Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Now both state executives are under fire. One for blackface, one for sexual assault.

NYT

Both should step down and a new election should take place. Too much drama to effectively govern.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Now both state executives are under fire. One for blackface, one for sexual assault.

NYT

Both should step down and a new election should take place. Too much drama to effectively govern.

Notice the difference in treatment:

Washington Post Refused To Run Sketchy Sex Assault Allegation Against A Democrat. They Ran Several Against Brett Kavanaugh.

The gang rape on a boat was pretty ridiculous. The fact anyone believed that just shows how far they are willing to reach to believe anything and everything.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The gang rape on a boat was pretty ridiculous. The fact anyone believed that just shows how far they are willing to reach to believe anything and everything.

He needs to receive the full Kavanaugh treatment. I'm waiting for Democrats to call for investigations.

Republicans shouldn't demand Democrats act in a manner they refuse to dothemselves. Looks silly.

The left is crying about the "suspicious timing" of this. Lol you just can't make this up. Brett Kavanaugh says hi.

Does it look as silly as Democrats refusing to act in a manner they demand Republicans act?

Originally posted by Robtard
Republicans shouldn't demand Democrats act in a manner they refuse to dothemselves. Looks silly.

They are demanding Democrats act in the manner they...acted like just a few months ago with Kavanaugh.

LOL get this guy some security though...Liam Neeson is out there and he's waiting.

Originally posted by Surtur
Notice the difference in treatment:

Washington Post Refused To Run Sketchy Sex Assault Allegation Against A Democrat. They Ran Several Against Brett Kavanaugh.
Not really?

I googled "Washington Post Justin Fairfax"; they ran a story of the allegations of sexual assault.

Fairfax is also threatening to sue The Washington Post over it. Justin Fairfax says Washington Post 'smeared' him by reporting sexual-assault allegations, threatens legal action

Originally posted by Silent Master
Does it look as silly as Democrats refusing to act in a manner they demand Republicans act?

"No you!"

Originally posted by Robtard
Not really?

I googled "Washington Post Justin Fairfax"; they ran a story of the allegations of sexual assault.

Fairfax is also threatening to sue The Washington Post over it. Justin Fairfax says Washington Post 'smeared' him by reporting sexual-assault allegations, threatens legal action

"Vanessa Tyson claims Fairfax sexually assaulted her at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, MA, when the Lt. Gov. was a campaign staffer. Fairfax has denied the accusation, pointing out that The Washington Post was made aware of the accusation around the time Fairfax was inaugurated a year ago, but the outlet investigated the claim and declined to run it."

Anything else?

So they didn't run the story fast enough, this is your gripe? Lolz.

Originally posted by Robtard
So they didn't run the story fast enough, this is your gripe? Lolz.

I'm merely observing the difference in treatment.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Does it look as silly as Democrats refusing to act in a manner they demand Republicans act?

This is the crux of what I have been saying for a while

Your most important point is a "No you!". Come on, now.

he's wealthy, so he's allowed to do that. isn't that what y'all brosplained to us in 2016 with the whole pussy-grabbing thing?

The side that supports porn stars crying about having sex with Trump doesn't have the wherewithal to be outraged about "grab by the *****"

Originally posted by Robtard
Your most important point is a "No you!". Come on, now.

Huh?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
he's wealthy, so he's allowed to do that. isn't that what y'all brosplained to us in 2016 with the whole pussy-grabbing thing?

What was said is that he said "they let". He was saying, in a vulgar way, that women let rich guys get away with shit like that.

Originally posted by Surtur
What was said is that he said "they let". He was saying, in a vulgar way, that women let rich guys get away with shit like that.

I guess they have never seen Dan Bliztarians life.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The side that supports porn stars crying about having sex with Trump doesn't have the wherewithal to be outraged about "grab by the *****"

Huh?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The side that supports porn stars crying about having sex with Trump doesn't have the wherewithal to be outraged about "grab by the *****"

I have not seen any democrats calling for an investigation. Yet they were calling for Kavanaugh to be investigated even before people knew the identity of his accuser.

