Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Link

The "journalist" deserved it freedom fighters need their anonymity

Woah... ANTIFIA truly is the most dangerous threat to national security in modern times bros...

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Woah... ANTIFIA truly is the most dangerous threat to national security in modern times bros...

This is quite scary. These savages also threatened acid attacks on participants at D.C Free Speech Rally:

https://www.newswars.com/antifa-plans-acid-attacks-on-d-c-free-speech-rally-vows-to-blind-attendees/

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Woah... ANTIFIA truly is the most dangerous threat to national security in modern times bros...

Nice to see where the far-left stands in regards to violence.

The guy apparently has a brain hemorrhage. The cops are saying they got reports Antifa was mixing quick dry cement into milkshakes. That stuff can cause chemical burns. Trigger Warning, here is Tim's take on it:

Antifa Brutally Beat Andy Ngo, He's Hospitalized With Brain Hemorrhage, Media Leftists Excuse Antifa

5gSGsaJ24wo&t

A GoFundMe for the guy has raised 75k, good. Also one of these days an black masked creep is gonna pick on someone who is armed and get blasted and on that day I'll be here to say: awful.

Originally posted by Surtur
The guy apparently has a brain hemorrhage. The cops are saying they got reports Antifa was mixing quick dry cement into milkshakes. That stuff can cause chemical burns. Trigger Warning, here is Tim's take on it:

Antifa Brutally Beat Andy Ngo, He's Hospitalized With Brain Hemorrhage, Media Leftists Excuse Antifa

5gSGsaJ24wo&t

A GoFundMe for the guy has raised 75k, good. Also one of these days an black masked creep is gonna pick on someone who is armed and get blasted and on that day I'll be here to say: awful.
Awful.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Awful.

https://i.imgur.com/yrDDXkw.jpg

The part he finds awful is that he didn't get to help.

nah, i would have just watched and laughed

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Woah... ANTIFIA truly is the most dangerous threat to national security in modern times bros...

Herpa derp, you get the smell my shoes award after I workout You can share this privilege with bash and whirly but I'm concerned whirly might enjoy it.

hilarious

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
nah, i would have just watched and laughed

I believe you, you'd lack the courage to get involved...even in a group beatdown.

Originally posted by Surtur
The guy apparently has a brain hemorrhage. The cops are saying they got reports Antifa was mixing quick dry cement into milkshakes. That stuff can cause chemical burns. Trigger Warning, here is Tim's take on it:

Antifa Brutally Beat Andy Ngo, He's Hospitalized With Brain Hemorrhage, Media Leftists Excuse Antifa

5gSGsaJ24wo&t

A GoFundMe for the guy has raised 75k, good. Also one of these days an black masked creep is gonna pick on someone who is armed and get blasted and on that day I'll be here to say: awful. Awful

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Awful

Bingo.

This isn't even a Surtur thread, do you think you can put your "war" on standby and give an honest response for once?

Originally posted by Silent Master
This isn't even a Surtur thread, do you think you can put your "war" on standby and give an honest response for once? it's pretty much what's expected, people like the proud boys are being stood up to. Lot's of far-right types are giving it large. As is there way and as is also their way they don't realise if you continue to be provocative people will be provoked. The silent majority don't like the far right. Sorry for the guy, but unrestrained free speech has consequences, was he being provocative?

She wore a short skirt, thus the rape was probably warranted.

Originally posted by Surtur
She wore a short skirt, thus the rape was probably warranted. Apples and orsnges, nice strawman.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
it's pretty much what's expected, people like the proud boys are being stood up to. Lot's of far-right types are giving it large. As is there way and as is also their way they don't realise if you continue to be provocative people will be provoked. The silent majority don't like the far right. Sorry for the guy, but unrestrained free speech has consequences, was he being provocative?

If the result was a bunch of proud boys you MIGHT sell me on this theory but the reality is the action was taken against someone reporting the action taken not being aggressive.

Originally posted by snowdragon
If the result was a bunch of proud boys you MIGHT sell me on this theory but the reality is the action was taken against someone reporting the action taken not being aggressive. I haven't seen the footage, is he your provocative rightist journo? The type who spouts hate speech fill me in. I'm not saying he deserved a kicking but is he the type who might?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Apples and orsnges, nice strawman.

Nope not at all kiddo

Originally posted by Putinbot1
it's pretty much what's expected, people like the proud boys are being stood up to. Lot's of far-right types are giving it large. As is there way and as is also their way they don't realise if you continue to be provocative people will be provoked. The silent majority don't like the far right. Sorry for the guy, but unrestrained free speech has consequences, was he being provocative?

