Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Is this like the time Trump claimed the FBI "broke into" and acted inappropriately towards Cohen? When none of that happened, the FBI didn't storm of break down doors and Cohen was quietly escorted out of his office.

Cohen later confirmed that the FBI agents were polite and professional the whole time. Because the last thing you want to do as an officer is give the criminal ammo to use against you when doing the arrest.

thank god for their trigger discipline. that man has valuable inflormation eat

*misuse

I'm asking if it legitimately happened as you claimed, because last time a misuse of power was claimed, it was a lie.

You're also not factoring that Stone is very rich, well connected and has ties to several non-extradition countries, like Russia. So it would be stupid for Mueller's team to send a "please report to my office" note as Stone could have fled.

And CNN just happened to be there to film it too. Weird.

He is a ****ing criminal and a traitor to his own country. Who the **** cares?

Originally posted by Surtur
And CNN just happened to be there to film it too. Weird.

Have you noticed how the left is ok with police force only used against their political opponents!

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He is a ****ing criminal and a traitor to his own country. Who the **** cares?


Your little outburst says more about the type of person you are then you probably intended.

"he shouldn't have resisted arrest!"

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your little outburst says more about the type of person you are then you probably intended.

Bingo.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
"he shouldn't have resisted arrest!"

How did he resist arrest?

Originally posted by Tzeentch
"he shouldn't have resisted arrest!"

Oh if he resisted arrest he deserved it. As do all who do

Originally posted by Tzeentch
"he shouldn't have resisted arrest!"

The best defense of this so far is “he’s guilty till proven innocent.”

Pathetic, the left should literally be in shame for how they approve of military force against private citizens for intimidation purposes.

For the people that hate guns, police and aggressive use of force they sure do approve of it when it’s shainst their political opponents.

Shows you who they really are. It’s all just virtue signaling.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He is a ****ing criminal and a traitor to his own country. Who the **** cares?

roger stone was arrested under charges, not convicted. as for the guns drawn, they must have considered him unpredictable as well as a flight risk. so since when does arrest mean robbery of due process unless there are no charges given?

Can't we just judge Stone guilty via the Court of Public Opinion like we do with Trump and just have Stone executed as soon as possible.

Guys movies suck now so I say we just get it over with.

trump was convicted too? wow i missed that. how is he still president then? weird.

I imagine you miss a lot now, what with you being a Raging Drug Addict.

criminal justice is not driven by public opinion. that's why all your cults cries of "lock her up" amounted to no more than ineffectual screeching.

Wow. That is Some Strong "Script" you be token on Bro.

a bit early for you to be hittin the cough medicine, aint it fly?

Need me to stop off and get you a few cartons of eye drops? Or are your eyes just naturally that red?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
roger stone was arrested under charges, not convicted. as for the guns drawn, they must have considered him unpredictable as well as a flight risk. so since when does arrest mean robbery of due process unless there are no charges given?

As I posted, the judge did not deem him a flight risk and his passport is expired, hence why they let him out just on his signature, and he is still allowed to travel to many parts of the country.

This is intimidation, you just happen to agree with it because you dont like him.

Yeah I'm not saying don't go after Stone, but the way they did it seems quite extreme to me.

And CNN just happening to be there makes this entire thing seem like a political stunt, one involving one of our intelligence agencies.

Martha Stewart was a criminal too, did they arrest her like this?

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
That is a nice tu quoque fallacy you have constructed for yourself. The difference is that the laws Stone has broken are not discriminatory. They do not single him out for disparate treatment on the basis of a class to which he belongs. The laws in question have not been constructed to criminalize his existence. No, he has broken just laws that are apply to everyone equally. But keep defending traitors.


You write with the grammar of someone who has had education, but it seems you are lacking in self-awareness.

There is a very good reason why we have the criminal code that we have, and why we have enjoyed perhaps the most progressive society on the face of the Earth. Please do some self-reflection. Also, understand, that society is ever-changing. The very same people who would consider me a deviant half-breed or you a criminal for being homosexual, may very well gain power one-day.

People always forget this: When you draconiaize the law, and put limitations on freedom. Sooner or later, a REAL sociopath ends up in charge, and things go to shit.

