Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Video "nitwit" controversy

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



dadudemon

NemeBro
Link appears not to work friend, at least for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI5yvdaMIPU

This is the video, right?

Eternal Idol
It is an incredibly stupid smear tactic that has completely backfired. Funny how Kavanaugh's drunken cuntiness was dismissed by his supporters on the grounds that he was young and immature, yet many of those same people are questioning her character because she danced with a few college friends in a Breakfast Club homage video. It was probably a project they were being graded on, and if not, it was harmless fun.

That said, I think I'm in love...

NemeBro
She'd definitely get it yeah.

dadudemon
Originally posted by NemeBro
Link appears not to work friend, at least for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI5yvdaMIPU

This is the video, right?


Fixed the link.

Thanks!

dadudemon
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
It is an incredibly stupid smear tactic that has completely backfired. Funny how Kavanaugh's drunken cuntiness was dismissed by his supporters on the grounds that he was young and immature, yet many of those same people are questioning her character because she danced with a few college friends in a Breakfast Club homage video. It was probably a project they were being graded on, and if not, it was harmless fun.

That said, I think I'm in love...

thumb up

thumb up

and


thumb up

Alright, time to pack it up. Thread seems done.

NemeBro
Upon watching the video, I must say I am disgusted with how hot and fun Alexandria seems to have been in college. I'm fuming, and will do all in my power to spread the word of her degenerate behavior. thumb down

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by NemeBro
Upon watching the video, I must say I am disgusted with how hot and fun Alexandria seems to have been in college. I'm fuming, and will do all in my power to spread the word of her degenerate behavior. thumb down
laughing out loud

Imagine if this became some twisted parallel to the Kavanaugh hearing, and five guys came out and claimed to have been with her.... The GOP (and maybe even the establishment Democrats) would take their testimonies alone as their absolute proof that she is a sick and depraved whore with no moral compass...which would be completely ****ed up and unfair of them, but all too predictable.

truejedi
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
laughing out loud

Imagine if this became some twisted parallel to the Kavanaugh hearing, and five guys came out and claimed to have been with her.... The GOP (and maybe even the establishment Democrats) would take their testimonies alone as their absolute proof that she is a sick and depraved whore with no moral compass...which would be completely ****ed up and unfair of them, but all too predictable.

5 guys? Would that be a problem with you? You a prude? I think the kavanaugh situation was much more about consent. But sure.

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by NemeBro
Upon watching the video, I must say I am disgusted with how hot and fun Alexandria seems to have been in college. I'm fuming, and will do all in my power to spread the word of her degenerate behavior. thumb down

thumb up

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by truejedi
5 guys? Would that be a problem with you? You a prude? I think the kavanaugh situation was much more about consent. But sure.

Are you being sarcastic and playing along, or did you misunderstand my point?

BackFire
People talk about Trump derangement syndrome, but it seems there is now such a thing as Cortez Derangement Syndrome, because someone posting this as if it's some something to be insulted by is laughable and just shows them to be morons. Something about her really seems to bother some people on the right.

Flyattractor
Dadu thinks She is hot and has a nice smile?

Wow. How standards have fallen.

Along with IQ score values as well, but then that is how Democrats get into office.

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by BackFire
People talk about Trump derangement syndrome, but it seems there is now such a thing as Cortez Derangement Syndrome, because someone posting this as if it's some something to be insulted by is laughable and just shows them to be morons. Something about her really seems to bother some people on the right.
The fact that she's a young non-white woman with progressive ideas, a quick wit, and political power?

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by BackFire
People talk about Trump derangement syndrome, but it seems there is now such a thing as Cortez Derangement Syndrome, because someone posting this as if it's some something to be insulted by is laughable and just shows them to be morons. Something about her really seems to bother some people on the right.

I d watched it a few times. Now I want to be footloose

Flyattractor
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
The fact that she's a young non-white woman with progressive ideas, a quick wit, and political power?

QUICK aint the Word I hear most use when they use with the WIT to describer her intelligence.


eek!

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Flyattractor
QUICK aint the Word I hear most use when they use with the WIT to describer her intelligence.


eek!

That's because you're listening to fellow retards.

Surtur
Originally posted by BackFire
People talk about Trump derangement syndrome, but it seems there is now such a thing as Cortez Derangement Syndrome, because someone posting this as if it's some something to be insulted by is laughable and just shows them to be morons. Something about her really seems to bother some people on the right.

If you think the reaction to her dancing is bad just wait until she has an extra scoop of ice cream. Shit's gonna get real bad real quick.

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Surtur
If you think the reaction to her dancing is bad just wait until she has an extra scoop of ice cream. Shit's gonna get real bad real quick.

Well, shit, they've tried everything else. They'd might as well give it a shot.

To date, they've attacked her for her wardrobe, her job as a bartender, a a couple of misspoken statements during her campaign, where she went to college, where she lived when she went to college, how she paid for college, for not being able to afford housing in Washington D.C. before earning her salary as a Congresswoman, and now for dancing in a video apparently promoting her alma mater.

It's ****ing ridiculous.

