Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Jane, Riri, Laura-Wolverine, and cho vs Thor, Iron Man, Wolverine and Savage Banner Hulk.

How goes it?

Originals rape those sluts.

Cho screams the loudest.

Tbh Jane solos

It's not a baking contest.

Jane had her hands full with Junior Samurai.

Sin is funny.

And Sin is right.

So this is basically a man child thread having a cry about something.

Sorry, I can't seem to type very well. My tears keep soaking my keyboard.

https://tinyurl.com/y8r3mrmk

SJWs win.

Jane summons both Mjolnirs to her. GG.

Unless there'd Odin Force involved, I don't think there's a time that's ever been done to a worthy user.

But the Mother Storm just prefers Jane. She's just itching to leave Odinson.

....okay maybe.

Put it this way. Mother Storm is so stubborn that even Odin can't budge Mjolnir if he's not deemed worthy, and he's the main man.

If, as you say, the Odin Force needs to get involved to override Mjolnir, and the Mother Storm is able to override Odin.....it's going to boil down to how the Storm is feeling that day.

And we all saw how it was willing to just put it's faith in to Jane, just like that.

Everything you described is part of the new changes to Thor's history. **** Jason Aaron man.

To be fair though, we'd still need to see it on panel. Because while there are feats that suggest Mjolnir > Odin Force in a contest of wills, we have a lot more where Odin Force straight man handles it.

Originally posted by Damborgson
Everything you described is part of the new changes to Thor's history. **** Jason Aaron man.

To be fair though, we'd still need to see it on panel. Because while there are feats that suggest Mjolnir > Odin Force in a contest of wills, we have a lot more where Odin Force straight man handles it.

https://i.postimg.cc/KYRc1VKH/triggered-feminist-216108.png

Edited title.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
No she was not...


Where do you guys see the other fights going without the Thors involved?

They all lose to the originals, with the possible exception of Cho.

Would be good to mix it up, though.

X-23 vs Savage
Cho vs Tony
Riri vs Logan.

That would be quite interesting. Cho trying to out-smart Tony, whilst beating on him. Laura SHOULD do as well as Logan, because she's also quick, and it's not like strength matters when you have the claws.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
No she was not...


Where do you guys see the other fights going without the Thors involved? Originals

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
https://tinyurl.com/y8r3mrmk

Oh man, the 'Roo's reaction to the guy's punch: priceless.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Put it this way. Mother Storm is so stubborn that even Odin can't budge Mjolnir if he's not deemed worthy, and he's the main man.

If, as you say, the Odin Force needs to get involved to override Mjolnir, and the Mother Storm is able to override Odin.....it's going to boil down to how the Storm is feeling that day.

And we all saw how it was willing to just put it's faith in to Jane, just like that.

"Here is a power Thor never knew I had. A power that would have been more useful, then to fool a bunch of butt monkey stooges with no real clout."

Originally posted by -Pr-
Edited title.

Honest question, why?

Is SJW a slur now ?

Because they're just replacements.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
https://i.postimg.cc/KYRc1VKH/triggered-feminist-216108.png



Nice one.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Because they're just replacements.

They're a lot of things. But unless something was particularly offensive there, I'm not sure why the title needed to be changed.

That one girl on the left is like "What am I even doing here?"

Originally posted by Damborgson
Honest question, why?

Is SJW a slur now ?

It could potentially open a can of worms I really don't want opened in these threads.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Tbh Jane solos This, but unironically.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Edited title.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/WeirdEvergreenAnt-small.gif

Originally posted by Damborgson


Nice one.



They're a lot of things. But unless something was particularly offensive there, I'm not sure why the title needed to be changed.

That's because the op used it negatively..its not the word it's the context in which the word was used

And it's possible to use it positively these days...?

Originally posted by Damborgson
Sorry, I can't seem to type very well. My tears keep soaking my keyboard.

https://media.giphy.com/media/isP4TLqhjm3zq/giphy.gif

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
And it's possible to use it positively these days...?

Short answer. Yes

Originally posted by Sin I AM
That's because the op used it negatively..its not the word it's the context in which the word was used

It's used negatively for a reason.

