Alex Jones sent child porn to Sandy Hook victims

Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.



carthage
https://www.wsj.com/articles/lawyers-for-sandy-hook-families-say-alex-jones-sent-them-child-pornography-11560809877

Thoughts

eThneoLgrRnae
This has already been debunked. Alex didn't do this. It's just yet another one of the many lies pushed by those who hate him.

carthage
Spoken like someone wearing a tinfoil hat

eThneoLgrRnae
It's a lie, dude, but I understand why you so desperately wanna believe it... you hate him because he helped Trump get elected. Cry, cry, cry.

carthage
Whose Trumpo?

Adam_PoE
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This has already been debunked. Alex didn't do this. It's just yet another one of the many lies pushed by those who hate him.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It's a lie, dude, but I understand why you so desperately wanna believe it... you hate him because he helped Trump get elected. Cry, cry, cry.

The right-wing Wall Street Journal does not have it out for Jones or Trump.

Bashar Teg
lock his ass up. alex jones needs to do some b1tch-time

TempAccount
He didn't do that

eThneoLgrRnae
Keep crying, snowflakes. It's alright, Trump is STILL your president. smile

Bashar Teg
jones will be crying when the other inmates knock his teeth out and make him their suck puppet

eThneoLgrRnae
^waah, waah, waah!!

Bashar Teg
"it's fake news because my fee-fees"

NemeBro
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
This has already been debunked. Alex didn't do this. It's just yet another one of the many lies pushed by those who hate him. Got a source bud?

ArtificialGlory
Why the f*ck would he do that, if this is true?

TempAccount
Yes, let us ask ourselves what could he possibly have to gain by doing this if it were true before we jump on the bandwagon.

ares834
Google it. He was ordered by the court to send over a huge volume of his documents to the families's lawyers. Supposedly, it was in that.

So no, he didn't just email it to them for the lulz.

BackFire
He claims it was malware or something.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Keep crying, snowflakes. It's alright, Trump is STILL your president. smile what a little ***** you are on this account. Haha, we should rename you, thelonelybitch when you post as this character Fly.

ArtificialGlory

eThneoLgrRnae
^Doesn't mean what he says isn't true though.


Anyway, he's got a very good lawyer (whom Alex had on his show 2 or 3 days ago) who is going to defend him. I have no doubt Alex will be completely & utterly vindicated.

Adam Grimes
So you don't care if he has child porn or not, just that a lawyer saves his ass. Noted. thumb up

Originally posted by NemeBro
Got a source bud? btw

NemeBro
Originally posted by NemeBro
Got a source bud?

Robtard

Bashar Teg
*yawn* star/fly already debunked all that with his feelings.

Robtard
The 'eThneoLgrRnae' sock account went from being the uber Trumper to make other Trumpers here seem less Trumpy to defending a scumbag who peddles out child porn to victims of murdered children; of which Jones already spent years trolling/mocking them.

Let's see how this strategy plays out. edit: I guess this works for both the 'eThneoLgrRnae' sock and Alex Jones.

Flyattractor
Fun to see the Anti-Trumpers all have to group up and hide behind the same lies to just cope with reality.




But seriously...WhoTF is "Star" again?

Stringer

Flyattractor
Nah. You are to sticky for that.

Stringer

Flyattractor
But your kind of sticky isn't the "fun" kind of sticky.

Surtur
Originally posted by Surtur
Alex Jones' Lawyer: Claim Jones Sent Child Porn To Sandy Hook Lawyers Wildly Misleading

Intriguing.

They are claiming federal prosecutors told them it was malware.

Adam_PoE

Robtard
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He got caught watching transsexual porn on the air.

Funny and not my thing, but that's not illegal and I'm totally not surprised. Rightist in general love tranny porn.

Surtur
I'm not sure what to think, cuz Jones could be creepy enough to do this. But he's also so insane he could inspire people to troll him like this.

