Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Have their own Tactics finally turned around and Bite them in their own butts?

Looks LIke it...

M0aienuCBdg

The NPC meme is pretty accurate. They are utterly empty, vapid idiots that just signal whatever they've been programmed to.

The question is, what is it about Western culture that produces so many NPCs? Is it wealth, comfort and the need to find new territory within which to evolve one's ego (using other races - mostly Blacks and also the Muslims, as vehicles for ego masturbation)?

This also explains why they don't value free speech or intellectual diversity and are so **religiously** fixated upon outcome equality - it reinforces the NPC pattern, making everyone the same.

"They are utterly empty, vapid idiots that just signal whatever they've been programmed to."


Z5JNJxdTudQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5JNJxdTudQ

^ Cult behavior and mob mentality on full display

:0

And this is in lieu of an argument countering the fact that Leftist behaviour is formulaic, programmed and without any nuance or contextual appreciation.

When you're at a political rally, sloganeering is the norm, it is a cult-like atmosphere and one that every party indulges in (especially the Leftist ones) but, that doesn't explain why The Leftists are still in NPC mode outside, in the real world.

Nothing says formulaic and programmed responses than thousands chanting "lock her up!" on command and on cue like the good little drones they are.

But sure, you make your special rules for one and not the other. Typical expected nonsense from you people.

And again, no argument from The Left. No surprise.

No wonder you guys hate freedom of speech. It interrupts your chanting and posturing.


Also, I'm not even a Trump supporter, but I can see the difference between what they do and what Leftists do, and Leftists definitely do conform to the NPC meme.

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing says formulaic and programmed responses than thousands chanting "lock her up!" on command and on cue like the good little drones they are.

But sure, you make your special rules for one and not the other. Typical expected nonsense from you people.

Anyone who thinks this kind of behaviour isn't propagated by both sides is a moron and one of the sheep. As are those who have their opinions programmed into by edgy youtubers.

Originally posted by Beniboybling


Anyone who thinks this kind of behaviour isn't propagated by both sides is a moron and one of the sheep. As are those who have their opinions programmed into by edgy youtubers.

Bingo.

The Trumpers still haven't let up with the "lock her up!" frothing at the mouth droning. They've most recently applied the mob mentality chant to Feinstein in the last Trump Iowa rally. Don't worry though, they're not done with Clinton just yet, she's the bogeyman Trump can bring up at any times and they froth on command.

Originally posted by Robtard
"They are utterly empty, vapid idiots that just signal whatever they've been programmed to."


Z5JNJxdTudQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5JNJxdTudQ

^ Cult behavior and mob mentality on full display

:0 No understanding of irony or self-awareness.

Pretty much. And gotta love Beny and Robbie both agreeing with each other to say that since "Both Sides" do it that makes it OK.

Oh Empty No Soul Typical NPC Response.

Originally posted by super friend
No understanding of irony or self-awareness.

^ It seems It's_XYZ is back. Time to pull out the screen-caps again.

I'm surprised you caught on so quickly. Sure I wasn't all those other trolls you have to deal with?

You're pretty simple.

You're a bastard who repeats what your internet "friends" have to say so you look big in this forum. It's like you have an auto cue so you can pretend you win at anything.

Originally posted by super friend
You're a bastard who repeats what your internet "friends" have to say so you look big in this forum. It's like you have an auto cue so you can pretend you win at anything.

While I realize that you look very much older than you are due to your drinking and poor lifestyle choices, you're way too old to still have this nonsense High School level mentality. Grow up some, okay. Bye now.

Most people suck at abstract reasoning and the points they make for policy and political matters are comically flawed

Originally posted by Robtard
While I realize that you look very much older than you are due to your drinking and poor lifestyle choices, you're way too old to still have this nonsense High School level mentality. Grow up some, okay. Bye now. No... you just thought I was older than 26 for whatever ****ing reason you had. It was just another mistake on your part.

Fly cheerleading a true Paedo... both rightists, why is no one surprised.

Originally posted by Beniboybling


Anyone who thinks this kind of behaviour isn't propagated by both sides is a moron and one of the sheep. As are those who have their opinions programmed into by edgy youtubers.