I just don't see why some can't see the difference between "he has done something potentially worthy of jail time and at the very least arrest" and "he didn't warrant a Swat team to come arrest him".

The guy has been saying for a while they were gonna go after him, so if he was gonna flee he's had months to try. He's also 70+ years old. I don't see why they would waste the resources doing it like this.

It's weird to see how the left now views our intelligence agencies though. There was a time when this shit would have disturbed them, but now they carry water for these agencies.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You write with the grammar of someone who has had education, but it seems you are lacking in self-awareness.

There is a very good reason why we have the criminal code that we have, and why we have enjoyed perhaps the most progressive society on the face of the Earth. Please do some self-reflection. Also, understand, that society is ever-changing. The very same people who would consider me a deviant half-breed or you a criminal for being homosexual, may very well gain power one-day.

People always forget this: When you draconiaize the law, and put limitations on freedom. Sooner or later, a REAL sociopath ends up in charge, and things go to shit.

Homosexuality was illegal in this country on the federal level until 2003. You cannot educate me about Draconian laws and the danger of the wrong people in power. The fact remains that Roger Stone 1.) broke equally-applied just laws, and 2.) was not mistreated according to the letter of the law. If you disagree with that, you can work to change the law regarding his treatment, or you can challenge it in court. But what you are not going to get is an sympathy for someone who was not discriminated against or mistreated in any way, despite the fact that he deserves it.

you're acting like he's going to potentially end up in a real prison like you or i would.

wealthy people don't do b!tch time, and they rarely even lack for comfort.

martha stewart didn't whine about it like a sissygirl, and look at her now. she's got street cred and hangs with snoop dogg

^^^. Got that right.


Pretty sure he can afford a ticket out of "pound me in the ass prison", to quote Office Space.


He could even run for public office afterwards. Cons do really good at the polls.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Homosexuality was illegal in this country on the federal level until 2003.

That's wrong. Your wording implies that the US passed a law that made homosexuality legal. That's terribly dishonest and plain wrong.

What actually happened was the Supreme Court made same-sex sodomy bans (at the state level), no longer valid. Making laws illegal is not making homosexuality legal.

I assume you're referring to Lawrence v. Texas? It was a ruling against state sodomy laws. Not "federal" laws because they didn't exist.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102.ZO.html



Homosexuality was "legal" at the federal level since the US Constitution was formally ratified. Nothing at the federal level law made homosexuality illegal in civilian life.

Yeah, some gay people got killed, beat up, and mistreated in the US. Lots of them. Over many years. But you don't need to lie about your victim-hood to appear to be a bigger victim.

Adam really said homosexuality was illegal until 2003

For a guy that thinks he’s always right he sure has been wrong a lot in this thread.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Have you noticed how the left is ok with police force only used against their political opponents! Have you noticed how the right defend traitors and criminals?

If anyone is proven to be a traitor they need to be locked up.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Have you noticed how the right defend traitors and criminals?

No I haven't. They don't.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
If anyone is proven to be a traitor they need to be locked up. Yes they do.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you're acting like he's going to potentially end up in a real prison like you or i would.

wealthy people don't do b!tch time, and they rarely even lack for comfort.

martha stewart didn't whine about it like a sissygirl, and look at her now. she's got street cred and hangs with snoop dogg

Was Martha Stewart arrested in the same manner as Stone? If not, what you just said is irrelevant.

Originally posted by Deadline
No I haven't. They don't.

Yeah it's more...the left is so quick to brand people traitors. It's the same with words like nazi and fascist. They aren't thinking clearly anymore, blinded by Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Originally posted by Surtur
Was Martha Stewart arrested in the same manner as Stone? If not, what you just said is irrelevant. No it isn't. Do better

She surrendered.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
No it isn't. Do better

Yes or no was she arrested by an FBI swat team? You know she wasn't. If she was, do you think people would have said anything? I think so, especially since she's a woman.

I read the indictment again, it doesnt even hint he was a traitor to his country.

Even if he did talk to Wikileaks about John Podesta's shameful emails it doesnt make him a traitor.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
She surrendered.

And since Stone was expecting this and could easily afford bail I'm sure he would have surrendered too if they sent the word to his lawyer. "Turn yourself in to avoid a scene". Why wasn't that option given?