Surtur
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Well, shit, they've tried everything else. They'd might as well give it a shot.

To date, they've attacked her for her wardrobe, her job as a bartender, a a couple of misspoken statements during her campaign, where she went to college, where she lived when she went to college, how she paid for college, for not being able to afford housing in Washington D.C. before earning her salary as a Congresswoman, and now for dancing in a video apparently promoting her alma mater.

It's ****ing ridiculous.

Insane! They'll call her complicit in natural disasters next, just watch.

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Surtur
Insane! They'll call her complicit in natural disasters next, just watch.

"What! She drives a car? That self-serving eco-terrorist!" erm

I get you're trying to defend Trump from criticism for his shitty environmental policies and for being a cvnt to a devastated Puerto Rico after being slammed by a hurricane, but he actually had it coming for his shitty environmental policies and for being a cvnt to a devastated Puerto Rico after being slammed by a hurricane.

Emperordmb
I don't care about her videos. That's nothing of substance. It's more irrelevant than Bill Clinton ****ing Monica or Trump screwing Stormy Daniels, neither of which I care about in a political sense.

There are plenty of things worth criticizing this radical over, but this isn't one of them.

NemeBro
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I don't care about her videos. That's nothing of substance. It's more irrelevant than Bill Clinton ****ing Monica or Trump screwing Stormy Daniels, neither of which I care about in a political sense.

There are plenty of things worth criticizing this radical over, but this isn't one of them. Like what? Not too familiar with her.

Tzeentch
Why does this chick live so rent-free in the minds of conservatives?

Emperordmb
Originally posted by NemeBro
Like what? Not too familiar with her.
Just off the top of my head I'm pretty sure she floated the idea of a 70% income tax over the past couple days.

Tzeentch
She advocated a 60-70% income tax on people who's incomes are over $10 million, or something like that.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/high-income-earners-tax-rate/

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Just off the top of my head I'm pretty sure she floated the idea of a 70% income tax over the past couple days.
A 70% tax rate on the wealthiest Americans seems radical to you because it was never so high in your lifetime (or even mine), but it was the norm for much of the last century.

https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-historical-table-23

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/2018/01/19/USATODAY/USATODAY/636519693243752139-011918-income-tax-rates-Online.png

Flyattractor
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
A 70% tax rate on the wealthiest Americans seems radical to you because it was never so high in your lifetime (or even mine), but it was the norm for much of the last century.

https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-historical-table-23

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/media/2018/01/19/USATODAY/USATODAY/636519693243752139-011918-income-tax-rates-Online.png

Yep. Typical Lefty Soci-tard-ism once again on Full Display.

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Flyattractor
Yep. Typical Lefty Soci-tard-ism once again on Full Display.

That's historical tax data, dumb ****. Income tax rates at or above 70% on the wealthiest Americans were as American as apple pie, baseball, and racism in the 20th century.

In that time frame, there have been 11 Republican Presidents to the 8 Democratic Presidents, ~42 years of Republican Senate majorities to the ~64 years of Democratic Senate majorities, ~36 years of Republican House majorities to ~70 years of Democratic House majorities. It was over 70% during the First Red Scare (1919-1921) and the Second Red Scare in the 40s and 50s, and yet the income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans only ever went below 70%

1) during the post-WWI boom in the 20s, before the crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression years, when Republican Presidents held office the entire decade (Harding, Coolidge, Hoover),

and

2) after 1980 when Reagan was President with a Republican Senate majority, and it never recovered.

But of course, you're a ****ing imbecile who's been trained to bark "Socialism!" at the merest suggestion of raising taxes to fund non-military government programs that would benefit you by your wealthy masters, so nevermind.

'tard on, Fly.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Flyattractor
Yep. Typical Lefty Soci-tard-ism once again on Full Display.


You're an old man. So you should remember the 50s when the US was literally the world's largest economy, by far, and no other country came even close. Right?

The 50s: the heyday of the United States. Where our only problems where how much bigger our new hydrogen bomb could get, our racism against black people, and our sexism against women.


Those were the days.

SquallX
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Well, shit, they've tried everything else. They'd might as well give it a shot.

To date, they've attacked her for her wardrobe, her job as a bartender, a a couple of misspoken statements during her campaign, where she went to college, where she lived when she went to college, how she paid for college, for not being able to afford housing in Washington D.C. before earning her salary as a Congresswoman, and now for dancing in a video apparently promoting her alma mater.

It's ****ing ridiculous.

Where she lived was a big deal Actually. She claimed she was poor, and she used to her helped mom clean houses, then we found out she came from a well off family. That was legit criticism of her character.

But her being criticize because of her dancing is idiotic.

BrolyBlack

Emperordmb
Okay I'm actually starting to get a bit skeptical here.

Who actually got pissed off about this video?

The article really doesn't link to any of these so called twitter posts, I've seen people search and fail to find these supposed droves of conservatives. So where are they?