I will give one kudos to the Fairfax accuser: at least she knows where the incident happened.

That is because all Leftists are Lying Hypocrites.

See anything Robbie says as an example.

The Left can literally commit Murder and get a pass on it now.

Let me guess, he's another rightist?

Originally posted by Surtur
What was said is that he said "they let". He was saying, in a vulgar way, that women let rich guys get away with shit like that. because clearly ALL women behave like that... ... ... hang on
... wtf!

Originally posted by Putinbot1
because clearly ALL women behave like that... ... ... hang on
... wtf!

No, not all. But a ton.


Where I grew up as a lad and young man, it was rich white people-ville. Children talk about the things their rich, well-off fathers/parents do. Beating wives and psychopathic controlling behaviors seem to happen a lot.

Rich white-people-villes have some secrets.

People need to look up Dan Blizarian

Originally posted by Putinbot1
because clearly ALL women behave like that... ... ... hang on
... wtf!

sad isn't it?

Sadly society is engineered that whoever has the most money gets to do whatever they want

Originally posted by Putinbot1
because clearly ALL women behave like that... ... ... hang on
... wtf!

Who said all women behave this way? Quote it.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
sad isn't it? Very, very sad.

So no, can't quote anyone saying that, thought so.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, not all. But a ton.


Where I grew up as a lad and young man, it was rich white people-ville. Children talk about the things their rich, well-off fathers/parents do. Beating wives and psychopathic controlling behaviors seem to happen a lot.

Rich white-people-villes have some secrets. You see, everyone has relationships where they do stupid things most normal people move on and let things go before they get like that.

Still waiting on that quote.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Now both state executives are under fire. One for blackface, one for sexual assault.

NYT

Both should step down and a new election should take place. Too much drama to effectively govern.

I agree. Trump and Pence should resign and a new election should take place. There is too much drama around them to effectively govern.

Remember when Trump ran with the premise, "We cannot afford to elect someone who will be under federal investigation"? I do.

^

Whataboutism

Originally posted by Silent Master
^

Whataboutism

You gotta remember the rules though. Whataboutism is okay when it's leftists going "But Bush!" or "But Trump!" as they currently do. It's not okay for anyone else to do it.

Trump wasn't the only Republican who voiced such concerns, the 'we can't afford to have a sitting President under investigation', but he was certainly the loudest about it:

'His own remarks Wednesday morning in Miami, which included an extended riff on "dishonesty" in journalism and more "Lock her up!" chants from supporters, focused largely on Clinton, whom he attacked as corrupt while pointing to new WikiLeaks revelations and declaring the FBI investigation into her use of a private email server to be "the biggest scandal since Watergate."

Trump predicted that Clinton's election would bring "an unprecedented and protracted constitutional crisis" because of the looming investigation and suggested Americans would not want to endure a second Clinton administration marred by scandal. -snip

And then the numerous times at his rallies where he said a President under investigation wouldn't be able to properly govern.

So again, why ask the Democrats to do something you're unwilling to hold your own party too?

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump wasn't the only Republican who voiced such concerns, the 'we can't afford to have a sitting President under investigation', but he was certainly the loudest about it:

'His own remarks Wednesday morning in Miami, which included an extended riff on "dishonesty" in journalism and more "Lock her up!" chants from supporters, focused largely on Clinton, whom he attacked as corrupt while pointing to new WikiLeaks revelations and declaring the FBI investigation into her use of a private email server to be "the biggest scandal since Watergate."

Trump predicted that Clinton's election would bring "an unprecedented and protracted constitutional crisis" because of the looming investigation and suggested Americans would not want to endure a second Clinton administration marred by scandal. -snip



And then the numerous times at his rallies where he said a President under investigation wouldn't be able to properly govern.