This makes Mueller look petty IMO.

Stones passport was also expired. He couldn't leave the country.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I read the indictment again, it doesnt even hint he was a traitor to his country.

Even if he did talk to Wikileaks about John Podesta's shameful emails it doesnt make him a traitor.

His crime is lying about something that wasn't a crime lol. That is how I understand it.

Originally posted by Surtur
And since Stone was expecting this and could easily afford bail I'm sure he would have surrendered too if they sent the word to his lawyer. "Turn yourself in to avoid a scene". Why wasn't that option given?

This makes Mueller look petty IMO. well I get where you're coming from... The far right.

Point blank, what did Stone do to betray his country?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
well I get where you're coming from... The far right.

You're a deranged leftist, no more than a rabid dog now. You can't even wrap your mind around the fact that this didn't need to be handed this way.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Point blank, what did Stone do to betray his country?

It blows the mind how this is a betrayal of the country, but using foreign spies to dig up dirt on opponents is okay lol.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Have you noticed how the right defend traitors and criminals?

They're acting like Roger Stone was gagged, beaten, and dragged out of his in leg irons, when he was charged with serious crimes and arrested without incident. Zero harm.

Same people who wanted Hillary Clinton imprisoned without trial. "Lock her up!" ad vomitum.

Originally posted by Robtard
They're acting like Roger Stone was gagged, beaten, and dragged out of his in leg irons, when he was charged with serious crimes and arrested without incident. Zero harm.

Same people who wanted Hillary Clinton imprisoned without trial. "Lock her up!" ad vomitum.

That was terrible. The larger the crowd, the more successful a dumb message is. Herd mentality is a real thing.

Well, no, as it's still used by Trumpers and not just for Hillary, they chanted that towards little ole Jeff Sessions as wells and he wasn't charged with anything except Trump's wrath.

The Left is doing it towards these indicted people like Flynn, Manafort and Stone because they've legit been charged with crimes and some have been found guilty.

I don't remember Hillary saying that. But that's also ignoring that these people have been indicted and some have either been found guilty or pleaded guilty, as noted above.

There's a clear difference between wanting a criminal to be jailed and shouting for the jailing of someone who hasn't been charged, let a lone tried.

Originally posted by Robtard
They're acting like Roger Stone was gagged, beaten, and dragged out of his in leg irons, when he was charged with serious crimes and arrested without incident. Zero harm.

Same people who wanted Hillary Clinton imprisoned without trial. "Lock her up!" ad vomitum.

Nobody acted like he was gagged and beaten that's you just pulling your same ol' stuff. The question remains: why was a swat team needed?

Originally posted by Surtur
Nobody acted like he was gagged and beaten that's you just pulling your same ol' stuff. The question remains: why was a swat team needed?

Obvious hyperbole is obvious, but people here certainly are offended over Roger Stone being arrested. Just look at the purpose of this thread.

Not sure, maybe safety precautions? Maybe dramatics? Maybe a bit of both?

The better and more relevant question: When Roger Stone (who is also a complete weasel) flips on Trump to save his own ass ala Cohen. How quickly will Trumpers flip on him?

Originally posted by Robtard
Obvious hyperbole is obvious, but people here certainly are offended over Roger Stone being arrested. Just look at the purpose of this thread.

Not sure, maybe safety precautions? Maybe dramatics? Maybe a bit of both?

The better and more relevant question: When Roger Stone (who is also a complete weasel) flips on Trump to save his own ass ala Cohen. How quickly will Trumpers flip on him?

I haven't seen anyone who said he didn't deserve to be arrested. The discussion seems to have mostly been about the way it went down, but then I can't claim to have read every single post in the thread.

Didn't even answer my question.

You are acting like there is a massive support of Roger Stone and I'm not sure why. To "flip" on him would mean a lot of people are on his side.

I'd wager leftists care more about him than Trump supporters.

Originally posted by Surtur
You are acting like there is a massive support of Roger Stone and I'm not sure why. To "flip" on him would mean a lot of people are on his side.

I'd wager leftists care more about him than Trump supporters. Probably, as rightists don't want the truth. They can't handle the truth.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Probably, as rightists don't want the truth. They can't handle the truth.