This is like the boy who cried the frogs are gay.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
The 'eThneoLgrRnae' sock account went from being the uber Trumper to make other Trumpers here seem less Trumpy to defending a scumbag who peddles out child porn to victims of murdered children; of which Jones already spent years trolling/mocking them.

Let's see how this strategy plays out. edit: I guess this works for both the 'eThneoLgrRnae' sock and Alex Jones. That account cracks me up, it's so wacky and out there. It's passive aggressive and such a little *****. It's a parody surely.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
That account cracks me up, it's so wacky and out there. It's passive aggressive and such a little *****. It's a parody surely.

You calling others passive aggressive is hilarious lol. Good show ol' chap thumb up

NemeBro
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
He got caught watching transsexual porn on the air. There's nothing wrong with this.

Putinbot1
Double post

Putinbot1

Robtard
Originally posted by NemeBro
There's nothing wrong with this.

In hindsight, I think Adam's point wasn't that it's wrong to watch trans porn in of itself, just that Alex Jones has a history of shitting on transsexuals and using hate speech against them, to only get caught being an admirer of trans porn.

Which again is no surprise. eg How many Rightist professional gay-haters get caught being self loathing closeted homosexuals themselves.

Surtur

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
Dude settle down lol. Tommy can't hurt you, I promise. True, I'm not a care worker who's not a fighter, love you guys heroes, Alex Jones, Tommy Robinson. You are who you worship I guess.

Surtur
I never worshiped Tommy bro. Why say I do?

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Surtur
I'm not sure what to think, cuz Jones could be creepy enough to do this. But he's also so insane he could inspire people to troll him like this.

This is like the boy who cried the frogs are gay.


I promise you Alex doesn't do shit like this. In fact, he's constantly speaking out about stuff like that and the sexualizing of little children.


And he's not insane either. He just gets a little overly dramatic sometimes.


And as for the "gay frogs" thing, he wasn't the one who first started saying that. He quoted a research study from an article. Something about atrozine making some frogs prefer the same sex. He was just reporting on something someone else said. It's not like he just made it up out of the blue the way many people seem to think.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I promise you Alex doesn't do shit like this. In fact, he's constantly speaking out about stuff like that and the sexualizing of little children.


And he's not insane either. He just gets a little overly dramatic sometimes.


And as for the "gay frogs" thing, he wasn't the one who first started saying that. He quoted a research study from an article. Something about atrozine making some frogs prefer the same sex. He was just reporting on something else. It's not like he just made it up out of the blue the way many people seem to think. Every fan of Ian Watckins or Jimmy Savile probably said the same thing... Funny rightist. Your feelings prove his innocence.

eThneoLgrRnae
^Keep trolling & getting triggered so easily, pooty/bashy.


It's quite entertaining. thumb up

Surtur
Even if Alex was into kiddie porn it is bizarre to me he'd send it to people who could easily sue him and expose him.

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Surtur
Even if Alex was into kiddie porn it is bizarre to me he'd send it to people who could easily sue him and expose him.


Yeah, it's an obvious smear tactic done by someone who doesn't like him.

Robtard
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Every fan of Ian Watckins or Jimmy Savile probably said the same thing... Funny rightist. Your feelings prove his innocence.

His defense is very weird, he apparently forwarded emails from other people that were pertinent to the lawsuit of which he claims he never opened/read/knew of their content in the first place. Why would he send these, if he didn't know what they entailed.

The FBI should be able to trace the source and even possibly who accessed what, unless there was some heavy scrubbing done beforehand; of which I believe they'll be able to note if this was done. So Jones' will likely be cleared or go down for this.

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
His defense is very weird, he apparently forwarded emails from other people that were pertinent to the lawsuit of which he claims he never opened/read/knew of their content in the first place. Why would he send these, if he didn't know what they entailed.

It comes down to: do you wanna believe this was malice or laziness?