Sounds like they changed their minds. Sort of like how Obama changed his mind about gay marriage.

Your Red Herring has been noted, Surt. They didn't change their minds though, the scandal in VA is ongoing.

Repeat: So again, why ask the Democrats to do something you're unwilling to hold your own party too?

Originally posted by Silent Master
^

Whataboutism

It's not whataboutism to ensure that BrolyBlack's new standard for politicians is equally-applied. It's almost like showing the logical extension of his position might have consequences he does not like.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It's not whataboutism to ensure that BrolyBlack's new standard for politicians is equally-applied. It's almost like showing the logical extension of his position might have consequences he does not like.

You tried to deflect the conversation by bringing up other people's actions. it's the definition of whataboutism.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It's not whataboutism to ensure that BrolyBlack's new standard for politicians is equally-applied. It's almost like showing the logical extension of his position might have consequences he does not like. SilentMaster doesn't understand whataboutism it seems. Though his ultimate goal is to distract away from the valid point you made with time-waster-troll tactics. His Go-To.

If it isn't the cheerleader.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You tried to deflect the conversation by bringing up other people's actions. it's the definition of whataboutism.

But I did not deflect from their actions. To the contrary, I agreed with BrolyBlack's assessment of their actions, and I raised him another set to be judged similarly.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
But I did not deflect from their actions. To the contrary, I agreed with BrolyBlack's assessment of their actions, and I raised him another set to be judged similarly.

LOL!!!

Originally posted by Robtard
Trump wasn't the only Republican who voiced such concerns, the 'we can't afford to have a sitting President under investigation', but he was certainly the loudest about it:

'His own remarks Wednesday morning in Miami, which included an extended riff on "dishonesty" in journalism and more "Lock her up!" chants from supporters, focused largely on Clinton, whom he attacked as corrupt while pointing to new WikiLeaks revelations and declaring the FBI investigation into her use of a private email server to be "the biggest scandal since Watergate."

Trump predicted that Clinton's election would bring "an unprecedented and protracted constitutional crisis" because of the looming investigation and suggested Americans would not want to endure a second Clinton administration marred by scandal. -snip

And then the numerous times at his rallies where he said a President under investigation wouldn't be able to properly govern.

So again, why ask the Democrats to do something you're unwilling to hold your own party too?

"The President was never under investigation."

James Comey

Yes. Trump is more the Victim of Witch Hunts then any Actual Investigation.

Originally posted by Robtard
SilentMaster doesn't understand whataboutism it seems. Though his ultimate goal is to distract away from the valid point you made with time-waster-troll tactics. His Go-To. S and M and Surt simply are not that bright.

^
Tactic 103 from their playbook

Originally posted by Putinbot1
S and M and Surt simply are not that bright.

Unsubstantiated and biased claim.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Unsubstantiated and biased claim. oh, Fly is clearly also not bright at all.

I am Burning Bright! Lime Green Bright!

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
"The President was never under investigation."

James Comey

Mueller is investigating Trump as part of his scope. It's a Federal investigation.

Also this week: "Judge Andrew Napolitano said Tuesday that a New York federal probe is looking into whether unlawful foreign donations were made to President Trump's inaugural committee.

Federal prosecutors separate from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team issued a subpoena for documents Monday." -snip

Oh gawd, more investigations to lead to no where? You do know a person making an illegal donation has nothing to do with Trump right?

How many times have we heard that type of accusation over the last 2 years now?

Trump should really start to SUE each of the people behind these "Investigations" because each and every one of them is a WITCH HUNT!

Every time it is a NOTHING BURGER!

I should sue Robbie for pushing his Lies with Every post he makes.

Robbie is a Lying Tard.

Period.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Oh gawd, more investigations to lead to no where? As I often tell, Surt. You might want to wait until they're over; especially the Mueller probe, before declaring victories.

Robbie is such a PHUCKING HYPOCRITE!

