Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

fragile masculinity does seem to be the chief motivator behind both isis and vanilla isis

Bait threads can get people banned, just fyi.

Has someone reported him?

I only ask, because in fairness, there's a lot of baiting on both sides here.

That's not a defense, and I'm not trying to backseat mod, simply pointing out there's context, in case he's being reported by other members with an axe to grind (There's also quite a bit of hostility between some members)

That said, I'll shut up now.

Originally posted by cdtm
Has someone reported him?

I only ask, because in fairness, there's a lot of baiting on both sides here.

That's not a defense, and I'm not trying to backseat mod, simply pointing out there's context, in case he's being reported by other members with an axe to grind (There's also quite a bit of hostility between some members)

That said, I'll shut up now.

Yeah, here's the thing...you can view the topics posters create from a link in their profile. Here is Putinbots(the most recent threads will be at the top)

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=712891

Do you perhaps notice a pattern? Just look at the first 20 or so.

Should he be banned? If bait threads can get you banned then sure there are grounds to do it 1,000 times over, but I'd say no, he'd just come back anyways even if he was. But his bait threads far outnumber those from most other people.

Frankly, I think logging someone's entire posting career is problematic for several reasons. It ignores a lot of context, such as mod temperaments at the time, inter-poster relationships, sources of conflict between said posters.

It's easy to single out a single poster, over any length of time, and have them looking very bad.

That said, if mods make a decision regarding certain behavior, at a certain time, for all posters, then that's not something to argue against. And, that isn't what I'm arguing against now,

It's the muck raking I'm against. Posters looking to "blackball" other posters with a catalog of bad behavior. As I told Stilt, I was on CBR for some years, and certain posters did exactly this. Mods banned almost the entire core membership by the time it was done. The mass banning DESTROYED the community.

I was actually at the board they migrated to, when it happened, for quite some time.


Anyways, that's all I have to say on the subject.., I hope it made "some" sense, and didn't sound too preachy or disjointed.

Originally posted by cdtm
Frankly, I think logging someone's entire posting career is problematic for several reasons. It ignores a lot of context, such as mod temperaments at the time, inter-poster relationships, sources of conflict between said posters.

It's easy to single out a single poster, over any length of time, and have them looking very bad.

That said, if mods make a decision regarding certain behavior, at a certain time, for all posters, then that's not something to argue against. And, that isn't what I'm arguing against now,

It's the muck raking I'm against. Posters looking to "blackball" other posters with a catalog of bad behavior. As I told Stilt, I was on CBR for some years, and certain posters did exactly this. Mods banned almost the entire core membership by the time it was done. The mass banning DESTROYED the community.

I was actually at the board they migrated to, when it happened, for quite some time.


Anyways, that's all I have to say on the subject.., I hope it made "some" sense, and didn't sound too preachy or disjointed.

Lol ust look at the stuff from the past 2 months. Those will be the top results. There is no excuse of "it was a different time". The entire first page only goes back to only late September. It paints a clear enough picture you don't need to look back years.

Remember: this guy is posting on a sock that isn't even a year old.

^^made a sock account to avoid banning, was spared a permaban, and still cried 'injustice'

Special rules for surt, but the rest of you behave of he'll cry again.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol ust look at the stuff from the past 2 months. Those will be the top results. There is no excuse of "it was a different time". The entire first page only goes back to only late September. It paints a clear enough picture you don't need to look back years.

Remember: this guy is posting on a sock that isn't even a year old.

Maybe an example of what I'm trying to get at:



From Impedimemt, a mod:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f104/t504517.html

Second post, last block. The part where he says for childish insults or slights, he won't hand hold, and if someone hits you, hit them back. Essentially, his policy is to go after the greater problems (Like attacking family, or serious threats against people) and to let posters handle the rest as adults. He trusts them to play nice, and trusts them to be able to handle themselves if they play rough.


That's Impedimemts policy. Say a new mod steps in, with his own policy. Perhaps he takes a sterner view against petty insults or baiting.

It would be really easy to target a poster, and make him look really bad to this new mod. Very, very easy.

Cataloging someone to mods is bad news, imo.

