Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Why did not a single person get charged for collusion or conspiracy with Russia?

Surely he could have charged one person?

Was his team of goons that incompetent?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury

eat

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Why did not a single person get charged for collusion or conspiracy with Russia?

Surely he could have charged one person?

Was his team of goons that incompetent?


It was because they didn't have any actual evidence to charge anyone with it. And yes, of course they were also incompetent. His team was composed entirely of democrat "never Trumpers" , after all.

Clearly you cannot read the Op and living in fantasy land.

Rick Gates was charged with conspiracy against the United States for financial crimes having nothing to do with 2016 Election.

Prove me wrong

So I took you up on your offer. To see if I could prove you wrong, Supra.

I found this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/us/politics/special-counsel-indictments.html?_r=0



Their arrests, indictments, and plea deals were related to them not following the rules about being foreign agents. Not the Trump campaign. This is not a collusion charge against Trump. This is lobbyists not following the absurdly loose lobbying laws.

If even NYTimes is reporting that this has nothing to do with the Trump campaign, there is no case, here.

Good job, thank you for your post

Originally posted by dadudemon
So I took you up on your offer. To see if I could prove you wrong, Supra.

I found this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/us/politics/special-counsel-indictments.html?_r=0



Their arrests, indictments, and plea deals were related to them not following the rules about being foreign agents. Not the Trump campaign. This is not a collusion charge against Trump. This is lobbyists not following the absurdly loose lobbying laws.

If even NYTimes is reporting that this has nothing to do with the Trump campaign, there is no case, here.

Wait wait, hold up. I call f*cking bullshit.

Am I to assume feelings weren't taken into account when you made this post? Tsk tsk.

Definitely few fees.

CTDM once again proves to be a dummy troll

*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

Originally posted by cdtm
*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

https://pics.me.me/heh-i-was-almost-forced-to-face-the-fact-that-42300022.png

"Is too!" Is an argument?

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/12rD1sfVVYOtrO/giphy.gif

Originally posted by cdtm
*calls someone else a dummy*

*Repeatedly screws up a four letter acronym*

Is that all you got shit head?

Originally posted by Surtur
https://pics.me.me/heh-i-was-almost-forced-to-face-the-fact-that-42300022.png



He's been trying so hard lately.

Originally posted by Surtur
http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/12rD1sfVVYOtrO/giphy.gif


See, at least that requires some degree of effort and creativity. I've seen 6 year old kids make better "arguments" (Read: Trolls) on Mirc then Time.

You cant actually counter any of my points, which is why you can only laugh and thumbs up other people. You have no actual debating skills, you are dumb as a bag of bricks.