Are you saying that violence is an acceptable response to speech you don't like?

There's always shit more Antifa in the UK, is the US like that?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I haven't seen the footage, is he your provocative rightist journo? The type who spouts hate speech fill me in. I'm not saying he deserved a kicking but is he the type who might?

I honestly don't know all those answers aside from he worked/works for Quilette and while I think they lean right they aren't proud boys right which is a huge reach from what we are talking about in normal conversation.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Are you saying that violence is an acceptable response to speech you don't like? Absolutely, actions have consequences. Sometimes, speach even leads to wars.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Absolutely, actions have consequences. Sometimes, speach even leads to wars.

Do you denounce this attack?

Originally posted by snowdragon
I honestly don't know all those answers aside from he worked/works for Quilette and while I think they lean right they aren't proud boys right which is a huge reach from what we are talking about in normal conversation. I don't know enough about Quillete (I don't know anything about them). I do know if people give it they have to be able to take it.

Originally posted by Surtur
Do you denounce this attack? I don't know enough about it, or him. Was he spouting hateful rhetoric regularly?

No, but you are saying words can warrant violent reaction?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I don't know enough about Quillete (I don't know anything about them). I do know if people give it they have to be able to take it.

WTF are you smoking, if I am recording and shutting my mouth but simply recording history how in the hell is that being an antagonist, laughable!

Originally posted by snowdragon
WTF are you smoking, if I am recording and shutting my mouth but simply recording history how in the hell is that being an antagonist, laughable! was he recording or inciting, help me out here, I know nothing about this.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Absolutely, actions have consequences. Sometimes, speach even leads to wars.

So you agree that Antifa did the right thing?

If you talk shit about people would you turn up to where said people are in a heightened state of aggression? Is that what happened?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
was he recording or inciting, help me out here, I know nothing about this.

What do you consider inciting? please list specific examples to avoid misunderstandings.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
If you talk shit about people would you turn up to where said people are in a heightened state of aggression? Is that what happened?

No that is not what happened. I'm just saying even if someone came and said mean things it doesn't justify an attack.

You're kind of a piece of shit if you disagree, lol.

Originally posted by Silent Master
What do you consider inciting? please list specific examples to avoid misunderstandings. Different for everyone, please tell me what he did says exactly and I'll tell you if it's inciting in my opinion.

He was covering the situation he didn't say anything.

evidence, or is this "trust me bro"?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
was he recording or inciting, help me out here, I know nothing about this.

ERGGG nothing worse then when you ask me for something "inciting." In the video that I watched ( I don't follow this guy or Quillette) so I can't speak for everything but it APPEARED an aggressive group targeted him.

Now let's review what I said, I didn't say all on the left or all on the right I said recorded not responded.

Originally posted by Surtur
He was covering the situation he didn't say anything. Has he a history of saying things about the left, I mean is he a known rightist agitator, someone who is a figure of hate based on past behaviour for Antifa.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
evidece, or is this "trust me bro"?

Not how this works, not on me to prove he didn't do something. It's on you to prove he did.

Show me evidence he deserved it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Nice to see where the far-left stands in regards to violence. But I voted for Trump

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Has he a history of saying things about the left, I mean is he a known rightist agitator, someone who is a figure of hate based on past behaviour for Antifa.

Lol wow.

Originally posted by Surtur
Not how this works, not on me to prove he didn't do something. It's on you to prove he did.

Show me evidence he deserved it. Why is that how it works?

accompanying nazis on deliberately inflammatory public marches has it's risks.


i say "womp womp"

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol wow. Just asking.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
accompanying nazis on deliberately inflammatory public marches has it's risks.


i say "womp womp" Pretty much

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Different for everyone, please tell me what he did says exactly and I'll tell you if it's inciting in my opinion.

I've never even heard of him, all I know is he's a journalist and was attacked by Antifa. I want to know what you would consider justification for his beating. that way I have some parameters to search for.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Why is that how it works?

Are you a serious adult?

Originally posted by Surtur
Are you a serious adult? Just asking.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Just asking.

Can you prove you've never molested a child?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I've never even heard of him, all I know is he's a journalist and was attacked by Antifa. I want to know what you would consider justification for his beating. that way I have some parameters to search for. Like Bash and I said, while not condoning it, hanging out with Nazi's might be a high-risk choice. Even more so if he is a known sympathiser.

