Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

For quoting GOT.

The excuse is more than likely gonna be "well the algorithms".

The Wire, actually. But he never got it right.

https://mobile.twitter.com/parkermolloy/status/1124459620037214210

So was he never banned or did the ban end or what went down here lol.

He hasn't posted anything for days and he's usually more prolific.

So is it that he was banned, the ban ended and now he's not posting on twitter in protest...?

I'm guessing he's blocked from his account but his account itself isn't deleted.

Or maybe he's on holiday.

Okay so I found out that you can view his twitter, but he can't post until he gets rid of his tweet cuz of the "hang them all" which is indeed a call to violence.

However, people were not banned for stuff like #PunchANazi and stuff like that so he's refusing to delete it.

Ah right. I see. The moral equivalency between punching and hanging and between people James Woods disagrees with and Nazis.

Understandable really. Good for him.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Ah right. I see. The moral equivalency between punching and hanging and between people James Woods disagrees with and Nazis.

Understandable really. Good for him.



Oh there are tons of examples of leftists on twitter saying much worse things than just "punching a nazi" and yet they stiill have twitter accounts.



Problem is very few of the people that leftists accuse of being nazis are actually nazis. They stupidly think if you are a nationalists then that automatically makes you a nazi. Or just supporting Trump or you believe in strict immigration law enforcement makes you one automatically.


I hope you aren't one of those leftist snowflakes who thinks everyone who isn't a radical left-winger is, by default, a "nazi." lol

I'm sure there are tons of examples of people who should be banned from twitter but aren't. People who are are banned but shouldn't be. People who are banned and should be and people who aren't banned and shouldn't be.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I'm sure there are tons of examples of people who should be banned from twitter but aren't. People who are are banned but shouldn't be. People who are banned and should be and people who aren't banned and shouldn't be.




Yep. True on all counts.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Ah right. I see. The moral equivalency between punching and hanging and between people James Woods disagrees with and Nazis.

Understandable really. Good for him.

I'm just glad you didn't try to argue it's not hypocritical to allow one and not the other, that you were able to process that the two acts of violence do not need to be 100% equal in order for hypocrisy to be going on because nothing in the rules states you can threaten violence as long as it's not life threatening. Others here would have just made a snarky comment and moved on, but you didn't so good for you

Originally posted by Surtur
I'm just glad you didn't try to argue it's not hypocritical to allow one and not the other, that you were able to process that the two acts of violence do not need to be 100% equal in order for hypocrisy to be going on because nothing in the rules states you can threaten violence as long as it's not life threatening. Others here would have just made a snarky comment and moved on, but you didn't so good for you

Thanks.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh there are tons of examples of leftists on twitter saying much worse things than just "punching a nazi" and yet they stiill have twitter accounts.



Problem is very few of the people that leftists accuse of being nazis are actually nazis. They stupidly think if you are a nationalists then that automatically makes you a nazi. Or just supporting Trump or you believe in strict immigration law enforcement makes you one automatically.


I hope you aren't one of those leftist snowflakes who thinks everyone who isn't a radical left-winger is, by default, a "nazi." lol Fly posting as Fly without the lime green. What a pussy.

Muh free market, this is just a private company using their service in the manner they deem best. If you take any issue with it then you're a socialist.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Muh free market, this is just a private company using their service in the manner they deem best. If you take any issue with it then you're a socialist.

Letting da corporations run rampant to own da cons.

#Gottem

Originally posted by Surtur
Letting da corporations run rampant to own da cons.

#Gottem



...that about sums it up lol.

An interesting read:

Platform Access Is A Civil Right.

I don't even really mind the fact that twitter unfairly targets conservatives and libertarians specifically as it is their platform, after all.


What bothers me most is how they try to pretend like they're unbiased and are banning right-wingers simply because they are "violating" their "rules" yet many leftists say things much worse and are allowed to keep their accounts. Those who run Twitter and Facebook should just be honest and say they enforce their rules more strictly against conservatives than left-leaning accounts because they don't like them.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I don't even really mind the fact that twitter unfairly targets conservatives and libertarians specifically as it is their platform, after all.


What bothers me most is how they try to pretend like they're unbiased and are banning right-wingers simply because they are "violating" their "rules" yet many leftists say things much worse and are allowed to keep their accounts. Those who run Twitter and Facebook should just be honest and say they enforce their rules more strictly against conservatives than left-leaning accounts because they don't like them.