Originally posted by cdtm
Maybe an example of what I'm trying to get at:



From Impedimemt, a mod:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f104/t504517.html

Second post, last block. The part where he says for childish insults or slights, he won't hand hold, and if someone hits you, hit them back. Essentially, his policy is to go after the greater problems (Like attacking family, or serious threats against people) and to let posters handle the rest as adults. He trusts them to play nice, and trusts them to be able to handle themselves if they play rough.


That's Impedimemts policy. Say a new mod steps in, with his own policy. Perhaps he takes a sterner view against petty insults or baiting.

It would be really easy to target a poster, and make him look really bad to this new mod. Very, very easy.

Cataloging someone to mods is bad news, imo.

First off, PR isn't even a new mod. Been here for a while. Second, I wasn't linking his posts for a mod to see, it was in response to your post about both sides. Finally, I even said I don't feel he should be banned.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^^made a sock account to avoid banning, was spared a permaban, and still cried 'injustice'

Special rules for surt, but the rest of you behave of he'll cry again.

Isn't Bashy ALSO a sock?

^^posts the most 'bait threads'

Also has the honor of being kmc's oldest incel

^Posts in all of "Said" bait threads.

Originally posted by cdtm
Has someone reported him?

I only ask, because in fairness, there's a lot of baiting on both sides here.

That's not a defense, and I'm not trying to backseat mod, simply pointing out there's context, in case he's being reported by other members with an axe to grind (There's also quite a bit of hostility between some members)

That said, I'll shut up now.

He wasn't reported; I just saw the thread title and shook my head. I had no expectation that my post would cause an actual discussion in the thread.

Truth is, if anyone was to get banned, it wouldn't be for one singular thing unless it was really, really bad. People generally need to wear out their welcome before the mods will actually get rid of them, despite what some might claim.

Good read, thank you

Here is a good video on these losers

ynlp4vwUPTI

That is a youtube video and thus you negated the point you were trynig to make.

Sorry Brah.

I wasnt trying to make a point, I just posted a video and gave a nod to the OP for the link.

That aint how it works Brah.

How what works?

The problem is the words incel and fascist, like so many other words the left loves to use, have been stripped of most of their meaning through improper usage.

Another really good video about incels

MGTOW are literally incels are well it seems.

lStRqLokyEY

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Another really good video about incels

MGTOW are literally incels are well it seems.

lStRqLokyEY

Putinbot tends to get triggered by youtube videos. The fact this one has a kek icon is gonna make it double the trigger and double the hilarity.

If you ever want a good chuckle check out the mgtow subreddit

fD2briZ6fB0

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Another really good video about incels

MGTOW are literally incels are well it seems.

lStRqLokyEY

I agreed mostly with his points. Mostly.


The problem is, a normal dude can just simply work hard in his late teens and early 20s, take care of himself, dress well, etc.

Then land a damn good job. And bang all the hot women he has time for in his early to mid 20s. Just learn how to take rejection and keep trying. 1000s of times, get rejected. Until you learn how to not being a dysfunctional, socially inept, douchebag.

Sorry, guys, you're going to have to work VERY hard. You will get rejected. And when you start to accumulate success, as long as your personality grew with you, you'll do just fine.

Also, you need to workout, eat right, get plenty of sleep, NOT drink, and NOT do drugs.


Fact is, most to NONE of these incels do any of this.

They are just mad because it takes work to get into a relationship with a girl they are attracted to.

The Best thing the Right has gong for them is the fact that people on the Left No longer Breed. The Right just has to keep making babies and out last the opposition.

I dunno. Police Reports don't normally cover peoples Sexual Activities. Unless that is part of the actual crime.

It is just Leftist Cucks that think about such things...

Originally posted by -Pr-
Bait threads can get people banned, just fyi. Hi Pr, a little confusion here mate. Who am I baiting? The fascists, islamic terrorists, incels or misogynists on the board? Surely this media link between the casual anti-women attitudes some people and groups have and extremism is worth discussing? I agree some people on this board do talk about women as inferiors sickeningly. When of course we are different, which i for one celebrate.

This is a good thread, I don't see any bait here, to be honest. There are many common traits between these groups of people.

I would say the people in these three groups never have sex because they are unable to whoo women. Which causes undue stress and pain in their life, so they start doing bad things in life.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
This is a good thread, I don't see any bait here, to be honest. There are many common traits between these groups of people.