Originally posted by Surtur
Can you prove you've never molested a child?

if whirly was following nambla around on public marches, that question would have more weight

Originally posted by Surtur
Can you prove you've never molested a child? apples and oranges, another Surt analogy that doesn't work.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
if whirly was following nambla around on public marches, that question would have more weight Yeah, he doesn't get why his Strawman doesn't work, anyway laters people. Time for my supper and sleep.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
apples and oranges, another Surt analogy that doesn't work.

I see so your claims do not require proof, others do though.

Special rules.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Like Bash and I said, while not condoning it, hanging out with Nazi's might be a high-risk choice. Even more so if he is a known sympathiser.

What specific Nazis does he hang out with?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yeah, he doesn't get why his Strawman doesn't work



his fee-fees have made him powerful, but blind as well

Originally posted by Bashar Teg



his fee-fees have made him powerful, but blind as well

That's just liberal jizz in your eye, don't push that on others

Originally posted by snowdragon
Herpa derp, you get the smell my shoes award after I workout You can share this privilege with bash and whirly but I'm concerned whirly might enjoy it.

hilarious What did he mean by this?

PB is a perfect example of the UK's failing education system.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Has he a history of saying things about the left, I mean is he a known rightist agitator, someone who is a figure of hate based on past behaviour for Antifa.
So he
>Says bad things about the left
>He's right-wing
>He criticizes Antifa


The idea that you would think any of these three things is a justification for violence is honestly kind of disturbing.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
So he
>Says bad things about the left
>He's right-wing
>He criticizes Antifa


The idea that you would think any of these three things is a justification for violence is honestly kind of disturbing. Not really, if you are a known sympathiser and agitator and you go to an event where opposing sides will confront each other, it'almost like he was asking for it or hoping it would happen.

Network weirdness

Double post

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not really, if you are a known sympathiser and agitator and you go to an event where opposing sides will confront each other, it'almost like he was asking for it or hoping it would happen.


What specific group is he a known sympathizer of?

Originally posted by Silent Master
What specific group is he a known sympathizer of? You tell me. He obviously isn't well liked.

I told you, before this I had never even heard of him. Do you have any evidence that he may have been a known sympathizer or agitator?

ANTIFA is a joke and everyone knows that. It's filled with mostly sissy little beta-males who all imagine in their tiny minds that they are little Captain America's fighting the evil forces of "Fascism" lol (as if CA would ever talk shit about America, wear black, praise communism/socialism, and wave a communist flag lol). However, in very large groups even beta-male jokes can be a threat when they vastly outnumber those who they're attacking. Fact is they are classified asa a terrorist organization and that's what they are.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not really, if you are a known sympathiser and agitator and you go to an event where opposing sides will confront each other, it'almost like he was asking for it or hoping it would happen.

So again: she was asking to be raped cuz she had on a short skirt. Plus maybe she walked through a bad part of town while wearing that short skirt. Definitely was asking for a raping.

Originally posted by Surtur
So again: she was asking to be raped cuz she had on a short skirt. Plus maybe she walked through a bad part of town while wearing that short skirt. Definitely was asking for a raping. Again, you miss the point Bash clearly made.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Again, you miss the point Bash clearly made.

I didn't miss it, his point just wasn't valid.

He wasn't "asking for it" he was doing his job as a reporter. Nor did he accompany nazis. He was covering the event.

You're also such a sad soul you couldn't even denounce an unwarranted attack on a journalist by a group of masked cowards.

And if a reporter from CNN got the shit beaten out of him by Trump supporters I guarantee you wouldn't be asking "well did he do something to deserve it?".

Originally posted by Silent Master
I told you, before this I had never even heard of him. Do you have any evidence that he may have been a known sympathizer or agitator?

The guy is known for covering Antifa and pointing out the violent shit they do.

Apparently now this means he deserves violence committed upon him.

I wonder if this logic would be used if a left leaning reporter who frequently covers these clashes got the shit kicked out of her by some neo nazis.

And he's a reporter for Quillette, which while right wing it also has a higher factual reporting rating than CNN according to the website people here love to use to judge these things(the site classifies Quillette as right-center too).

Two long posts of feelings in a row... Triggered by any chance Surt?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Two long posts of feelings in a row... Triggered by any chance Surt?

Did the 4 sentences in each post strain you? My bad

Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:

The Andy Ngo Incident Is The Most Alarming Escalation Yet, Civil Conflict Is Encroaching

i4bis-yaANE

A GoFundMe for Andy has now raised over 100k

What does antifa even represent?

They are against Far Right Ideology... Clearly.