I mean yeah, I'd also be okay if they grew a sac and said "we're biased little shits, deal with it". That should be their slogan, in fact.

If you're going to be bias, admit to it. No need to be cowardly.

Originally posted by Surtur
I mean yeah, I'd also be okay if they grew a sac and said "we're biased little shits, deal with it". That should be their slogan, in fact.

If you're going to be bias, admit to it. No need to be cowardly.


Amen. This goes for so-called "journalists" at CNN and MSNBC as well. They need to quit pretending to be unbiased after all the untrue shit they've said about Trump and those of us who support him.



At least Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Laura Ingraham all admit they're biased.

Just to stir things up, how many people were banned for the #killallmen?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just to stir things up, how many people were banned for the #killallmen?

Hopefully lots.

I don't actually follow twitter, so for all I know, everyone that used it might have been suspended.

Does anyone actually know?

Well I use Twitter and I hadn't even heard about that hashtag until you mentioned it.

Also given that they ban lots of people with few followers for supposedly infringing rules (including myself for telling someone to "kill your self" in response to a conversation about ads that use stupid taglines like "find your happy" and "be more dog" and "book yourself fabulous" then I would expect they have banned people for that too.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Well I use Twitter and I hadn't even heard about that hashtag until you mentioned it.

Also given that they ban lots of people with few followers for supposedly infringing rules (including myself for telling someone to "kill your self" in response to a conversation about ads that use stupid taglines like "find your happy" and "be more dog" and "book yourself fabulous" then I would expect they have banned people for that too.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/killallmen?lang=en

I am totally going to troll the shit outta that hashtag.

Good to see the female equivalent of incels being noticed. Lol

Still waiting on Videodrome 2.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Muh free market, this is just a private company using their service in the manner they deem best. If you take any issue with it then you're a socialist.

Well...you're not wrong. And I've explained this, before. Twitter doesn't owe anyone anything and it is not free speech to be able to use it.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...you're not wrong. And I've explained this, before. Twitter doesn't own anyone anything and it is not free speech to be able to use it. Agreed

I maintain that they have the right to do so, I'm just going to heavily criticize their decision to do so, in the same way that someone like Richard Spencer has the right to free speech but I will criticize what he says nonetheless.

I'm consistent here. What's interesting is the people who would defend this with one hand, but with the other hand demand that the government force baker make the cake.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Well...you're not wrong. And I've explained this, before. Twitter doesn't own anyone anything and it is not free speech to be able to use it.

Yeah but the problem is wacky things like...why is it okay for our courts to force Trump to unblock people on twitter then?

And if people are owed twitter access to Trump...why then is it okay for twitter to permanently ban anyone from their platform?

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah but the problem is wacky things like...why is it okay for our courts to force Trump to unblock people on twitter then?

And if people are owed twitter access to Trump...why then is it okay for twitter to permanently ban anyone from their platform?

We already had this conversation.

It's not okay for the courts to do that and they are wrong. I posted about this in lengthy detail.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I maintain that they have the right to do so, I'm just going to heavily criticize their decision to do so, in the same way that someone like Richard Spencer has the right to free speech but I will criticize what he says nonetheless.

I'm consistent here. What's interesting is the people who would defend this with one hand, but with the other hand demand that the government force baker make the cake.

I'm conflicted here because it seems like these platforms are becoming more and more akin to the public square and they are run by private corporations.

Originally posted by dadudemon
We already had this conversation.

It's not okay for the courts to do that and they are wrong. I posted about this in lengthy detail.

It's one of the reasons Republicans piss me off, why did they just...let that happen and not fight it more?

And if people wanna say it's hypocritical for conservatives to feel the way they do about social media companies even though they are private companies...it seems just as hypocritical for the left to be suddenly embracing the rights of private corporations lol.

Do you think the country would be better off if social media platforms only banned illegal content?

Originally posted by Surtur
It's one of the reasons Republicans piss me off, why did they just...let that happen and not fight it more?

It's because Republicans are the same as Democrats. They don't actually care about your rights. They really don't.

Both parties are evil. And should be dismantled.

I should go further and state that you should not support the Republican party just because the Democrats are evil and terrible. That's also making the same mistake.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's because Republicans are the same as Democrats. They don't actually care about your rights. They really don't.

Both parties are evil. And should be dismantled.

The dude for 2020. Run as an independent and you sure have my vote!

