Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Soy Boy
A modern effeminate male, typically a millennial. A self-described feminist-leftist who majored in Social Justice Studies, Gender Studies, Ethnic Studies, Theater, Dance or any other range of useless college degree fields. Shows fear and revulsion at the sight of masculine men. Usually appears in public wearing flannel, skinny jeans often of a short length to resemble Capri pants. May have dyed hair and a beard that he spends at least a half hour each morning grooming. Urinates standing up in a stall in the men's room rather than at the urinal. Has a penchant for expensive Starbucks flavored drinks with soy milk and flavored craft beer. Likely a vegan or vegetarian. Raised by dominant man-hating feminist mother either without a father or with a cuckold henpecked man for a father. May own a car, likely a Toyota Prius or Nissan Cube, but has no concept of how to open the hood or change a tire. More likely rides a fixed gear bike. Completely lacking in any mechanical skills and proud of that fact. May spends hours or days gaming in his mother's basement. Offers nothing to society.


Incel

aka "involuntarily celibate", a person (usually male) who has a horrible personality and treats women as sexual objects and thinks his lack of a sex life comes from being "ugly" when its really just his blatant sexism and terrible attitude. incels have little to no self-awareness; even when they see other "ugly" men with girlfriends, they consider these men to be tricksters who have somehow beat the system and can get women despite being cursed with unattractiveness (in other words, they're respectful to women and women are attracted to their personalities, but incels can't comprehend such a phenomenon). they believe that women owe them sex, and many of the more extreme incels like to spend time in incel communities on the internet coming up with ways to make women have sex with them (often involving genocide of people of color, genocide of "Chads" (men who have sex), taking rights away from women, raping them, having sex with women's dead bodies, and other horrid, disgusting things. they can't understand that that is PRECISELY why women want nothing to do with them).

-------------------------


Both are equally disgusting, so how can we reduce the population of these characters?

Is it nature vs nurture stemming from the political ideology of the parents and upbringing, or is it biology?

I'd argue a soy boy is just the leftist version of incel.

Correct.

until i see innocent people murdered in sick acts of soy boy terrorism, i can't equate the two.

The thread isnt about equating, its about figuring out why these people exist in the first place. Also not every incel is a terrorist.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Correct.

Yep, and lets take someone like Elliot Rodgers. Chances are he was a leftist...

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Also not every incel is a terrorist.

...and zero "soy boys" are terrorists. that makes the two very different.

if you're comparing 2 ideals of any sort, and one of those is not only violent in nature, but has long procession of body bags from terrorist attacks...and the others' worst crimes are that of being whiney phaggots. it's not something you can dismiss. same as if we were comparing jihadists vs online video game griefers.

Muslims have a long history of body bags, but we constantly have to hear "not every Muslim is a terrorist." Same applies here.

This isn't about murderers, your only bringing that up to win this argument but this isn't about winning the thread or OP. It's about why these people exist.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Muslims have a long history of body bags,

Indeed, since the year 2000 they've probably killed more people in the USA than right wing terrorists have.

broly, you equated them in your OP.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Both are equally disgusting

that's what i was replying to. if you retract it, then fine. would be nice if you did, because discussing the problems of our society which leads to cultures of anti-reason/logic, is actually a very good topic imho.

Ok Ill retract that to get back to the focus of the OP.

They're equally disgusting though lol.

Both of these characters are the inevitable byproduct of Western society cultural norms; to separate the wheat from the chaff a major overhaul in the line of political ideologies are in order. Though, one could even argue that these archetypes would persist in some fashion even if drastic remodeling took place. There have always been variations of what we now know as the incel and soy boy, only now have they been correctly identified in line with the modern political model.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Both of these characters are the inevitable byproduct of Western society cultural norms; to separate the wheat from the chaff a major overhaul in the line of political ideologies are in order. Though, one could even argue that these archetypes would persist in some fashion even if drastic remodeling took place. There have always been variations of what we now know as the incel and soy boy, only now have they been correctly identified in line with the modern political model.
Hmmmm, I have to wonder from some of your terminology, are you a lobster as I am?