They say it's about misogyny. Yeah, that's why Samus Aran, Laura Croft, and The Bride, and Azula are some of the most popular characters among the comic book nerd crowd. They obviously hate women.

I don't think Logan would go all out against Riri if they were matched against each other.

Originally posted by cdtm
It's used negatively for a reason.

They say it's about misogyny. Yeah, that's why Samus Aran, Laura Croft, and The Bride, and Azula are some of the most popular characters among the comic book nerd crowd. They obviously hate women.

I have no idea what you're talking about cd...restructure your sentences

Marvel makes "diverse" replacement characters, then cries bigotry from the fanbase when they fail.

Which ignores the fanbase has no problem with icons, like that played by Sigourney Weaver. The comic book fanbase happens to cross over with movie and video game fanbases, which include iconic women like Ripley, or various characters played by Samuel L. Jackson.

But Marvel ignores that, to push the "We give you diversity, and you boycott it. The fanbase are whiny misogynist white basement dwelling white supremacists."

It's not that at all. They just don't want them making Wonder Woman black and calling it "diversity".

Which is what Marvel does. That's what inspired the thread OP to call them "SJW replacement characters", even if he was off the mark on some of them being replacements made for diversity selling.

Originally posted by cdtm
Marvel makes "diverse" replacement characters, then cries bigotry from the fanbase when they fail.

Which ignores the fanbase has no problem with icons, like that played by Sigourney Weaver. The comic book fanbase happens to cross over with movie and video game fanbases, which include iconic women like Ripley, or various characters played by Samuel L. Jackson.

But Marvel ignores that, to push the "We give you diversity, and you boycott it. The fanbase are whiny misogynist white basement dwelling white supremacists."

It's not that at all. They just don't want them making Wonder Woman black and calling it "diversity".

Which is what Marvel does. That's what inspired the thread OP to call them "SJW replacement characters", even if he was off the mark on some of them being replacements made for diversity selling.

Hmmm....interesting. Which character in particular is a "diversity" character and what traits make them so

Originally posted by cdtm
Marvel makes "diverse" replacement characters, then cries bigotry from the fanbase when they fail.

Which ignores the fanbase has no problem with icons, like that played by Sigourney Weaver. The comic book fanbase happens to cross over with movie and video game fanbases, which include iconic women like Ripley, or various characters played by Samuel L. Jackson.

But Marvel ignores that, to push the "We give you diversity, and you boycott it. The fanbase are whiny misogynist white basement dwelling white supremacists."

It's not that at all. They just don't want them making Wonder Woman black and calling it "diversity".

Which is what Marvel does. That's what inspired the thread OP to call them "SJW replacement characters", even if he was off the mark on some of them being replacements made for diversity selling.
I think it's more complicated that, but even so, we can't deny that there's been an unfortunate reflex in the opposite direction for some.
To the point that some scream "SJW libtards!" whenever a woman or minority does anything cool. It's getting just as ridiculous on that side, and does make the community look like
"whiny misogynist white basement dwelling white supremacists."

I mean, I've seen people lump X-23, Spectrum, Storm and Northstar into the SJW bunch. These folks weren't arbitrary diversity replacements. It's not automatically an SJW thing just because a minority was involved.

Jane and Riri on the other hand... Also, yes, Jane solos.

THIS. This is why I edited the ****ing title.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
They all lose to the originals, with the possible exception of Cho.

Would be good to mix it up, though.

X-23 vs Savage
Cho vs Tony
Riri vs Logan.

That would be quite interesting. Cho trying to out-smart Tony, whilst beating on him. Laura SHOULD do as well as Logan, because she's also quick, and it's not like strength matters when you have the claws.

Originally posted by -Pr-
THIS. This is why I edited the ****ing title.

Sorry about that.

Originally posted by Sin I AM
That's because the op used it negatively..its not the word it's the context in which the word was used

That's truly ridiculous

That Dambo is the worst

Originally posted by Damborgson
That's truly ridiculous

It is.

Sigh.

The only serious threat is Jane tbh.

Originally posted by -Pr-
THIS. This is why I edited the ****ing title.

That was just mistake, I just came to this thread to find out why the title was edited and after reading it now I want to start some sh_t.

And I'm not even kidding ahah






(But I have self-restraint)