Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

the whole imperial starfleet as of rotj, no Death Star

vs.

eternal fleet of zakuul

who wins

Imperial starfleet stomps lol

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Imperial starfleet stomps lol

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Imperial starfleet stomps lol

the only debate to be held here is discussing how long does Eternal Fleet survive and does it have chances to escape to hyperspace

How many proper quality warships are in the Imperial Starfleet? Because the Eternal Fleet is composed of tens of thousands. The Eternal Fleet is perfectly organised and is based on a hivemind which means there is no one weakness to it and will never succumb to problems such as the loss of Sheev's Battle Meditation. The Eternal Fleet has quantum bombs which can obiterate an entire enemy fleet and anything it touches in a range of 20k-50k kilometers. The Eternal Fleet Battlecruisers can combine firepower Species 8472 style and decimate anything instantly. Oh and, they're all powered by Sun Generators so powerful that the excess plasma discharge of one can nearly bust planets. How the hell does the Imperial Starfleet defeat that?

Executor solos

The shit AP said is legit. the Eternal Empire is by far the most dominant fleet in Galactic History, and the Star Forge was pumping out 1200m capital ships. (yes I know ISD's are 1600m, and that the Executor is 19km, etc)

While I believe the Imperial Starfleet stomps, I think people underestimate the power of the EF here. It's damn potent, and damn versatile.

Originally posted by XSUPREMEXSKILLZ
the Eternal Empire is by far the most dominant fleet in Galactic History
As is the British Naval Fleet circa 18th century. 18th century British navy would still get blown the **** out if it had to fight the US navy today in a conventional battle.

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11128/111282615/6413161-imperial+fleet+size+2.png
Rebellion Era Campaign Guide

Originally posted by Tzeentch
As is the British Naval Fleet circa 18th century. 18th century British navy would still get blown the **** out if it had to fight the US navy today in a conventional battle.

SW is a bit different though with the "ancient builder tech > all" theme.

Nothing I've seen from the EE compares to the firepower of even a regular ISD.

Iokath tech shit stomps Empire tech to be honest. Iokath was more advanced than the fvcking Star Forge. All Rakata technology, even tiny pieces, could take basically anything to grow like a living organism and become much larger, making it capable of producing essentially anything. Yet, again, Iokath tech was the most advanced ever seen.

It's not even as if GE tech was better than the technology the SE had. They were creating all kinds of mass producable Harrower variants with basically superweapons attached. The Silencer weapon is only one example. This is before they even get their hands on Isotope-5 and upgrade the entire Sith fleet. Yet despite being so advanced, Eternal Fleet Battlecruisers stomped the Harrowers.

People like to take out of context examples to lowball the strength of their ships, but the reality is that the Eternal Fleet has the technology advantage in spades. They have no crews and are commanded by incredibly advanced GEMINI droids whose sole purpose is to outsmart organics in tactics and strategy.

A tiny piece of the SF could create galaxies in time.

The Empire had, what? 20,000 Star Destroyers? Pretty much the only ships that could matter here. So no, the Eternal Fleet isn't subject to a quote that is clearly wrong when the Eternal Fleet itself has similar numbers.

Also, EE firepower curbstomps. Are we forgetting how they can combine their power output to create death star level beams? Are we forgetting the quantum bombs that would decimate entire fleets and the GE would have no counters?

Seeing no arguments at all for an Imperial victory.