What's wrong with peeing in a stall? You can't properly get all the piss out of your wiener without extensive wank like movements, and people look at you funny when you do that at a urinal. A little shake doesn't do it ever.

Soyboys are inevitability weak domicile creatures capable of being cucked by masculine men and will take it. If their feminist women, if they even have one wants to say have sex with a chad or alpha male, and make them watch, they will do so.

Incels are not as domicile, they will rage, and have possible homicidal tendencies.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Soyboys are inevitability weak domicile creatures capable of being cucked by masculine men and will take it. If their feminist women, if they even have one wants to say have sex with a chad or alpha male, and make them watch, they will do so.

Incels are not as domicile, they will rage, and have possible homicidal tendencies.

It reminds me of this, lmao:

BuzzFeed Guys Test Their Testosterone Levels. The Results Are Exactly What You'd Expect.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
What's wrong with peeing in a stall? You can't properly get all the piss out of your wiener without extensive wank like movements, and people look at you funny when you do that at a urinal. A little shake doesn't do it ever.
I mean, me personally, I go into a stall because I can vape in it lol.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Hmmmm, I have to wonder from some of your terminology, are you a lobster as I am?

Very much so, fellow lobster folk.

Originally posted by Surtur
It reminds me of this, lmao:

BuzzFeed Guys Test Their Testosterone Levels. The Results Are Exactly What You'd Expect.

Wow, thats just embarrassing.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I mean, me personally, I go into a stall because I can vape in it lol. vape...

I just don't like piss in my shorts. I squeeze my cock like an empty toothpaste and then helicopter it around and give it a couple more squeezes. I do that at the urinal too but you can't be as willy nilly.

The stall is freedom.

i believe that cultures of anti-logic and anti-reason are the product of unresolved infantile/juvenile issues, usually caused by parental over-coddling.

a two year old baby will cry over anything, and be absolutely certain that their emotions validate their tantrums, even if they are screaming over literally nothing. that's a psychological and intellectual hurdle that all/most of us managed to scale at a very early age, but it most often requires the help and tough-love of a parent to bring us along. but some parents just hug the kid and go 'there there, poor baby' after their tantrums until they're 35.

Originally posted by Surtur
It reminds me of this, lmao:

BuzzFeed Guys Test Their Testosterone Levels. The Results Are Exactly What You'd Expect.

Hahaha what a collection of weak, effeminate losers.

I strongly suggest for all men to regularly check their testosterone levels and compare to the PAST averages, not current averages, as it is a sliding scale.

"An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men."

I want to ready this study. On the surface it makes sense. If you are in favor of hard work, and follow the general masculine principles of dedication, worth ethic, and competition, extreme versions of wealth redistribution and socialism is incongruent with your beliefs. Masculinity is very nurturing and social safety nets are a byproduct of the "patriarchy" that everyone so despises on the left, but coddling society is disgusting and leads to little losers like soyboys and incels. These guys need strong male role models.

But I never take "academic studies" at face value without reading the data anymore.

If you are an incel and can't get laid, then grow up. Women are nature's quality check. They bear the baby, and have the most investment in a pregnancy, so naturally they will want the most attractive of mates to invest their seed. It means you have to step up your game. Some people are just screwed and are ugly, but you can always make steps to improve yourself to some degree.

I don't know what the cure for Soyboys is. I feel like it's a different reflection of the same problem. Instead of giving up women, they try and virtue signal to try and get brownie points. Which is f*cking hilarious and reveals a complete misunderstanding of women and nature. You CANNOT negotiate attraction. That is just biology at play. Being subservient, and washing the dishes, in exchange for sex from your girl dries up a vagina faster than anything I've seen.