Originally posted by super friend
You're a bastard who repeats what your internet "friends" have to say so you look big in this forum. It's like you have an auto cue so you can pretend you win at anything.

this was hilarious

Originally posted by super friend
No... you just thought I was older than 26 for whatever ****ing reason you had. It was just another mistake on your part. Who is super friend?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Who is super friend?

It's_XYZ, he's had multiple accounts.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's_XYZ, he's had multiple accounts. XYZ along with RJ are two of the only posters as creepy as AC Quan. Paedos all.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's_XYZ, he's had multiple accounts. He lurked but in the shadows outside my usual parameters. I am sure the guy will not last long.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
XYZ along with RJ are two of the only posters as creepy as AC Quan. Paedos all. The dude is a legit pedo?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Oh since you want to debate by all means begin. Your flaming is quite frankly pitiful just like it was your first 5 accounts. It's the flaming of a nonce and now he is allied with XYZ, nonces together.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The dude is a legit pedo? No, that's just Robtard's friends who suspiciously don't come here anymore.....

Originally posted by quanchi112
The dude is a legit pedo? He posted about hanging around a school and pretty much yeah, Rob needs to "post the quote". He is the perfect "friend" for TI and Fly.

Originally posted by super friend
What do you mean "almost smart?" Enjoy this account while it lasts.

Originally posted by super friend
No, that's just Robtard's friends who suspiciously don't come here anymore..... Proof?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
He posted about hanging around a school and pretty much yeah, Rob needs to "post the quote". He is the perfect "friend" for TI and Fly. The island of misfit toys.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The island of misfit toys. Pretty much, he had a fixation on Bardocks girlfriend too and because Bardock started dating her in his late teens hen she was about 15-16 XYZ claims Bardock is a paedo, despite the two of them still being together now as they both approach 30.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Pretty much, he had a fixation on Bardocks girlfriend too and because Bardock started dating her in his late teens hen she was about 15-16 XYZ claims Bardock is a paedo, despite the two of them still being together now as they both approach 30. Why cant these losers move on past kmc? The multiple permas the declarations they are done it is just sad at this point they press on. Cannot move on. They have been rejected more times than trump around college graduates at the ballot box.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why cant these losers move on past kmc? The multiple permas the declarations they are done it is just sad at this point they press on. Cannot move on. They have been rejected more times than trump around college graduates at the ballot box. XYZ use to send Sancty messages and harass Bardock, he had a serious fixation on her.

Anyway, who the **** are you?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why cant these losers move on past kmc? The multiple permas the declarations they are done it is just sad at this point they press on. Cannot move on. They have been rejected more times than trump around college graduates at the ballot box. He was elected president.....

I can't even comprehend how dumb you are.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
XYZ use to send Sancty messages and harass Bardock, he had a serious fixation on her. This xyz seems triggered. Upset bardock took the woman he wanted.

Originally posted by super friend
He groomed her when she was 14 and he was 20 and he created his own forum where pedos like RJ, AC and others frequented to get in on the action.... It's closed down now for some reason. I can't think of any possible reason why...... Also, Robtard and Bashar Teg went there a lot as well for some reason.

Anyway, who the **** are you? You are fixated on her kid, he started dating her when she was 16... She didn't want you.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You are fixated on her kid, he started dating her when she was 16... She didn't want you. Xyz is traumatized by this.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You are fixated on her kid, he started dating her when she was 16... She didn't want you. Dude, it started when she was 14 and he was around 20. That's pedo behaviour.

Originally posted by super friend
He was elected president.....

I can't even comprehend how dumb you are. Yes, I know he was. The intelligent rejected him. The majority of the country have but he was elected. I never said otherwise, loser.

Originally posted by super friend
Dude, it started when she was 14 and he was around 20. That's pedo behaviour. Quit crying over her rejecting you.

"if I flame, he might stop posting, then I win" - Quanchi

Live with it.

Originally posted by super friend
"if I flame, he might stop posting, then I win" - Quanchi Dude, she rejected you. How does it feel?

I bet this eats him up inside.

Now putin n Quan are accusing others of sick shit.

Typical bs in KMC

Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12
Now putin n Quan are accusing others of sick shit.

Typical bs in KMC Then quit coming back, Ti. Live your Texas dream.

our Fav To Loony Lefty Posters PROVE with out a doubt just how NPC they are becoming.

