engaging.

Rocket, Peter and Drax had a certain natural charm, in the source material, that Gunn spun into gold, but what's there to work with in SS?

Maybe he could have done Flash or even Shazam (which isn't looking too bad).

I seem to remember James Gunn wrote and directed another little well known film called Movie 43, well known for being awful. Just saying SS might be shit...again.

I like the chances of it being good as more likely than it sucking though no one is perfect.

Lol, well it's even more obvious DC was indeed trying too hard to be Guardians of the Galaxy with Suicide Squad now that they've hired Gunn..

Meh, I'm sure Gunn could improve SS, but I think he should turn it down and do something else more original and interesting.

Originally posted by steverules_2
I seem to remember James Gunn wrote and directed another little well known film called Movie 43, well known for being awful. Just saying SS might be shit...again.

He didn't direct the whole movie, Just one segment of it.

It will be interesting, just because the real creative power at Marvel Studios seems to be Kevin Feige and the production team, rather than the individual directors. Gunn will be under pressure to deliver something close to GOTG; we'll see how well he does without that team he had before.

Or, like Joss Whedon walking away from Batgirl, he might just quit while he still has respect.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I would have thought Green Lantern corps would be right up his alley.

But again, WB would have given him the choice of whatever DC project he wanted.

A Guy Gardner movie by James Gunn would be damn interesting.

Originally posted by Kazenji
He didn't direct the whole movie, Just one segment of it.

Really? Wow, no wonder it was such a mess

Wonder if Gunn will write in a scene where there is a Large Pile of Dead Children?

Which says a LOT about Gunn..

Maybe if SS take on a planet

Could just film at Gunn's house...

Originally posted by steverules_2
Really? Wow, no wonder it was such a mess I loved Gotg 2 more than one and think the guy is awesome so if he gets full control I will definitely see this with higher expectations.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Wonder if Gunn will write in a scene where there is a Large Pile of Dead Children?

Which says a LOT about Gunn..

I hope this turns out well, but I am highly dubious and believe this will be another Joss Whedon directing Justice League situation. The WB just doesn't let directors do their own thing unless you're Patty Jenkins.

Originally posted by Dr Will Hatch
I hope this turns out well, but I am highly dubious and believe this will be another Joss Whedon directing Justice League situation. The WB just doesn't let directors do their own thing unless you're Patty Jenkins.

How so?

when they've pretty much have said that they won't be using the previous script that has been written and James Gunn is writing an all new script, It's not like he's being brought in halfway through filming the second movie.

Yeah its completely different to JL, where Whedon only entered the scene after Snyder has finished his initial shooting of the film.

WB gave no special privileges to Patty Jenkins. In fact they never even had her signed on for a second film, then had to go back to renegotiate with her after Wonder Womans success.

Originally posted by Dr Will Hatch
I hope this turns out well, but I am highly dubious and believe this will be another Joss Whedon directing Justice League situation. The WB just doesn't let directors do their own thing unless you're Patty Jenkins. He took over midway this is completely different.

https://tinyurl.com/y7tw95qf

https://tinyurl.com/y7jtr6y2

Disney, ffs, stop this shit.

^ What were his vulgar tweets about?

Disney needs to stop bending the knee to rapists and nazis pretending to have a moral compass.

Yes. Give the Franchise to James(Diddlin Little Kids) Gunn.

That should show em.!!!!!

^ Got actual proof that Gunn actually touched kids?....otherwise stfu about it.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Yes. Give the Franchise to James(Diddlin Little Kids) Gunn.

That should show em.!!!!! Provide proof.

Oh just do your own google searches.

Intent and all that.

Sad how some will excuse behavior like Pedophilia just because they like a movie.

Tsk Tsk!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Oh just do your own google searches.

Intent and all that.

Sad how some will excuse behavior like Pedophilia just because they like a movie.

Tsk Tsk!! So you cannot prove it but instead want to overreact and expect to be taken seriously, Nah.

Originally posted by Dr Will Hatch
I hope this turns out well, but I am highly dubious and believe this will be another Joss Whedon directing Justice League situation. The WB just doesn't let directors do their own thing unless you're Patty Jenkins.

It's weird to look at what Whedon has done with Marvel and then see him utterly f*ck up with DC.

I think Whedons Batgirl would have been gold personally.

And so would Ben Afflecks Batman had that happened.

Whatever happened with Henry Cavil and Superman? He was cryptic about it I remember, is he officially done with that?

Originally posted by Surtur
Whatever happened with Henry Cavil and Superman? He was cryptic about it I remember, is he officially done with that? Google it ffs.

No one knows for sure, but its clear we are not getting Superman (Cavill or otherwise) anytime soon. Not On the big screen at least.

Wise decision since man of steel vastly underperformed and had a budget bigger than the first Avengers.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wise decision since man of steel vastly underperformed and had a budget bigger than the first Avengers.


It did not underperform lol.

Stop making stuff up.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you cannot prove it but instead want to overreact and expect to be taken seriously, Nah.

Well there is Gunn's admitting to going to Rape parties and his Obvious Obsessions with Child Pedophilia as with his deleted tweets.