It should be noted that for Antifa anyone to the right of Marx is "far right".

Originally posted by Putinbot1
They are against Far Right Ideology... Clearly.

So they use violence to suppress a political ideology.

That makes them terrorists.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
What does antifa even represent?

Cowardly thugs looking to beat down anyone who disagrees with them. That's basically it, they operate under the guise of "fighting fascism".

It feels like the media is the only winner. They are pushing us closer to a civil war with breathless hair on fire reporting on all things Trump. The down just had its best year since 1930, and all the left cares about is taking Trump down.

Oh and the mayor of Portland needs to be removed from his position for enabling Antifa to run wild.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
It feels like the media is the only winner. They are pushing us closer to a civil war with breathless hair on fire reporting on all things Trump. The down just had its best year since 1930, and all the left cares about is taking Trump down.

Psshhh nonsense, the media push us closer to a civil war?

Originally posted by Surtur
Trigger warning, Tim Pool video:

Media Encourages Doxxing Law Enforcement And Banning Conservatives From Business

-jwZ-6QWuUI

Totally not the enemy

Oh

Originally posted by Surtur
Oh and the mayor of Portland needs to be removed from his position for enabling Antifa to run wild.
****, this was in Portland? Not ****ing surprised.

I just found out that Andy was attacked on the first day of protests. On the 2nd day Antifa was recorded hitting an elderly man with a crowbar.

I truly hope one day they go after someone who is armed.

https://i.imgur.com/TyOF0HI.jpg

Clearly brought it on himself.

Originally posted by Surtur
I just found out that Andy was attacked on the first day of protests. On the 2nd day Antifa was recorded hitting an elderly man with a crowbar.

I truly hope one day they go after someone who is armed. "Andy", first name basis, cute. What was this elderly man doing? Goose stepping?

Originally posted by Surtur
https://i.imgur.com/TyOF0HI.jpg

Clearly brought it on himself. where is the film of this incident, surely some fascist has it?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
"Andy", first name basis, cute. What was this elderly man doing? Goose stepping?

They were trying to help someone Antifa was chasing.

I say "they" because there was a 2nd guy who got the back of his head split open.

Care to denounce this yet or nah?

Originally posted by Surtur
I just found out that Andy was attacked on the first day of protests. On the 2nd day Antifa was recorded hitting an elderly man with a crowbar.

I truly hope one day they go after someone who is armed.

These are all homocide-levels of attacks. The people are lucky to not have died from these attacks.


When the body count starts to rise, it will grow exponentially. We went from a mentally disturbed guy running a bunch of people over to barbaric beat downs. It's just going to escalate.

The alt-right, racists, and right-wingers will not tolerate this: they will retaliate.

That just means this will get worse. Not looking forward to the polarization thing getting out of hand.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
where is the film of this incident, surely some fascist has it?

Link

Go on, defend it.

Originally posted by Surtur
It should be noted that for Antifa anyone to the right of Marx is "far right".

Pretty much, yeah. Anyone who doesn't support open borders the way lunatic leftists do are automatically labelled as being "far right" by those same radical leftists.

Originally posted by Surtur
Cowardly thugs looking to beat down anyone who disagrees with them. That's basically it, they operate under the guise of "fighting fascism".


Yep. They call themselves "anti-fascists" while actually acting like fascists themselves.


Originally posted by Surtur
Link

Go on, defend it.

Oh, I have no doubt whatsoever that he and other leftists will try and defend it.

Rumors are that Andy Ngo (of Chinese/Vietnamese descent) actually got beat up by the Alt-Right White supremacist Proud Boys and such, but blamed it on the black clad "antifa" people to push a false flag narrative.

Originally posted by Robtard
Rumors are that Andy Ngo (of Chinese/Vietnamese descent) actually got beat up by the Alt-Right White supremacist Proud Boys and such, but blamed it on the black clad "antifa" people to push a false flag narrative. Interesting and very likely.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
"Andy", first name basis, cute.

Originally posted by Robtard
Rumors are that Andy Ngo (of Chinese/Vietnamese descent) actually got beat up by the Alt-Right White supremacist Proud Boys and such, but blamed it on the black clad "antifa" people to push a false flag narrative.

The rumor I read was that Antifa pushed the rumor you're talking about to gaslight the facts and it said not to fall for antifa's gaslighting tactics.

Another rumor I read was that antifa's gaslighting tactics are only a temporary measure and only an idiot would believe the gaslighitng attempts in the face of thousands upon thousands of social media posts that indicate they were preparing for and arming for violence - not protected speech.