Sad but still fun to watch.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
our Fav To Loony Lefty Posters PROVE with out a doubt just how NPC they are becoming.

Sad but still fun to watch. Nah.

Originally posted by janus77
The NPC meme is pretty accurate. They are utterly empty, vapid idiots that just signal whatever they've been programmed to.

The question is, what is it about Western culture that produces so many NPCs? Is it wealth, comfort and the need to find new territory within which to evolve one's ego (using other races - mostly Blacks and also the Muslims, as vehicles for ego masturbation)?

This also explains why they don't value free speech or intellectual diversity and are so **religiously** fixated upon outcome equality - it reinforces the NPC pattern, making everyone the same.

The best part is they KNOW it accurately describes them which is why they are so damn butthurt over this lol.

I still love the fact that people who call anyone who disagrees with them nazis are whining and saying they are being dehumanized by an NPC meme. You just can't make this up, even their responses to the meme about them being pre programmed are pre programmed lol. One NPC just keeps repeating the same pre programmed lines about "lock her up" chants.

Oh and hell the left was doing this to the right as well lol. Instead of calling them NPC's they called them Russian bots and you didn't see conservatives throw a b*tch fit and write articles about how it's dehumanizing us. Rather we laugh at the Russian bot hysteria.

Yet the left gets called NPC's and it's "Waaaaaaaaaaah! both sides! Waaaaaaaaaah!"

Surt is racking up posts triggering himself.

https://i.imgur.com/etKLzWX.jpg

Soothe yourself.

Originally posted by quanchi112
NPC.

Super Big Lol at the first few seconds of this....cause its TRUE!

pEpUUU0e-Q0

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Soothe.

2XvrNvL2fxs

leftists: HAHAHAHA TINY MUSHROOM PENIS!!!! SO FUNNY THAT STORMY DANIELS TOLD THE MEDIA DETAILS ABOUT INTIMATE AND PRIVATE PARTS OF TRUMP'S BODY!!!

also leftists: HOW DARE TRUMP CALL HER A HORSEFACE, THIS IS BEYOND THE PALE CONDEMN IT!!!

Like I said, if you're okay having the POTUS using the office to get into middle school insults matches with a porn star he himself paid to sleep with like the true morally defunct retard he is, cool.

IMO, the office of the POTUS should be above such embarrassing petty nonsense like this. When a Democrat is president next, I'm still going to hold this same standard, it's constant regardless of who is in office.

edit: Try it this way, what if Obama did this? Paid a porn star for sex, tried to cover it up and then got into public insult matches with her. You'd have flipped out. The moral Right would have imploded and then exploded.

New name, same old TI with the same old tricks.

Originally posted by Robtard
New name, same old TI with the same old tricks. Poor TI, I actually find his pain sad. Shocked he pretended he was a kid to that victre poster thing.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Poor TI, I actually find his pain sad. Shocked he pretended he was a kid to that victre poster thing. He needs to take a hint. Move on.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He needs to take a hint. Move on. He just needs help. Cognitive behaviour therapy, something like that.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
He just needs help. Cognitive behaviour therapy, something like that. That kinda crazy will repel any kind of help that came his way.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That kinda crazy will repel any kind of help that came his way. More than probably, we know it's happened with him before.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
More than probably, we know it's happened with him before. When he teared up when trump won I knew he was beyond help.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When he teared up when trump won I knew he was beyond help. What a weirdo he is.

I've met some pretty fascinating NPC's during my time gaming, so I'm not sure what the point of the OP actually is.

Originally posted by Robtard
Like I said, if you're okay having the POTUS using the office to get into middle school insults matches with a porn star he himself paid to sleep with like the true morally defunct retard he is, cool.

IMO, the office of the POTUS should be above such embarrassing petty nonsense like this. When a Democrat is president next, I'm still going to hold this same standard, it's constant regardless of who is in office.

edit: Try it this way, what if Obama did this? Paid a porn star for sex, tried to cover it up and then got into public insult matches with her. You'd have flipped out. The moral Right would have imploded and then exploded.
If someone talks about someone else's penis to the press and describes it in an embarassing way and the media makes a news cycle mocking it, I'm not going to lose sleep over that person calling the other person a horseface. That's pretty tame in comparison to calling someone a mushroom dick.