But then we must excuse such Pedo Foibles because.. DER MARVEL MOVIES!

Originally posted by Darth Thor
It did not underperform lol.

Stop making stuff up. I provided the link where it made less than 700 million on a bigger budget than the avengers.

Which Avengers?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Well there is Gunn's admitting to going to Rape parties and his Obvious Obsessions with Child Pedophilia as with his deleted tweets.

But then we must excuse such Pedo Foibles because.. DER MARVEL MOVIES! You need to prove it and to quit overreacting.

He did that himself.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
He did that himself. Nah, he will be fine though. You are such a drama queen.

Lucky for me that aint James type.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Lucky for me that aint James type. The guy has a great life you on the other hand.

He is rich and can afford to buy and get rid of the bodies of children quite easily.

Oh those Wacky Rich Holywood Pedos....Like GUNN!

I hope they keep Margot Robbie she was the best part of SS

^ Well she will be reprising her role in Birds of Prey which starts shooting in a few months.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I provided the link where it made less than 700 million on a bigger budget than the avengers.


And Robtard already called you out on that showing how it made approximately the same profit as IM1. Both films kicked off their respective Universes. Except MOS had to fight off the bad taste of Superman Returns which completely Flopped.

Plus it could afford the increased budget with all the sponsorships they were getting from Gillette based around the Man of Steel title.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And Robtard already called you out on that showing how it made approximately the same profit as IM1. Both films kicked off their respective Universes. Except MOS had to fight off the bad taste of Superman Returns which completely Flopped.

Plus it could afford the increased budget with all the sponsorships they were getting from Gillette based around the Man of Steel title. Iron man first off was not an icon at the time nor was the budget as large as the man of steel. Expectations were much higher for Superman. No, incorrect the man of steel was divisive and failed to make 700 million worldwide. The movie failed off its own merits.


Nah, Batman v. Superman made even more money but still fell below expectations and further devalued the brand. Superman is not a huge draw times have changed. MCU flourished the dceu puttered and is being kept alive due to WW not Kal. Your opinion is not shared on a massive level as I claimed.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
He is rich and can afford to buy and get rid of the bodies of children quite easily.

Oh those Wacky Rich Holywood Pedos....Like GUNN! More baseless claims from the clown.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Iron man first off was not an icon at the time nor was the budget as large as the man of steel. Expectations were much higher for Superman. No, incorrect the man of steel was divisive and failed to make 700 million worldwide. The movie failed off its own merits.




And the previous Superman film flopped. Iron Man did not have that stench to pass. The MCU Incredible Hulk flopped because it carried the stench of the previous Hulk film. And Hulk was a much bigger name than Iron Man.Do you know Batman Begins failed to make $400million? You have no point.

So your theory is it took Warner Bros 5 years to figure out that MOS was a failure? Lmao

No dummy. Its just that after BvS was received badly and Justice League failed, WB thought they better give the Big 2 a break for now and concentrate on fresh new properties.


Originally posted by quanchi112

Nah, Batman v. Superman made even more money but still fell below expectations and further devalued the brand. Superman is not a huge draw times have changed. MCU flourished the dceu puttered and is being kept alive due to WW not Kal. Your opinion is not shared on a massive level as I claimed.

Stop changing the topic. We are talking about MOS.

Made good profit at the box office after the failure of the previous Superman film.

Got an A- Cinemascore from Audiences. Was mixed critically but still the 2nd best received film in the DCEU to date, both from audiences and critics.

Oh and it sold more than Iron Man 3 on home entertainment. Despite IM3 making double at the box office.

So yeah it successfully launched the DCEU. The DCEU only failed from the films that came after, sans Wonder Woman obviously.

Your excuses are just that. Excuses. Your butthurt over Superman being the most iconic heavyweight in comics is simply hilarious.

But hey keep spewing out fake news like MOS was a failure if it makes you feel better. I think youve been called out on it plenty but will obviously continue to Troll.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
And the previous Superman film flopped. Iron Man did not have that stench to pass. The MCU Incredible Hulk flopped because it carried the stench of the previous Hulk film. And Hulk was a much bigger name than Iron Man.Do you know Batman Begins failed to make $400million? You have no point.

So what? Batman begins made a healthy profit. Unproven nonsense. The majority of the general audience did not clamor for Hulk. You have anecdotal evidence at best. Nothing correlating anything truly.

In terms of exoecatuons and the budget it was a failure just not a flop. They trudged on and look where that got them with the League film.


Because they were not universally accepted and utterly flopped in their team film. They are right to abandon these properties since they are not the draws they once were. My point exactly.

It did not reach their exoecations and considering it had a higher budget than avengers it is downright pitiful in relation. My point exactly is Superman is not a huge draw and sub 700 million box office with this high budget confirms it. Point proven.
Most people do not give cinema scores so this does not represent the majority of the audience. I thought it was sub par.
So what? We do not take inebumber we take the totality otherwise you are just cherry picking. Iron man 3 kicked the shit out of Superman in the final score. Not just one stat but the complete stats factored in.
It hobbled out of the gate with man of steel since the movie was not universally praised and failed to meet the expectations of the studio considering the massive budget.