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's because Republicans are the same as Democrats. They don't actually care about your rights. They really don't.

Both parties are evil. And should be dismantled.

I should go further and state that you should not support the Republican party just because the Democrats are evil and terrible. That's also making the same mistake.

Yeah I just might not vote at all in 2020.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah I just might not vote at all in 2020.

Slow clap

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I maintain that they have the right to do so, I'm just going to heavily criticize their decision to do so, in the same way that someone like Richard Spencer has the right to free speech but I will criticize what he says nonetheless.

I'm consistent here. What's interesting is the people who would defend this with one hand, but with the other hand demand that the government force baker make the cake.


Exactly. That's the hypocritical left for ya.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah I just might not vote at all in 2020.

That's how we got Trump and Hillary tickets.


If every independent voted for something other than a D or an R, we wouldn't have a D or and R in the White House.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's how we got Trump and Hillary tickets.


If every independent voted for something other than a D or an R, we wouldn't have a D or and R in the White House.

Who do you intend to vote for? Who did you vote for in 2016?

Originally posted by Surtur
Who do you intend to vote for? Who did you vote for in 2016?

I voted for Gary Johnson in 2016.

I will vote for not a D or and R in 2020. It doesn't matter, yet. Gotta wait until late this year, early next year, to know for sure who I will actually vote for.

I don't know much about the independents. May I ask what it was about Gary that made you vote for him?

Originally posted by Surtur
I don't know much about the independents. May I ask what it was about Gary that made you vote for him?

A 74% overlap in our political positions is what made me vote for him according to the "I Side With" quiz I took on 3 separate occasions throughout the 2016 election period.

Massive prison reform, ending foreign wars, ending the drug war, major tax reform, etc. The obvious low-hanging fruit that any normal and reasonable person agrees with.

It gave us Trump. Oh the horror!


Our country is doing better under him than it's done in a very long time especially economically and militarily and unemployment is the lowest it's been since the late 60's. That's just awful!


If only Trump was like the last joke of a president and went around apologizing & kissing the asses of every other leader in the world, bending over & taking it up the a** from them, & letting every other country in the world especially China & the EU keep ripping us off!



If that's "how we got Trump" then hopefully people will do it again!


But no, "how we got Trump" is people turned-out to vote for him in record numbers. "But... but... Hillary won the popular vote! *sniff* *sniff*"


Nah, she didn't. Illegals don't count.

Originally posted by dadudemon
A 74% overlap in our political positions is what made me vote for him according to the "I Side With" quiz I took on 3 separate occasions throughout the 2016 election period.

Massive prison reform, ending foreign wars, ending the drug war, major tax reform, etc. The obvious low-hanging fruit that any normal and reasonable person agrees with.

What do you say to those who argue it's wrong to vote independent in our current system because it's essentially a wasted vote?

For example, some people have incorrectly tried to say Jill Stein played a role in Hillary's loss.

Originally posted by Surtur
What do you say to those who argue it's wrong to vote independent in our current system because it's essentially a wasted vote?

For example, some people have incorrectly tried to say Jill Stein played a role in Hillary's loss.

Better a "wasted" vote, than a vote for either Trump or Hillary.

How can we break out of this 2 party system?

Start voting for people instead of against others. if enough people do that, then eventually either the D/R will start running good candidates or a 3rd party will finally get elected.

The problem is, very few people are willing to look long term.

Do you think how much money it takes to run for president is an issue?

It's a symptom of the problem.

Originally posted by dadudemon
It's because Republicans are the same as Democrats. They don't actually care about your rights. They really don't.

Both parties are evil. And should be dismantled.

I should go further and state that you should not support the Republican party just because the Democrats are evil and terrible. That's also making the same mistake. Huh... really made me think.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It gave us Trump. Oh the horror!


Our country is doing better under him than it's done in a very long time especially economically and militarily and unemployment is the lowest it's been since the late 60's. That's just awful!


If only Trump was like the last joke of a president and went around apologizing & kissing the asses of every other leader in the world, bending over & taking it up the a** from them, & letting every other country in the world especially China & the EU keep ripping us off!



If that's "how we got Trump" then hopefully people will do it again!


But no, "how we got Trump" is people turned-out to vote for him in record numbers. "But... but... Hillary won the popular vote! *sniff* *sniff*"


Nah, she didn't. Illegals don't count. You such a faceless troll Fly, hsha.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Start voting for people instead of against others. if enough people do that, then eventually either the D/R will start running good candidates or a 3rd party will finally get elected.