The only tweet I've seen anyone manage to find mocking her for this before she responded to the apparent swarm of mockery was a twitter account that had been created five days prior. Seems a bit fishy.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/39966/ocasio-cortez-claims-gop-thinks-her-dancing-was-ryan-saavedra

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Okay I'm actually starting to get a bit skeptical here.

Who actually got pissed off about this video?

The article really doesn't link to any of these so called twitter posts, I've seen people search and fail to find these supposed droves of conservatives. So where are they?

The only tweet I've seen anyone manage to find mocking her for this before she responded to the apparent swarm of mockery was a twitter account that had been created five days prior. Seems a bit fishy.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/39966/ocasio-cortez-claims-gop-thinks-her-dancing-was-ryan-saavedra

It was probably Fly having another "LEFTIST COMMUN-NAZI!!!1" meltdown.

cdtm
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Okay I'm actually starting to get a bit skeptical here.

Who actually got pissed off about this video?

The article really doesn't link to any of these so called twitter posts, I've seen people search and fail to find these supposed droves of conservatives. So where are they?

The only tweet I've seen anyone manage to find mocking her for this before she responded to the apparent swarm of mockery was a twitter account that had been created five days prior. Seems a bit fishy.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/39966/ocasio-cortez-claims-gop-thinks-her-dancing-was-ryan-saavedra

Does seem like a mockudrama.

Cute video.

cdtm

Flyattractor
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
That's historical tax data, dumb ****. Income tax rates at or above 70% on the wealthiest Americans were as American as apple pie, baseball, and racism in the 20th century.

In that time frame, there have been 11 Republican Presidents to the 8 Democratic Presidents, ~42 years of Republican Senate majorities to the ~64 years of Democratic Senate majorities, ~36 years of Republican House majorities to ~70 years of Democratic House majorities. It was over 70% during the First Red Scare (1919-1921) and the Second Red Scare in the 40s and 50s, and yet the income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans only ever went below 70%

1) during the post-WWI boom in the 20s, before the crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression years, when Republican Presidents held office the entire decade (Harding, Coolidge, Hoover),

and

2) after 1980 when Reagan was President with a Republican Senate majority, and it never recovered.

But of course, you're a ****ing imbecile who's been trained to bark "Socialism!" at the merest suggestion of raising taxes to fund non-military government programs that would benefit you by your wealthy masters, so nevermind.

'tard on, Fly.

Hee hee... Now that was some fun right there...

Originally posted by dadudemon
You're an old man. So you should remember the 50s when the US was literally the world's largest economy, by far, and no other country came even close. Right?

The 50s: the heyday of the United States. Where our only problems where how much bigger our new hydrogen bomb could get, our racism against black people, and our sexism against women.


Those were the days.

Yes. In the 50's they knew how to handle uppity Commie Nazis like SJWs. Fire Hose and the Dogs and a good dose of the Night Stick.

The Good Old Days.

Emperordmb
You can point to the historical tax rates, but you can't pretend this is not a completely radical idea in the modern world that wouldn't severely damage our economy.

And you can't pretend that people are just pulling shit out of their ass for criticizing what is obviously terrible policy.


Really what this all seems like is maybe a handful of random assholes criticized her so she turned it into a media circus to rally her followers. Quite clever political strategy but really disingenuous.

cdtm
About as clever as framing the tax debate as in any way a common man issue.

I mean, whether big business hoards it, or goverment wastes it on inflated contractors, that's money we aren't going to see. evil face

Adam_PoE
Originally posted by Emperordmb
You can point to the historical tax rates, but you can't pretend this is not a completely radical idea in the modern world that wouldn't severely damage our economy.

And you can't pretend that people are just pulling shit out of their ass for criticizing what is obviously terrible policy.

Originally posted by Eternal Idol
That's historical tax data, dumb ****. Income tax rates at or above 70% on the wealthiest Americans were as American as apple pie, baseball, and racism in the 20th century.

In that time frame, there have been 11 Republican Presidents to the 8 Democratic Presidents, ~42 years of Republican Senate majorities to the ~64 years of Democratic Senate majorities, ~36 years of Republican House majorities to ~70 years of Democratic House majorities. It was over 70% during the First Red Scare (1919-1921) and the Second Red Scare in the 40s and 50s, and yet the income tax rate on the wealthiest Americans only ever went below 70%

1) during the post-WWI boom in the 20s, before the crash of 1929 and the subsequent Great Depression years, when Republican Presidents held office the entire decade (Harding, Coolidge, Hoover),

and

2) after 1980 when Reagan was President with a Republican Senate majority, and it never recovered.

But of course, you're a ****ing imbecile who's been trained to bark "Socialism!" at the merest suggestion of raising taxes to fund non-military government programs that would benefit you by your wealthy masters, so nevermind.

'tard on, Fly.

Emperordmb
You aren't challenging the point that this would be terrible for our economy. You're just reiterating what I've already conceded.

cdtm
There's also corporate advocates gaining positions in the courts.


Personally, I think just like businessmen had an open coup in Hawaii, there's been a similar, more shadowy coup in the US. No blood needed, just a lot of money, and gaming the system (Like getting your people in the courts.)

