Sidious is to recruit a new aprentice, who does he pick?

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



Josh_Alexander
Sidious needs help to choose between Kylo and Maul to be his new aprentice.

Who does he pick? Why?

relentless1
Kylo certainly more potential, he is a Skywalker after all. Maul is just fodder in comparison; imagine Anakin before the lava dip and that's what Kylo can be basically

ShadowFyre
Kylo was trash. The worst person to ever wield a lightsaber.

Maul woulda killed Kylo in seconds in the forest

victreebelvictr
Maybe now, but I doubt he will be weak in the future.

Eon Blue
Kylo has more potential than Maul.

h1a8
Maul was one of the best ever.
I don't know many who were as skilled as he. I see him beating everyone except yoda, sidious, and mace.

victreebelvictr
Originally posted by h1a8
Maul was one of the best ever.
I don't know many who were as skilled as he. I see him beating everyone except yoda, sidious, and mace. And Dooku?

Smart. :3

playa1258
Originally posted by h1a8
Maul was one of the best ever.
I don't know many who were as skilled as he. I see him beating everyone except yoda, sidious, and mace. Anakin and Obi-Wan have him beat too.

ares834
Originally posted by playa1258
Anakin and Obi-Wan have him beat too.

And Vader and Kanan (lulz) and therefore likely countless others.

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Eon Blue
Kylo has more potential than Maul.

thumb up

victreebelvictr

relentless1
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Kylo was trash. The worst person to ever wield a lightsaber.

Maul woulda killed Kylo in seconds in the forest

maybe so, but if he was trained by Sidious instead of that crippled **** Snoke he would've been a badass

Juk3n
Kylo due to force potential.

Josh_Alexander
I was thinking based on feats, I mean, both contest for the worst SW villain, at least moviewise.

victreebelvictr
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I was thinking based on feats, I mean, both contest for the worst SW villain, at least moviewise. How about based on potential? ;3

Josh_Alexander
Originally posted by victreebelvictr
How about based on potential? ;3

There is no certainty basing it on that. I mean, thr Jedi recruited Anakin based on his potential and yet he disappointed them.

Samething with Kylo. Snoke confessed that he wasn't what he expected.

So, I was thinking based on feats.

ShadowFyre
Im going off feats. Kylo was trash and so was snoke.

Josh_Alexander
Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Im going off feats. Kylo was trash and so was snoke.

Kylo was a massive disappointment I agree. But movie Maul wasn't that great either.

Nevan
Originally posted by relentless1
Kylo certainly more potential, he is a Skywalker after all. Maul is just fodder in comparison; imagine Anakin before the lava dip and that's what Kylo can be basically What was Sidious' plan if Anakin wasn't crippled?

relentless1
Originally posted by Nevan
What was Sidious' plan if Anakin wasn't crippled?

its implied in ROTS that Sidious knew and was OK with Anakin usurping him when he was powerful enough...

(to Yoda) "Darth Vader will become more powerful than either of us"

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.