The problem is, very few people are willing to look long term.

We don't agree often but when we do. 👍

Originally posted by Surtur
Do you think how much money it takes to run for president is an issue?

One of the things they're considering here is public funding for election campaigns to remove lobbying. The 2 main parties will get the same amount.

The only problem with that is it effectively locks in a 2 party system unless they guarantee the same funding for the smaller parties of which there are lots and the number is growing.

In the UK elections to the European parliament later this month we'll have, off the top of my head,

The Conservative party
Labour
Liberal democrats
Scottish National Party
The Green Party
Plaid Cymru
Democratic Unionist party
Sinn Fein
The Brexit Party
UKIP
Change UK

and that's only the bigger parties. There's a huge number of smaller ones too.

I'm not British but I endorse UKIP

Every time I give you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you aren't going along with some retarded shit, you shatter the doubt. It boggles my mind.

Personally I wish more politicians would run on the platform that they won't rape people. Sounds like a positive guarantee.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Every time I give you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you aren't going along with some retarded shit, you shatter the doubt. It boggles my mind.

you have too much faith in people, and it makes you naive at times

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'm not British but I endorse UKIP

Big Nige now runs The Brexit Party. UKIP are relying on the popularity of their three 3 internet celebrities. Tommy Robinson, Sargon of Akaad and Count Dankula

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you have too much faith in people, and it makes you naive at times True

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Big Nige now runs The Brexit Party. UKIP are relying on the popularity of their three 3 internet celebrities. Tommy Robinson, Sargon of Akaad and Count Dankula Nigel's visit to Scotland is still one of the funniest moments in British Politics ever!

Yeah UKIP aren't popular here. They still manage to get David Coburn elected. Perhaps the most flumpish and ineffectual politician I've ever seen.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Personally I wish more politicians would run on the platform that they won't rape people. Sounds like a positive guarantee.

Did you see where he triggered people cuz he said he might rape her under pressure? Lol.

UKIP Candidate Carl Benjamin Has Talked Again About Raping Labour MP Jess Phillips And Now She Wants Action

She wants action...he might give her some, if under pressure

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Yeah UKIP aren't popular here. They still manage to get David Coburn elected. Perhaps the most flumpish and ineffectual politician I've ever seen. He shat his pants.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
He shat his pants.

Happens to the best of us.

Originally posted by BackFire
Happens to the best of us.

I wouldn't even poop on you.

It's fine, I don't accept pity poops.

Originally posted by BackFire
It's fine, I don't accept pity poops anymore.

Fixed it for you.

Well you're not wrong.

Originally posted by Surtur
What do you say to those who argue it's wrong to vote independent in our current system because it's essentially a wasted vote?

They are the problem. They are not part of the problem. They are THE problem.

You must do everything in your power to silence them, destroy their positions utterly, embarass them, shame them, ruin their reputations, etc. You have to be as vicious as possible within the power of your words and actions.

Never violence.

Originally posted by Surtur
For example, some people have incorrectly tried to say Jill Stein played a role in Hillary's loss.

And those same morons, idiots, trolls, Democrats, anti-patriots, and misinformed people also said Bernie Sanders cost Hillary the election.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It gave us Trump. Oh the horror!


Our country is doing better under him than it's done in a very long time especially economically and militarily and unemployment is the lowest it's been since the late 60's. That's just awful!


If only Trump was like the last joke of a president and went around apologizing & kissing the asses of every other leader in the world, bending over & taking it up the a** from them, & letting every other country in the world especially China & the EU keep ripping us off!



If that's "how we got Trump" then hopefully people will do it again!


But no, "how we got Trump" is people turned-out to vote for him in record numbers. "But... but... Hillary won the popular vote! *sniff* *sniff*"


Nah, she didn't. Illegals don't count.

You do realize you're trying to sell the same BS about employment as Democrats, right?

Workforce Participation rates? Yeah, still haven't recovered.

https://i.imgur.com/2l9tD6i.png




Actual unemployment, not the crap that the Department of Labor feeds us? Still hasn't recovered to the levels of pre-dot com bust. Nice try on the 1960 figures, though.

https://i.imgur.com/QN3S31b.png

In fact, unemployment has barely recovered since the Great Recession. Were you aware?



You're unable to blame this just on Democrats, home-skillet.