I would say the people in these three groups never have sex because they are unable to whoo women. Which causes undue stress and pain in their life, so they start doing bad things in life.

Do Islamic terrorists even try to whoo women? What would that look like? They bring their child brides a juice box and some cookies?

There was a guy in the Army that tried exposing the "boy Thursdays" in Afghanistan where they would rape young boys, his command had him arrests and he was thrown out.

Look it up.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/23/world/asia/afghanistan-military-abuse.html

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
There was a guy in the Army that tried exposing the "boy Thursdays" in Afghanistan where they would rape young boys, his command had him arrests and he was thrown out.

Look it up.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/23/world/asia/afghanistan-military-abuse.html

I'm well aware of this, my point is I don't think the islamic terrorists are terrorists cuz of a lack of sex. Just like I don't think fascists are fascists cuz of lack of sex.

The incels are incels cuz of lack of sex lol. That's about it. Dig beneath the surface of anything and the "these groups have these things in common" game is easy. I can find shit from the communist manifesto that sounds like stuff that would come from the mouth of a democrat too. I can point to nazi behavior that lines up perfectly with behavior from the SJW's on the left.

And given the propensity for people on the left to mislabel people as fascists and incels it's quite problematic for people to spew rhetoric like this IMO.

Parallels can obviously drawn between the above observations and online and offline Incel/alt-right attitudes to women. The women they find threatening they label, the mumsy, sisterly, girl next door types are desexualised and seen as safe.

What you like to imagine people do when Not On Line can't be claimed as Actual FACTS.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
What you like to imagine people do when Not On Line can't be claimed as Actual FACTS.

This is full proof science. After all, some guy in the 70s read some diaries and then it was mentioned in an article by The Guardian.

Doesn't get much more concrete than that.

Actual SCIENCE at Work!!!!!!!! Loony Lefty Science anyway...

If people are seriously worried about "incels" they should perhaps start using the term correctly and insist others do the same. The same goes for the word "fascist". If these things worry you...learn how to correctly identify them.

WHy should you get "Worried" about Incels. It aint like they are passing on their shitty genes. Like how the mass majority of EU nations are at a almost
0% native birth rate.

Too bad the Invading Peoples are breeding like Radicalized Rabbits.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
WHy should you get "Worried" about Incels. It aint like they are passing on their shitty genes. Like how the mass majority of EU nations are at a almost
0% native birth rate.

Too bad the Invading Peoples are breeding like Radicalized Rabbits.

Well a deranged person would say "worry cuz they have stuff in common with fascists and islamic terrorists!"

Islamic Terrorists are an actually thing. Real Fascists have been Gone for nearly 80 years. But then REALITY is a prob the Left has dealing with.

Originally posted by Robtard
Spot on story and it's telling who it trig'd in here. Very telling, the usual suspects.

^Thinks pointing out facts equates to being triggered now. Good stuff

Like the fact you whined about people making sock accounts when you made one after getting a easy two-week ban to play the victim, cry that you'd never come back; only to come crawling back? Good stuff? Nay, GREAT stuff eat

Originally posted by Robtard
Like the fact you whined about people making sock accounts when you made one after getting a easy two-week ban to play the victim, cry that you'd never come back; only to come crawling back? Good stuff? Nay, GREAT stuff eat

As leftist cultists love to scream "false equivalency!"

A sad pathetic troll who has repeatedly been banned, come back, been banned, come back...is not the same. It's hilarious you thought you had a gotcha here.

Says the guy with Protected Status on this Board.

Robbie is such a trigger beithc.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Says the guy with Protected Status on this Board.

Robbie is such a trigger beithc.

I hope he pushes the issue lol. I'll compare my own one sock to the pathetic behavior of Putinbots many many socks any day. Remember when he registered under a name in order to talk shit about himself, and then was caught and banned? That shit was HILARIOUS.

He Got Banned? WOW!? Really! I bet it was for a Really Long Time TOO!

Probably a whole 15 minutes or summin.

LESSON HARD LEARNED I BET!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
He Got Banned? WOW!? Really! I bet it was for a Really Long Time TOO!

Probably a whole 15 minutes or summin.

LESSON HARD LEARNED I BET!

Oh he was back within a day I think. He's like herpes...you might temporarily clear it up, but it will always be back.