He tells Surt that While HE HIMSELF claims Victory at just the announcement of ANOTHER False Investigation.

Robbie is a Hypocritical Lying Bastard.

Originally posted by Robtard
As I often tell, Surt. You might want to wait until they're over; especially the Mueller probe, before declaring victories.

How else do I say it, I don't care about these investigations Rob. Its a waste of time.

To the Left a Lying Smear Campaign is NEVER a Waste of Time.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
How else do I say it, I don't care about these investigations Rob. Its a waste of time. We'll see m8.

Been a waste of time for the last 2 years so...

Lol this story just got better: the accuser has now hired the same team of lawyers Christine Blasey Ford used.

Sounds like a modern day lynching.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Sounds like a modern day lynching.

I'm very curious how Democrats are gonna handle this lol.

It's hilarious.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm very curious how Democrats are gonna handle this lol.

Have they attacked the accuser like Republicans attacked BlaseyFord? If not, they're already handling it better

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Robbie is such a PHUCKING HYPOCRITE!

He tells Surt that While HE HIMSELF claims Victory at just the announcement of ANOTHER False Investigation.

Robbie is a Hypocritical Lying Bastard.

Having a bad day, cupcake? Perhaps consider signing out of KMC, drink some hot chocolate, take a poop, take a nap, and contemplate getting in better shape.

Originally posted by Robtard
Have they attacked the accuser like Republicans attacked BlaseyFord? If not, they're already handling it better

And Robbie Lies Again!

It gets better, Faifax lied and tried to say WaPo didn't publish the story when they got it cuz they found many red flags and inconsistencies. WaPo pushed back and said that wasn't true, that the reality was they couldn't confirm it either way...but they found no red flags or inconsistencies. Dayum.

Motherf*cker thought he was ascending a few days ago, womp womp.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Having a bad day, cupcake? Perhaps consider signing out of KMC, drink some hot chocolate, take a poop, take a nap, and contemplate getting in better shape.

Says the "Guy" with a Big Cake of Death in his Sig Pic.


Looks like the one needing to get the POOP out aint Me!

Originally posted by Silent Master
You tried to deflect the conversation by bringing up other people's actions. it's the definition of whataboutism.

This is another thing they do. When you call them on their shit they always pretend like "no I wasn't doing it, see I was right to bring it up cuz...".

They never pull whataboutism or hypocrisy or anything like that, it's always different, cuz reasons.

Trumpers be like:

Kavanaugh accused = He's innocent, it's a smear tactic!

Fairfax accused = He's guilty!

Weird, it's almost like if the accused is a Black man and/or a Democrat, there's a separate set of standards

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Been a waste of time for the last 2 years so... it doesn't work like that Fly, but you know that...

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers be like:

Kavanaugh accused = He's innocent, it's a smear tactic!

Fairfax accused = He's guilty!

Weird, it's almost like if the accused is a Black man and/or a Democrat, there's a separate set of standards

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers be like:

Kavanaugh accused = He's innocent, it's a smear tactic!

Fairfax accused = He's guilty!

Weird, it's almost like if the accused is a Black man and/or a Democrat, there's a separate set of standards

I never said he's guilty, I said he should receive the full Kavanaugh treatment. Don't let that stop you from playing the race card though

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers be like:

Kavanaugh accused = He's innocent, it's a smear tactic!

Fairfax accused = He's guilty!

Weird, it's almost like if the accused is a Black man and/or a Democrat, there's a separate set of standards
Tbh, I'm mainly laughing at the media's inconsistency here. I don't think this guy's career should be ruined because of this unsubstantiated accusation.

And honestly, despite how much of a piece of shit the governor is, I don't think the photo is grounds for him to resign either. I'm not a fan of this dig up shit people said/did decades ago to smear them for it game even though it would be politically expedient for me to play into it now.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Tbh, I'm mainly laughing at the media's inconsistency here. I don't think this guy's career should be ruined because of this unsubstantiated accusation.