I'd rather vote for Trump than risk one of the democratic candidates winning tbh. Call me part of the problem, whatever.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'd rather vote for Trump than risk one of the democratic candidates winning tbh. Call me part of the problem, whatever.

You're part of the problem.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'd rather vote for Trump than risk one of the democratic candidates winning tbh. Call me part of the problem, whatever.



Hear, hear!


The democrats have gone so far to the left it would make even Stalin and Marx blush... smh.


There are no more "moderate democrats" anymore.

You guys are the democratic equivalent of an anti-vaxxer

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I'd rather vote for Trump than risk one of the democratic candidates winning tbh. Call me part of the problem, whatever.

Your determination to win in the short term is what is going to ensure that the country loses in the long term.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
One of the things they're considering here is public funding for election campaigns to remove lobbying. The 2 main parties will get the same amount.

The only problem with that is it effectively locks in a 2 party system unless they guarantee the same funding for the smaller parties of which there are lots and the number is growing.

In the UK elections to the European parliament later this month we'll have, off the top of my head,

The Conservative party
Labour
Liberal democrats
Scottish National Party
The Green Party
Plaid Cymru
Democratic Unionist party
Sinn Fein
The Brexit Party
UKIP
Change UK

and that's only the bigger parties. There's a huge number of smaller ones too.


Does the Monster Raving Loony Party not exist anymore? Shame if so.

Yeah they're still going. Pretty sure the main guy died a couple of years ago though.

Screaming Lord Sutch.

Contrary to what left-wing liars say or what some so-called "republicans" on FOX say, Jones is not an "extremist" lol. He's a libertarian. Perhaps even conservative but he is NOT "extreme."


I know attacking AJ and other conservatives like Laura Southern, Laura Loomer, & Paul Joseph Watson is the fad nowadays but the truth is he is not the monster people in the MSM make him out to be. Nor is anyone else I mentioned. The MSM constantly twist things he's said and just outright make up stuff about him (like calling him a "racist", for example, which is laughable considering he's actually protested the KKK on numerous occasions) just like they do to Trump.



No doubt left-wing looneys think someone like Tommy Robinson is "extreme" as well lol. Truth is he is just a patriot for his country.



Anyone who believes in strong borders and speaks out about the dangers of mass migration and Sharia law is automatically labelled "extreme" by the radical left.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Contrary to what left-wing liars say or what some so-called "republicans" on FOX say, Jones is not an "extremist" lol. He's a libertarian. Perhaps even conservative but he is NOT "extreme."


I know attacking AJ and other conservatives like Laura Southern, Laura Loomer, & Paul Joseph Watson is the fad nowadays but the truth is he is not the monster people in the MSM make him out to be. Nor is anyone else I mentioned. The MSM constantly twist things he's said and just outright make up stuff about him (like calling him a "racist", for example, which is laughable considering he's actually protested the KKK on numerous occasions) just like they do to Trump.



No doubt left-wing looneys think someone like Tommy Robinson is "extreme" as well lol. Truth is he is just a patriot for his country.



Anyone who believes in strong borders and speaks out about the dangers of mass migration and Sharia law is automatically labelled "extreme" by the radical left. silly Fly defending the far right nut jobs.

Leftists seem to think everyone on the right are all far right lol.


A person being "extreme right" would mean that person doesn't support government of any kind. They would prefer anarchy. No one on the right I'm aware of is quite THAT extreme.


Sure, us conservatives like limited government but that doesn't mean we want to do away w/all of it. We recognize that some government is necessary. We''re certainly not in love with it as radical leftists are. To the average leftist, government is their "god."

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Leftists seem to think everyone on the right are all far right lol.


A person being "extreme right" would mean that person doesn't support government of any kind. They would prefer anarchy. No one on the right I'm aware of is quite THAT extreme.


Sure, us conservatives like limited government but that doesn't mean we want to do away w/all of it. We recognize that some government is necessary.

We've already seen on this forum that certain people can't use terms like far right, alt right, nazi, fascist, sexist, racist, etc. correctly.

Originally posted by Surtur
We've already seen on this forum that certain people can't use terms like far right, alt right, nazi, fascist, sexist, racist, etc. correctly.



Correct.


And the thing is, it's just not people on this forum. It's leftists pretty much as a whole, Surt.

The problem is you label far rightists as far-rightists, and they cry like the little bitches they are.