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
It comes down to: do you wanna believe this was malice or laziness?

That's not an unreasonable 'this or that' scenario. With Jones' though, I don't know, even if he isn't a legit pedo, I could see him not fully thinking things through and sending this kind of shit as some weird "f**k you; I'll make you look like pedos!" move.

We'll have to wait and see what the FBI turns up in their electronic diggings. He's a scumbag, but I'd want him cleared of this if he is indeed innocent.

eThneoLgrRnae
Just knowing what I know about the kinds of things Alex is constantly and vehemently speaking out against on his show, it just doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever for him to be the one actually behind this.

Bashar Teg
is that how you feel?

Flyattractor
Keep your hands to yourself Bashy. Bad Touch.. BAD TOUCH!

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
That's not an unreasonable 'this or that' scenario. With Jones' though, I don't know, even if he isn't a legit pedo, I could see him not fully thinking things through and sending this kind of shit as some weird "f**k you; I'll make you look like pedos!" move.

We'll have to wait and see what the FBI turns up in their electronic diggings. He's a scumbag, but I'd want him cleared of this if he is indeed innocent.

Keep in mind the title to this thread is misleading. If you click the actual link it is for the WSJ, and while you won't be able to read most of the article unless you pay for it, you can see the title. Which says this stuff was not sent to the victims, but rather the lawyers for the victims.

If he wanted to make people think those suing him were pedos sending the child porn to the lawyers doesn't make any sense.

Adam_PoE
Originally posted by NemeBro
There's nothing wrong with this.

If you are against LGBT rights, but beat off to chick with dicks, yeah, there is something wrong with it.

BrolyBlack

Bentley
Thanks for clarifying your point Adam, I admit that sometimes I don't fully follow some of your arguments so I was in the fence on that.

As Rob mentioned it's not all that surprising, the fact that he finds it wrong/forbidden it's part of what makes it kinky for the dude.

eThneoLgrRnae
@Broly: Yep. You're spot on there. And we all know when it is proven he didn't actually do it all of his haters will just ignore it like they always do when they're proven wrong.


(once again, couldn't quote you)

Robtard

Surtur
Broly he is right about the point of people speaking against things being unable to be one. After all, we see racist leftists who speak out against racism all the time.

Robtard
Right on cue; can set your watch to it. El Oh El.

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
Right on cue; can set your watch to it. El Oh El.

Even when I agree with you it triggers you. Surtur Derangement Syndrome.

Robtard
First eWin of the day, good boy thumb up

Surtur
smile

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
I have no idea if Jones is a legit pedo, but I can see him sending hidden files as a "f**k you!", we'll find out the source soon enough.

But your logic of "he speaks against pedophilia, so he can't be one" is highly flawed. eg How many Rightist professional gay-haters later on get caught cheating on their wives by sucking off another dude in a dirty truck stop of similar. Jones himself shits all over trans people yet gets caught touching his tiny pecker to tranny porn.

Jones wasn't the one to expose the CIA's MK-Ultra program, this had been whispered/talked about in the late 50's and 60's and then exposed to the light in the mid 70's.

Where did I say Alex Jones exposed Mk Ultra?

Robtard
"He was right about the CIA mind control" -you

If that wasn't a reference to MK-Ultra, what CIA project are you referring to then?

BrolyBlack
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/cia-mkultra-documents-files-remote-control-dogs-1250519%3famp=1

Robtard
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/cia-mkultra-documents-files-remote-control-dogs-1250519%3famp=1


That's also MKUltra.

Flyattractor
Robbie is a Prime Example of the Lefts ability of "If they Imagine its True, that makes it TRUE".

It is really very sad.

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
That's also MKUltra.

I know for a fact I posted something on MK ultra in the conspiracy forum and was just disregarded by you and laughed off. Now that its a fact, I bet people feel pretty dumb disregarding it.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f70/t599265.html

Robtard
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
I know for a fact I posted something on MK ultra in the conspiracy forum and was just disregarded by you and laughed off. Now that its a fact, I bet people feel pretty dumb disregarding it.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f70/t599265.html

I did, where?