I agree with the second rumor the most. That's also not a rumor but the facts. The facts that caused the FBI to label Antifa a terrorist organization who is violent and destructive.

Originally posted by Robtard
The too cool I'm trying very hard to be like Avenatti edginess aside, so they arrested the people who directly attack Ngo or their authorities know exactly who these people are?

No arrests were made over the incident and I think she would have used their specific names if they had been identified. Luckily nearly 150k has been raised on a GoFundMe.

For the other attack I posted one person has been successfully identified, but has not been arrested yet. Turns out he was arrested last year at a different protest in Portland for using a slingshot to fire projectiles at people. Looks like he decided to upgrade this year. He isn't the one who attacked the older man he is the one that split the back of the bald dudes head open.

If he is arrested he should be charged with attempted murder.

Originally posted by dadudemon
The rumor I read was that Antifa pushed the rumor you're talking about to gaslight the facts and it said not to fall for antifa's gaslighting tactics.

Another rumor I read was that antifa's gaslighting tactics are only a temporary measure and only an idiot would believe the gaslighitng attempts in the face of thousands upon thousands of social media posts that indicate they were preparing for and arming for violence - not protected speech.

I agree with the second rumor the most. That's also not a rumor but the facts. The facts that caused the FBI to label Antifa a terrorist organization who is violent and destructive.

So gaslighting and false flag claims are idiotic if the source isn't from a Rightist viewpoint and angle. Got it; thank you.

Originally posted by Surtur
No arrests were made over the incident and I think she would have used their specific names if they had been identified. Luckily nearly 150k has been raised on a GoFundMe.

For the other attack I posted one person has been successfully identified, but has not been arrested yet. Turns out he was arrested last year at a different protest in Portland for using a slingshot to fire projectiles at people. Looks like he decided to upgrade this year. He isn't the one who attacked the older man he is the one that split the back of the bald dudes head open.

If he is arrested he should be charged with attempted murder.

So that seems like a bunch of empty yelling and posturing from the lawyer thus far, how Avenatti of her.

Going to be hilarious if it turns out that the White supremacist attacked Ngo and he lied and people gave him 150+k for it.

Hopefully there's some video on him being attacked, kinda odd none has come out (or has it) considering almost everyone has a camera on them these days.

Like I said before, it's good to know that the far-left supports political violence. well, when they do it.

Originally posted by Robtard
So gaslighting and false flag claims are idiotic if the source isn't from a Rightist viewpoint and angle. Got it; thank you.

Close but actually not even close.

It's gaslighting when the facts don't add up in the gaslighting narrative. Especially when the gaslighting clearly doesn't match video evidence (posted in this thread) and FBI's rigorous analysis.

Also, it's from a liberal viewpoint, not a rightist viewpoint.

Looks like you were wrong on all accounts and should stop falling for obviously retarded gaslighting.

He's just looking for any excuse to support Antifas terrorism.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Close but actually not even close.

It's gaslighting when the facts don't add up in the gaslighting narrative. Especially when the gaslighting clearly doesn't match video evidence (posted in this thread) and FBI's rigorous analysis.

Also, it's from a liberal viewpoint, not a rightist viewpoint.

Looks like you were wrong on all accounts and should stop falling for obviously retarded gaslighting. is it from a Tim Pool "liberal" viewpoint DDM

Conservative teen smirks at Native American man: non-stop coverage for days from CNN

Leftists beat down a gay asian reporter who happens to be conservative: 30 seconds of coverage of the story done right before going to a break

Originally posted by Surtur
Violence...fine, but could you explain how the incident in the story you linked shows racism?

Proud Boys, bro.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Close but actually not even close.

It's gaslighting when the facts don't add up in the gaslighting narrative. Especially when the gaslighting clearly doesn't match video evidence (posted in this thread) and FBI's rigorous analysis.

Also, it's from a liberal viewpoint, not a rightist viewpoint.

Looks like you were wrong on all accounts and should stop falling for obviously retarded gaslighting.

Disagreed. We have examples of gaslighting and false flags that were not seen as "idiotic" when the Rightist were doing it.

But I've not seen the video of Andy Ngo being attacked, which is what we're talking about, not the general violence that happened between the Proud Boys and these "antifa" masked people. Do you have a link to it? That would defo clear up the rumors.