Actually the problem is sad older men with b*tch t*ts too dumb to determine who is far right and who isn't lol. And I guess the sad folk who pretend he's not a troll are also part of the problem.

TIL: Louis Farrakan isn't an "extremist" according to Trumpers. Who knew.

I'm guessing Surt is triggered. I'd snap him like a twig in real life so who the **** cares. Little *****.

^Would never do a damn thing, cowardly thing he is

Originally posted by Surtur
^Would never do a damn thing yeah, you're an unemployed guy on disability my little faceless troll *****. Ley's see who you are in real life. Haha, I can only imagine.

Originally posted by Surtur
^Would never do a damn thing



Little b*tch boy pooty bot is still goin' around pretending like he's some big bad ass MF'er lol.



So sad.

Faceless troll bitches scared to postvwhatvthey even look like in real life.

yawn

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
yawn *****

Hey, pooty... last I checked Tommy Robinson lives in the UK. He's a pretty big tough guy. Why don't you prove to us just how bad ass you are by challenging him to a fight? Or do you just prefer to bully those you can "snap like a twig" lol.



Someone your own size (if in fact you are as big as you claim) you seem to don't want to fight. Why is that? Why you only like to pick on those who, in your mind at least, are far smaller than you are?



Yet you had the nerve to accuse TI/BB of being a "pussy" because he wouldn't fly to the UK to face you? Talk about irony lol.

Tommy Robinson is like 5'6"; maybe shorter, that's not "big", that's well below average.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Hey, pooty... last I checked Tommy Robinson lives in the UK. He's a pretty big tough guy. Why don't you prove to us just how bad ass you are by challenging him to a fight? Or do you just prefer to bully those you can "snap like a twig"



Someone your own size (if in fact you are as big as you claim) you seem to don't want to fight. Why is that? Why you only like to pick on those who, in your mind at least, are far smaller than you are?



Yet you had the nerve to accuse TI/BB of being a "pussy" because he wouldn't fly to the UK to face you? Talk about irony lol. Tommy Robimson runs to the Police mate, whole documentaeries on him running to the Police. If he said something to my face it would be different he hasn't. I've never interacted with him. I don't like his views. But he's never given it large in my face.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
yeah, you're an unemployed guy on disability my little faceless troll *****. Ley's see who you are in real life. Haha, I can only imagine.

LOL he took me off ignore, I'm in this kids head

And he's mad I accurately pointed out he's a coward. Good

Originally posted by Surtur
LOL he took me off ignore, I'm in this kids head

And he's mad I accurately pointed out he's a coward. Good I never had you on ignore lol.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I never had you on ignore lol.

This just means I'm even more in your head, coward

Originally posted by Surtur
This just means I'm even more in your head, coward Coward lol. Post a picture of your unemployed, broken body *****. Lol.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Coward lol. Post a picture of your unemployed, broken body *****. Lol.

Your cowardice is hilarious to me, as is how angry you get when called one you old worthless b*tch t*ts having kunt

Originally posted by Surtur
Your cowardice is hilarious to me, as is how angry you get when called one you old worthless b*tch t*ts having kunt haha you have nothing, no job, no gf, no education, no life. You are what you are and in real life i can only imagine howvsad ypur life is. Do better, loser *****.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
haha you have nothing, no job, no gf, no education, no life. You are what you are and in real life i can only imagine howvsad ypur life is. Do better, loser *****.

Bwahaaha. Do better b*tch t*ts

Originally posted by Surtur
Bwahaaha. Do better b*tch t*ts Get a job or a girlfriend loser.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Get a job or a girlfriend loser.

Get some new insults kiddo

Originally posted by Surtur
Get some new insults kiddo why when the truth is so good. You will never have anything.

lol this recent triggereddom/freak out from little pooty is very hilarious and entertaining and I do so enjoy laughing at it but sadly real life calls.


I look forward to coming back in an hour or two though to laugh my ass off some more.


This is better than a stand-up comedy show lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
lol this recent triggereddom/freak out from little pooty is very hilarious and entertaining and I do so enjoy laughing at it but sadly real life calls.


I look forward to coming back in an hour or two though to laugh my ass off some more.


This is better than a stand-up comedy show lol. Fly you far right faceless loser troll *****. A ***** you are and a ***** you ever will be.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Coward lol. Post a picture of your unemployed, broken body *****. Lol.

You should be more ruthless with your punches (this is sarcasm).

I'd legit rather have a broken body than man boobies. That's just me, that's just something I believe. Call me crazy call me a pervert.