On a side note:

If you have the cash and time I suggest you go to some of the most cosmopolitan cities in the States. I highly recommend San Fransisco or Silicon Valley. It's so full of limp-wristed female boys, it's like shooting fish in a barrel. Women will, and I mean this literally, gravitate towards you like you are a celebrity if you lift weights, are moderately good-looking, or aren't some genetic dead-end. One of my best friends is an Account Manager for a start-up, and I didn't really believe him, so he took me to two conferences in the last 5 months. You can bang like 3-4 hot chicks a day, and they'll be the most vocal, tech-driven, "feminist" type on the surface begging for some domination.

Buzzfeed is the "bottom" of "journalism" no wonder, their employees are weak ineffective losers.

dailywire is no better than any other tabloid rag, including buzzfeed. anyone who takes what they see on those sites at face value is an idiot.

I would bet my last dollar the men at daily wire have higher testosterone than the soy boys at buzzfeed.

if you're suggesting it's an all-men's club, you might be right.

i don't know because i consider all these sites to be garbage, and don't care about anything they print/post, and really couldn't care less about their corporate demographics.

dump them all and you'll be better informed

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if you're suggesting it's an all-men's club, you might be right.

i don't know because i consider all these sites to be garbage, and don't care about anything they print/post, and really couldn't care less about their corporate demographics.

dump them all and you'll be better informed

10000%

Be very careful what you read. It really shapes your opinions in subconscious ways. Remember to ALWAYS be critical. I suggest taking a history course at a local CC or University that teaches you a holistic approach when evaluating a piece of writing including writer motivations and the demographic it is writing to.

My "journalist" can beat up your "journalist"

As a grandfather who is presently married for the third time and hoping to start my final third set of children in my 50's, the only advice I can give Soy boys and Incels is have a big cock like me, works wonders.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if you're suggesting it's an all-men's club, you might be right.

i don't know because i consider all these sites to be garbage, and don't care about anything they print/post, and really couldn't care less about their corporate demographics.

dump them all and you'll be better informed

I don't actively every read daily wire. and I hardly click on links to them, this was the first time in a while.

Buzzfeed, however, has consistently been re-reported on by large media outlets where is the daily wire is not.

So buzzfeed has done more damage to the population than daily wire.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
As a grandfather who is presently married for the third time and hoping to start my final third set of children in my 50's, the only advice I can give Soy boys and Incels is have a big cock like me, works wonders.

Most guys think their dick is bigger than it is, if yours is so big though, why do you marriages keep failing you?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack

Buzzfeed, however, has consistently been re-reported on by large media outlets where is the daily wire is not.

you are mistaken, unless you consider foxnews to be another silly tabloid rag.

https://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=daily+wire

I'm more referring to the major stories like the Steele dossier and Michael Cohen story that had to be retracted.

Anyways, this isn't about journalism or media outlets, it's about the OP. I won't post on media matters anymore.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Most guys think their dick is bigger than it is, if yours is so big though, why do you marriages keep failing you? Because people grow apart, got any kids mate? Ever been in a relationship for ten years or more? The best thing about life is I get older my wives stay the same age.

My current relationship is 3 years and she has a son. Hoping to make it to forever.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
My current relationship is 3 years and she has a son. Hoping to make it to forever. Good, its hard work bringing up other people's kids. A guy is doing wonderful work with my last set and whilst they don't call him Dad I appreciate his efforts. Kudos to you!

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I'm more referring to the major stories like the Steele dossier and Michael Cohen story that had to be retracted.

Anyways, this isn't about journalism or media outlets, it's about the OP. I won't post on media matters anymore.

news networks are like multi-headed hydras, except one head is noble and essential to preserving our democracy. the others are deceptive trolls, particularly tv and clickbait trash web, like fox/cnn has become. there are legitimate and essential journalists in all these networks/newspapers/etc, however. they put their personal safety/lives at risk often, and at least deserve to be on a pedestal above these garbage tabloid rags, as well as their corporate shitlord bosses, in terms of who to lend more credibility to.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Good, its hard work bringing up other people's kids. A guy is doing wonderful work with my last set and whilst they don't call him Dad I appreciate his efforts. Kudos to you!