Adam_PoE
Originally posted by Emperordmb
You aren't challenging the point that this would be terrible for our economy. You're just reiterating what I've already conceded.

"The policy that was in place for much of the modern era, and particularly during times of middle-class economic prosperity, will not work today, because reasons."

You only think the policy is radical, because the rate has never been that high in your lifetime.

The wealthy want you to believe their tax rate is too high, and they have trained you to bark on command to protect their interests, "This will be disastrous for the economy. The wealthy are job creators, and if we raise their taxes, they will create fewer jobs, which will have a trickle-down effect on the rest of us."

The reality is that tax breaks for wealthy people do not lead to job creation, it leads to the wealthy hoarding more wealth.

cdtm
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
"The policy that was in place for much of the modern era, and particularly during times of middle-class economic prosperity, will not work today, because reasons."

You only think the policy is radical, because the rate has never been that high in your lifetime.

The wealthy want you to believe their tax rate is too high, and they have trained you to bark on command to protect their interests, "This will be disastrous for the economy. The wealthy are job creators, and if we raise their taxes, they will create fewer jobs, which will have a trickle-down effect on the rest of us."

The reality is that tax breaks for wealthy people do not lead to job creation, it leads to the wealthy hoarding more wealth.

I can give a reason it won't work anymore:

Corporate responsibility to shareholders.

The courts enforce a policy where businesses are money making machines for investors, and nothing else. Tax rates really won't fix that, either way.

Emperordmb
And what happens when wealthy people are less interested in living or doing business here Adam? What happens when they've decided they've found a better arrangement elsewhere?

Is that just fantasy wealthy elite brainwashing rather than the simple logic that it's a disincentive for someone to do business in the US if their success means more than half of their income will be taken away from them?

Also taking away more than half of someone's income is something I firmly object to on principle.

Tzeentch
Originally posted by Emperordmb
What happens when they've decided they've found a better arrangement elsewhere? And where would that be? I'm curious to see this magical, untapped land that fits both conditions of:

Its tax codes are friendlier to large businesses then the American tax code

and

The citizens of said company have buying power that rivals that of an American citizen

Because you need both to be a better arrangement. You can go to Mexico and you might pay less taxes, but Mexicans won't buy your televisions, cars and other frivolous, consumerist garbage at the rate Americans do. You could also try going to Australia or Canada or Sweden, places where first-world citizens have more disposable income, but those countries also don't deep-throat corporate cock the way we do here, so enjoy getting bent over even harder in regards to taxes (and also regulations).

NemeBro
Originally posted by Emperordmb

Also taking away more than half of someone's income is something I firmly object to on principle. Why is that if someone's income is incredibly disproportionate compared to others?

If you were to take over half of the average person's income, they would be phucked without lube. Affording basic needs like food, housing healthcare, and transportation would become insanely difficult or even impossible for them.

For someone who makes 10,000,000 or more a year, what are they losing by comparison? Their basic needs are still more than met, and their disposal income allows them to live in far greater luxury than most people.

Flyattractor
Yeah. Its Fair when it happens to Other People. Not me.

BackFire
You are forgetting Jesus' quote about the rich.

"Yay my children, and bend at the waist for those above your station and present yourself to them, and accept what they give you, what they decide you are worth, for you are worth nothing more and they deserve all they have and then more, for they are your better and if you cannot afford health care then that is what you must suffer, for their Lamborgini is of greater importance. If you cannot afford food, then that is what you must suffer, for their ability to afford to fly to Taiwan and make love to the little children is of greater importance. It is their convenience that must take priority over the things you need to live. Yay my child, don't forget the lube. "

Flyattractor
Wow. What Book was that from the The Book of BFpullingOutofHisArse Chap 6:9??

BackFire
The New Te$tament, please pay $9.99 for additional passages.

cdtm
Originally posted by NemeBro
Why is that if someone's income is incredibly disproportionate compared to others?

If you were to take over half of the average person's income, they would be phucked without lube. Affording basic needs like food, housing healthcare, and transportation would become insanely difficult or even impossible for them.

For someone who makes 10,000,000 or more a year, what are they losing by comparison? Their basic needs are still more than met, and their disposal income allows them to live in far greater luxury than most people.

No one "needs" a hundred million dollars.

Otoh, the American left does talk about "fairness" a lot. Nothing much fair about arbitrarily taking what you want from someone, whether they could afford it or not.

Flyattractor
Originally posted by BackFire
The New Te$tament, please pay $9.99 for additional passages.

So what your saying is that if I DON'T pay you... you will stop talking?


eek!

BackFire
No. In fact if you don't pay me, the volume of my voice goes up.

Flyattractor
Hmmm? I thought that noise was someone putting a mouses balls in a press....

Emperordmb
Originally posted by BackFire
You are forgetting Jesus' quote about the rich.