And like I said, I think it was pathetic when people were trying to impeach Bill Clinton or flip out over him getting blown by Monica Lewenski.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Super Big Lol at the first few seconds of this....cause its TRUE!

pEpUUU0e-Q0


Why the hell are the right-wing retards still whining about twitter?


Dude...just ****ing making your own twitter service and don't censor. Bam, problem solved.

Dudster obviously didn't watch the vid before He lipped off.

Typical Lefty NPC Reaction..

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If someone talks about someone else's penis to the press and describes it in an embarassing way and the media makes a news cycle mocking it, I'm not going to lose sleep over that person calling the other person a horseface. That's pretty tame in comparison to calling someone a mushroom dick.

And like I said, I think it was pathetic when people were trying to impeach Bill Clinton or flip out over him getting blown by Monica Lewenski.

This is a big f*cking BINGO. The media took what this hooker said and ran with it, took anything she said as gospel. "She was so detailed! It's not like she's had years and years to think about this!".

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why the hell are the right-wing retards still whining about twitter?


Dude...just ****ing making your own twitter service and don't censor. Bam, problem solved.

The idea of "just switch, problem solved" sounds great on paper, but it's problematic. Why do people use social media? To socialize with others, friends and family.

Leaving makes no sense unless all you wanna do is tweet provocative things. If you intend to socialize with friends and family you probably won't have an easy time convincing them all to switch to another platform.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Why the hell are the right-wing retards still whining about twitter?


Dude...just ****ing making your own twitter service and don't censor. Bam, problem solved.

I also think people just want twitter to grow a sac and stop being weasels. They need to just admit their bias.

Originally posted by Surtur
I also think people just want twitter to grow a sac and stop being weasels. They need to just admit their bias. Let it go. Your pouty antics are your own. Twitter is not run by a douche such as yourself.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Dudster obviously didn't watch the vid before He lipped off.


I would not have known he was whining about the unfairness with Twitter unless I watched the video.

Looks like you didn't watch your own video.

Originally posted by Surtur
The idea of "just switch, problem solved" sounds great on paper, but it's problematic. Why do people use social media? To socialize with others, friends and family.

Leaving makes no sense unless all you wanna do is tweet provocative things. If you intend to socialize with friends and family you probably won't have an easy time convincing them all to switch to another platform.

All of your points are moot. You can traverse Twitter's API if you want to incorporate Twitter into your social media service:

https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs.html



Yes, you really can have your cake and eat it, too. Make your own Twitter, retain your network of "friends and family" from Twitter, but without all the censorship.

Make openness and inclusion one of your Terms of Service principles, too.



Surty Wurty, I think you keep forgetting that I'm a fart smeller, I mean smart feller. If I whine about an obvious solution, it means I thought about it a lot already and it would work.

Here's why the retards don't create their own Twitter:

1. Too much work. They are lazy cretins.
2. They want to whine and not solve problems just like the libtards do because they are the same type of people.

Hey it's cool if there are ways to connect.

They still should grow a sac and admit their bias. If they flat out admit it and conservatives still use it...well, that's on conservatives then.

Originally posted by Surtur
Hey it's cool if there are ways to connect.

They still should grow a sac and admit their bias. If they flat out admit it and conservatives still use it...well, that's on conservatives then.

I don't need people to admit that they are taking actions x, y, or z. The facts speak for themselves. Admitting it or not doesn't change anything except massage my feelings so I can feel slightly happier kissing my teddy bear before I go to sleep at night.


You don't like Twitter? Make your own. But with cocaine and hookers. This is America: we build and make success. We're awesome like that.

I think the point he's making are people like twitter, or CNN, or whoever else are being duplicitous lying pieces of shit when they pretend to be "objective" or "neutral"

Originally posted by dadudemon
I don't need people to admit that they are taking actions x, y, or z. The facts speak for themselves. Admitting it or not doesn't change anything except massage my feelings so I can feel slightly happier kissing my teddy bear before I go to sleep at night.


You don't like Twitter? Make your own. But with cocaine and hookers. This is America: we build and make success. We're awesome like that.

And yet if they grew a sac and admitted it conservatives would officially have zero reason to complain if they keep going back.