Thank you

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
news networks are like multi-headed hydras, except one head is noble and essential to preserving our democracy. the others are deceptive trolls, particularly tv and clickbait trash web, like fox/cnn has become. there are legitimate and essential journalists in all these networks, however. they put their personal safety/lives at risk often, and at least deserve to be on a pedestal above these garbage tabloid rags, in terms of who to lend more credibility to. A lot of truth in this. As Twain stated you don't read the papers you are illinformed, you do and you are misinformed.

Re teststerone, I'm with Jo Rogan, if it's low replace it. I had a video sent of him ages ago saying this by another middle aged juicing mate who laughed and said it's what we'd been sayng for years. Testosteronebis an easy fix, being an Incel I suspect is harder.

Yes but soy boys are fine with low T and being beta cucks. They think masculinity is toxic. Increasing their T would go against their ideology.

Both fall short on the adoption of responsibility and strength.

The Soy Boys don't recognize that weakness and victimhood is not virtue, and the Incels don't realize, as Jordan Peterson puts it, that "if all the women are rejecting you, whose the one with the problem? Because it's not all women"

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
They think masculinity is toxic.

they're just as silly and idiotic as people who believe that toxic masculinity/femininity doesn't exist.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they're just as silly and idiotic as people who believe that toxic masculinity/femininity doesn't exist.

Pretty much. These two are two sides of the same coin, if anything.

Both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity are an inability to adopt responsibility for vulnerability.

Toxic masculinity does this by concealing and denying it, becoming overly macho, aggressive. Violence over an insult to honor and all that shit.

Toxic femininity does this by instead flaunting vulnerability as a social weapon. Victimhood culture, also passive aggressiveness by which you can undermine someone so if they snap on you it seems like an escalation of things.

My problem is that a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic masculinity are embodiments of toxic femininity.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Soy Boy
Urinates standing up in a stall in the men's room rather than at the urinal.
I think you're giving them too much credit here tbh

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity are an inability to adopt responsibility for vulnerability.

Toxic masculinity does this by concealing and denying it, becoming overly macho, aggressive. Violence over an insult to honor and all that shit.

Toxic femininity does this by instead flaunting vulnerability as a social weapon. Victimhood culture, also passive aggressiveness by which you can undermine someone so if they snap on you it seems like an escalation of things.

My problem is that a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic masculinity are embodiments of toxic femininity.

To you last paragraph, that statement cuts both ways.: a lot of the people who most loudly proclaim the evils of toxic femininity are embodiments of toxic masculinity.

I've know you've seen it, just as I've seen the acts in your statement. Both need to be put down.

.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Soy Boy
A modern effeminate male, typically a millennial. A self-described feminist-leftist who majored in Social Justice Studies, Gender Studies, Ethnic Studies, Theater, Dance or any other range of useless college degree fields. Shows fear and revulsion at the sight of masculine men. Usually appears in public wearing flannel, skinny jeans often of a short length to resemble Capri pants. May have dyed hair and a beard that he spends at least a half hour each morning grooming. Urinates standing up in a stall in the men's room rather than at the urinal. Has a penchant for expensive Starbucks flavored drinks with soy milk and flavored craft beer. Likely a vegan or vegetarian. Raised by dominant man-hating feminist mother either without a father or with a cuckold henpecked man for a father. May own a car, likely a Toyota Prius or Nissan Cube, but has no concept of how to open the hood or change a tire. More likely rides a fixed gear bike. Completely lacking in any mechanical skills and proud of that fact. May spends hours or days gaming in his mother's basement. Offers nothing to society.