If Roger Stone can provide concrete evidence(video, audio, emails) of Trump colluding or Trump obstructing justice I'm all for it.

We aren't going to get that though.

Originally posted by Surtur
If Roger Stone can provide concrete evidence(video, audio, emails) of Trump colluding or Trump obstructing justice I'm all for it.

We aren't going to get that though. every little bit helps.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Probably, as rightists don't want the truth. They can't handle the truth.

Seems to happen whenever one of Trump's inner guys gets dinged. "Oh, who cares about *insert name*, they're nobodies; always were."

roger stone must have been yet another "coffee boy"

Originally posted by Robtard
Seems to happen whenever one of Trump's inner guys gets dinged. "Oh, who cares about *insert name*, they're nobodies; always were."

Actually what happens is someone gets dinged and you and those like you pretend Trump supporters were very much behind that person. You did it with Manafort, you're doing it with Stone.

Lots of nobodies, eh.

Originally posted by Robtard
Lots of nobodies, eh.

There is a difference between a nobody and someone Trump supporters were very much behind.

Besides Trump name a figure they put a lot of support behind that is close to him.

Flynn was the golden boy, before he wasn't

Manafort was the "Trump couldn't have done it without him" guy, before he turned cuck.

Cohen was the "he's like a son to Trump", now he's a weasel, so who cares.

Stone is Trump's "Longest advisor and good friend, right hand". Soon he'll be a ratphuck.

But sure, Trumpers never cared; let's go with that. Just waiting for Donnie Jr and/or Jared to be indicted. That'll be funny. "Trump barely knew those cucks." -Trumper npc

Originally posted by Robtard
Flynn was the golden boy, before he wasn't

Manafort was the "Trump couldn't have done it without him" guy, before he turned cuck.

Cohen was the "he's like a son to Trump", now he's a weasel, so who cares.

Stone is Trump's "Longest advisor and good friend, right hand". Soon he'll be a ratphuck.

But sure, Trumpers never cared; let's go with that. Just waiting for Donnie Jr and/or Jared to be indicted. That'll be funny. "Trump barely knew those cucks." -Trumper npc

None of those people were celebrated by Trumpers at large. Not a one of them. Prove me wrong.

Stone being important to Trump does not make him important to Trump's supporters, you get that right Rob?

LoL, there were rallies where the whole Trumper crowd went ballistic in cheering Flynn on chanting with him "Lock her up!" when he came onto Trump's campaign. But sure, another who cares unimportant nobody.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, there were rallies where the whole Trumper crowd went ballistic in cheering Flynn on chanting with him "Lock her up!" when he came onto Trump's campaign. But sure, another who cares unimportant nobody.

Most Trump supporters seem to think Flynn got a raw deal. So if you're claiming he was a golden boy he's not an example of someone they flipped on.

Anything else? Anyone else?

Maybe you should say who on team Trump matters, besides Trump? But I suspect the answer will be "no one!" Shit, I even suspect a possible future where you'll go "Meh, Trump never really mattered" at this point.

Originally posted by Robtard
Maybe you should say who on team Trump matters, besides Trump? But I suspect the answer will be "no one!" Shit, I even suspect a possible future where you'll go "Meh, Trump never really mattered" at this point.

You don't seem to be able to name anyone that mattered to Trump supporters who they then turned on.

Because everyone basically turns into a 'who cares' guy magically after they're arrested.

Guess the question in the indictment thread should be: "Who will be the next coffee boy to be indicted?" I'll ask a mod to edit.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because everyone basically turns into a 'who cares' guy magically after they're arrested.

Guess the question in the indictment thread should be: "Who will be the next coffee boy to be indicted?" I'll ask a mod to edit.

You can't prove your case, concession accepted.

I did, you ignored it.

Don't you flip out on Quan when he does that though>

Originally posted by Robtard
I did, you ignored it.

Don't you flip out on Quan when he does that though>

You did not prove your case and your concession has been accepted.

I can imagine the conversation now, so Rog you get that tramp tat of "The Donald" and pardons are incoming (it has to be twice as big as your nixon tatoo!)

Originally posted by snowdragon
I can imagine the conversation now, so Rog you get that tramp tat of "The Donald" and pardons are incoming (it has to be twice as big as your nixon tatoo!)