Again, MKUltra isn't something newly exposed, it happened in the mid 70's.

Flyattractor
Lol

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
I did, where?

Again, MKUltra isn't something newly exposed, it happened in the mid 70's.

In the link i posted, you laughed it off and went on some bizzare disney illuminti thing. Which means you didnt think it was a serious subject at all. You cant deny this after the fact, when I already posted a link to it, with you being nonsensical about it.

Flyattractor
https://media.giphy.com/media/SIO00WvNcnbSo/giphy.gif

Robtard
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
In the link i posted, you laughed it off and went on some bizzare disney illuminti thing. Which means you didnt think it was a serious subject at all. You cant deny this after the fact, when I already posted a link to it, with you being nonsensical about it.

I did not laugh the MKUltra stuff off; in fact, I didn't even respond to you.

I laughed at the other poster's: "Think about Disney. How many child stars have been turned into whores by that organization?" remark.

Flyattractor
Originally posted by Flyattractor
https://media.giphy.com/media/SIO00WvNcnbSo/giphy.gif

BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
I did not laugh the MKUltra stuff off; in fact, I didn't even respond to you.

I laughed at the other poster's: "Think about Disney. How many child stars have been turned into whores by that organization?" remark.

So you believe in MK Uktra undoubtedly?

Robtard
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So you believe in MK Uktra undoubtedly?

That it happened? Yes, it was exposed in the mid 70's.

Putinbot1
MK Ultra is fact, yes.

Putinbot1
75 I think the Jason Bourne books are partially based on techniques used in the Canada phase as I remember.

Flyattractor
All those Poor Goats.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Flyattractor
All those Poor Goats. Good film tbh.

Surtur
There is a great docu-drama on netflix called "Wormwood" about a scientist for the CIA who essentially was killed by MK Ultra. It was officially reported as a "suicide". Later it was a "wrongful death".

The family even got to visit the White House and actually got an apology from Gerald R Ford. Think about that, how many people have gotten a personal apology...in the white house, from the president(and CIA Director), for something our government did?

Flyattractor
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Good film tbh.

Yeah. It Was.

BrolyBlack

Putinbot1

Putinbot1
Treadstone maybe.

Surtur
They'd only stop if it bore no fruit. They'd never stop due to exposure. Not unless the CIA itself was dismantled.

Flyattractor
Gov Agencies Never Die.

Surtur
I have no problem with crazy lsd experiments, but just do it with people who consent.

Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so. I think Trump studied Hitler more than CIA experiments... Yeah, I went there.

Robtard
Find an easy group to demonize, make the sheep believe those people are the cause of their own woes, sow discord.

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so.

Irony overload.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
Find an easy group to demonize, make the sheep believe those people are the cause of their own woes, sow discord. Exactly, cheap popularist Dictator 101.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so.

Yeah, some of the Trumpers are fanatical. Around .001% of them.

If the CIA wants a better sample pool, they should look at about 20% of American leftists and Democrats. Much better examples of people who fall in line with directions and orders than Trumpers.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by dadudemon
Yeah, some of the Trumpers are fanatical. Around .001% of them.

If the CIA wants a better sample pool, they should look at about 20% of American leftists and Democrats. Much better examples of people who fall in line with directions and orders than Trumpers. Nice gaslighting. wink

Surtur
Originally posted by dadudemon
Yeah, some of the Trumpers are fanatical. Around .001% of them.

If the CIA wants a better sample pool, they should look at about 20% of American leftists and Democrats. Much better examples of people who fall in line with directions and orders than Trumpers.

Rob I got some aloe if you need it.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Nice gaslighting. wink

https://media.giphy.com/media/uhRggg96lxHTW/giphy.gif

dadudemon
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Nice gaslighting. wink

Here's the definition of gaslighting:

"manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity."