Originally posted by Surtur
Conservative teen smirks at Native American man: non-stop coverage for days from CNN

Leftists beat down a gay asian reporter who happens to be conservative: 30 seconds of coverage of the story done right before going to a break


Is there a video of this? Cos that would easily clear up the rumors that he got beat up by the Proud Boys for being Asian and gay.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He's just looking for any excuse to support Antifas terrorism.

Good job smearing me, I said the "antifa" people were violent.

Besides, it's your hero Trump who's said in the past "good people on both sides".

Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize. triggered by neutrality re violence.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
triggered by neutrality re violence.

^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes and you seem to support their violence, unless of course I missed where you stated they were in the wrong. if so, feel free to repost the quote and I'll apologize.

I've said** multiple times that I find all the violence regardless of which side starts it at rallies and such to be wrong and you know this, so it seems like you're just trying to smear me and get me in one of your well known Time-Waster-Troll routines. What do we say to the Time-Waster-Troll. Not today.

**said it in the Charlottesville thread and you were there defending the White Supremacist via equalization and whatabout tactics because you're orange hero was being attacked

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with. Been to court for it too

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Been to court for it too

Sometimes violence is needed. eg What if you see a rape happening and the only way to stop it is to literally beat the rapist down. You get violent and there's nothing wrong with it in the given situation

Originally posted by Robtard
Sometimes violence is needed. eg What if you see a rape happening and the only way to stop it is to literally beat the rapist down. You get violent and there's nothing wrong with it in the given situation I don't disagree. Tbh, I'll expand racist fascists propagating hate, and their enablers are asking for kicking in my opinion.

Originally posted by Silent Master
^
Approves of violence, if it's against those he disagrees with.


Did Donald Trump Encourage Violence at His Rallies? True.

https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2018/02/19510578_334932460273028_4437980780719315754_n.jpg

You've had no problem when it's your orange leader doing it...

Originally posted by Robtard
Did Donald Trump Encourage Violence at His Rallies? True.

https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2018/02/19510578_334932460273028_4437980780719315754_n.jpg

You've had no problem when it's your orange leader doing it... So true.

Only, I don't support Trump nor do I think calls for violence or actual violence are ok(like you seem to). But nice try.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I don't disagree. Tbh, I'll expand racist fascists propagating hate, and their enablers are asking for kicking in my opinion.

The reason this is disturbing is because you've repeatedly shown you can't correctly identify racists and fascists.

And when you say you've been to court over violence why do I get the feeling it wasn't because you were valiantly defending someone getting raped?

Originally posted by Surtur
The reason this is disturbing is because you've repeatedly shown you can't correctly identify racists and fascists.

And when you say you've been to court over violence why do I get the feeling it wasn't because you were valiantly defending someone getting raped? I disagree and would say the same of you. Or instead you prefer not to identify them correctly.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Only, I don't support Trump nor do I think calls for violence or actual violence are ok(like you seem to). But nice try. You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
I disagree and would say the same of you. Or instead you prefer not to identify them correctly.

So what specifically landed you in court?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Well yeah he is like Tim Pool in that he is labeled a Trumper and alt right for daring to criticize the left. Oh and another thing he has in common with Tim is that he seems to trigger you.

Originally posted by Surtur
So what specifically landed you in court? Early 20's didn't like someones attitude, called them on it, beat them up then beat a friend of their's up who was going to get me two days later... Enjoyment and well worth it. Both ended up in casually.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're a "liberal" like Tim Pool am I right.

Also not a Trump supporter like Pool. *wink* *wink*

Originally posted by Robtard
Also not a Trump supporter like Pool. *wink* *wink* Tim Pool is the gift that keeps giving.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
So true.


Inciting others to violence is bad, unless orange man does it, then it's good. Orange man good.

Originally posted by Robtard
Inciting others to violence is bad, unless orange man does it, then it's good. Orange man good. In the real world, people should know actions have consequences. It is that simple.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
In the real world, people should know actions have consequences. It is that simple.

You'd think.

Let's cut out all the BS, do you think Antifa was justified in beating the journalist?

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Early 20's didn't like someones attitude, called them on it, beat them up then beat a friend of their's up who was going to get me two days later... Enjoyment and well worth it. Both ended up in casually.

Who threw the first punch them or you?

Originally posted by Surtur
Who threw the first punch them or you? him the first time, me the second time, when I went looking for his pal.

I also beat a neighbour up around then and nearly went to court for that, he thought I was banging his wife, I wasn't.

Why would they send you to court the first time if you were the one attacked

Originally posted by Surtur
Why would they send you to court the first time if you were the one attacked The second one and the level of violence my man. I went looking for his pal.