And honestly, despite how much of a piece of shit the governor is, I don't think the photo is grounds for him to resign either. I'm not a fan of this dig up shit people said/did decades ago to smear them for it game even though it would be politically expedient for me to play into it now.

Yeah...people aren't saying he's guilty. They are jokingly saying "believe all women".

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers be like:

Kavanaugh accused = He's innocent, it's a smear tactic!

Fairfax accused = He's guilty!

Weird, it's almost like if the accused is a Black man and/or a Democrat, there's a separate set of standards

I literally just said it sounds like a modern day lynching.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I literally just said it sounds like a modern day lynching.

You're the one Trumper exception, buddy. How you've grown.

Originally posted by Surtur
I never said he's guilty,

I said he should receive the full Kavanaugh treatment. Don't let that stop you from playing the race card though

Your generally attitude and outlook on life says otherwise.

But if you felt Kavanaugh was truly innocent and got a raw deal, why would you want someone else to get similar? Explain.

We are all apart of the problem. The rush to judgment on both sides is sickening.

Agreed, but with Surt it's not about that.

From his point-of-view Surt seems to want a man who he believes is innocent (like Kavanaugh) to get screwed over, just because he's a Democrat.

There is an ocean between what Kav was accused of and this.

Gang rape, on boats and parties, and worse. Many people on this very forum were willing to believe the most vile from a slime lawyer like Avenatti.

Everyone now wants their political enemies to be guilty of the worse crimes known to man, facts be damned. Innocent till proven guilty be dammed.

Originally posted by Robtard
Agreed, but with Surt it's not about that.

From his point-of-view Surt seems to want a man who he believes is innocent (like Kavanaugh) to get screwed over, just because he's a Democrat. Its who Surt is, he is as damaged as the frog I the frog and the Scorpion, being a pro victim he sees all people he doesn't agree with as enemies.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Oh gawd, more investigations to lead to no where?

37 indictments and 4 guilty pleas to date is "nowhere"?




Originally posted by BrolyBlack
How else do I say it, I don't care about these investigations Rob. Its a waste of time.

https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/nothing_to_see_here_naked_gun.gif

Well, your boy is still in the White House.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
37 indictments and 4 guilty pleas to date is "nowhere"?

https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/nothing_to_see_here_naked_gun.gif

Mueller's face when he hears that marching order being pushed

https://kwtri4b8r0ep8ho61118ipob-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/40998130765_6eaf021560_o.jpg

Originally posted by Robtard
Your generally attitude and outlook on life says otherwise.

But if you felt Kavanaugh was truly innocent and got a raw deal, why would you want someone else to get similar? Explain.

Cuz I'd find it funny. Seeing democrats get strung up by their own rules makes me laugh.

Yeah, your morals are really ****ed up; becoming a Trumper really broke you.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, your morals are really ****ed up; becoming a Trumper really broke you.

LOL! You guys will blame Trump for anything.

I don't think people like Surtur are the people who have been broken by Trump...

If you think his morals are ****ed up for finding it funny, I can only imagine what you think of the Democrats since it's them being held to their standards he finds funny.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I don't think people like Surtur are the people who have been broken by Trump...

He thinks Fairfax is innocent but wants him to receive treatment he feels is wrong on the grounds that he's a Democrat so he deserves it. Surt was not like this before jumping on the Trump train.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you think his morals are ****ed up for finding it funny, I can only imagine what you think of the Democrats since it's them being held to their standards he finds funny.
^
#whiteknighting
#cheerleading

Originally posted by Robtard
He thinks Fairfax is innocent but wants him to receive treatment he feels is wrong on the grounds that he's a Democrat so he deserves it. Surt was not like this before jumping on the Trump train.

You're so mad and blaming Trump. I'd have found this funny no matter what. You guys are getting roasted by your own rules this week.