Is what I did gaslighitng?

hmm




Here, I'll not be a coward like DIjkdlfjsdfIDIDFIF is. I'll better explain my position.


When Obama voters were confronted with things Obama actually did, in 2012, which included a laundry list of heinous things that the standard Democrat should vehemently opposed, they still supported Obama. Here's the catch: those actions were presented to the Obama voters as things Romney did, said, or voted for. After it was revealed that these were all things Obama did, the Obama voters, almost universally, stated they would still vote for Obama in 2012.

It gets better: when these same people were presented with things Romney said or did, but they were told it was what Obama said or did, these voters liked those actions and quotes very much because they thought Obama did it. When it was revealed that it was Romney, not Obama, they did not switch their choice: they still stuck with Obama.



It gets better: a similar thought experiment was done with Trump's new tax plan.

Leftist morons were presented with "Bernie Sanders' tax plan", but it was actually Trump's tax plan, and asked if they liked the details. They did. When it was revealed that it wasn't Sanders' plan, but Trump's, the collective pants shitting was hilarious. Guess what? The anti-Turmptards still doubled down on their Trump Derangement Syndrome.




And there are tens of millions of people like that, right now, in the US. So many people suffering from Democrat-induced-propaganda fueled by the big-media hate machine. smile

Surtur
Whirly my aloe plant is also available to you if you need it.

cdtm
Originally posted by Surtur
They'd only stop if it bore no fruit. They'd never stop due to exposure. Not unless the CIA itself was dismantled.


Rationalwiki had an.... interesting conversation about the topic, in the "wiki changes" area.


Some of the more vocal members were pooh poohing the concept that it was only about LSD. One claimed it was about much more then that, and that we learned a lot.


Never mind the fact this data gathering was completely without the consent of those being studied, but to make such statements that these studies were a net positive, says a lot about the speaker. He's probably one of those "Science justifies anything" sorts, even if talking about irradiating consciousness objectors, or unsuspecting towns (All of which has happened).

Putinbot1
Originally posted by dadudemon
Here's the definition of gaslighting:

"manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity."

Is what I did gaslighitng?

hmm




Here, I'll not be a coward like DIjkdlfjsdfIDIDFIF is. I'll better explain my position.


When Obama voters were confronted with things Obama actually did, in 2012, which included a laundry list of heinous things that the standard Democrat should vehemently opposed, they still supported Obama. Here's the catch: those actions were presented to the Obama voters as things Romney did, said, or voted for. After it was revealed that these were all things Obama did, the Obama voters, almost universally, stated they would still vote for Obama in 2012.

It gets better: when these same people were presented with things Romney said or did, but they were told it was what Obama said or did, these voters liked those actions and quotes very much because they thought Obama did it. When it was revealed that it was Romney, not Obama, they did not switch their choice: they still stuck with Obama.



It gets better: a similar thought experiment was done with Trump's new tax plan.

Leftist morons were presented with "Bernie Sanders' tax plan", but it was actually Trump's tax plan, and asked if they liked the details. They did. When it was revealed that it wasn't Sanders' plan, but Trump's, the collective pants shitting was hilarious. Guess what? The anti-Turmptards still doubled down on their Trump Derangement Syndrome.




And there are tens of millions of people like that, right now, in the US. So many people suffering from Democrat-induced-propaganda fueled by the big-media hate machine. smile Yeah, the definition has broadened with the Internet DDM. From wiki the font of all knowledge.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, gaslighting involves attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief.

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term originated from the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gaslight and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations, in which the gas-fueled lights in a character's home are dimmed when he turns the attic lights brighter while he searches the attic at night. He convinces his wife that she is imagining the change. The term has been used in clinical and research literature, as well as in political commentary.