Lol if you want some real entertainment go to the members list and click W. I wanted to see how many socks this sad soul has truly had. There were 108 pages for W, I took a chance and went immediately to page 50(figured names beginning with "Wh" would be around there), turns out I only had to go one page over to find this:

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/memberlist.php?s=&action=getall&what=username&ltr=W&perpage=30&orderby=username&ausername=&homepage=&icq=&aim=&yahoo=&joindateafter=&joindatebefore=&lastpostafter=&lastpostbefore=&postslower=&postsupper=&direction=ASC&pagenumber=51

Lol...and those are just his socks that have the word "whirly" in some form.

Surt's seeing bogeymen in every dark corner and self-triggering, please carry on eat

Originally posted by Surtur
As leftist cultists love to scream "false equivalency!"

A sad pathetic troll who has repeatedly been banned, come back, been banned, come back...is not the same. It's hilarious you thought you had a gotcha here.

That's not fair, though. He did it for "lols." It was a different time on the internet, then.

Now he's mostly just a normal poster who trolls occasionally.

And some of the same mods (I think) that banned his socks before are letting him stay, now.

It's not sad and pathetic: it was just funsies.





Edit - And to the redistribution of intercourse suggestion - I understand the concept. But that would have to be solely based on volunteers. Personal freedom is far far more important to me than solving dysfunctional, suicidal, and sometimes homicidal social issues. Yes, I am taking the stance that it is better people commit homicides and suicides than to force women to have intercourse with disenfranchised men.

A compromise is to make prostitution legal and offer counseling on how to be better men in this modern world.

Originally posted by Surtur
I hope he pushes the issue lol. I'll compare my own one sock to the pathetic behavior of Putinbots many many socks any day. Remember when he registered under a name in order to talk shit about himself, and then was caught and banned? That shit was HILARIOUS.

Never socked before. The one time I was banned for life, I never went back.

Unless...

If you switch accounts with someone, just to see if anyone notices, is that a sock?

Never been done here, but in a much older, much smaller community.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's not fair, though. He did it for "lols." It was a different time on the internet, then.

Now he's mostly just a normal poster who trolls occasionally.

And some of the same mods (I think) that banned his socks before are letting him stay, now.

It's not sad and pathetic: it was just funsies.

We'll agree to disagree I suppose. I understand trolling, I've done it myself. I even understand coming back a few times after a ban. IMO it enters the territory of sad when you get to 31 socks lol. And that's just with his Whirly ones.

I don't want him banned, IMO one should only be banned for stuff like posting kiddie porn or threatening to kill people.

Originally posted by cdtm
Never socked before. The one time I was banned for life, I never went back.

Unless...

If you switch accounts with someone, just to see if anyone notices, is that a sock?

Never been done here, but in a much older, much smaller community.

The definition of a sock seems to be that it's a name one starts posting under once their username has been banned. So unless you were banned no you weren't socking. There isn't anything against the rules if two people willingly decide to swap accounts, at least I don't think there is.

@DDM, Rob, Bash etc. Thanks guys.

@ Surt you realise this site needs no email verification. It takes 20 seconds to make a sock.

Now let's get back to topic.

Interestingly, the Nazi's had "Love camps" for virgin soldiers where Jewish women were used as prostitutes.

The virgins in the afterlife serve a similar purpose, as does the idea of redistribution of women for Incels propagated online.

Originally posted by Putinbot1


@ Surt you realise this site needs no email verification. It takes 20 seconds to make a sock.


It's not about the length of time it takes to register that makes it sad, but okay we will move on

Originally posted by Putinbot1
@DDM, Rob, Bash etc. Thanks guys.

@ Surt you realise this site needs no email verification. It takes 20 seconds to make a sock.

Now let's get back to topic.

Interestingly, the Nazi's had "Love camps" for virgin soldiers where Jewish women were used as prostitutes.

The virgins in the afterlife serve a similar purpose, as does the idea of redistribution of women for Incels propagated online.

It's all part of the same mentality.

Don't bother explaining things to Surt, he's especially worked up today. Like a tire fire, just gotta sit back and watch it burn itself out.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's all part of the same mentality.

Don't bother explaining things to Surt, he's especially worked up today. Like a tire fire, just gotta sit back and watch it burn itself out.