"Yay my children, and bend at the waist for those above your station and present yourself to them, and accept what they give you, what they decide you are worth, for you are worth nothing more and they deserve all they have and then more, for they are your better and if you cannot afford health care then that is what you must suffer, for their Lamborgini is of greater importance. If you cannot afford food, then that is what you must suffer, for their ability to afford to fly to Taiwan and make love to the little children is of greater importance. It is their convenience that must take priority over the things you need to live. Yay my child, don't forget the lube. "
there's a difference between telling people to voluntarily be generous and taking their property from them by force

Flyattractor
Yes. Its the diff between Charity and Being a Big Pillock.

BackFire
Originally posted by Emperordmb
there's a difference between telling people to voluntarily be generous and taking their property from them by force

Who is advocating taking property?

Flyattractor
The Pillocks!

BackFire
The rich taste like chicken.

Flyattractor
The Poor taste like McDonalds.

And don't get me started on what Mods of out of date interweb message boards taste like..

BackFire
Imp tastes like a butter ball turkey.

Flyattractor
Butter makes almost everything taste better.

MythLord
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRsDIUji_sw

Tzeentch
Originally posted by cdtm
No one "needs" a hundred million dollars.

Otoh, the American left does talk about "fairness" a lot. Nothing much fair about arbitrarily taking what you want from someone, whether they could afford it or not. Taxes aren't arbitrary. All citizens pay them.

MythLord
I think he's referring to how much certain classes pay taxes based on their income.

riv6672
Originally posted by NemeBro
She'd definitely get it yeah.
I must agree.

Surtur
This seems more or less like fake outrage. One or two trolls on twitter made comments and morons translated that somehow into "The GOP finds women dancing scanalous!".

Kinda funny. Her dancing seems, I guess, charming and I have no issue with it. I only wish she did math half as well.

Surtur
Btw who wants to guess who said the GOP thinks women dancing are scandalous? Lol, can you guess who, it's a mystery!

cdtm
Originally posted by Surtur
This seems more or less like fake outrage. One or two trolls on twitter made comments and morons translated that somehow into "The GOP finds women dancing scanalous!".

Kinda funny. Her dancing seems, I guess, charming and I have no issue with it. I only wish she did math half as well.

Could be standard media telephone effect, instead of something deliberately deceptive.

Like in this case:


Context from Gizmodo:


https://medium.com/@parkermolloy/5-things-the-media-does-to-manufacture-outrage-ba79125e1262

Surtur
It's the standard tactic of:

create imaginary monster
slay imaginary monster
celebrate imaginary victory

Emperordmb
Well we all know how important it is to slay the dragon so you can rescue your father from the underworld and embody the archetypal hero so you can save your city from collapsing and rescue the virgin. But this is just larping.

Flyattractor
That and you can start the "What if the Dragon Returns " Larp too.

The Dragon is Never Really GONE!

Surtur
Originally posted by Surtur
Btw who wants to guess who said the GOP thinks women dancing are scandalous? Lol, can you guess who, it's a mystery!

Everybody already knows the answer to this...don't they?

Emperordmb
You're right about the dragon's return fly, because the real fight is against original sin identity based privilege a dark nature that is a part of all human beings because it's universally true that all people have an immoral part of their nature only certain people based on their identity groups based on where they land on the intersectionality hierarchy. And as we move forwards, we the most privileged must confess our sins to our rightful overlords who are avatars of moral purity.

Surtur
AOC also tried to say the GOP booed her for voting for Pelosi:

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1080998665672630272? ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm
%5E1080998665672630272&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2F39966%2Focasio-cortez-claims-gop-thinks-her-dancing-was-ryan-saavedra

I clicked the link. I hear some "ohhs" but no boo's.

Surtur
"False Flag Smear" About Ocasio-Cortez Dancing, NO ONE Cared

3O9vsqIVXEg

An interesting theory from this center left leaning youtuber...

Eternal Idol
Originally posted by Surtur
"False Flag Smear" About Ocasio-Cortez Dancing, NO ONE Cared

3O9vsqIVXEg

An interesting theory from this center left leaning youtuber...
Sandy Hook... "Sandy" Cortez... it's all adding up now...

durpot

Flyattractor
Tsk Tsk Making Fun of a tragedy like that...

jaden_2.0
None of the usual alt-right YouTubers think anyone on the right cared about her dancing but they all cared enough about it to make videos telling everyone how none of them cared about it.

Lol.

Flyattractor
Got you to click on it so they got your view. Thats Pure YouTube Money!

Putinbot1
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
None of the usual alt-right YouTubers think anyone on the right cared about her dancing but they all cared enough about it to make videos telling everyone how none of them cared about it.

Lol. Brilliant Post laughing out loud

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
None of the usual alt-right YouTubers think anyone on the right cared about her dancing but they all cared enough about it to make videos telling everyone how none of them cared about it.

Lol.

Who are the Alt-right youtubers that made videos?

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Flyattractor
Got you to click on it so they got your view. Thats Pure YouTube Money!

I already subscribe to Sargon & The Thinkery, Styx, RazorFist, Bearing, Dave Cullen, Matt Christiansen and others.

I don't live in an echo chamber like most people do.