He's getting "TrumpLife" tatted on his chest.

Originally posted by Surtur
He's getting "TrumpLife" tatted on his chest.

Just imagine Roger Stone in place of 2pac.

41qC3w3UUkU

Originally posted by Robtard
I did, you ignored it.

Don't you flip out on Quan when he does that though>

where is quan? did he leave us?

*dances* take money, take money

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
where is quan? did he leave us?

He's been known to go AWOL for a month or two. I'm very confident he'll be back to terrorize Surtur in 30days or less.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's been known to go AWOL for a month or two. I'm very confident he'll be back to terrorize Surtur in 30days or less.

Terrorize? I legit had dude posting whiny topics trying to get me to acknowledge him. I hope he comes back. He needs my attention it seems.

Come on now, you run from Quan.

Originally posted by Robtard
Come on now, you run from Quan.

No, I found him useless and he couldn't take being ignored. He followed me around constantly.

You even yourself know he's best ignored.

I don't ignore Quan doh...

Originally posted by Surtur
None of those people were celebrated by Trumpers at large. Not a one of them. Prove me wrong.

Stone being important to Trump does not make him important to Trump's supporters, you get that right Rob?

Yea I gotta say I think the only one Trump supporters weren't too keen on was Cohen. I think a lot of Trump supporters at least like Flynn and Stone.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because everyone basically turns into a 'who cares' guy magically after they're arrested.

Guess the question in the indictment thread should be: "Who will be the next coffee boy to be indicted?" I'll ask a mod to edit.

What's your point anyway? People got arrested so they're guilty?

Correct, if arrested, must be guilty.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Correct, if arrested, must be guilty.

What I'm trying to figure out is if they colluded with Russia why did Roger Stone have to try to reach out to Russia to ask about wikileaks?

Being arrested doesn't mean one is guilty, obviously. Don't be so silly, people.

Though I do recall that a certain candidate in 2016, despite being investigated and cleared multiples times, was effectively "I don't care, she's guilty!" in the Trumpersphere.

Originally posted by Robtard
Being arrested doesn't mean one is guilty, obviously. Don't be so silly, people.

Though I do recall that a certain candidate in 2016, despite being investigated and cleared multiples times, was effectively "I don't care, she's guilty!" in the Trumpersphere.

Um Comey proved she was guilty on live TV but just didn't want to arrest her because she was too powerful he even stated that if anybody else did it they would be arrested.

Cuz it's still funny:

https://i.imgur.com/QpJ3alE.jpg

This is why a small part of me wants Clinton to run in 2020, though not get far. Just to have a hilarious recap of the frothing "But Benghazi!", "But her emails!" all over again.

Originally posted by Surtur
What I'm trying to figure out is if they colluded with Russia why did Roger Stone have to try to reach out to Russia to ask about wikileaks?

The information Stone received was already public before he got it, that's what's funny.

Originally posted by Robtard


This is why a small part of me wants Clinton to run in 2020, though not get far. Just to have a hilarious recap of the frothing "But Benghazi!", "But her emails!" all over again.

If you dont want anyone to care about her illegally deleted emails, why do you care about wikileaks emails from Podesta?

The right is playing the "overkill" card to the hilt.


An easy card to play, as asking why they went to such lengths when arresting the man are natural questions. Was he a flight risk? A danger? Is this posturing for the public, or an intimidation tactic?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
If you dont want anyone to care about her illegally deleted emails, why do you care about wikileaks emails from Podesta?

I want you to care, as i said, would be funny to have that recapped again. Even though it never really went away fully as Trump still occasionally drops it. So yes, bring back "But her emails!" and "Benghazi!" in full frothing glory while ignoring that Trump's circumventing proper protocols in getting top security clearance for his shady friends and family members.

But the left has been doing the same thing about Podesta's emails saying that because Wikileaks released them, that makes Trump a traitor to his country.

It's absolutely nuts.

At least her emails were state property and subject to government records acts and laws. Podesta's emails were the equivalent of high school gossip and dirty laundry being aired out.

Originally posted by cdtm
The right is playing the "overkill" card to the hilt.