^Trying to break his previous record for number of imaginary wins in a day, good stuff.

If these guys are so mad women won't bang them why don't they just go to a hooker?

Originally posted by Robtard
It's all part of the same mentality.

Don't bother explaining things to Surt, he's especially worked up today. Like a tire fire, just gotta sit back and watch it burn itself out. I know Rob, wish he'd get up and get a hookers or something.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I know Rob, wish he'd get up and get a hookers or something.

Agreed. But hookers cost money.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I know Rob, wish he'd get up and get a hookers or something.

Lol thanks for proving my point. You lack the intelligence to apply terms like "incel" and "fascist" correctly. It's why people like you who cry about these things aren't to be taken seriously.

EDIT: It's very much like the term "alt right". It went from something people self identified as...to something leftists use to try to demonize conservatives they disagree with. "Alt right" is yet another term you and Rob have also shown you cannot correctly apply.

^ Pretend winning.

Alt-Right was a self-applied label. Now that it's beyond clear that the Alt-Right movement are fascist and White Supremacist for some time now, you have weasel-cucks like Gavin McInnes rebranding themselves as "Alt-Lite".

Different package, same contents as always.

ps Blaze Media (part of The Blaze) recently fired Gavin

The Proud Boys founder was described as a "provocateur" by the company's co-president Gaston Mooney in a statement to CNN, who called McInnes "one of the many varied voices and viewpoints on Blaze Media platforms.”

McInnes, who has since disavowed the Proud Boys, was denied a visa for a speaking tour in Australia due to "bad character" last month and has faced criticism after two members of his former group were arrested over their suspected roles in chasing down and beating protesters last month in Manhattan. -snip

All this cuck does is try and rebrand himself when his actions catch up with him

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Pretend winning.

Alt-Right was a self-applied label. Now that it's beyond clear that the Alt-Right movement are fascist and White Supremacist for some time now, you have weasel-cucks like Gavin McInnes rebranding themselves as "Alt-Lite".

Different package, same contents as always.

ps Blaze Media (part of The Blaze) recently fired Gavin Poor old Surt, he really does need a hooker... he seems the type who would have benefited from the Joy Division and enjoyed a house of girls.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Pretend winning.

Alt-Right was a self-applied label. Now that it's beyond clear that the Alt-Right movement are fascist and White Supremacist for some time now, you have weasel-cucks like Gavin McInnes rebranding themselves as "Alt-Lite".

Different package, same contents as always.

ps Blaze Media (part of The Blaze) recently fired Gavin

The Proud Boys founder was described as a "provocateur" by the company's co-president Gaston Mooney in a statement to CNN, who called McInnes "one of the many varied voices and viewpoints on Blaze Media platforms.”

McInnes, who has since disavowed the Proud Boys, was denied a visa for a speaking tour in Australia due to "bad character" last month and has faced criticism after two members of his former group were arrested over their suspected roles in chasing down and beating protesters last month in Manhattan. -snip

All this cuck does is try and rebrand himself when his actions catch up with him

Lol you self triggering over Gavin doesn't change the fact you have not been able to use the term "alt right" correctly.

Let's get back to topic as the hatred of women in the internet youth is disturbing especially given the parallels with fascism and Islamic terrorists being promised virgins in heaven.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Let's get back to topic as the hatred of women in the internet youth is disturbing especially given the parallels with fascism and Islamic terrorists being promised virgins in heaven.

So what makes Islamic terrorists incels? Where is that coming from, the 72 virgins thing?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Let's get back to topic as the hatred of women in the internet youth is disturbing especially given the parallels with fascism and Islamic terrorists being promised virgins in heaven.

Agreed and I noted months back that these incels are very much like ISIS (Islamic extremist) in their views of women.

Originally posted by Surtur
So what makes Islamic terrorists incels? Where is that coming from, the 72 virgins thing? that and no sex before marriage in Pakistan etc. The most radical are always the most devout. Be they followers of Jordan Petersonesque doctrines, Radical Islam or Fascism.

Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed and I noted months back that these incels are very much like ISIS (Islamic extremist) in their views of women. They are Rob, very much, the rape rings in Northern England are not unlike some of the Incel teachings.