Incel

aka "involuntarily celibate", a person (usually male) who has a horrible personality and treats women as sexual objects and thinks his lack of a sex life comes from being "ugly" when its really just his blatant sexism and terrible attitude. incels have little to no self-awareness; even when they see other "ugly" men with girlfriends, they consider these men to be tricksters who have somehow beat the system and can get women despite being cursed with unattractiveness (in other words, they're respectful to women and women are attracted to their personalities, but incels can't comprehend such a phenomenon). they believe that women owe them sex, and many of the more extreme incels like to spend time in incel communities on the internet coming up with ways to make women have sex with them (often involving genocide of people of color, genocide of "Chads" (men who have sex), taking rights away from women, raping them, having sex with women's dead bodies, and other horrid, disgusting things. they can't understand that that is PRECISELY why women want nothing to do with them).

-------------------------


Both are equally disgusting, so how can we reduce the population of these characters?

Is it nature vs nurture stemming from the political ideology of the parents and upbringing, or is it biology?


Soy Boys are more likely to be trannies, which means they are more likely to let me phuck them in the ass. Therefore Soy Boys are better

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
dailywire is no better than any other tabloid rag, including buzzfeed. anyone who takes what they see on those sites at face value is an idiot.

Daily Wire is far superior to Buzzfeed lol. The fact you would contend otherwise just shows how warped you are.

Soy Boy and Incel are different sides of the same coin... if one side of the coin thought he is owned sex and is willing to murder every single person who denies him.

Originally posted by Surtur
Daily Wire is far superior to Buzzfeed lol. The fact you would contend otherwise just shows how warped you are.

more time-wasting barking from the uneducated bitter incel?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
more time-wasting barking from the uneducated bitter incel?

You're clearly quite angry, but unfortunately what I said is true. You don't have to like Daily Wire, but it's silly to compare them to Buzzfeed. Just like it's silly to compare CNN or MSNBC to Buzzfeed.

me neither broly. i have no interest in "garbage tabloid vs garbage tabloid"

Originally posted by MythLord
Soy Boy and Incel are different sides of the same coin... if one side of the coin thought he is owned sex and is willing to murder every single person who denies him.

So are incels and soy boys a product of nature or nurture?

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So are incels and soy boys a product of nature or nurture?

Definitely nurture.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
more time-wasting barking from the uneducated bitter incel?

How dare you attack the dailywire, they're a legitimate tabloid, you monster

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So are incels and soy boys a product of nature or nurture?
Most probably nurture, yeah.

Originally posted by Robtard
How dare you attack the dailywire, they're a legitimate tabloid, you monster

No less legitimate than CNN.

You were.

Originally posted by NemeBro
You were.

That's like a dagger through my heart

Originally posted by MythLord
Most probably nurture, yeah.

You Silly Sock You.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
You Silly Sock You.

Grow up and actually contribute to the topic rather than derail it, mental midget.

Are you an incel or a soy boy in disguise? In all honesty, I despise both equally.

I despise those that go around calling Others those names.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Fly is paranoid and fearful Disney is out to force the pennies out of his wallet.

Hahaha haha

Originally posted by quanchi112
Fly is paranoid and fearful Disney is out to force the pennies out of his wallet.

Says the Delusional Little Shill Boy. Cause I have been to the Diz Parks, and if you think They Do Not want every Penny out of your wallet.

Then You Like Quanchierstoo, are a PHUCKING MORON!

Stupid Stupid Little Shill Boy.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Says the Delusional Little Shill Boy. Cause I have been to the Diz Parks, and if you think They Do Not want every Penny out of your wallet.

Then You Like Quanchierstoo, are a PHUCKING MORON!

Stupid Stupid Little Shill Boy. Says the guy who shits himself at the thought of Mickey Mouse.

Says the guy who will WILLINGLY Lick that Shit Up!

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Says the guy who will WILLINGLY Lick that Shit Up! You have issues.

Go clean your tongue off.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
Go clean your tongue off. Quit being so emotional.