Surtur
https://media.giphy.com/media/pUeXcg80cO8I8/giphy.gif

Robtard
Originally posted by dadudemon
Yeah, some of the Trumpers are fanatical. Around .001% of them.

If the CIA wants a better sample pool, they should look at about 20% of American leftists and Democrats. Much better examples of people who fall in line with directions and orders than Trumpers.

Disagreed. It's easily 30%. They believe every lie and outrageous claim.

Disagreed. See above.

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
Rob I got some aloe if you need it.

^Classic Cheerleading

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
^Classic Cheerleading

More irony overload lol. Good stuff, keep it up.

Robtard
^ Textbook triggerdom

dadudemon
Originally posted by Robtard
Disagreed. It's easily 30%. They believe every lie and outrageous claim.

You're right: it's 30% of the lefties and Democrats.

Thanks for the clarification.

dadudemon
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, the definition has broadened with the Internet DDM. From wiki the font of all knowledge.

Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, gaslighting involves attempts to destabilize the victim and delegitimize the victim's belief.

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term originated from the 1938 Patrick Hamilton play Gaslight and its 1940 and 1944 film adaptations, in which the gas-fueled lights in a character's home are dimmed when he turns the attic lights brighter while he searches the attic at night. He convinces his wife that she is imagining the change. The term has been used in clinical and research literature, as well as in political commentary.

Gotcha. So not at all what I posted even a tiny bit. But what Robtard posted.

Thanks for clarifying.

Robtard
Originally posted by dadudemon
You're right: it's 30% of the lefties and Democrats.

Thanks for the clarification.
Oh you, classic DDM.


Anyhow, what's the difference between a chickpea and a garbanzo bean?

Now think about this for at least a minute before revealing: I've never had a garbanzo on my face

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Robtard
If the CIA is still interested in mind control, they should take a good look at Trumpers, they fall in line without question when Trump commands it so.


LOL@ the irony of that statement coming from someone like you who has been thoroughly brainwashed by the lying leftist MSM to think that Trump is literally the next Hitler lmao or that so-called "man-made" climate change is more of a threat to the planet than nuclear weapons lmao or that socialism is superior to capitalism or that there are 69 genders lol.


Irony overload, indeed.

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Robtard
^Classic Cheerleading



...says the person who is always cheerleading for his butt-buddies with his little "bingos." laughing out loud

Adam Grimes
Calm down, buddy. It's gonna give you something.

Flyattractor
There goes that Lefty Imagination again.

Surtur
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Calm down, buddy. It's gonna give you something.

Except he's not wrong. Rob legit behaves in the exact same manner he dubs as "cheerleading" on a near daily basis lol.

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Surtur
Except he's not wrong. Rob legit behaves in the exact same manner he dubs as "cheerleading" on a near daily basis lol.


It's totally ok when Rob or some other snowflake leftist does it, Surtur. Snowflakes like Grimey only have a problem with it when a Conservative does it.

samhain
Why do peeps insist on using the term 'irony overload' when they more often than not mean hypocrisy?

Surtur
Originally posted by samhain
Why do peeps insist on using the term 'irony overload' when they more often than not mean hypocrisy?

It's just a thing here people(on both sides) do.

Why is "dick" a nickname for "Richard"?

eThneoLgrRnae
Either one fits in that instance, tbh.


It's funny how you don't show annoyance over slightly incorrect word usage when rob uses "irony overload" in the exact same way for very similar situations. It's almost like you have selective outrage because Rob is a progressive dolt and I'm a Conservative... go figure.

samhain
Originally posted by Surtur
It's just a thing here people(on both sides) do.

Why is "dick" a nickname for "Richard"?

And "Nick" is short for "Nicholas", yet apparently "Nichard" and "Richolas" are considered silly names.

samhain
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Either one fits in that instance, tbh.


It's funny how you don't bother to bring it up when rob uses it in the exact same way for very similar circumstances. It's almost like you have selective outrage because Rob is a progreessive dolt and I'm a Conservative.