No, I'm not going to feel sympathy for any of you. I'm gonna laugh. Tee hee. Hehehehe.

Originally posted by Robtard
^
#whiteknighting
#cheerleading

Who exactly was I white-knighting or cheerleading for? seeing as nothing in that post was defending anyone or their arguments.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Everyone now wants their political enemies to be guilty of the worse crimes known to man, facts be damned. Innocent till proven guilty be dammed.

Yup, the court of public opinion is able to drown out facts before everything is on the table then of course since public opinion drives political action we can see the crap chain of events like a mini nuclear explosion in peoples lives.

Originally posted by Surtur
You're so mad and blaming Trump. I'd have found this funny no matter what. You guys are getting roasted by your own rules this week.

No, I'm not going to feel sympathy for any of you. I'm gonna laugh. Tee hee. Hehehehe.

^ Broken by Trump sad

Originally posted by Silent Master
Who exactly was I white-knighting or cheerleading for? seeing as nothing in that post was defending anyone or their arguments.

You responded and didn't agree with him. In Rob's world that's white knighting. Forgive him though...he's really upset over this situation.

Sort of like how you're labeled a Trumper.

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Broken by Trump sad

https://media.giphy.com/media/KDNVWB8sOZ2nK/giphy.gif

Now he's laughing at himself. Weird.

Originally posted by Robtard
Now he's laughing at himself. Weird.

Laughing at your triggered responses.

https://i.imgur.com/tx42ruT.png

^ When you know Surt knows he's lost the argument and the narrative, that old meme comes out.

Lol oh shit the accuser is also a Stanford researcher. So she's more than likely a leftist herself.

I wonder how well her hippocampus has held up...

Originally posted by Robtard
^ When you know Surt knows he's lost the argument and the narrative, that old meme comes out.

We were arguing? About what?

Originally posted by Surtur


I wonder how well her hippocampus has held up...

giggity

Innocent till proven guilty in my book. Of coarse this standard will never be applied to anyone who’s not a democrat

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Innocent till proven guilty in my book. Of coarse this standard will never be applied to anyone who’s not a democrat

It's unfortunate your book is different from the book the Democrats use.

It's also funny.

Why arnt Dems demanding his impeachment though since they don’t beleive in innocent till proven guilty.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why arnt Dems demanding his impeachment though since they don’t beleive in innocent till proven guilty.

They know they can't just ask for one of these guys to go...it would have to be all of them. Yet if all of them go it seems a Republican would then be in charge.

It's still funny to me this Fairfax guy was getting all ready...thinking he was gonna be elevated to the governors office, lmao.

And the AG thought he was going to be Lt Gov which is why he called for his resignation.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
And the AG thought he was going to be Lt Gov which is why he called for his resignation.

Lmao his explanation for why he's not resigning is gonna be interesting.

Didn't realize the women who is accusing him is also black. I take back my comment about it being a lynching.

I just love it, the democrats were all excited "we gonna have a black man! 2nd black man in history to hold this position!" and there is a rule in Virginia where a governor can only have one term, so since this wouldn't technically be Fairfax's first term, they were glad cuz they could have had a democrat as governor for the next 6-7 years.

Womp womp, that's gone.

And I guarantee you the reason they went after Northam so hard to resign is cuz a black guy could replace him for potentially 6-7 years, they get a dem in power for a long time and the diversity points they crave. Notice they aren't going as hard after the AG to resign? Cuz his resignation gets them nothing.

There are more shoes to drop

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
There are more shoes to drop

Lol and remember the standard they set: just 1 week for an investigation isn't enough. It wasn't enough for Kavanaugh.

Broly you wanna laugh? Lol:

https://casbs.stanford.edu/people/vanessa-tyson

Read what she researches, LMFAO!

"Vanessa Tyson will use her fellowship year to research the politics and policies surrounding sexual violence against women and children in the United States. More specifically, she will explore political discourse surrounding sexual assault, corresponding policies, and the unique identities of sexual assault survivors."