But they won't ever grow a sac anyways.

And btw in case you didn't watch the video: they are apparently banning people for merely using the NPC meme as avatars lol.

I suppose it's possible they feel playing the victim in the same way the left loves to play one...might get them votes?

EDIT: Hmm, especially if they can paint twitter as just another arm of the left and claim that this is the type of shit we're in store for if Democrats take power.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I think the point he's making are people like twitter, or CNN, or whoever else are being duplicitous lying pieces of shit when they pretend to be "objective" or "neutral"

Bingo. They claim time and time again they aren't bias. It's clear they are. So why won't they admit it? If it's fear of conservatives leaving then perhaps they should try to stop this bias.

Side note: thanks to twitter it really is a great time to be a journalist. You can take half a dozen tweets bashing Trump over a decision and write an entire story out of it "Twitter bashes Trump over his newest choice!".

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If someone talks about someone else's penis to the press and describes it in an embarassing way and the media makes a news cycle mocking it, I'm not going to lose sleep over that person calling the other person a horseface. That's pretty tame in comparison to calling someone a mushroom dick.

Most people would not accept "She started it!" as an excuse for bad behavior from a kindergartener, let alone the President of the United States. Your bar is so low, it is under the floor.

We could always take Britons Example and just start to outlaw Thought.

And with the Corrupt Leftist Media and NPC's like Adam. It doesn't matter what Trump does.

People like Adam will put a negative spin on it no matter what.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
If someone talks about someone else's penis to the press and describes it in an embarassing way and the media makes a news cycle mocking it, I'm not going to lose sleep over that person calling the other person a horseface. That's pretty tame in comparison to calling someone a mushroom dick.

And like I said, I think it was pathetic when people were trying to impeach Bill Clinton or flip out over him getting blown by Monica Lewenski.

Adam already covered it, "She started it!" is kiddie-level reasoning.

I'd expect you to demand better behavior from the POTUS than say a private citizen porn star.

Even thou what Trump said is true. Daniels did START it when she tried to use a lawsuit to create a cash grab.

Sad that certain people here have such hard times accepting things like that.

I have no problem with Trump going after someone after they've already gone after him. This woman blackmailed him and then wrote a book talking shit about him too lol. She tried to sue him for defamation because he called her on her bullshit.

She has 100% earned whatever Trump says about her. It's silly as hell for the left to whine that he went after Stormy. It's insane this is the hill they want to die on.

Originally posted by Robtard
Adam already covered it, "She started it!" is kiddie-level reasoning.

I'd expect you to demand better behavior from the POTUS than say a private citizen porn star.
It wasn't just the pornstar it was our supposedly reputable and respectable great american press that fixated on this shit as well.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It wasn't just the pornstar it was our supposedly reputable and respectable great american press that fixated on this shit as well.

She's more than a porn star now anyways, she's a public figure who has made the rounds on a bunch of talk shows, etc.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
It wasn't just the pornstar it was our supposedly reputable and respectable great american press that fixated on this shit as well.

We're talking about the "horseface" comment. You're conflating things now. Get some sleep.

Originally posted by Surtur
I have no problem with Trump going after someone after they've already gone after him. This woman blackmailed him and then wrote a book talking shit about him too lol. She tried to sue him for defamation because he called her on her bullshit.

She has 100% earned whatever Trump says about her. It's silly as hell for the left to whine that he went after Stormy. It's insane this is the hill they want to die on.

This is because you'll find a way to excuse nigh any of Trump's poor behavior, you've shown this time and again; you have zero standards for the office of the POTUS because it's Trump and he's your special guy.

I suspect once he's gone you'll also go back to how it was before, where if a President got into a public middle school insult fight with a private citizen, you'd condemn the poor behavior, especially when it will be a Democrat next.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is because you'll find a way to excuse nigh any of Trump's poor behavior, you've shown this time and again; you have zero standards for the office of the POTUS because it's Trump and he's your special guy.

I suspect once he's gone you'll also go back to how it was before, where if a President got into a public middle school insult fight with a private citizen, you'd condemn the poor behavior, especially when it will be a Democrat next.

She brought it on herself by going after Trump first. People who voted for him, like me, are not unhappy over the fact he's a fighter. I especially am not going to hold it against him for going after someone who blackmailed him and then wrote a book insulting him.