An easy card to play, as asking why they went to such lengths when arresting the man are natural questions. Was he a flight risk? A danger? Is this posturing for the public, or an intimidation tactic? Don't they always when it's one of there own?

Originally posted by cdtm
The right is playing the "overkill" card to the hilt.


An easy card to play, as asking why they went to such lengths when arresting the man are natural questions. Was he a flight risk? A danger? Is this posturing for the public, or an intimidation tactic?

It saddens me that it's the right and not "any rational thinking person". Cuz really everybody should feel this was overkill. I have yet to see a sane rational argument as to why it's not. And "it's legally allowed" is not a good argument considering all the shit that is legally allowed that the left throws a fit over(child separation was legally allowed, deporting anyone here illegally is legally allowed)

Roger Stone was not a flight risk. If he was a danger he wouldn't have been granted bail. This was purely political.

And how the narrative keeps being pushed: "the real story isn't if Roger Stone is a criminal and who cares about the list of charges and what it could mean, but were there too many agents there to arrest him, that's the real story!"

LoL @ Trumpers.

Originally posted by Robtard
And how the narrative keeps being pushed: "the real story isn't if Roger Stone is a criminal and who cares about the list of charges and what it could mean, but were there too many agents there to arrest him, that's the real story!"

LoL @ Trumpers.

I'm guessing this is the closest you'll ever be capable of getting to admitting "maybe this wasn't handled very well". Okay.

Originally posted by Robtard
And how the narrative keeps being pushed: "the real story isn't if Roger Stone is a criminal and who cares about the list of charges and what it could mean, but were there too many agents there to arrest him, that's the real story!"

LoL @ Trumpers.

You don't see the difference between everyone in the Clinton Investigation being brought in, giving full immunity, taking the 5th in front of Congress.


vs

FBI swat teams raiding peoples homes?

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm guessing this is the closest you'll ever be capable of getting to admitting "maybe this wasn't handled very well". Okay.

Fact: Roger Stone was arrested without incident and without injury to himself or others around him.

So if you want me to clutch pearls because too many cops showed up. I can't, you people have already clutched all the pearls.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fact: Roger Stone was arrested without incident and without injury to himself or others around him.

So if you want me to clutch pearls because too many cops should up. I can't, you people have already clutched all the pearls.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fact: Roger Stone was arrested without incident and without injury to himself or others around him.

So if you want me to clutch pearls because too many cops should up. I can't, you people have already clutched all the pearls.

^Still can't be a man and admit what went down wasn't needed. Okie dokie.

Originally posted by Putinbot1


I'm just waiting until he turns states evidence and then these same "But there were too many cops!" defenders will throw the weasel Roger Stone under the Cuck-Bus while Trump is driving it.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm just waiting until he turns states evidence and then these same "But there were too many cops!" defenders will throw the weasel Roger Stone under the Cuck-Bus while Trump is driving it. it's what they do every time.

Originally posted by Surtur
^Still can't be a man and admit what went down wasn't needed. Okie dokie.

I said too many cops showed up. He wasn't hurt though and nothing happened, So how long are you going to cling to this nothing burger?

Answer: Until Stone flips and then he'll be just another cuck traitor to the Cult.

How did stone betray America though?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
it's what they do every time.

Every time, m8

Originally posted by Robtard
I said too many cops showed up. He wasn't hurt though and nothing happened, So how long are you going to cling to this nothing burger?

Answer: Until Stone flips and then he'll be just another cuck traitor to the Cult.

Then stop whining like a b*tch over people pointing out this was poorly handed. Nobody has suggested if he committed a crime the way he was arrested somehow negates it. What are you complaining over?

Still can't get anyone to answer how Stone betrayed America.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Still can't get anyone to answer how Stone betrayed America.

They won't. Just like they will never explain how Trump was colluding with Russia, yet Stone had to reach out to ask them about wikileaks.

Originally posted by Surtur
Then stop whining like a b*tch over people pointing out this was poorly handed. Nobody has suggested if he committed a crime the way he was arrested somehow negates it. What are you complaining over?

The classic reversal of blame. I'm the one losing my shit here, not you and the rest flipping over Roger Stone being arrested and nothing bad happened during. Neat!

