leonidas
so this is from another thread that did not end particularly well. basically we all (many of us) love metatextual characters--especially higher level ones. see the yellow aliens from animal man and multiversity for examples.
but the very nature of metatextual is STILL fiction, and yet many of these metatextual characters are held in esteem above and beyond their more traditionally fictional characters. SHOULD that be the case? who are some of the biggest and baddest metafiction characters and how do they REALLY compare to the biggest and baddest traditional comic characters from all companies?
this is essentially more of a discussion than a vs match, but obviously characters will be pitted against each other here as examples. can the two types of characters even BE compared in any way that matters, or should the metafictional versions not be allowed to be placed in vs match ups?
all civil thoughts welcome.
but the very nature of metatextual is STILL fiction, and yet many of these metatextual characters are held in esteem above and beyond their more traditionally fictional characters. SHOULD that be the case? who are some of the biggest and baddest metafiction characters and how do they REALLY compare to the biggest and baddest traditional comic characters from all companies?
this is essentially more of a discussion than a vs match, but obviously characters will be pitted against each other here as examples. can the two types of characters even BE compared in any way that matters, or should the metafictional versions not be allowed to be placed in vs match ups?
all civil thoughts welcome.