Dem congressman told by accuser a year ago that Fairfax had '#MeToo allegation.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/07/politics/vanessa-tyson-bobby-scott-allegations/index.html

Originally posted by Surtur
Broly you wanna laugh? Lol:

https://casbs.stanford.edu/people/vanessa-tyson

Read what she researches, LMFAO!

"Vanessa Tyson will use her fellowship year to research the politics and policies surrounding sexual violence against women and children in the United States. More specifically, she will explore political discourse surrounding sexual assault, corresponding policies, and the unique identities of sexual assault survivors."

"Vanessa Tyson will use her fellowship year to research the politics and policies surrounding sexual violence against women and children in the United States. More specifically, she will explore political discourse surrounding sexual assault, corresponding policies, and the unique identities of sexual assault survivors."

What a shame

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Dem congressman told by accuser a year ago that Fairfax had '#MeToo allegation.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/07/politics/vanessa-tyson-bobby-scott-allegations/index.html

#BelieveSurvivors

Surt right now:

https://i.imgflip.com/2t3sjg.jpg

*crowd laughs*

Originally posted by Robtard
Surt right now:

https://i.imgflip.com/2t3sjg.jpg

*crowd laughs*

It's funny you just essentially described the situation Democrats are in. There's that famous leftist projection

Yea that backfired on him

Lol yeah.

Anyways here is what I think the Dems should do...assuming the law in Virginia allows them: First the Lt. Governor should resign. Then Northam should appoint a new Lt. Governor(this is the part where I'm not sure if the law lets him). Then the AG resigns and then Northam resigns.

It gives them a way to get rid of everyone without putting a Republican in power, but it depends on Northam being able to appoint a new Lt. gov.

He should resign if the accusations are true. He should be thrown in prison if they're true, actually.

Originally posted by MythLord
He should resign if the accusations are true. He should be thrown in prison if they're true, actually.

At this point it's gonna come down to who you choose to believe. This isn't like Kavanaugh since Fairfax admits to an encounter with her, he just claims the entire thing was consensual.

It was just the two of them in his room, so if he is indeed guilty the only way we'll truly know is if he admits it. Unless someone hid a camera in the room he was staying in.

Its ok. The Left are busy at work to replace the Black Man with the Brown Man.

So Go ahead and Push that WHAMMIN Button!

Has there been any case on the state level in recent years where multiple politicians have had scandals (in the same party), that threatened to upend multiple members of a cabinet? Interesting situation

Nope

For me personally I've already chosen who I believe. It wasn't a hard choice and skin color doesn't enter into it, hell both are the same race. So far no evidence has been presented to show the sexual assault took place.

My point is that for those who are saying they wanna wait for more info...IMO there won't be much more unless there was a hidden camera in his room. Otherwise it will be he said/she said.

I was laughing at the meme because I have no idea where you found it. But it really is your current delima. I don’t feel bad for anyone. I’ve runs in me veins.

Did he PM again screaming "Stop laughing at Rob's post!"?

Originally posted by Robtard
Did he PM again screaming "Stop laughing at Rob's post!"?

You're so paranoid Rob. I've never PM'ed anyone to ask them not to laugh at your posts lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
It's funny you just essentially described the situation Democrats are in. There's that famous leftist projection



To be fair though I hope we don't get a lecture on liking beer.

https://media.giphy.com/media/2jMfStzGj2W3KnvBeZ/giphy.gif

The Kavanaugh hearing.
Saturday Night Live.

Again, gotta love...

Entire skits mocking Brett Kavanaugh and people calling him a gang rapist... business as usual.

Trump mocks Ford... HOW DARE HE!


Reminds me of, Stormy Daniels mocks Trump's penis then the MSM mocks his dick for a few days... business as usual, just fine.

Trump calls Stormy Daniels a horseface... THE HORROR!!!