Well the Islamic terrorists aren't technically incels since it's not involuntary on their part.

Originally posted by BackFire
Well the Islamic terrorists aren't technically incels since it's not involuntary on their part. Agreed but the affect is the same. Heightened aggression and hatred of women, the different, easily manipulated etc.

Originally posted by BackFire
Well the Islamic terrorists aren't technically incels since it's not involuntary on their part.

True, but they are indeed the most vile pieces of shit out of the 3 groups. Mostly due to the whole "child bride" thing.

Yeah I agree, they're both worthless.

Originally posted by BackFire
Yeah I agree, they're both worthless. I think we can all agree there.

Speaking of incels, incel thought leader and lover of anal stimulation Gavin McInnes has been banned from youtube.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/420562-youtube-bans-proud-boys-founder-gavin-mcginnes

Originally posted by BackFire
Speaking of incels, incel thought leader and lover of anal stimulation Gavin McInnes has been banned from youtube.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/420562-youtube-bans-proud-boys-founder-gavin-mcginnes So that's why Surt got triggered when Rob mentioned him.

Kudos youtube

Originally posted by Putinbot1
So that's why Surt got triggered when Rob mentioned him.

Kudos youtube

Lol so now are we pretending I'm a huge Gavin fan? I have no real issues with him, he's made some entertaining videos...but it's been a long time since I watched anything he has done.

Yet if you need the pretend win...go for it?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so now are we pretending I'm a huge Gavin fan? I have no real issues with him, he's made some entertaining videos...but it's been a long time since I watched anything he has done.

Yet if you need the pretend win...go for it? There is no need 2b upset.

Originally posted by BackFire
Speaking of incels, incel thought leader and lover of anal stimulation Gavin McInnes has been banned from youtube.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/420562-youtube-bans-proud-boys-founder-gavin-mcginnes

McInnes rage-quit his precious Proud Boys. Banned from Youtube and even the Far-Right Blaze Media took him off their platform and pulled his blabbering podcast segment.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
So that's why Surt got triggered when Rob mentioned him.

Kudos youtube

Bingo and see above. Bad month for McInnes and his flock.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
There is no need 2b upset.

At least use the gorilla.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Hi Pr, a little confusion here mate. Who am I baiting? The fascists, islamic terrorists, incels or misogynists on the board? Surely this media link between the casual anti-women attitudes some people and groups have and extremism is worth discussing? I agree some people on this board do talk about women as inferiors sickeningly. When of course we are different, which i for one celebrate.

Likening incels to terrorists is in incredibly bad taste, imo. But it's your thread, and I plan for this to be the last post I make because I just generally dislike these kinds of conversations and how people behave in them.

Also, you don't have to keep saying how much you like women. Most of us do. It's the default.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Likening incels to terrorists is in incredibly bad taste, imo. But it's your thread, and I plan for this to be the last post I make because I just generally dislike these kinds of conversations and how people behave in them.

Also, you don't have to keep saying how much you like women. Most of us do. It's the default.


Damn...PR with the mic drop comment to Whirly...

Are you implying that the majority of men in the ME are either goat f*ckers and/or child rapist?

the incel ideal has led to terrorist attacks resulting in many murder victims. should we pretend this doesn't happen because fee-fees? nah.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Likening incels to terrorists is in incredibly bad taste, imo. But it's your thread, and I plan for this to be the last post I make because I just generally dislike these kinds of conversations and how people behave in them.

Also, you don't have to keep saying how much you like women. Most of us do. It's the default.

Bingo.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the incel ideal has led to terrorist attacks resulting in many murder victims. should we pretend this doesn't happen because fee-fees? nah.

Oh? List me the total amount of people murdered in this country last year and then gimme the number of people murdered by those who identify as incels.

Three emotionally driven responses in a row Surt and you still haven't looked up the word vernacular, trust me it will help you understand and comprehend the world around you. I do feel bad for you, the whole belief system you have bought into is unravelling before your eyes. But no matter how you try to make this thread personal the issues being discussed are far wider than those of an individual, the pervasive internet misogyny and how it extends into the minds of Incels is way beyond that.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Three emotionally driven responses in a row Surt and you still haven't looked up the word vernacular, trust me it will help you understand and comprehend the world around you. I do feel bad for you, the whole belief system you have bought into is unravelling.