Question, how is Alex Jones far right? He's a conspiracy theorist who says some crazy shit I'll admit, I don't really take him that seriously. But what policy positions make him far right?

I've heard him say whacky conspiratorial shit and stuff about elites contacting aliens with palantirs, but does anyone have anything deeply racist or totalitarian on the guy?

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Question, how is Alex Jones far right? He's a conspiracy theorist who says some crazy shit I'll admit, I don't really take him that seriously. But what policy positions make him far right?

I've heard him say whacky conspiratorial shit and stuff about elites contacting aliens with palantirs, but does anyone have anything deeply racist or totalitarian on the guy?

What I wanna know is, can they describe the differences between far right and alt right?

And this is the same side that called Farrakhan "far right" lol. Washington Post and at least one other news source(I forget which one) had to edit their articles to correct that claim.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'd legit rather have a broken body than man boobies. That's just me, that's just something I believe. Call me crazy call me a pervert.

STFU you jobless, broken body, no GF having, CUCK, incel, Trump-voter, fascist!


Don't you dare ask me how you can be a cuck but no GF, either! That's just stupid talk, ya hear?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Fly you far right faceless loser troll *****. A ***** you are and a ***** you ever will be.

Now that’s something I would have posted. Well done, sir 👍

Originally posted by dadudemon
STFU you jobless, broken body, no GF having, CUCK, incel, Trump-voter, fascist!


Don't you dare ask me how you can be a cuck but no GF, either! That's just stupid talk, ya hear?

You have wounded me, good sir!

Originally posted by Surtur
You have wounded me, good sir!

Exactly how all Nazis should be treated. uhuh

@Emperor: No, no one has a damn thing on him in regardss to him being a "racist" or "authoritarian" or even "far right". And yeah, I'll admit he goes over the top sometimes w/some of the things he says and I certainly don't agree with every single thing he says but he is very informed politically.


He, just like Trump, is the opposite of an authoritarian.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Exactly how all Nazis should be treated. uhuh

You have foiled my nazi plot...for now! But I am retreating to Argentina to regroup with other nazis.

#WeWillReturn

Originally posted by Robtard
TIL: Louis Farrakan isn't an "extremist" according to Trumpers. Who knew.
He says some radical shit, I don't think he should be banned though.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
He says some radical shit, I don't think he should be banned though.

Bingo, unless he's saying illegal shit...let him spew his BS.

And we have people on the right saying Farrakhan should be able to express himself as long as it's not illegal. You won't see many on the left defending Alex Jones.

Though I will say if they are gonna be lame and ban people like Jones yeah Farrakhan has to go, but in reality neither should go.

lol of course Farrakan is an extremist. Don't think anyone tried to claim otherwise but he is not on the right though.

Originally posted by Surtur
Bingo, unless he's saying illegal shit...let him spew his BS.

And we have people on the right saying Farrakhan should be able to express himself as long as it's not illegal. You won't see many on the left defending Alex Jones.

Though I will say if they are gonna be lame and ban people like Jones yeah Farrakhan has to go, but in reality neither should go.



Only one on the left I've seen defending Jones's right to speak is Bill Maher lol.


Who would've ever guessed that?

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Only one I've seen defending Jones's right to speak is Bill Maher lol.


Who would've ever guessed that?
I would've. Bill Maher is someone who seems to like free speech, not just as a legal policy, but an important social value.

Bill Maher is a weird liberal. He can be very wise on topics such as freedom of speech, Islam, etc.

On the other hand he can fall into the same trap with Trump others do. There is some hope for him, we have this...trigger warning:

Bill Maher ADMITS "I Have Been Owned" Says Trump Supporters "Owned The Libs"

ZIxCsUyImtw&t

Originally posted by Emperordmb
I would've. Bill Maher is someone who seems to like free speech, not just as a legal policy, but an important social value.




Yeah, of course as would I and pretty much any other conservative, libetarian, or classical liberal would. I meant that he was the only one on the left I've seen defending Jones.


That is one of the major differences between true liberals, conservatives, libertarians, and all of these radical leftist so-called "progressives." We think the 1st amendment grants everyone the right to speak even if that speech is "hate speech" while the modern day "progressive" left thinks speech they designate as "hate speech" (aka any speech they don't like) isn't covered by the 1st amendment.

Originally posted by Surtur
Bill Maher is a weird liberal. He can be very wise on topics such as freedom of speech, Islam, etc.