I do not care that Spider-Man is huge either just as I do not care Superman used to be bigger. He is shit now. He is glossed over because he does not matter like he used to. My guy Thanos is who I have always loved and I care about how amazing the film was. Dceu has always been shit compared to the MCU and man of steels laughable missteps are a treat for me to rub your face in.

You notice how it always seems that his Biggest Factor in his arguments is His Own Opinion?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You notice how it always seems that his Biggest Factor in his arguments is His Own Opinion? I cite facts to bolster my claims but I personally do not care about popularity. Ironic though.

Shakey Facts that You prod up with your own biases.

Try again Skippy.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Shakey Facts that You prod up with your own biases.

Try again Skippy. What fact was shaky?

Why is the same ****ing topic spread over three threads or so?

Cause Quan's Ego is out of control. He needs a time out.

I am behind Gunn here but the liars claim I support Disney in every single decision which is blatantly untrue.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am behind Gunn here but the liars claim I support Disney in every single decision which is blatantly untrue. Damn, you support pedos, man?

Originally posted by Mindset
Damn, you support pedos, man? He is not a pedo. You need to relax.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is not a pedo. You need to relax. He probably has kids chained up in his basement.

Originally posted by Mindset
He probably has kids chained up in his basement. If they are dc fans they probably deserved it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He is not a pedo. You need to relax.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am behind Gunn here but the liars claim I support Disney in every single decision which is blatantly untrue.

I Bet You Like it BEHIND Jimmy!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Mindset
He probably has kids chained up in his basement. As long as he's not having sex with him I fail to see a problem...?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
I Bet You Like it BEHIND Jimmy!!!!!!!

Concession accepted.

The King is DEAD. Long Live the King.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
The King is DEAD. Long Live the King. Disney is on its throne.

Which will one day get FLUSHED!!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Which will one day get FLUSHED!!!! Nothing lasts forever but right now it has given me the best film of all time. Best fictional universe ever. I knew marvel was always superior to dc.

They are Cookie Cutter Movies. Nothing special. I am quite bored with them. But then You are much Simpler Minded then most.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
They are Cookie Cutter Movies. Nothing special. I am quite bored with them. But then You are much Simpler Minded then most. Who cares about your opinion? It clearly sucks. Cry more.

Yet You expect us to all VALUE your opinion?


DELUSIONAL To the MAX!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Yet You expect us to all VALUE your opinion?


DELUSIONAL To the MAX!!! It clearly shows I am not alone. Money talks and the MCU is the biggest guy on the block.

Bloated on its own Mediocrity.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Bloated on its own Mediocrity. Money talks you do not. MCU is king.

You talk more then money. You are incapable of Silence.

YeppityYappsterreno!!!!!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You talk more then money. You are incapable of Silence.

YeppityYappsterreno!!!!! You wanted to compare value and money is one measurable way. MCU is king.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You wanted to compare value and money is one measurable way. MCU is king.

So we are back to the McDonalds Hamburger Argument again are we?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
So we are back to the McDonalds Hamburger Argument again are we? I said I loved it you wanted to say that does not matter but money does. Money matters to businesses you poor dolt.

I think you being a Corporate Shill is the most important thing to you.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
I think you being a Corporate Shill is the most important thing to you. Nah, I disagreed with firing Gunn. You just switch your silly stances that do not make any sense.

When your heart is set in stone it is a fair bet that your Head is as well.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
When your heart is set in stone it is a fair bet that your Head is as well. My opinion is based off reality yours is not.

The Reality of a Stone. Never changing. Locked in Eternal Darkness and Boredom.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
The Reality of a Stone. Never changing. Locked in Eternal Darkness and Boredom. Described yourself there.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Described yourself there.

kettle Gif.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
kettle Gif. Go Gunn go.

Ok...so AGAIN

Who would anyone like to see star in Guns film?

You mean Actors or Characters from comics? GOTG movies or Otherwise?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Go Gunn go.
Yes. Go Gunn Go... Far away from the Children He wants to go Full Pedo on... Just don't stop going GUNN!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Yes. Go Gunn Go... Far away from the Children He wants to go Full Pedo on... Just don't stop going GUNN! Unpriven nonsense. I am happy to see he has got work. Smart move, warner.

Gunn and the Weinstiens are a perfect pair.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Gunn and the Weinstiens are a perfect pair. Disagree.

I want SS Movie to be fun and Dark....with less Harley Quinn... SHe is just annoying as Phuck now. That and get C.C.H. Pounder to be Waller. That woman would have NAILED the Role.

I prefer Classic Harley when she was more of a Fan Girl that was in over her head, instead of the Fan Girl Power more Mad then the Joker cause FAN GIRL Bullshit Character that is just as good a fighter as Batman cause she studied psychology and acrobatics and She all da Kooky with Fan Girl Plot Armor that she is now.

His Lawyers do to.

I like both versions

Harley from the old Batman animated series