Is 5G going to make life better or kill us all?

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



BrolyBlack
It's been noted that the amplification of wireless signals if causing an increase in cancer and hurts our health. But the 5G looks very dangerous, it's so powerful that it can handle up to 1 million devices in 1 square kilometer.

Currently, 4G can handle 1 million devices in 500 square kilometers.

FCC: The Dangers of 5G

FCC



So if the US does roll out 5G, what are we going to do about it? It seems like even with the warnings, nothing is going to stop this.


'Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature aging)
disruption of cell metabolism
increased blood-brain barrier permeability
melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
disruption of brain glucose metabolism
generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)'
Source
https://eluxemagazine.com/magazine/dangers-of-5g/

https://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/emf-5G-Radiation-Dangers-5G-Info-Table.jpg

GEx_d0SjvS0

Robtard
When the bees all die off because of the interference in the airwaves and climate change, then we'll go within a generation, maybe two.

Surtur
The robots will get us first.

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
When the bees all die off because of the interference in the airwaves and climate change, then we'll go within a generation, maybe two.

Can you post on topic instead of this

Surtur
If there is a true proven danger I don't see why the country would choose to use 5G?

BrolyBlack
Because it offers a response time of 1ms. Which is real-time data. And people dont give a hoot if it hurts them or not.

Surtur
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Because it offers a response time of 1ms. Which is real-time data. And people dont give a hoot if it hurts them or not.

Since when does the government care what the people want?

BrolyBlack
The government isnt bringing it, it's the same dip shit corporations that bring us all this other garbage that kills us.

Flyattractor
It is times like this I am REALLY Glad I don't own a Smart Phone.

5G will just Cull the Chafe from Humanity. Plus giving us a bunch of Funny Videos of 5G Smart Phone Users getting killed in Hilarious ways.

Surtur
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
The government isnt bringing it, it's the same dip shit corporations that bring us all this other garbage that kills us.

So if these are a genuine health threat the government has zero ways to intervene?

BrolyBlack
Probably not because of lobbyists. Read the FCC warnings I posted.

Flyattractor
The Gov can just Shoot the Space Lazers and take out the Cell Stats....Health Problem Solved!

Surtur
They even decrease melatonin levels.

Flyattractor
Oh well then I guess we should keep it then.

Cause Planned Parenthood as the same goal.

Robtard
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Can you post on topic instead of this

That was on topic...

Lord Lucien
I like how 5G's Technology is "WWWW". Like the regular world wide web can even handle any more water.

dadudemon
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Because it offers a response time of 1ms. Which is real-time data. And people dont give a hoot if it hurts them or not.

Response time is a processing and physics problem, not a bandwidth solution.

I hope that makes sense.


It doesn't matter how fast your connection is. You'll be limited by the laws of physics because photons have a finite velocity in whatever medium they travel through (atmosphere).

In 1 second, light can travel around the earth about 7 times. So to travel around half the world, not including processing times, that's 71 milliseconds. That's assuming the transmission medium was Radiowaves.

BrolyBlack
Regardless of those details, thats not the problem I am trying to address here. Its the power of the signal and its detriment to our health to have our pointless youtube videos load faster.

dadudemon
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Regardless of those details, thats not the problem I am trying to address here. Its the power of the signal and its detriment to our health to have our pointless youtube videos load faster.

The power of the signal won't change. I think you're talking about the intensity of the light waves.

That won't change. We won't be saturating the atmosphere with anymore intensity than we have now. You'll get more EMR from standing out in the sun than if you stood in a small tiny room of 1,000 people all on an HD Facetime video call.


That's how much bullshit is going into this 'Cellphones cause cancer' crap.

Even the research about reducing your sperm count is shitty science.




https://www.vox.com/2018/7/16/17067214/cellphone-cancer-5g-evidence-studies

BrolyBlack
So why is the FCC warning about the dangers of 5G?

dadudemon
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So why is the FCC warning about the dangers of 5G?

You mean the FCC which states this?



https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns


The article I posted in my previous post does a much better job of breaking down the science than the FCC. The FCC is not a medical body or institution.

cdtm
Originally posted by Surtur
If there is a true proven danger I don't see why the country would choose to use 5G?

That hasn't stopped us using certain chemicals in drinking water, that the manufacturer themselves banned because of cancer causing properties (No, not floride. I'm not THAT far gone as a conspiracy theorist.)

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by dadudemon
You mean the FCC which states this?



https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns


The article I posted in my previous post does a much better job of breaking down the science than the FCC. The FCC is not a medical body or institution.

I think this is from the FCC, but not sure now.

https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1053072081009/5G%20Radiation%20Dangers%20- %2011%20Reasons%20To%20Be%20Concerned%20_%20Electr
icSense.pdf

dadudemon
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I think this is from the FCC, but not sure now.

https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1053072081009/5G%20Radiation%20Dangers%20- %2011%20Reasons%20To%20Be%20Concerned%20_%20Electr
icSense.pdf

That's not the FCC. That's from ElectricSense.


https://www.electricsense.com/


This is a group that is pseudo-science, at best, and harmful false science, most of the time.

They mention oxidative damage to DNA as a problem from 5G. lol wut? That's like saying you shouldn't vote for Trump because watermelon.

BrolyBlack
Ah, well 5G is going to fry your ballsack, but only yours. Be afraid!

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.