Flyattractor
Razorfist is the best source for OnLineNews!

https://78.media.tumblr.com/6fb61b41a193954357c83beb4109d3ad/tumblr_inline_nmopfihr3y1rym0gr_400.gif

jaden_2.0
His rants are mostly fun. He's like an angry version of Escapist when he does game reviews.

Flyattractor
Yeah. You gotta love his Spinning Phuck You I Was Right.

Surtur
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
None of the usual alt-right YouTubers think anyone on the right cared about her dancing but they all cared enough about it to make videos telling everyone how none of them cared about it.

Lol.

Yes they pointed out the made up narrative. Also, name which alt right youtubers covered this.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I don't live in an echo chamber like most people do.

Lol yeah you certainly do live in an echo chamber. If you didn't you'd be able to recognize Tim Pool is not alt right.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Surtur
Yes they pointed out the made up narrative. Also, name which alt right youtubers covered this.



Lol yeah you certainly do live in an echo chamber. If you didn't you'd be able to recognize Tim Pool is not alt right.

Yeah. He just agrees with all the alt-right YouTubers and makes videos on all the exact same subjects and has the exact same opinion.

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Yeah. He just agrees with all the alt-right YouTubers and makes videos on all the exact same subjects and has the exact same opinion.

Which alt right YouTubers does he agree with and which videos and opinions are you referring to?

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Which alt right YouTubers does he agree with and which videos and opinions are you referring to?

Well let's see. On this subject he made the exact same argument as Styx and Sargon did on Styx's taxes and economy video and Sargon's Thinkery Dancing Radical video.

He's made the videos with the same opinion of Sargon's banning from Patreon as Lauren Chen, The Patriotic Report Ben Shapiro, Styx, Matt Christiansen.

There was the cookie cutter videos from all the same bunch about "Thot audits"

The migrant "caravans"

He jumped on the same bandwagon last time Cortez was doing the rounds about her not being to pay her rent or some shit.

I could go on and on, frankly.

Silent Master
Well first off neither Sargon or Ben Shapiro are alt right. and you still haven't said what the opinions were you just listed a couple of topics and said they had the same opinion.

Hell, The Young Turks have made videos about some of those topics. Are they alt right as well?


Edit: never watched any of the other people you mentioned, so I can't say whether they are actually alt right or just more people that you disagree with.

Dr Will Hatch
*fap fap fap fap*

Jeffo
Alt right =/= Styxhexenhammer, Sargon and Shapiro.....

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Well first off neither Sargon or Ben Shapiro are alt right. and you still haven't said what the opinions were you just listed a couple of topics and said they had the same opinion.

Hell, The Young Turks have made videos about some of those topics. Are they alt right as well?


Edit: never watched any of the other people you mentioned, so I can't say whether they are actually alt right or just more people that you disagree with.

Yeah yeah. Same old patter. I forgot. It's "libertarian" for the denialists. Isn't it?

Silent Master
Like I said, your definition of the alt right appears to be people that disagree with you.

Surtur
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Well let's see. On this subject he made the exact same argument as Styx and Sargon did on Styx's taxes and economy video and Sargon's Thinkery Dancing Radical video.

He's made the videos with the same opinion of Sargon's banning from Patreon as Lauren Chen, The Patriotic Report Ben Shapiro, Styx, Matt Christiansen.

There was the cookie cutter videos from all the same bunch about "Thot audits"

The migrant "caravans"

He jumped on the same bandwagon last time Cortez was doing the rounds about her not being to pay her rent or some shit.

I could go on and on, frankly.

Lol I have to ask: how do you personally define the term "alt right"?

Silent Master
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol I have to ask: how do you personally define the term "alt right"?

It appears to be, people that disagree with him. I mean judging by his argument that they've made videos on some of the same topics, The Young Turks and Bill Maher are also alt right.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Like I said, your definition of the alt right appears to be people that disagree with you.

Where did I say I disagreed with them?

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
It appears to be, people that disagree with him. I mean judging by his argument that they've made videos on some of the same topics, The Young Turks and Bill Maher are also alt right.

You must've missed the bit where I mentioned that they all have the same opinions on the same topics. It's not about just covering a particular subject. It's about what they think about those subjects.

Surtur
Originally posted by Silent Master
It appears to be, people that disagree with him. I mean judging by his argument that they've made videos on some of the same topics, The Young Turks and Bill Maher are also alt right.

Some of the reasoning is just bizarre. I'm not sure why thinking what Patreon did to Sargon was unfair is a view held strictly by the alt right. Hell Dave Rubin didn't think it was fair, I guess now he's alt right too. It also makes Sam Harris alt right.

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Where did I say I disagreed with them?

If their opinions make them alt right and you agree with them, that means you're alt right.

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You must've missed the bit where I mentioned that they all have the same opinions on the same topics. It's not about just covering a particular subject. It's about what they think about those subjects.

You say they have the same opinions, yet you haven't actually said what those opinions were nor provided any proof that they actually hold that opinion. Nor have you explained how whatever opinion you claim they have is an alt right opinion.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
If their opinions make them alt right and you agree with them, that means you're alt right.