No. It just happened to be after you had said it. Should I have waited for somebody that you don't agree with to use the term 'Irony overload' before asking my question? Or are you saying that nobody can ask a question or make an observation without clearly listing all of those people who do it?

eThneoLgrRnae
It just seemed suspicious to me that's all. Sorry if I was mistaken.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by samhain
No. It just happened to be after you had said it. Should I have waited for somebody that you don't agree with to use the term 'Irony overload' before asking my question? Or are you saying that nobody can ask a question or make an observation without clearly listing all of those people who do it? Sam, it's a parody account mate. It can't be real; it's too perfectly ludicrous.

Surtur
Originally posted by samhain
And "Nick" is short for "Nicholas", yet apparently "Nichard" and "Richolas" are considered silly names.

And they call people named John Jack. F*cking name him Jack then.

samhain
Originally posted by samhain



Why do peeps insist on using the term 'irony overload' when they more often than not mean hypocrisy?


I hardly pointed the finger at any specific person here though, I was as brief as possible.

samhain
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Sam, it's a parody account mate. It can't be real; it's too perfectly ludicrous.


Most likely. I actually have found this account to be capable of reason on occasion.

eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, unlike Bashy on his "PutinBot1" sock account where he does nothing but troll and constantly get triggered.

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Sam, it's a parody account mate. It can't be real; it's too perfectly ludicrous.


There goes the pot calling the kettle black again... oh bashy. no

Putinbot1
Originally posted by samhain
Most likely. I actually have found this account to be capable of reason on occasion. A good troll can't always be a **** or no one will interact at all. So yeah, I've also seen moments of clarity from it.

Thing is if it were real, it would care it was continually getting e-fisted. But it doesn't because even when it is gaping with posters arms shoulder deep in its e-intestine, it's puppeteer also has it's hand so deep up it's e-arse its hand is moving its mouth.

Surtur
Here is a thought: if it's a parody account you're doing exactly what it wants by obsessing over it like you're a teenage girl trying to decide on a dress for prom.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
Here is a thought: if it's a parody account you're doing exactly what it wants by obsessing over it like you're a teenage girl trying to decide on a dress for prom. I'm not obsessing, as I have said over and over, I enjoy that account kudos to the creator, it is a work of hilarious art.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I'm not obsessing, as I have said over and over, I enjoy that account kudos to the creator, it is a work of hilarious art.

Okay dude you have stated you enjoy the account.

We all saw it, I'll vouch.

It's obsession if you feel the need to continually point this out in the future lol.

Jessica Tandy

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
Okay dude you have stated you enjoy the account.

We all saw it, I'll vouch.

It's obsession if you feel the need to continually point this out in the future lol. Not really, but, your idea of obsession is a few one, two or three sentence posts on a message board. You are either white knighting, a friend or a snowflake.

Robtard
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not really, but, your idea of obsession is a few one, two or three sentence posts on a message board. You are either white knighting, a friend or a snowflake.


Why not both?

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
Why not both? laughing so true, dare I say: Bingo!

eThneoLgrRnae
Poor bashy/pooty is so obsessed with me. It's sad his life is so empty...smh no

Jessica Tandy
We are talking about the gay frogs, marmalade of stupidity screamer guy, right? Not the porn star?

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not really, but, your idea of obsession is a few one, two or three sentence posts on a message board. You are either white knighting, a friend or a snowflake.

I see I hit a nerve. It's okay, obsess over whatever you want. As long as you're enjoying yourself thumb up

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Surtur
I see I hit a nerve. It's okay, obsess over whatever you want. As long as you're enjoying yourself thumb up As if more proof was needed obsession means something different to you than the rest of the world.

Robtard
Surt's fixations over Whirly and his little Surt eWins aside, this happened and it's good, another nail in Jones' coffin, may he and these other "Sandy Hook was a false flag!" scum be sued into pennilessness by these parents. The parents were harassed for years by idiots who believe hacks like Alex Jones.