As for your claim of me condemning a democrat behaving poorly...it depends on the context. For instance, if a democrat went after someone who had blackmailed them and wrote a book insulting them I wouldn't really hold it against them.

IOW: "She started it!". We've done that already, so what I said, zero standards cos Trump.

And know, you'll absolutely have different standards of expected behavior when it's say President Warren or President Harris in office.

Originally posted by Robtard
IOW: "She started it!". We've done that already, so what I said.

And know, you'll have different standards of behavior when it's say President Warren or President Harris in office.

Lol you're insane if you think Warren has any chance.

What stormy Daniels did wasn't calling Trump some orange man or some shit.

If a woman was president who once slept with Trump and Trump wasn't president, and Trump started trying to make money off her and talking about how "she's got beef flaps like you wouldn't believe, the most oddly shaped vagina ever, clit strung out like a noodle" or some shit and the media started ranting about it for several days, no I wouldn't be outraged at all if this hypothetical female president called hypothetical noncandidate Trump an orange freak or some shit.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol you're insane if you think Warren has any chance.

It was just an example, but notice how triggered you got over the words "President Warren". Oh my, seems we got a new Clinton for you.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was just an example, but notice how triggered you got over the words "President Warren". Oh my, seems we got a new Clinton for you.

Triggered? Lol nope, I hope Last of the Fauxhicans runs.

Originally posted by Surtur
Triggered? Lol nope, I hope Last of the Fauxhicans runs.

And why is that?

Originally posted by Robtard
And why is that?

Entertainment.

That being said as far as Trump's rhetoric goes he is not the ideal candidate.

The way it seems from my vantage point is that people like me are on the other end of a culture war in some sense from some of our cultural establishments such as the mainstream media, political correctness, weaponized identity politics, the identity politics narrative in the education system, talking about abolishing affirmative action or not having open borders gets you called a racist, people like Jordan Peterson or Sargon etc. get routinely slandered by the media etc.

If I could narrow the type of leader the nation could have in this instance to four archetypes so to speak, they would be the conspirator, the cuck, the savage and the lobster.

The conspirator would basically be a president who is completely allied with these sorts of cultural forces that I'm not a fan of at all, and would serve to consolidate their power in not only the cultural but political institutions as well, and this is completely unacceptable to me.

The cuck would basically be a president who is not allied with these cultural forces, but would just kinda submit to them and let them run roughshod. Someone without a backbone to stand up against the media or political correctness and just kinda submit to them. Not as bad as the conspirator but still someone without the strength that I think is needed here.

The savage is basically Donald Trump. Someone who has the kind of strength to stand up to this shit, but lacking in self-control and restraint. Obviously this is not ideal, such a person clearly incites further polarization within our nation to unhealthy levels in a way that's going to be difficult to heal from. That being said I can still appreciate this archetypal president over the first two because at least he is doing something to undercut this pernicious cultural force. His very existence leads the media, leads left-wing identitarians, antifa, professors, the democrats, etc. to act out in such a way that makes this cultural problem more apparent to the public and rightly erodes the trust they had in these institutions that honestly don't deserve that trust. And it awakens people to the obvious race baiting that's being used to smear one side of the issue on immigration and a host of other political discourses.

The lobster would be a hypothetical president with a temperament somewhat like Jordan Peterson's, dignified, restrained, civil, but with a definite backbone and willing to call out this obvious horseshit. Someone who will not deliberately stoke the outrage of half the country and incite this bitter resentful polarization, but still someone who will take a hard stand against the obvious bullshit of this cultural movement and dismantle it. Someone who has a sword so to speak, knows how to use it, knows when to use it, and knows when not to use it. This would be my ideal type of president in our current situation, and if such a person tries to primary Trump in 2020 they will get my vote, no matter how futile that may be, because that's the only type of person I think can appropriately address the issue at hand.

In absence of the lobster though, I will take the savage with his glaring flaws who stands up against the things I am against over someone who submits to those things, or a democrat actively working to advance a cultural and economic agenda with which I fundamentally disagree. Someone needs to tell these people no, and if there is not a lobster to stand in the arena I will begrudgingly take the savage.

It's not a dilemma I am happy to be faced with.