Originally posted by Robtard
The classic reversal of blame. I'm the one losing my shit here, not you and the rest flipping over Roger Stone being arrested and nothing bad happened during. Neat!

Oh Rob, this post was epic. Top notch.

Originally posted by Robtard
The classic reversal of blame. I'm the one losing my shit here, not you and the rest flipping over Roger Stone being arrested and nothing bad happened during. Neat! As usual m8!

Originally posted by Surtur
They won't. Just like they will never explain how Trump was colluding with Russia, yet Stone had to reach out to ask them about wikileaks.

Been telling you this for almost two years now, Surt. But you might want to stop insisting that Trump never colluded until the investigation is over. As you never really know.

In the chance it turns out to be true, you're going to have to do a whole lot of backpedaling and flips.

Wont you have to do the same though Rob if it turns out he didnt?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Wont you have to do the same though Rob if it turns out he didnt?

Just look at how they cope with how Trump is handling Venezuela lol. They don't know what to make of it cuz it shatters the "Trump is Putin's puppet" narrative.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Wont you have to do the same though Rob if it turns out he didnt?

No. Cos I never said Trump colluded as fact. I've been waiting for the investigation to finish like a normal person.

Originally posted by Robtard
No. Cos I never said Trump colluded as fact. I've been waiting for the investigation to finish like a normal person. As have we all.

Originally posted by Robtard
No. Cos I never said Trump colluded as fact. I've been waiting for the investigation to finish like a normal person.

Oh no you won't weasel out lol. You accused Trump of sending missiles to Syria to distract from Russia.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As have we all. Though it's uncanny how correct StoptheHate keeps being proven a soothsayer with each indictment.

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh no you won't weasel out lol. You accused Trump of sending missiles to Syria to distract from Russia.

That's not collusion. That's to distract from an unfavorable press cycle. Seriously, are you mental?

Originally posted by Robtard
That's not collusion. That's to distract from an unfavorable press cycle. Seriously, are you mental?

Lol that's how you're gonna spin it? Okay.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's not collusion. That's to distract from an unfavorable press cycle. Seriously, are you mental? Answer... honestly, yes Surt probably is mental. With his life how could he not be?

Originally posted by Robtard
No. Cos I never said Trump colluded as fact. I've been waiting for the investigation to finish like a normal person.

So you have never said Trump colluded with Russia?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you have never said Trump colluded with Russia? I think it's quite possible, let's wait to see if he definitely has though.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you have never said Trump colluded with Russia?

Remember: Rob waited like a normal person for proof before he accused Trump of firing missiles at Syria to distract from Russia. Honest he did.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you have never said Trump colluded with Russia?

My stance has been that I don't know (though I do suspect with how Trump acts and with all these indictments) and am waiting for the investigation to be over.

Also said from the start that I will also accept Mueller's findings regardless of where they land towards Trump. Meaning if Trump is cleared, so be it, lets move on.

Ok

Originally posted by Surtur
Remember: Rob waited like a normal person for proof before he accused Trump of firing missiles at Syria to distract from Russia. Honest he did.

The proof is your eyes, Surt. The Russia probe was in a very loud and unfavorable cycle right at the time Trump fired missiles that basically do nothing to Syria. Planes flew from that very same "destroyed" airstrip a couple days later.

The missile strike shifted the focus away for a bit, so it worked.

Originally posted by Robtard
The proof is your eyes, Surt. The Russia probe was in a very loud and unfavorable cycle right at the time Trump fired missiles that basically do nothing to Syria. Planes flew from that very same "destroyed" airstrip a couple days later.

The missile strike shifted the focus away for a bit, so it worked.

You have no evidence, do better.

Originally posted by Robtard
The proof is your eyes, Surt. The Russia probe was in a very loud and unfavorable cycle right at the time Trump fired missiles that basically do nothing to Syria. Planes flew from that very same "destroyed" airstrip a couple days later.

The missile strike shifted the focus away for a bit, so it worked.

Originally posted by Surtur
You have no evidence, do better.

^ Literally from the guy who said he believed every single ridiculous Clinton smear.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Literally from the guy who said he believed every single ridiculous Clinton smear. Surt asking anyone to "do better", I suppose he might be Fly's superior at something.