Sandy Hook Victim's Father Wins Defamation Suit; Alex Jones Sanctioned

Leonard Pozner, whose 6-year-old son was killed in the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, has been battling against conspiracy theorists for years, and on Tuesday he scored a victory against deniers who claim that the shooting that left 20 first-graders dead never happened.

A Wisconsin judge issued a summary judgment in favor of Pozner in a defamation lawsuit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, a 400-page book purporting a series of false claims, including ideas that the mass shooting was a FEMA drill to promote gun control and that the grieving father had fabricated his son Noah's death certificate, which is a crime in Connecticut.

"Mr. Pozner has sought for years to try to get these conspiracy theorists to understand that his son really was a person and that his son really did die and as a last resort we initiated this defamation case," Pozner's lawyer, Jake Zimmerman, told NPR.

The lawsuit focused narrowly on the claim by James Fetzer and Mike Palecek that Pozner had forged or faked the death certificate, though it also alluded to other convoluted theories advanced by Fetzer on his blog, including the theory that Noah was not Pozner's son.

"Fetzer acted with actual malice," court documents say, also accusing the writer of publishing statements knowing that they "were false or with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statements." -snip


The publisher of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" has recently apologized and pulled the book from circulation.

Surtur
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As if more proof was needed obsession means something different to you than the rest of the world.

^Same guy who can't properly identify the alt right, nazis, etc. lol.

Pure. Comedy. Gold.

Putinbot1
Originally posted by Robtard
Surt's fixations over Whirly and his little Surt eWins aside, this happened and it's good, another nail in Jones' coffin, may he and these other "Sandy Hook was a false flag!" scum be sued into pennilessness by these parents. The parents were harassed for years by idiots who believe hacks like Alex Jones.

Sandy Hook Victim's Father Wins Defamation Suit; Alex Jones Sanctioned

Leonard Pozner, whose 6-year-old son was killed in the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, has been battling against conspiracy theorists for years, and on Tuesday he scored a victory against deniers who claim that the shooting that left 20 first-graders dead never happened.

A Wisconsin judge issued a summary judgment in favor of Pozner in a defamation lawsuit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, a 400-page book purporting a series of false claims, including ideas that the mass shooting was a FEMA drill to promote gun control and that the grieving father had fabricated his son Noah's death certificate, which is a crime in Connecticut.

"Mr. Pozner has sought for years to try to get these conspiracy theorists to understand that his son really was a person and that his son really did die and as a last resort we initiated this defamation case," Pozner's lawyer, Jake Zimmerman, told NPR.

The lawsuit focused narrowly on the claim by James Fetzer and Mike Palecek that Pozner had forged or faked the death certificate, though it also alluded to other convoluted theories advanced by Fetzer on his blog, including the theory that Noah was not Pozner's son.

"Fetzer acted with actual malice," court documents say, also accusing the writer of publishing statements knowing that they "were false or with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statements." -snip


The publisher of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" has recently apologized and pulled the book from circulation. Let's hope all these conspiracy nuts get what they deserve over this Rob thumb up

Surtur
Good for them, makes me smile cuz it reminds me of Oberlin College getting what it deserved.

Robtard
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Let's hope all these conspiracy nuts get what they deserve over this Rob thumb up

Justice would be done and Alex Jones' fans would rage even harder. Win/win

Robtard
Originally posted by Surtur
Good for them, makes me smile cuz it reminds me of Oberlin College getting what it deserved.

Considering you're an Alex Jones fan, this comes off as heavy coping, Surt.

Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
Considering you're an Alex Jones fan, this comes off as heavy coping, Surt.

I'm a fan? Prove it smile

I've seen some videos, but don't really follow him. Prove your claim.

Robtard
Oh, maybe you were just kidding again or something.

<< THERE IS MORE FROM THIS THREAD HERE >>