Maybe in your world. Some people are sycophants though.

I can agree with some of their opinions on some topics and disagree with others.

Same with YouTubers from the left that I follow like Thunderf00t.

Surtur
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Maybe in your world. Some people are sycophants though.

I can agree with some of their opinions on some topics and disagree with others.

Same with YouTubers from the left that I follow like Thunderf00t.

The problem is they do not agree with the right on every issue. They have the same opinion as conservatives over SJW's, the outrage culture, etc

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Maybe in your world. Some people are sycophants though.

I can agree with some of their opinions on some topics and disagree with others.

Same with YouTubers from the left that I follow like Thunderf00t.

Ah, so now we're back to you disagreeing with them and those disagreements making them alt right. in other words, I was correct in stating that you view the alt right as anyone that you disagree with.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Ah, so now we're back to you disagreeing with them and those disagreements making them alt right. in other words, I was correct in stating that you view the alt right as anyone that you disagree with.

My disagreeing with some opinions doesn't have any bearing on whether they are alt-right. It's their opinions that make them alt-right. If you have the same opinion on a large number of issues as the likes of Tommy Robinson, Lauren Southern, Pat Condell, Stefan Molyneux, PJW and Crowder then you're alt-right. They do, he does, so they are.

Silent Master
Yet you still haven't stated what opinions they share nor what makes those opinions alt right.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Yet you still haven't stated what opinions they share nor what makes those opinions alt right.

Yet I already gave several examples of issues they've shared opinion on.

There's general consensus that they mostly wanted Trump to win the election. A right wing stance

They mostly are in favour of Brexit. Some a so called "hard" Brexit. A right wing stance.

They are, for the most part, anti-immigration. A right wing stance.

Then they share consensus on issues that the old school right don't usually address. Feminism, social justice, antifa, social media conglomerate hegemony.

Silent Master
No, you had listed several topics you didn't actually explain what their opinions were about those topics nor what made those opinions alt right. You appear to be under the impression that right wing and ALT right are the same thing.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you had listed several topics you didn't actually explain what their opinions were about those topics nor what made those opinions alt right. You appear to be under the impression that right wing and ALT right are the same thing.

Except for where I mentioned the topics that the traditional right doesn't address. Hence making those who do cover those issues, alternative.

darthgoober
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Except for where I mentioned the topics that the traditional right doesn't address. Hence making those who do cover those issues, alternative.
The issues you listed that aren't traditionally right wing talking points are relatively new.

Silent Master
The reason you don't see the so called traditional right address those issues is because you've labeled everyone that does address them as alt right. Your logic is dizzying.

Here is the actual definition of alt-right.https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alt-right

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by darthgoober
The issues you listed that aren't traditionally right wing talking points are relatively new.

So is the "alt-right".

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
The reason you don't see the so called traditional right address those issues is because you've labeled everyone that does address them as alt right. Your logic is dizzying.

Here is the actual definition of alt-right.https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alt-right

Except that's not alt-right. That's just the same old far right that's been around for decades.

Silent Master
Alt right doesn't just mean new conservatives, it describes a specific type of extreme right-wing white nationalist type of conservatives.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alt-right

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Except that's not alt-right. That's just the same old far right that's been around for decades.

I believe you mean, that's not how you personally define the alt right.

darthgoober
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
So is the "alt-right".
Which matters how? You listed general issues of the right and issues that there was no reason to take a stance against in previous times as proof that they're "alt right"... seems kinda like you think that "right"="alt right" tbh...

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Alt right doesn't just mean new conservatives, it describes a specific type of extreme right-wing white nationalist type of conservatives.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alt-right

Funny that when unite the right rally happened and certain media outlets called it an alt-right event, certain people were clambering over themselves to declare that it wasn't the real alt-right.

dadudemon
Man, with how serious business you guys are about correcting a mislabeling of somewhat right-wing talking points, I'm very tempted to troll the shit out of you guys for lulz but string you along for as many posts as possible to see the depths of your anger.

I had no idea this was such a passionate topic.

lol!!!

Silent Master
Then, like you. They were using their personal definition of alt-right rather than the real definition.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by darthgoober
Which matters how? You listed general issues of the right and issues that there was no reason to take a stance against in previous times as proof that they're "alt right"... seems kinda like you think that "right"="alt right" tbh...

They're the ones who label SJWs, feminists and social media owners are leftists, progressives, regressives, liberals then take the opposing standpoint thus putting themselves firmly in the alternative right.

Not me.

Silent Master
Originally posted by dadudemon
Man, with how serious business you guys are about correcting a mislabeling of somewhat right-wing talking points, I'm very tempted to troll the shit out of you guys for lulz but string you along for as many posts as possible to see the depths of your anger.

I had no idea this was such a passionate topic.

lol!!!

Labeling everyone that disagrees with you "insert hated group" is just lazy and intellectually dishonest. It's what people do that can't actually defend their stances.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by dadudemon
Man, with how serious business you guys are about correcting a mislabeling of somewhat right-wing talking points, I'm very tempted to troll the shit out of you guys for lulz but string you along for as many posts as possible to see the depths of your anger.