^Thanks for proving my point kiddo, moving on.

Originally posted by Surtur
^Thanks for proving my point kiddo, moving on. no one proved your point, you are imagining again.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
no one proved your point, you are imagining again.

Whatever helps you cope kiddo. A tip: learn to correctly identify incels and fascists if you're gonna continue to whine about them.

Another tip: screaming about the word vernacular isn't gonna cut it here

Originally posted by dadudemon
When my godbrothers came back from their deployments, they said the same things as Squall. I know it seems racist or whatever to you but sometimes, facts don't match up with American Liberal ideals. It sucks, yes. But some stereotypes exist because they have a strong foundation in fact.

But...

It was more like, "Some of the boondocks villages had disgusting and perverted men who did x and y."




Think of it this way to help you digest the facts Squall is laying out:

There's a lot of teen pregnancy in the Midwest due to how stupid and ignorant the Victorian morals are (wait till your married, abstinence only education in schools, etc.). Pointing this out by calling the Christian Midwesterners ignorant and harmful for their practices is acceptable. But it is every bit as "terrible" as pointing out the same thins Squall is pointing out. As someone who has been in the middle East and Africa a lot longer than Squall X was, I'm going to disagree with him.

Originally posted by Surtur
Whatever helps you cope kiddo. A tip: learn to correctly identify incels and fascists if you're gonna continue to whine about them.

Another tip: screaming about the word vernacular isn't gonna cut it here Suggesting you should look a word up and understand it's meaning is hardly screaming. You are so emotional and over the top as Quan and others have pointed out often.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As someone who has been in the middle East and Africa a lot longer than Squall X was, I'm going to disagree with him.

Is Afghanistan considered The Middle East, though?

And I highly doubt you worked and stayed in remote villages. Why would you be working in remote villages?

Originally posted by dadudemon
Is Afghanistan considered The Middle East, though?

And I highly doubt you worked and stayed in remote villages. Why would you be working in remote villages? You'd be surprised where and what I've done DDM. And yes it is the Middle East. I was first in the ME 41 years ago when my Dad worked in Damascus. I've been to many places before the wars.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Suggesting you should look a word up and understand it's meaning is hardly screaming. You are so emotional and over the top as Quan and others have pointed out often.

You don't even have an ounce of self awareness do you?

Originally posted by Surtur
You don't even have an ounce of self awareness do you? I think as Quan, Rob and many others keep pointing out, that's you.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
NO YOU!!!!!!!!!

Do better.

Originally posted by Surtur
Do better. again, words for you to live by.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
NO YOU!!!!

You're a broken record now.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're a broken record now. Surely that's you? A gazillion posts all saying the same things.

Back to topic.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Surely that's you? A gazillion posts all saying the same things.

You're just making my claim that you have no self awareness even more accurate.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're just making me claim that you have no self awareness even more accurate. dur You are confirming lots of other peoples claims you have no self awareness Pinnochio.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I have nothing left but...no you!

Oh my.

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh my. dur Poor Pinnochio.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
And yes it is the Middle East.

Well, almost no ethnic Arabs live there and it is Central/Southest Asia. Not sure why you would say Afghanistan is Middle East besides perhaps you talk to too many racist Americans. awesome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Afghanistan

Edit - Decided to edit out all the other crap where I pretty much just crap on Whirly and call him a liar. I don't want to do that and I have no interest in being a jerk about it. Forget I brought it up.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well, almost no ethnic Arabs live there and it is Central/Southest Asia. Not sure why you would say Afghanistan is Middle East besides perhaps you talk to too many racist Americans. awesome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Afghanistan

Edit - Decided to edit out all the other crap where I pretty much just crap on Whirly and call him a liar. I don't want to do that and I have no interest in being a jerk about it. Forget I brought it up.

Depends how you see it.

The Greater Middle East was a political term coined by the second Bush administration in the first decade of the 21st century, to denote various countries, pertaining to the Muslim world, specifically Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Various Central Asian countries are sometimes also included.

In terms of geopolitics most consider it the middle east still, whilst geographically it isn't. When Squall X talked about middle east ****ing goats, he's using Bush's term.

I actually never lie. But, I think many people struggle to cope with the differences between my life and there's.