On the other hand he can fall into the same trap with Trump others do. There is some hope for him, we have this...trigger warning:

Bill Maher ADMITS "I Have Been Owned" Says Trump Supporters "Owned The Libs"

ZIxCsUyImtw&t

Are you feeling ok, Surt?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Are you feeling ok, Surt?

Ya, why?

You never posted a trigger warning for that Tim Pool video. Seemed like very unusual behaviour. Lol

My bad! I forgot some of the most pathetic folk here get triggered by him.

I feel bad, I hope they don't kill themselves.

😄

Rightist are once again doing that thing where they believe freedom to speech/expression also means they get a platform to do it; that isn't so.

eg Alex Jones and Louis Farrakan both have the freedom to say what they wish (barring some things like inciting violence), but that doesn't mean Facebook, a school or a donut shop has to give them a platform to do it.

They are both certainly free to go back to ranting in public parks though.

Originally posted by Robtard
Rightist seem to be once again doing that thing where they believe freedom to speech/expression also means they get a platform; that isn't so.

eg Alex Jones and Louis Farrakan both have the freedom to say what they wish (barring some things like inciting violence), but that doesn't mean Facebook, a school or a donut shop has to give them a platform to do it.

They are both certainly free to go back to ranting in public parks though.

^You just love making the people who vouch for you look bad lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
^You just love making the people who vouch for you look bad lol.

Two questions:

1) What exactly are you talking about?

2) What in my benign post set you off this time?

Originally posted by Robtard
Two questions:

1) What exactly are you talking about?

2) What in my benign post set you off this time?

I'm talking about any poster here who deems to take you seriously on a subject. You make them look bad.

I see, so you're just shit posting and whining as usual. Cool.

What I said stands, freedom of speech doesn't mean someone has to give you a platform to do it. Deal with it already.

Originally posted by Robtard
I see, so you're just shit posting and whining as usual. Cool.

What I said stands, freedom of speech doesn't mean someone has to give you a platform to do it. Deal with it already.

Rob, you're not fooling anyone anymore.

Is there a piece of shit willing to admit to being fooled by this guy? Now is the time.

Originally posted by Surtur
Rob, you're not fooling anyone anymore.

Is there a piece of shit willing to admit to being fooled by this guy? Now is the time.

^ Trig'd over facts

Originally posted by Robtard
^ Trig'd over facts

Irony overload.

Originally posted by Robtard
Rightist are once again doing that thing where they believe freedom to speech/expression also means they get a platform to do it; that isn't so.
No I'm not, there's a difference between what someone shouldn't do, and what they shouldn't be allowed to do.

I think social media should genuinely commit themselves to free speech, I don't think they should be legally forced to.

I think it's healthier for society if companies aren't pressured by outrage mobs into censoring people who disagree with them. I think it's preferable that online political discourse not be controlled by the bubble silicon valley lives in. I think the political dialogue is healthier if people just talk instead of trying get one over on each other by desperately trying to dig up anything anyone said in the past to demand advertisers to pull out in order to remove people from the political discourse. It's just gross. I'd rather people be able to determine for themselves if they want to listen what someone has to say rather than it being determined for them by the overlords at silicon valley.

Additionally, I don't think it's healthy to remove extremists from the mainstream platforms where there are actually dissenting voices to disagree with them and actual standards around incitement to violence. Unless... you'd rather them be on a platform with no dissenting opinions and no standards around incitement to violence?

Tell me, is it better that Alex Jones is on a platform where people can debunk his conspiracy theories and try and dissuade people who think him seriously? Maybe have the moral high ground to say, "nobody is out to get you, you're just paranoid," as opposed to... I don't know... validate his conspiracy theories in the eyes of a lot of people by trying to silence him?

Is it better that even the most hateful voices or people tempted by them are on public platforms where they can be debunked and challenged on their points and have to not call for acts of violence? Or would you rather them congregate on 8chan in an echo chamber that just drives them to be more and more radical until you have an insulated hidden group of people encouraging each other to shoot up mosques and synagogues?


At the end of the day though, I think it's their right as a private company to determine who gets to use their platform, but something being a right is not the same as it being the right thing to do.

I didn't have a problem when FB and Youtube let these morons do their thing on those platforms and I don't have a problem with these companies banning them as that's their right to do so.

So we seem to be in overall agreement and thanks for the calm measured reply.