I had no idea this was such a passionate topic.

lol!!!

Shut up, gay beard.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
Labeling everyone that disagrees with you "insert hated group" is just lazy and intellectually dishonest. It's what people do that can't actually defend their stances.

As lazy as strawmanning?

dadudemon
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Shut up, gay beard.

That's offensive and clearly anti-Lesbian. I'll not tolerate any talk like that, here. This is a warning. Next offense is a 3 day ban. Don't let me catch you posting bigoted stuff like this, again.

darthgoober
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
They're the ones who label SJWs, feminists and social media owners are leftists, progressives, regressives, liberals then take the opposing standpoint thus putting themselves firmly in the alternative right.

Not me.
Except that many of those things are also under fire from many traditional liberals like Bill Mahar. Thus, those aren't strictly alt right opinions.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Silent Master
Labeling everyone that disagrees with you "insert hated group" is just lazy and intellectually dishonest. It's what people do that can't actually defend their stances.

My post was my subtle way of dropping a hint. Ahem...

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by darthgoober
Except that those things are also under fire from many traditional liberals like Bill Mahar. Thus, those aren't strictly alt right opinions.

Bill Maher has a range of opinions although mostly of the left.

Not when it comes to Islam and Judaism though. Lol.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by dadudemon
That's offensive and clearly anti-Lesbian. I'll not tolerate any talk like that, here. This is a warning. Next offense is a 3 day ban. Don't let me catch you posting bigoted stuff like this, again.

Poke it.

Silent Master
How are his beliefs about Islam not liberal?

darthgoober
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Bill Maher has a range of opinions although mostly of the left.

Not when it comes to Islam and Judaism though. Lol.
Yeah, lots of people have a range of opinions on those kinds of issues... which is why it's silly to use your list when it comes to identifying the alt right. To identify the alt right you need to look at the issues upon which the alt right specifically differentiates itself from the general right.

Silent Master
vln9D81eO60


https://youtu.be/vln9D81eO60

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
How are his beliefs about Islam not liberal?

Because he ****ing hates those *****.

Silent Master
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Because he ****ing hates those *****.

I don't recall him ever saying that, can you provide the link?

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Silent Master
I don't recall him ever saying that, can you provide the link?

Yes. But I won't.

Silent Master
Translation: the link doesn't actually exist.

jaden_2.0
I like how you always translate what I say into what you want me to say.

Emperordmb
Really the label is less important than the accuracy of what you're implying by that label.

So I have this to ask you Jaden, in your view, does a person have to be racist against minorities to be alt-right?

Silent Master
Feel free to prove me wrong by posting the link.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Emperordmb
Really the label is less important than the accuracy of what you're implying by that label.

So I have this to ask you Jaden, in your view, does a person have to be racist against minorities to be alt-right?

No. Because alt-righters don't go in for identity politics.

BackFire
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Would you like me to make you an omelet, BackFire?

Why yes, I'd love an omelet right about now, thanks.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by BackFire
Why yes, I'd love an omelet right about now, thanks.

Human eggs aren't great for omelettes. You need A LOT of them.

Surtur
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
No. Because alt-righters don't go in for identity politics.

Either this is a troll post or you just confirmed you don't know what it means to be alt right lol. Richard Spencer is alt right. To say the man doesn't go in for identity politics is baffling.

Patient_Leech
Her name is too damn long. But I like her. She seems awesome from just the couple short interviews I've seen.

And yes, it's hilarious that they thought this super cute video of her dancing would be bad for her image.

Bentley
Even if it was a sex tape it shouldn't hurt her image but US peeps are prudes.

Surtur
Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Her name is too damn long. But I like her. She seems awesome from just the couple short interviews I've seen.

And yes, it's hilarious that they thought this super cute video of her dancing would be bad for her image.

"They" in this case was like 2 people on twitter.

May I ask what about her is awesome though? I get she's likable, but that doesn't make you a good politician. What specific policies has she put forth that you find awesome?

Patient_Leech
Originally posted by Surtur
"They" in this case was like 2 people on twitter.

May I ask what about her is awesome though? I get she's likable, but that doesn't make you a good politician. What specific policies has she put forth that you find awesome?

I've only seen a couple short interviews. She seems honest, sincere and non-crazy... you know, generally level-headed (I.e. the opposite of Donald). But I don't know her positions on everything.

jaden_2.0
Originally posted by Surtur
Either this is a troll post or you just confirmed you don't know what it means to be alt right lol. Richard Spencer is alt right. To say the man doesn't go in for identity politics is baffling.

There's nothing"alt" about white supremacy. It's been going on for quite a while.

So even if he coined the term, he's not it.

Surtur
Originally posted by jaden_2.0
There's nothing"alt" about white supremacy. It's been going on for quite a while.

So even if he coined the term, he's not it.

And...not a word you just typed negates the fact it is silly to claim the alt right is not about identity politics.

They are. They are about identity politics and victimhood, just like the alt left.

<< THERE IS MORE FROM THIS THREAD HERE >>